Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patients’ experiences undergoing cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

  • Research
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to understand patients’ experiences undergoing cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. In response to COVID-19, many elective cancer surgeries were delayed creating a massive backlog of cases. Patients’ experiences with surgical delays may inform healthcare systems’ responses to the backlog of cases and guide preparations for future healthcare emergencies.

Methods

This was a qualitative description study. Patients undergoing general surgery for cancer at two university-affiliated hospitals between March 2020 and January 2021 were invited to one-to-one interviews. Patients were purposefully selected using quota sampling until interviews produced no new information (i.e., thematic saturation). Interviews were conducted using a semi-structured guide and analyzed according to inductive thematic analysis.

Results

Twenty patients were included [mean age 64 ± 12.9; male (n = 10); surgical delay (n = 14); cancer sites: breast (n = 8), skin (n = 4), hepato-pancreato-biliary (n = 4), colorectal (n = 2), and gastro-esophageal (n = 2)]. When determining their willingness to undergo surgery, patients weighed the risk of COVID-19 infection against the urgency of their disease. Changes to the hospital environment (e.g., COVID-19 preventative measures) and deviations from expected treatment (e.g., alternative treatments, remote consultations, rescheduled care) caused diverse psychological responses, ranging from increased satisfaction to severe distress. Patients employed several coping strategies to mitigate distress, including eliciting reassurance from care providers, seeking information from unconventional sources, and reframing care interruptions.

Conclusions

Changes in care during the pandemic elicited diverse psychological responses from patients undergoing cancer surgery. Coping was facilitated by consistent communication with providers, emphasizing the importance of patient-centered expectation setting as we prepare for the future within and beyond the pandemic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 [Internet]. World Health Organisation.2020 [cited 2022 Apr 19]. Available from: https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020

  2. Richards M, Anderson M, Carter P, Ebert BL, Mossialos E (2020) The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cancer care. Nat Cancer 1(6):565–567

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans. Br J Surg. 2020 107(11):1440–9.

  4. Bruemmer R (2021) It will take two years to reduce Quebec’s surgery backlog, Dubé says [Internet]. montrealgazette. [cited 2022 Apr 19]. Available from: https://montrealgazette.com/news/local-news/it-will-take-two-years-to-reduce-quebecs-surgery-backlog-dube-says

  5. Malagón T, Yong JHE, Tope P, Miller WH Jr, Franco EL, McGill, (2022) Task Force on the Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer. Control and Care Predicted long-term impact of COVID-19 pandemic-related care delays on cancer mortality in Canada. Int J Cancer 150(8):1244–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Søreide K, Hallet J, Matthews JB, Schnitzbauer AA, Line PD, Lai PBS, et al. (2020) Immediate and long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delivery of surgical services. BJS (British Journal of Surgery) [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jul 20];n/a(n/a). Available from: http://bjssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11670

  7. COVIDSurg Collaborative (2020) Global guidance for surgical care during the COVID-19 pandemic. BJS (British Journal of Surgery) [Internet]. [cited 2020 Jul 20];n/a(n/a). Available from: http://bjssjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11646

  8. Shin DW, Cho J, Kim SY, Guallar E, Hwang SS, Cho B et al (2013) Delay to curative surgery greater than 12 weeks is associated with increased mortality in patients with colorectal and breast cancer but not lung or thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 20(8):2468–2476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson BA, Waddimba AC, Ogola GO, Fleshman JW, Preskitt JT (2021) A systematic review and meta-analysis of surgery delays and survival in breast, lung and colon cancers: implication for surgical triage during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Surg 222(2):311–318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim H, Sefcik JS, Bradway C (2017) Characteristics of qualitative descriptive studies: a systematic review. Res Nurs Health 40(1):23–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandelowski M (2000) Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health 23(4):334–340

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sandelowski M (2010) What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Res Nurs Health 33(1):77–84

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19(6):349–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Patton MQ (2005) Qualitative research. In: Encyclopedia of Statistics in Behavioral Science [Internet]. American Cancer Society; [cited 2020 Nov 9]. Available from: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/https://doi.org/10.1002/0470013192.bsa514

  15. Ministère de la Santé et des Services sociaux (2020) Directives cliniques aux professionnels et au réseau pour la COVID-19: Bloc opératoire [Internet]. [cited 2022 May 20] p. 1–9. Available from: https://publications.msss.gouv.qc.ca/msss/fichiers/directives-covid/archives/dgaumip-archive-bloc-operatoire.pdf

  16. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B et al (2018) Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant 52(4):1893–1907

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kallio H, Pietilä AM, Johnson M, Kangasniemi M (2016) Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. J Adv Nurs 72(12):2954–2965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Reserach in Psychology 3(2):77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dodgson JE (2019) Reflexivity in Qualitative Research. J Hum Lact 35(2):220–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F (2016) Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res 26(13):1802–1811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kerr C, Nixon A, Wild D (2010) Assessing and demonstrating data saturation in qualitative inquiry supporting patient-reported outcomes research. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 10(3):269–281

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Byrnes ME, Brown CS, De Roo AC, Corriere MA, Romano MA, Fukuhara S et al (2021) Elective surgical delays due to COVID-19. Med Care 59(4):288–294

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Boutros M, Moujaess E, Kourie HR (2021) Cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic: choosing between the devil and the deep blue sea. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 1(167):103273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Colomer-Lahiguera S, Ribi K, Dunnack HJ, Cooley ME, Hammer MJ, Miaskowski C et al (2021) Experiences of people affected by cancer during the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic: an exploratory qualitative analysis of public online forums. Support Care Cancer 29(9):4979–4985

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Türkcü SG, Uludağ E, Serçekuş P, Özkan S, Yaren A (2021) Experiences and coping strategies of women receiving treatment for breast and gynecological cancers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. European Journal of Oncology Nursing [Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 14];54. Available from: https://www.ejoncologynursing.com/article/S1462-3889(21)00151-4/fulltext

  26. Savard J, Jobin-Théberge A, Massicotte V, Banville C (2021) How did women with breast cancer experience the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic? A qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 29(10):5721–5727

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Butow P, Havard P, Butt Z, Juraskova, Sharpe L, Dhillon H, et al. (2022) The impact of COVID-19 on cancer patients, their carers and oncology health professionals: a qualitative study. Patient Education and Counseling [Internet]. [cited 2022 Mar 14]; Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0738399122000453

  28. Chen G, Wu Q, Jiang H, Zhang H, Peng J, Hu J et al (2020) Fear of disease progression and psychological stress in cancer patients under the outbreak of COVID-19. Psychooncology. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5451

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Sokas C, Kelly M, Sheu C, Song J, Welch HG, Bergmark R et al (2021) Cancer in the shadow of COVID: early-stage breast and prostate cancer patient perspectives on surgical delays due to COVID-19. Ann Surg Oncol 28(13):8688–8696

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang J, Vahid S, Eberg M, Milroy S, Milkovich J, Wright FC et al (2020) Clearing the surgical backlog caused by COVID-19 in Ontario: a time series modelling study. CMAJ 192(44):E1347–E1356

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Botly LCP, Martin-Rhee M, Kasiban A, Swartz RH, Mulvagh SL, Lindsay MP et al (2020) COVID-19 pandemic: global impact and potential implications for cardiovascular disease in Canada. CJC Open 2(4):265–272

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gagliardi AR, Yip CYY, Irish J, Wright FC, Rubin B, Ross H et al (2021) The psychological burden of waiting for procedures and patient-centred strategies that could support the mental health of wait-listed patients and caregivers during the COVID-19 pandemic: A scoping review. Health Expect 24(3):978–990

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Park M, Giap TTT, Lee M, Jeong H, Jeong M, Go Y (2018) Patient- and family-centered care interventions for improving the quality of health care: a review of systematic reviews. Int J Nurs Stud 87:69–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. McCormack LA, Treiman K, Rupert D, Williams-Piehota P, Nadler E, Arora NK et al (2011) Measuring patient-centered communication in cancer care: a literature review and the development of a systematic approach. Soc Sci Med 72(7):1085–1095

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sauro KM, Smith C, Kersen J, Schalm E, Jaworska N, Roach P, et al. (2022) “It affects every aspect of your life”: A qualitative study of the impact of delaying surgery during COVID-19 [Internet]. medRxiv; [cited 2022 May 24]. p. 2022.01.20.21267627. Available from: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.01.20.21267627v1

  36. Lombe D, Sullivan R, Caduff C, Ali Z, Bhoo-Pathy N, Cleary J et al (2021) Silver linings: a qualitative study of desirable changes to cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ecancermedicalscience 11(15):1202

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shenton AK (2004) Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Educ Inf 22(2):63–75

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from the McGill University Health Centre (MUHC) Foundation awarded to JF. The study funders had no role in project development, data collection or analysis, writing of the report, or the decision to submit this article for publication. The remaining authors have no sources of financial support to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Makena Pook and Maxime Lapointe-Gagner performed data collection. Makena Pook, Tahereh Najafi, Maxime Lapointe-Gagner, and Philip Nguyen-Powanda performed data analysis. Tahereh Najafi, Hiba Elhaj, Pepa Kaneva, Fateme Rajabiyazdi, Lawrence Lee, Liane S. Feldman, and Julio F. Fiore Jr. oversaw the study conduct and contributed to data interpretation. Makena Pook prepared the first draft of manuscript and all authors provided revisions and feedback on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved of the final manuscript. All authors agree to be accountable to all aspects of the work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julio F. Fiore Jr.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Conflict of interest

JF has received research funding from Merck Canada. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 120 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pook, M., Najafi, T., Lapointe-Gagner, M. et al. Patients’ experiences undergoing cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 31, 400 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07861-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-023-07861-w

Keywords

Navigation