Abstract
Objective
This study explored the emotional state and decision perceptions of fertility preservation (FP) decisions of male and female cancer patients undergoing FP.
Setting
Obstetrics & Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University.
Method
All patients with a cancer diagnosis were referred by their physician to contact a fertility preservation specialist for FP plan discussion. After FP counseling, participants completed sociodemographic and basic information surveys and validated psychological and decisional scales.
Results
The final sample included 17 male and 16 female cancer FP patients. Overall, 85% of participants reported currently undergoing moderate to severe depression and anxiety states. Sex differences were found in both depression and anxiety states (P < 0.05). Both genders demonstrated a low level of regret in the decision to preserve fertility, indicating that participants felt they had made the right decision. However, there displayed decisional conflict, suggesting that cancer patients felt high conflict when making decisions.
Conclusion
In conclusion, there is a nonnegligible emotional burden on FP patients who have already undergone a painful situation before the start of oncological treatment. This is the first study to use validated DRS to examine emotional problems occurring in both men and women during FP decision-making.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this manuscript.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Wallace W, Anderson RA, Irvine DS (2005) Fertility preservation for young patients with cancer: who is at risk and what can be offered?[J]. Lancet Oncology 6(4):209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70092-9
Tschudin S, Bitzer J (2009) Psychological aspects of fertility preservation in men and women affected by cancer and other life-threatening diseases. Hum Reprod Update 15(5):587–597. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmp015
Jayasuriya S, Peate M, Allingham C et al (2019) Satisfaction, disappointment and regret surrounding fertility preservation decisions in the paediatric and adolescent cancer population. J Assist Reprod Genet 36(9):1805–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01536-4
Komatsu H, Yagasaki K, Yamauchi H (2018) Fertility decision-making under certainty and uncertainty in cancer patients. Sex Reprod Healthc 15:40–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2017.12.002
Wang Y Logan S Stern K et al (2020) Supportive oncofertility care, psychological health and reproductive concerns: a qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 28(2):809–817. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-04883-1
Niemasik EE, Letourneau J, Dohan D (2012) Patient perceptions of reproductive health counseling at the time of cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of female California cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 6(3):324–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-012-0227-9
Greenwood EA, Pasch LA, Jordan H et al (2018) To freeze or not to freeze: decision regret and satisfaction following elective oocyte cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 1097:1097–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.127
Lawson AK, Klock SC, Pavone ME et al (2014) Prospective study of depression and anxiety in female fertility preservation and infertility patients. Fertil Steril 102(5):1377–1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.07.765
Zebrack BJ, Mills J, Weitzman TS (2007) Health and supportive care needs of young adult cancer patients and survivors. J Cancer Surviv 1:137–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-007-0015-0
Schover LR, Rybicki LA, Martin BA, Bringelsen KA (1999) Having children after cancer. a pilot survey of survivors’ attitudes and experiences. Cancer 86:697–709. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990815)86:4%3C697::AID-CNCR20%3E3.0.CO;2-J
Wang M, Zhu L, Xiong H, Wang J, Li Z, Yang L, Jin L, Xi Q (2020) Lack of Knowledge, the main stumbling block of fertility preservation promotion in China. J Cancer Educ Sep 12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-020-01875-2
Selvi I, Basar H (2020) Subcapsular orchiectomy versus total orchiectomy and LHRH analogue in the treatment of hormone-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a different perspective in evaluation of the psychosocial effects. Support Care Cancer 28(9):4313–4326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05266-2
Alexis O, Adeleye AO, Worsley AJ (2020) Men’s experiences of surviving testicular cancer: an integrated literature review. J Cancer Surviv 14(3):284–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-019-00841-2
Brandberg Y, Sandelin K, Erikson S, Jurell G, Liljegren A, Lindblom A, Lindén A, von Wachenfeldt A, Wickman M, Arver B (2008) Psychological reactions, quality of life, and body image after bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women at high risk for breast cancer: a prospective 1-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 26(24):3943–3949. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.13.9568.
Logan S, Anazodo A (2019) The psychological importance of fertility preservation counseling and support for cancer patients. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 98(5):583–597. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13562
Jayasuriya S, Peate M, Allingham C, Li N, Gillam L, Zacharin M, Downie P, Moore P, Super L, Orme L, Agresta F, Stern C, Jayasinghe Y (2019) Satisfaction, disappointment and regret surrounding fertility preservation decisions in the paediatric and adolescent cancer population. J Assist Reprod Genet 36(9):1805–1822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-019-01536-4
Zhang H, Wang G, Jiang B, Cao M, Jiang Q, Yin L, Fu B, Zhang J (2020) The knowledge, attitude, and self-reported behaviors of oncology physicians regarding fertility preservation in adult cancer patients. J Cancer Educ 35(6):1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-019-01567-6
Ju K, Kopp M, Wang Y, Yuan G, Zheng W, Ataman LM, Woodruff TK, Chen Q, Xiao S (2019) A survey study of attitude and knowledge regarding female fertility preservation among reproductive health professionals in Fujian. China. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol 8(1):67–73. https://doi.org/10.1089/jayao.2018.0065
Ng EYL, Ip JKH, Mak DR, Chan AYW, Chung JPW (2020) Awareness of fertility preservation among Chinese medical students. Hong Kong Med J 26(3):184–191. https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj208390
Yasmin E, Balachandren N, Davies MC, Jones GL, Lane S, Mathur R, Webber L, Anderson RA (2018) Fertility preservation for medical reasons in girls and women: British fertility society policy and practice guideline. Human Fertil (Camb) 21(1):3–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14647273.2017.1422297
Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, Quinn G, Wallace WH, Oktay K (2013) Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31(19):2500–2510. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.49.2678
Oktay K, Harvey BE, Partridge AH, Quinn GP, Reinecke J, Taylor HS, Wallace WH, Wang ET, Loren AW (2018) Fertility preservation in patients with cancer: ASCO clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 36(19):1994–2001. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2018.78.1914
Funding
This project was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. 2017SHZDZX01) and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission(Grant No.C20142).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Not applicable.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Fudan Human Sperm Bank Ethics Committee (2021–02). All participants provided and signed informed consent prior to the study.
Consent for publication
The authors confirm that the work described has not been published before and agree to publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, M., Zhang, Y., Zhang, F. et al. Psychological State and Decision Perceptions of Male and Female Cancer Patients on Fertility Preservation. Support Care Cancer 30, 5723–5728 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06973-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06973-z