Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Recommendations for supportive care and best supportive care in NCCN clinical practice guidelines for treatment of cancer: Differences between solid tumor and hematologic malignancy guidelines

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

It is unclear how NCCN guidelines recommend “supportive care” and “best supportive care” in oncology practice. We examined the usage of “supportive care” and “best supportive care” in NCCN guidelines and compared between solid tumor and hematologic malignancy guidelines.

Methods

We reviewed all updated NCCN Guidelines for Treatment of Cancer in October 2019. We documented the frequency of occurrence, definition, and timing of introduction of each term. We compared between solid tumor and hematologic malignancy guidelines.

Results

We identified a total of 37 solid tumor and 16 hematologic guidelines. Thirty-seven (70%) guidelines mentioned “supportive care” and 36 (68%) mentioned “best supportive care.” Hematologic guidelines were significantly more likely than solid tumor guidelines to use the term “supportive care” (median occurrence 19 vs. 2; P = 0.001) and to describe “supportive care” as management of cancer-related complications (N = 11/15, 73% vs. N = 2/22, 9%; P < 0.001). Domains of specialist palliative care were infrequently mentioned (N = 10/37, 27%). In contrast, solid tumor guidelines were significantly more likely than hematologic guidelines to mention “best supportive care” (median occurrence 6 vs. 0; P = 0.016). This term was rarely defined and mostly used in the advanced disease setting.

Conclusion

“Supportive care” and “best supportive care” were frequently used in NCCN guidelines, with significant variations in usage between solid tumor and hematologic oncologists. “Supportive care” was mostly limited to management of cancer-related complications and treatment adverse effects in NCCN guidelines, highlighting the need to go beyond the traditional biomedical model to more a patient-centered care model with greater integration of palliative care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Torre LA, Siegel RL, Ward EM, Jemal A (2016) Global cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends–an update. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 25:16–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah-Manek B, Wong W, Ravelo A, DiBonaventura M (2018) Oncologists’ perceptions of drug affordability using NCCN evidence blocks: results from a national survey. J Manag Care Spec Pharm 24:565–571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ernecoff NC, Check D, Bannon M et al (2020) Comparing specialty and primary palliative care interventions: analysis of a systematic review. J Palliat Med 23:389–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (2018) Latest global cancer data: cancer burden rises to 18.1 million new cases and 9.6 million cancer deaths in 2018. https://www.who.int/cancer/PRGlobocanFinal.pdf. Accessed 25 November 2019

  5. Hui D, De La Cruz M, Mori M et al (2013) Concepts and definitions for “supportive care”, “best supportive care”, “palliative care”, and “hospice care” in the published literature, dictionaries, and textbooks. Support Care Cancer 21:659–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee RT, Ramchandran K, Sanft T, Von Roenn J (2015) Implementation of supportive care and best supportive care interventions in clinical trials enrolling patients with cancerdagger. Ann Oncol 26:1838–1845

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hui D (2014) Definition of supportive care: does the semantic matter? Curr Opin Oncol 26:372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cellerino R, Tummarello D, Guidi F, Isidori P, Raspugli M, Biscottini B, Fatati G (1991) A randomized trial of alternating chemotherapy versus best supportive care in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 9:1453–1461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Jack B, Boland A, Dickson R, Stevenson J, McLeod C (2010) Best supportive care in lung cancer trials is inadequately described: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 19:293–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cherny N (2011) Best supportive care: a euphemism for no care or a standard of good care? Semin Oncol 38:351–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sanz Rubiales A, Sanchez-Gutierrez ME, Flores Perez LA, Del Valle Rivero ML (2020) How is best supportive care provided in clinical trials for patients with advanced cancer? A review of registered protocols of clinical trials. Curr Oncol 27:e100–e105

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Paz-Ares L, de Marinis F, Dediu M et al (2012) Maintenance therapy with pemetrexed plus best supportive care versus placebo plus best supportive care after induction therapy with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (PARAMOUNT): a double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13:247–255

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kang JH, Lee SI, Lim DH et al (2012) Salvage chemotherapy for pretreated gastric cancer: a randomized phase III trial comparing chemotherapy plus best supportive care with best supportive care alone. J Clin Oncol 30:1513–1518

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mo L, Urbauer DL, Bruera E, Hui D (2021) Recommendations for palliative and hospice care in NCCN guidelines for treatment of cancer. Oncologist 26:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hui D, Hannon BL, Zimmermann C, Bruera E (2018) Improving patient and caregiver outcomes in oncology: team-based, timely, and targeted palliative care. CA Cancer J Clin 68:356–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brudno JN, Kochenderfer JN (2019) Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: mechanisms, manifestations and management. Blood Rev 34:45–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fu JB, Tennison JM, Rutzen-Lopez IM, Silver JK, Morishita S, Dibaj SS, Bruera E (2018) Bleeding frequency and characteristics among hematologic malignancy inpatient rehabilitation patients with severe thrombocytopenia. Support Care Cancer 26:3135–3141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Fontana L, Strasfeld L (2019) Respiratory virus infections of the stem cell transplant recipient and the hematologic malignancy patient. Infect Dis Clin North Am 33:523–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ludwig H (2002) Anemia of hematologic malignancies: what are the treatment options? Semin Oncol 29:45–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Yilmaz M, Atilla FD, Sahin F, Saydam G (2020) The effect of malnutrition on mortality in hospitalized patients with hematologic malignancy. Support Care Cancer 28:1441–1448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Koizumi K, Tayama J, Ishioka T, Nakamura-Thomas H, Suzuki M, Hara M, Makita S, Hamaguchi T (2018) Anxiety, fatigue, and attentional bias toward threat in patients with hematopoietic tumors. PLoS One 13:e0192056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jordan K, Aapro M, Kaasa S et al (2018) European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care. Ann Oncol 29:36–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. El-Jawahri A, LeBlanc T, VanDusen H et al (2016) Effect of inpatient palliative care on quality of life 2 weeks after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 316:2094–2103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Porta-Sales J, Guerrero-Torrelles M, Moreno-Alonso D, Sarra-Escarre J, Clapes-Puig V, Trelis-Navarro J, Sureda-Balari A, Fernandez De Sevilla-Ribosa A (2017) Is early palliative care feasible in patients with multiple myeloma? J Pain Symptom Manage 54:692–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Epstein AS, Goldberg GR, Meier DE (2012) Palliative care and hematologic oncology: the promise of collaboration. Blood Rev 26:233–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Smith TJ, Temin S, Alesi ER et al (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology provisional clinical opinion: the integration of palliative care into standard oncology care. J Clin Oncol 30:880–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. El-Jawahri AR, Abel GA, Steensma DP et al (2015) Health care utilization and end-of-life care for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer 121:2840–2848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Temel JS, Greer JA, El-Jawahri A et al (2017) Effects of early integrated palliative care in patients with lung and GI cancer: a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 35:834–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A et al (2010) Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 363:733–742

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Hui D, Didwaniya N, Vidal M, Shin SH, Chisholm G, Roquemore J, Bruera E (2014) Quality of end-of-life care in patients with hematologic malignancies: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer 120:1572–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hui D, Park M, Liu D, Reddy A, Dalal S, Bruera E (2015) Attitudes and beliefs toward supportive and palliative care referral among hematologic and solid tumor oncology specialists. Oncologist 20:1326–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hui D, Cerana MA, Park M, Hess K, Bruera E (2016) Impact of oncologists’ attitudes toward end-of-life care on patients’ access to palliative care. Oncologist 21:1149–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ruiz M, Reynolds P, Marranzini R, Khan A, Ketterer J, Brahim A (2018) Role of early palliative care interventions in hematological malignancies and bone marrow transplant patients: barriers and potential solutions. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 35:1456–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. LeBlanc TW, O’Donnell JD, Crowley-Matoka M, Currow DC, Abernethy AP (2015) Perceptions of palliative care among hematologic malignancy specialists: a mixed-methods study. J Oncol Pract 11:e230–e238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Barni S, Maltoni M, Tuveri G et al (2011) Attitude of Italian medical oncologists toward palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: results of the SIO project. Support Care Cancer 19:381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cherny RI, Catane R, European Society of Medical Oncology Taskforce on Palliative and Supportive Care (2003) Attitudes of medical oncologists toward palliative care for patients with advanced and incurable cancer: report on a survery by the European Society of Medical Oncology Taskforce on Palliative and Supportive Care. Cancer 98:2502–2510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lesnock JL, Arnold RM, Meyn LA, Buss MK, Quimper M, Krivak TC, Edwards RP, Chang JC (2013) Palliative care education in gynecologic oncology: a survey of the fellows. Gynecol Oncol 130:431–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Buss MK, Lessen DS, Sullivan AM, Von Roenn J, Arnold RM, Block SD (2011) Hematology/oncology fellows’ training in palliative care: results of a national survey. Cancer 117:4304–4311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Feld E, Singhi EK, Phillips S, Huang LC, Shyr Y, Horn L (2019) Palliative care referrals for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): patient and provider attitudes and practices. Clin Lung Cancer 20:e291–e298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hui D, De La Rosa A, Chen J, Dibaj S, Delgado Guay M, Heung Y, Liu D, Bruera E (2020) State of palliative care services at US cancer centers: an updated national survey. Cancer 126:2013–2023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zafar SY, Currow DC, Cherny N, Strasser F, Fowler R, Abernethy AP (2012) Consensus-based standards for best supportive care in clinical trials in advanced cancer. Lancet Oncol 13:e77–e82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health (NIH) / National Cancer Institute grants (R01CA214960‐01A1; R01CA225701‐01A1; R01CA231471-01A1 to D.H.) and a National Institute of Nursing Research grant (1R21NR016736‐01 to D.H.). This work was also supported in part by a National Institutes of Health Cancer Center Support grant (P30CA016672 to D.U.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study concept and design: David Hui and Li Mo. Data acquisition/analysis and interpretation: all authors. Manuscript preparation/critical revision for important intellectual content: David Hui and Li Mo. Final approval: all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hui.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The Institutional Review Board at MD Anderson Cancer Center reviewed the protocol and provided approval to proceed without the need for full committee review.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 241 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mo, L., Urbauer, D.L., Bruera, E. et al. Recommendations for supportive care and best supportive care in NCCN clinical practice guidelines for treatment of cancer: Differences between solid tumor and hematologic malignancy guidelines. Support Care Cancer 29, 7385–7392 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06245-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06245-2

Keywords

Navigation