Abstract
Purpose
Oral mucositis is a common complication in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Accurate oral mucositis grading is essential for both clinical practice and oral mucositis research. This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of daily oral mucositis grading by nurses in a tertiary hospital in Australia.
Methods
A retrospective study was undertaken to review the daily patient oral assessment record, including diet, pain, erythema, ulceration and the oral mucositis grade based on World Health Organization (WHO) oral mucositis grading scale. The accuracy of the grade was determined by the observations recorded, and reasons for inaccuracy were documented. Any repetition of the same error in the same patient was noted.
Results
In total, 6841 oral assessments in 373 patients, conducted between 2017 and 2020, were reviewed. A total of 70% (N = 4781) were graded correctly. Of these, 64% (N = 3043) were grade 0. When the grade 0 scores were excluded, the accuracy of grading was reduced to 46% (N = 1738). Common reasons for incorrect grading included: unable to grade due to diet not specified, no ulceration and no pain was scored grade 1, no ulceration was scored as grade 2–4, oral intake was not taken into account, and pain without ulcer was scored 0. A total of 77% of the errors were repeated in the same patient on consecutive days.
Conclusions
Our results suggest there is frequent inaccurate evaluation of oral mucositis and a need for nurse training to accurately assess oral mucositis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All data is available on request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Lalla RV, Saunders DP, Peterson DE (2014) Chemotherapy or radiation-induced oral mucositis. Dental Clinics 58(2):341–349
Berger K, Schopohl D, Bollig A, Strobach D, Rieger C, Rublee D, Ostermann H (2018) Burden of oral mucositis: a systematic review and implications for future research. Oncol Res Treat 41(6):399–405. https://doi.org/10.1159/000487085
Gibson F, Auld EM, Bryan G, Coulson S, Craig JV, Glenny A (2010) A systematic review of oral assessment instruments: what can we recommend to practitioners in children’s and young people’s cancer care? Cancer Nurs 33(4):E1-19. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e3181cb40c0
World Health Organization (1979) WHO handbook for reporting results of cancer treatment. World Health Organization
National Cancer Institute (NCI) (2018) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTCAE). https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm. Accessed Nov 2021
Sonis ST, Elting LS, Keefe D, Peterson DE, Schubert M, Hauer-Jensen M, Bekele BN, Raber-Durlacher J, Donnelly JP, Rubenstein EB (2004) Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients. Cancer 100(9 Suppl):1995–2025. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.20162
Sonis ST, Eilers JP, Epstein JB, LeVeque FG, Liggett WH Jr, Mulagha MT, Peterson DE, Rose AH, Schubert MM, Spijkervet FK, Wittes JP, Group ftMS (1999) Validation of a new scoring system for the assessment of clinical trial research of oral mucositis induced by radiation or chemotherapy. Cancer 85(10):2103–2113. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990515)85:10%3c2103::Aid-cncr2%3e3.0.Co;2-0
Eilers J, Berger AM, Petersen MC (1998) Development, testing, and application of the oral assessment guide. Oncol Nurs Forum 15(3):325–330
Cox JD, Stetz J, Pajak TF (1995) Toxicity criteria of the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) and the European organization for research and treatment of cancer (EORTC). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 31(5):1341–1346
Schubert MM, Williams BE, Lloid ME, Donaldson G, Chapko MK (1992) Clinical assessment scale for the rating of oral mucosal changes associated with bone marrow transplantation: development of an Oral Mucositis Index. Cancer 69(10):2469–2477
McGuire DB, Peterson DE, Muller S, Owen DC, Slemmons MF, Schubert MM (2002) The 20 Item Oral Mucositis Index: reliability and validity in bone marrow and stem cell transplant patients. Cancer Invest 20(7–8):893–903. https://doi.org/10.1081/CNV-120005902
Revill S, Robinson J, Rosen M, Hogg M (1976) The reliability of a linear analogue for evaluating pain. Anaesthesia 31(9):1191–1198
Kushner JA, Lawrence HP, Shoval I, Kiss TL, Devins GM, Lee L, Tenenbaum HC (2008) Development and validation of a Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptom (PROMS) scale. J Can Dent Assoc 74(1):59–59
Stiff PJ, Erder H, Bensinger WI, Emmanouilides C, Gentile T, Isitt J, Lu ZJ, Spielberger R (2006) Reliability and validity of a patient self-administered daily questionnaire to assess impact of oral mucositis (OM) on pain and daily functioning in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Bone Marrow Transplant 37(4):393–401. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1705250
McQuellon R, Russell G, Cella D, Craven B, Brady M, Bonomi A, Hurd D (1997) Quality of life measurement in bone marrow transplantation: development of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) scale. Bone Marrow Transplant 19(4):357–368
Epstein JB, Beaumont JL, Gwede CK, Murphy B, Garden AS, Meredith R, Le QT, Brizel D, Isitt J, Cella D (2007) Longitudinal evaluation of the oral mucositis weekly questionnaire-head and neck cancer, a patient-reported outcomes questionnaire. Cancer 109(9):1914–1922. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22620
Quinn B, Potting CMJ, Stone R, Blijlevens NMA, Fliedner M, Margulies A, Sharp L (2008) Guidelines for the assessment of oral mucositis in adult chemotherapy, radiotherapy and haematopoietic stem cell transplant patients. Eur J Cancer 44(1):61–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2007.09.014
UK Oral Management in Cancer Care Group (UKOMiC) (2019) Oral management guidance. http://www.ukomic.co.uk/guidance.html. Accessed 17 Feb 2020
Quinn B, Stone R, Uhlenhopp M, McCann S, Blijlevens N (2007) Ensuring accurate oral mucositis assessment in the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation Prospective Oral Mucositis Audit. Eur J Oncol Nurs 11(SUPPL. 1):S10–S18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-3889(07)70003-0
Thieblemont C, Dumontet C, Saad H, Roch N, Bouafia F, Arnaud P, Hequet O, Espinouse D, Salles G, Roy P, Eljaafari-Corbin A, Du Manoir-Baumgarten C, Coiffier B (2002) Amifostine reduces mucosal damage after high-dose melphalan conditioning and autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation for patients with multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant 30(11):769–775. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bmt.1703757
Rambod M, Pasyar N, Ramzi M (2018) The effect of zinc sulfate on prevention, incidence, and severity of mucositis in leukemia patients undergoing chemotherapy. Eur J Oncol Nurs 33:14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2018.01.007
Harman M, Ovayolu N, Ovayolu O (2019) The effect of three different solutions on preventing oral mucositis in cancer patients undergoing stem cell transplantation: a non-randomized controlled trial: a Turkish study. J Pak Med Assoc 69(6):811–816
Askarifar M, Lakdizaji S, Ramzi M, Rahmani A, Jabbarzadeh F (2016) The effects of oral cryotherapy on chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients undergoing autologous transplantation of blood stem cells: a clinical trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J 18(4):e24775. https://doi.org/10.5812/ircmj.24775
Stokman MA, Sonis ST, Dijkstra PU, Burgerhof JGM, Spijkervet FKL (2005) Assessment of oral mucositis in clinical trials: Impact of training on evaluators in a multi-centre trial. Eur J Cancer 41(12):1735–1738. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2005.04.030
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Foundation for their financial support through scholarship for the principal author.
Funding
This study was conducted as a part of principal author’s Doctor of Philosophy degree. She has received a scholarship from the Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Midori Nakagaki. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Midori Nakagaki, and all the authors commented on subsequent versions of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study was approved by the Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/2020/QRBW/60530) and the University of Queensland’s Human Research Ethics Committee (2020001484 / HREC/2020/QRBW/60530).
Consent to participate
As this study was a retrospective review, participants’ consent was waived. The approval to access confidential information for the purpose of research under the provision of Sect. 280 of the Public Health Act 2005 was obtained from the Director-General of Queensland Health.
Consent for publication
Not applicable as consent was waived and no patient data or individual data was included in manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nakagaki, M., Gavin, N.C., Clavarino, A. et al. A real-world accuracy of oral mucositis grading in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Support Care Cancer 30, 2705–2712 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06654-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06654-3