Abstract
Background
Informal caregivers play a fundamental role in the care of hematological cancer patients, but less is known about how secondary caregivers are involved. We assessed the presence or absence of a secondary caregiver, the types of caregiving activities performed by primary and secondary caregivers, and examined whether the presence of a secondary caregiver was associated with primary caregiver characteristics and well-being over time.
Methods
A case series of hematological cancer patient-caregiver dyads (n = 171) were recruited from oncology clinics in Virginia and Pennsylvania and followed for 2 years. Multilevel models were developed to examine the associations between the presence of a secondary caregiver and the primary caregivers’ well-being.
Results
Most (64.9%) primary caregivers reported having secondary caregivers. Multilevel models showed primary caregivers without help had higher baseline mental and physical health, but experienced deteriorating physical health over time, compared to supported primary caregivers. Supported primary caregivers reported improvements in mental health over time that was associated with improvements in physical health.
Conclusions
Primary caregivers in good physical and mental health at the beginning of their caregiving journey but who have the least assistance from others may be at greatest risk for detrimental physical health effects long term. Attention to the arrangement of caregiving roles (i.e., who provides what care) over time is needed to ensure that caregivers remain healthy and well supported.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Dataset available upon request.
Code availability
Available upon request.
References
Society AC (2019) Cancer Treatment & Survivorship Facts & Figures 2019–2021. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/cancer-treatment-and-survivorship-facts-and-figures/cancer-treatment-and-survivorship-facts-and-figures-2019-2021.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
National Alliance for Caregiving and AARP (2020) Caregiving in the U.S. 2020 Report. https://www.caregiving.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/AARP1316_RPT_CaregivingintheUS_WEB.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2020
Shaffer KM, Kim Y, Carver CS, Cannady RS, Society AC (2017) Effects of caregiving status and changes in depressive symptoms on development of physical morbidity among long-term cancer caregivers. 36(8):770–778
Schulz R (2020) Caregiving as a risk factor for mortality. 282(23):2215–2219
Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2011) Spouses, adult children, and children-in-law as caregivers of older adults: a meta-analytic comparison. Psychol Aging 26(1):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021863
Pinquart M, Sörensen S (2003) Differences between caregivers and noncaregivers in psychological health and physical health: a meta-analysis. Psychol Aging 18(2):250–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.250
Johansen S, Cvancarova M, Ruland C (2018) The effect of cancer patients’ and their family caregivers’ physical and emotional symptoms on caregiver burden. Cancer Nurs 41(2):91–99. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0000000000000493
Kim G, Allen RS, Wang SY, Park S, Perkins EA, Parmelee P (2019) The relation between multiple informal caregiving roles and subjective physical and mental health status among older adults: do racial/ethnic differences exist? Gerontologist 59(3):499–508. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx196
Fredman L, Doros G, Ensrud KE, Hochberg MC, Cauley JA (2009) Caregiving intensity and change in physical functioning over a 2-Year period: results of the caregiver-study of osteoporotic fractures. Am J Epidemiol 170(2):203–210. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwp102
Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C (2010) Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psychooncology 19(10):1013–1025
Elliott AF, Burgio LD, DeCoster J (2010) Enhancing caregiver health: findings from the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer’s Caregiver Health II Intervention. J Am Geriatr Soc 58:30–37
Kent EE, Mollica MA, Buckenmaier S, Wilder SA (2019) The characteristics of informal cancer caregivers in the United States. Semin Oncol Nurs 35(4):328–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soncn.2019.06.002
Rowland JH (2019) Interdependence modeling approach. 28(7):1453-1460. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5096.Dyadic
Pruchno R, Wilson-Genderson M, Cartwright F (2009) Self-rated health and depressive symptoms in patients with end-stage renal disease and their spouses: a longitudinal dyadic analysis of late-life marriages. Journals Gerontol - Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 64(2):212–221. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbp006
Kim Y, Carver CS, Spillers RL, Crammer C, Zhou ES (2011) Individual and dyadic relations between spiritual well-being and quality of life among cancer survivors and their spousal caregivers. Psychooncology 20(7):762–770. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1778
Kershaw T, Ellis KR, Yoon H, Schafenacker A, Katapodi M, Northouse L (2015) The interdependence of advanced cancer patients’ and their family caregivers’ mental health, physical health, and self-efficacy over time. Ann Behav Med 49(6):901–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-015-9743-y
Siminoff LA, Wilson-Genderson M, Barta S, Thomson MD (2020) Hematological cancer patient-caregiver dyadic communication: a longitudinal examination of cancer communication concordance. Psychooncology. Published online. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5458
McCann JJ, Hebert LE, Bienias JL, Morris MC, Evans DA (2004) Predictors of beginning and ending caregiving during a 3-year period in a biracial community population of older adults. Am J Public Health 94(10):1800–1806. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.94.10.1800
Biggs, A., Brough, P., & Drummond S. Lazarus and Folkman’s psychological stress and coping theory. In: Cooper CL. QJ, ed. The Handbook of Stress and Health: A Guide to Research and Practice. Wiley-Blackwell; 2017:351–364.
Thomson MD, Siminoff LA (2018) Managing work and cancer treatment: experiences among survivors of hematological cancer. Cancer 124(13):2824–2831. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.31375
Funding
NIH/NCI 5R01CA196576.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
M.D.T. and L.A.S. conceived of the presented idea, M.W.G. completed the statistical modeling and analysis, M.D.T. lead writing with co-writers M.W.G. and L.A.S.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Approval to perform the study obtained from the institutional review board, IRB # HM13074.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all participants IRB # HM13074.
Consent for publication
Consent to publish was obtained IRB # HM13074.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Precis for use in the Table of Contents
Primary cancer caregivers without help had higher baseline mental and physical health, but experienced deteriorating physical health over time, compared to supported primary caregivers. Supported primary cancer caregivers reported improvements in mental health over time that was associated with improvements in physical health.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Thomson, M.D., Wilson-Genderson, M. & Siminoff, L.A. The presence of a secondary caregiver differentiates primary cancer caregiver well-being. Support Care Cancer 30, 1597–1605 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06544-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06544-8