Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Risk factors for opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: a single-institution, retrospective analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To identify risk factors for opioid-induced constipation (OIC).

Methods

This study retrospectively analyzed 175 advanced cancer patients who were receiving pain treatment with opioids and were newly prescribed laxatives for OIC at Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital between November 2016 and June 2021. For the regression analysis of factors associated with OIC, variables were extracted manually from clinical records. The effect of newly prescribed laxatives for OIC was evaluated as “effective” in cases where the number of spontaneous bowel movements increased at least once in the first 3 days. The OIC was defined based on Rome IV diagnostic criteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for OIC. Optimal cutoff thresholds were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Values of P < 0.05 (two-tailed) were considered significant.

Results

Significant factors identified included body mass index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] = 0.141, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.027–0.733; P = 0.020), chemotherapy with taxane within 1 month of evaluation of laxative effect (OR = 0.255, 95% CI = 0.068–0.958; P = 0.043), use of naldemedine (OR = 2.791, 95% CI = 1.220–6.385; P = 0.015), and addition or switching due to insufficient prior laxatives (OR = 0.339, 95% CI = 0.143–0.800; P = 0.014).

Conclusion

High BMI, chemotherapy including a taxane within 1 month of evaluation of laxative effect, no use of naldemedine, and addition or switching due to insufficient prior laxatives were identified as risk factors for OIC in advanced cancer patients with cancer pain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data are not available due to ethical restrictions.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Mercadante S (2011) Emerging drugs for cancer-related pain. Support Care Cancer 19:1887–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiffen PJ, Wee B, Derry S, Bell RF, Moore RA (2017) Opioids for cancer pain - an overview of Cochrane reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 7:CD012592

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Krashin D, Murinova N, Jumelle P, Ballantyne J (2015) Opioid risk assessment in palliative medicine. Expert Opin Drug Saf 14:1023–1033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarrió RG, Calsina-Berna A, García AG, Esparza-Miñana JM, Ferrer EF, Working Group ActEIO Project, Porta-Sales J (2021) Delphi consensus on strategies in the management of opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients. BMC Palliat Care 20:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mesía R, Virizuela Echaburu JA, Gómez J, Sauri T, Serrano G, Pujol E (2019) Opioid-induced constipation in oncological patients: new strategies of management. Curr Treat Options Oncol 20:91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. ALMouaalamy N (2021) Opioid-induced constipation in advanced cancer patients. Cureus 13:e14386

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Harada T, Imai H, Fumita S, Noriyuki T, Gamoh M, Okamoto M, Akashi Y, Kizawa Y, Tokoro A (2021) Opioid-induced constipation in patients with cancer pain in Japan (OIC-J study): a post hoc subgroup analysis of patients with gastrointestinal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 26:104–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rumman A, Gallinger ZR, Liu LWC (2016) Opioid induced constipation in cancer patients: pathophysiology, diagnosis and treatment. Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care 1:25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farmer AD, Drewes AM, Chiarioni G, De Giorgio R, O’Brien T, Morlion B, Tack J (2019) Pathophysiology and management of opioid-induced constipation: European expert consensus statement. United European Gastroenterol J 7:7–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Argoff CE (2020) Opioid-induced constipation: a review of health-related quality of life, patient burden, practical clinical considerations, and the impact of peripherally acting μ-opioid receptor antagonists. Clin J Pain 36:716–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Larkin PJ, Cherny NI, La Carpia D, Guglielmo M, Ostgathe C, Scotté F, Ripamonti CI; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Electronic address: clinicalguidelines@esmo.org (2018) Diagnosis, assessment and management of constipation in advanced cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 29 Suppl 4:iv111-iv125

  12. Davies A, Leach C, Caponero R, Dickman A, Fuchs D, Paice J, Emmanuel A (2020) MASCC recommendations on the management of constipation in patients with advanced cancer. Support Care Cancer 28:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mearin F, Lacy BE, Chang L, Chey WD, Lembo AJ, Simren M, Spiller R (2016) Bowel disorders. Gastroenterology S0016–5085(16):00222–00225

    Google Scholar 

  14. Palsson OS, Whitehead WE, van Tilburg MA, Chang L, Chey W, Crowell MD, Keefer L, Lembo AJ, Parkman HP, Rao SS, Sperber A, Spiegel B, Tack J, Vanner S, Walker LS, Whorwell P, Yang Y (2016) Rome IV diagnostic questionnaires and tables for investigators and clinicians. Gastroenterology S0016–5085(16):00180–00183

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simren M, Palsson OS, Whitehead WE (2017) Update on Rome IV criteria for colorectal disorders: implications for clinical practice. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 19:15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Palsson OS, Whitehead W, Törnblom H, Sperber AD, Simren M (2020) Prevalence of Rome IV functional bowel disorders among adults in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom. Gastroenterology 158:1262-1273.e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yurtdaş G, Acar-Tek N, Akbulut G, Cemali Ö, Arslan N, Beyaz Coşkun A, Zengin FH (2020) Risk factors for constipation in adults: a cross-sectional study. J Am Coll Nutr 39:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cattani L, Neefs L, Verbakel JY, Bosteels J, Deprest J (2021) Obstetric risk factors for anorectal dysfunction after delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J 32:2325–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. Body mass index—BMI. 2021. (https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/disease-prevention/nutrition/a-healthy-lifestyle/body-mass-index-bmi). Accessed October 17, (2021)

  20. Nyrop KA, Deal AM, Shachar SS, Basch E, Reeve BB, Choi SK, Lee JT, Wood WA, Anders CK, Carey LA, Dees EC, Jolly TA, Reeder-Hayes KE, Kimmick GG, Karuturi MS, Reinbolt RE, Speca JC, Muss HB (2019) Patient-reported toxicities during chemotherapy regimens in current clinical practice for early breast cancer. Oncologist 24:762–771

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Crockett S, Greer KB, Sultan S (2019) Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) guideline. Gastroenterology 156:228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia JM, Shamliyan TA (2018) Management of opioid-induced constipation in patients with malignancy. Am J Med 131:1041-1051.e3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Müller-Lissner S, Bassotti G, Coffin B, Drewes AM, Breivik H, Eisenberg E, Emmanuel A, Laroche F, Meissner W, Morlion B (2017) Opioid-induced constipation and bowel dysfunction: a clinical guideline. Pain Med 18:1837–1863

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank all the patients and medical staff at Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital who were involved in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

YK: concept and design, data analysis, data interpretation, manuscript writing; YI, MS, SS, and KY: concept and design, data acquisition, data interpretation; MU: concept and design, data interpretation, supervision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuko Kanbayashi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The Medical Ethics Review Committee of Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital approval no. 3310 and the Faculty of Pharmacy, Osaka Medical Pharmaceutical University, approved this study, approval no. 0088. All procedures were performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital and Osaka Medical Pharmaceutical University of Medicine Institutional Medical Ethics Review Committee and the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. No prospective studies with human participants or animals were performed by any of the authors for this article.

This study retrospectively analyzed 208 cancer patients newly prescribed laxatives for OIC or OIC prevention at Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital between November 2016 and June 2021. All study protocols were approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee at Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital (approval no. 3310) and the Faculty of Pharmacy at Osaka Medical Pharmaceutical University (approval no. 0088).

Consent to participate

Given the retrospective nature of this work, the need to obtain informed consent was waived for the individual participants included in the study, in accordance with the standards of the Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital and Osaka Medical Pharmaceutical University of Medicine Institutional Medical Ethics Review Committee.

Consent for publication

All authors give their consent for this manuscript to be published in Supportive Care in Cancer.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanbayashi, Y., Ishizuka, Y., Shimizu, M. et al. Risk factors for opioid-induced constipation in cancer patients: a single-institution, retrospective analysis. Support Care Cancer 30, 5831–5836 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07002-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07002-9

Keywords

Navigation