Skip to main content
Log in

Trends in the prevalence and risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients from 2016 to 2022: a multicenter study

  • Research
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To identify the trends in the prevalence of peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) related complications in cancer patients and explore the risk factors for complications and occurrence speed.

Methods

A total of 3573 cancer patients with PICC were recruited at 17 hospitals from 2016 to 2022. Logistic and COX regression were performed to identify influencing factors of PICC-related complications and incidence speed, respectively.

Results

The proportion of symptomatic PICC-related thrombosis, phlebitis, and infections reported had decreased from 59.1% (in 2017), 11.9% (in 2016), and 11.1% (in 2016) to 15.3% (in 2022), 2.9% (in 2022), and 7.4% (in 2022), and adhesive-related skin injuries and bleeding/oozing reported had increased from 4.8% (in 2016) and 0.0% (in 2016) to 45.5% (in 2022) and 3.4% (in 2022), respectively. Catheter occlusion showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing from 2.4 (in 2016) to 12.0 (in 2020) to 5.8% (in 2022). Logistic regression showed that hospital level, nature, the patient’s gender, age, diagnosis, history of deep vein catheterization, chemotherapy drug administration, and type of PICC were influencing factors of complications. COX regression showed that the patient’s gender, age, diagnosis, history of deep vein thrombosis and thrombophlebitis, history of deep vein catheterization, chemotherapy drug administration, type of PICC, type of connector, and StatLock used for fixation were influencing factors of incidence speed.

Conclusion

The composition ratios of PICC-related complications in cancer patients in China have changed in recent years. Chemotherapy drug administration was a significant risk factor accelerating the occurrence of complications. Maintenance factors had the maximum weight on the COX model, followed by patient factors. It is suggested that patients with high-risk factors be closely monitored and proper maintenance be performed to prevent and delay the occurrence of PICC-related complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Sun D, Cao M, Li H, He S, Chen W (2020) Cancer burden and trends in China: a review and comparison with Japan and South Korea. Chin J Cancer Res 32(2):129–139. https://doi.org/10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2020.02.01

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. (Accessed on November 30, 2023). Cancer [EB/OL]. https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer#tab=tab_1

  3. Amerasekera SS, Jones CM, Patel R, Cleasby MJ (2009) Imaging of the complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheters. Clin Radiol 64(8):832–840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2009.02.021

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu K, Li J, Zhang D, Liu B, Wang K, Liu W, Shi Y, Zhao Y, Liu Y, Guo N, Sun W (2023) Types of peripherally inserted central catheters and the risk of unplanned removals in patients: a prospective cohort study. Int J Nurs Stud 149:104621. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104621

  5. Mielke D, Wittig A, Teichgräber U (2020) Peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in outpatient and inpatient oncological treatment. Supp Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Supp Care Cancer 28(10):4753–4760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05276-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bertoglio S, Faccini B, Lalli L, Cafiero F, Bruzzi P (2016) Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) in cancer patients under chemotherapy: a prospective study on the incidence of complications and overall failures. J Surg Oncol 113(6):708–714. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.24220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cote J, Dumas O, Demers C, Lemieux J (2013) Prevalence, risk factors, treatment and outcomes of catheter-related thrombosis in patients with malignancies. J Clin Oncol 31(15_suppl):e17517–e17517. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.e17517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Iriondo J, Iarra O, Sarriegui B, Sanz N, Ceberio I (2020) Peripherally inserted central catheter (picc) related deep venous thrombosis: a retrospective cohort study on incidence and risk factors in a single center. Blood 136(Supplement 1):30–31. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2020-139506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kagan E, Banks AL, Marculescu C, Cantey JR, Salgado C (2014) Risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) bloodstream infection (BSI). Idweek Meet Infect Dis Soc Am

  10. Kim K, Kim Y, Peck KR (2020) Previous peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement as a risk factor for PICC-associated bloodstream infections. Am J Infect Control 48(10):1166–1170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2019.12.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gao C, Yu C, Lin X, Wang H, Sheng Y (2020) Incidence of and risk factors for medical adhesive-related skin injuries among patients: a cross-sectional study. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Off Publ Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs Soc 47(6):576–581. https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000000714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pires-Júnior JF, Chianca TCM, Borges EL, Azevedo C, Simino GPR (2021) Medical adhesive-related skin injury in cancer patients: a prospective cohort study. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem 29:e3500. https://doi.org/10.1590/1518-8345.5227.3500

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Gorski LA, Hadaway L, Hagle ME, Broadhurst D, Clare S, Kleidon T, Meyer BM, Nickel B, Rowley S, Sharpe E, Alexander M (2021) Infusion therapy standards of practice, 8th Edition. J Infus Nurs Off Publ Infus Nurs Soc 44(1S Suppl 1):S1–S224. https://doi.org/10.1097/NAN.0000000000000396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fallouh N, Mcguirk HM, Flanders SA, Chopra V (2015) Peripherally inserted central catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis: a narrative review. Am J Med. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Li YH (2010) Causative analysis of unhoped extubation of patients in ICU and its precaution strategies. Chin Nurs Res 24(36):3369–3370. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2010.36.055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lin Y, Chen ZF, Sun YW, Lu XR, Chi P (2022) Treatment of postoperative chylous leakage in colorectal cancer. J Color Anal Surg 28(3):217–220. https://doi.org/10.19668/j.cnki.issn1674-0491.2022.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhu LQ, Zhuang R, Cao SM, Zhou XQ, Zhang W, Zhou FY (2017) Evidence summary for risk assessment of PICC-related venous thrombosis. Chin J Nurs 52(10):1179–1185. https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2017.10.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yi XL, Chen J, Li J, Feng L, Wang Y, Zhu JA et al (2014) Risk factors associated with picc-related upper extremity venous thrombosis in cancer patients. J Clin Nurs (23–5/6). info:doi/https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.12227

  19. Wang X (2017) Preventive effect of dexamethasone solution pre-treated catheter on piccinduced phlebitis. Biomed Res 28(12):5310–5314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Bayoumi MAA, van Rens MFPT, Chandra P, Masry A, D’Souza S, Khalil AM, Shadad A, Alsayigh S, Masri RM, Shyam S, Alobaidan F, Elmalik EE (2022) Does the antimicrobial-impregnated peripherally inserted central catheter decrease the CLABSI rate in neonates? Results from a retrospective cohort study. Front Pediatr 10:1012800. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.1012800

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Seckold T, Walker S, Dwyer T (2015) A comparison of silicone and polyurethane PICC lines and postinsertion complication rates: a systematic review. J Vasc Access 16(3):167–177. https://doi.org/10.5301/jva.5000330

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu R, Xu H, Pu L, Xie X, Chen H, Wu Z, Chen H, Zhang X (2023) Clinical characteristics of peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: a prospective and observational study. BMC Cancer 23(1):894. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11413-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JH, Kim MU, Kim ET, Shim DJ, Kim IJ, Byeon JH, Kim HB (2020) Prevalence and predictors of peripherally inserted central venous catheter associated bloodstream infections in cancer patients: a multicentre cohort study. Medicine 99(6):e19056. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000019056

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang HY (2022) Analysis of risk factors of PICC-related venous thrombosis and other complications in cancer patients. Shanghai Nurs 22(11):50–55

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Chen YL (2020) Clinical analysis of peripherally inserted central venous catheter-related thrombosis events in patients with malignant tumors. Yangzhou University, Jiangsu

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kim IJ, Shim DJ, Lee JH, Kim ET, Byeon JH, Lee HJ, Cho SG (2019) Impact of subcutaneous tunnels on peripherally inserted catheter placement: a multicenter retrospective study. Eur Radiol 29(5):2716–2723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5917-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Campagna S, Gonella S, Berchialla P, Morano G, Rigo C, Zerla PA, Fuzzi R, Corona G, Storto S, Dimonte V, Mussa B (2019) Can peripherally inserted central catheters be safely placed in patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy? A retrospective study of almost 400,000 catheter-days. Oncologist 24(9):e953–e959. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen L, Lu Y, Wang L, Pan Y, Zhou X (2023) Construction of a nomogram risk prediction model for PICC-related venous thrombosis and its application. Asian J Surg S1015–9584(23)00713–3. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.05.043

  29. Leung A, Heal C, Perera M, Pretorius C (2015) A systematic review of patient-related risk factors for catheter-related thrombosis. J Thromb Thrombolysis 40(3):363–373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-015-1175-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang L, Tian J, Du LY, Xie XY, Xiong DM, Liu LH et al (2016) Influencing factors and nursing countermeasures of venous thrombus in tumour patients with PICC. Chin J Modern Nurs 22(21):4. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.1674-2907.2016.21.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li J, Mi Y, Xie LL (2022) Related factors and nursing of PICC catheter-related thrombosis in tumor patients. Chin J Thromb Hemost 28(2):3. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6213.2022.02.065

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Badheka AV, Hodge D, Ramesh S, Bloxham J, Espinoza E, Allareddy V, Karhade DS, Chegondi M, Allareddy V (2021) Catheter related thrombosis in hospitalized infants: a neural network approach to predict risk factors. Thromb Res 200:34–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2021.01.009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Cao XZ, Zhao LF, Zeng XF, Wang YP, Jin XH, Chen XH (2020) The influence of PICC catheterization history on PICC insertion process and catheter indwelling effect. Chin J Nurs 55(12):1844–1850. https://doi.org/10.3761/j.issn.0254-1769.2020.12.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gao Y, Liu Y, Ma X, Wei L, Chen W, Song L (2015) The incidence and risk factors of peripherally inserted central catheter-related infection among cancer patients. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:863–871. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S83776

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Jiang H, Zhao SY, Yu FY (2009) Comparative study on application of two ways positive pressure connector and heparin cap to connect peripherally inserted central venous catheter. Nurs Res 23(33):3053–3054. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1009-6493.2009.33.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Miyagaki H, Nakajima K, Hara J, Yamasaki M, Kurokawa Y, Miyata H, Takiguchi S, Fujiwara Y, Mori M, Doki Y (2012) Performance comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters in gastrointestinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Nutr (Edinburgh, Scotland) 31(1):48–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2011.09.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Alport B, Burbridge B, Lim H (2012) Bard PowerPICC Solo2 vs Cook Turbo-Ject: a tale of two PICCs. Can Assoc Radiol J 63(4):323–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2011.05.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) (grant number 2021-I2M-C&T-B-095).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design: Hong SUN and Shengxiao NIE. Data collection: Hong SUN. Data analysis and interpretation: Shengxiao NIE. Drafting of the article: Shengxiao NIE and Shengmiao MA. Critical revision of the article: Hong SUN and Lei WANG.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hong Sun.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Because we retrospectively collected patients’ basic information, catheterization information, maintenance information, and nursing records and there were no intervention measures for the subjects, we applied for an exemption from informed consent before we conducted this study, and the protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Hospital (approval number: 2021BJYYEC-334–03).

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOC 34 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nie, S., Wang, L., Ma, S. et al. Trends in the prevalence and risk factors for peripherally inserted central catheter-related complications in cancer patients from 2016 to 2022: a multicenter study. Support Care Cancer 32, 239 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08444-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08444-z

Keywords

Navigation