Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of delayed pegfilgrastim administration following consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients

  • Research
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study the effects of delaying pegfilgrastim administration following high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) consolidation in AML patients on time to neutrophil count recovery, infectious complications, and survival.

Methods

Single-center retrospective chart review of 55 patients receiving pegfilgrastim as early administration (within 72 h) or delayed administration (after 72 h) of HiDAC.

Results

The difference in neutrophil recovery time was similar between the early and delayed groups (18 days versus 19 days, p < 0.28). Infections were seen in four patients in the early administration group following chemotherapy compared to none in the delayed group (p = 0.04). Febrile neutropenia rates were also decreased in the delayed administration group (23.1% versus 10.3%, p = 0.28) as well as a trend towards longer median survival (16 months versus 19 months, p = 0.69) and overall survival (21 months versus 31 months, p = 0.47).

Conclusion

A difference in time to neutrophil recovery was not observed between the early and delayed administration groups yet decreased infectious complications may support the delayed administration of pegfilgrastim in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data and materials comply with standards.

References

  1. Dombret H, Gardin C (2016) An update of current treatments for adult acute myeloid leukemia. Blood 127(1):53–61. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2015-08-604520

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Döhner H, Wei AH, Appelbaum FR et al (2022) Diagnosis and management of AML in adults: 2022 recommendations from an international expert panel on behalf of the ELN. Blood 140(12):1345–1377. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2022016867

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bloomfield CD, Lawrence D, Byrd JC et al (1998) Frequency of prolonged remission duration after high-dose cytarabine intensification in acute myeloid leukemia varies by cytogenetic subtype. Cancer Res 58(18):4173–4179

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Petros WP (1992) Pharmacokinetics and administration of colony-stimulating factors. Pharmacotherapy 12:32S-38S. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1875-9114.1992.tb02680

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Neulasta® OnPro® [package insert]. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc; 2018

  6. Zwick C, Hartmann F, Zeynalova S et al (2011) Randomized comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia. Ann Oncol 22(8):1872–1877. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdq674

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ottmann OG, Bug G, Krauter J (2007) Current status of growth factors in the treatment of acute myeloid and lymphoblastic leukemia. Semin Hematol 44(3):183–192. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2007.04.007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Böhm A, Piribauer M, Wimazal F et al (2005) High dose intermittent ARA-C (HiDAC) for consolidation of patients with de novo AML: a single center experience. Leuk Res. 29(6):609–615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2004.10.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jaramillo S, Benner A, Krauter J et al (2017) Condensed versus standard schedule of high-dose cytarabine consolidation therapy with pegfilgrastim growth factor support in acute myeloid leukemia. Blood Cancer J 7(5):e564. https://doi.org/10.1038/bcj.2017.45

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kam G, Yiu R, Loh Y et al (2015) Impact of pegylated filgrastim in comparison to filgrastim for patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) on high-dose cytarabine (HIDAC) consolidation chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 23(3):643–649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2417-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sierra J, Szer J, Kassis J et al (2008) A single dose of pegfilgrastim compared with daily filgrastim for supporting neutrophil recovery in patients treated for low-to-intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 2 trial. BMC Cancer 8:195. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. van Der Auwera P, Platzer E, Xu ZX et al (2001) Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of single doses of subcutaneous pegylated human G-CSF mutant (ro 25–8315) in healthy volunteers: comparison with single and multiple daily doses of filgrastim. Am J Hematol. 66(4):245–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.1052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have made substantial contributions to the conception/design of the project, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript draft and review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Spencer K. Yingling.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at WVU Hospitals.

Consent to participate

Not applicable—research was retrospective in nature.

Consent for publication

All authors grant final approval of the manuscript draft for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yingling, S.K., Francis, J., Seago, K. et al. Efficacy of delayed pegfilgrastim administration following consolidation therapy with high-dose cytarabine (HiDAC) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. Support Care Cancer 32, 276 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08480-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08480-9

Keywords

Navigation