Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How do prostate cancer patients navigate the active surveillance journey? A 3-year longitudinal study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether prostate cancer (PCa) patients’ coping strategies (i.e., fighting spirit, anxious preoccupation, fatalism, helplessness/hopelessness, and avoidance) significantly change during the first 3-year follow-up period of active surveillance (AS).

Materials and methods

Altogether, 104 patients on AS completed the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) at baseline (T0), at 10 and 12 months after diagnostic biopsy (T1 and T2, respectively) and then at 24- (T3) and 36-month (T4) follow-up. Paired samples T test was used to detect statistically significant changes over time. Changes ≥ 1 point (or ≤ − 1) were hypothesized to be clinically relevant.

Results

During the first 3 years on AS, men experienced decreased anxiety, avoidance thoughts/behaviors, and fight-against-cancer attitudes, and these changes were found to be statistically significant. When considering clinically significant changes between inclusion in AS (T0) and 3-year follow-up (T4), avoidance decreased in 19% of patients.

Conclusions

Most patients were observed to have adopted functional coping strategies at baseline, which were maintained through the first 3 years on AS. Overall, men on AS may perceive increasing control over their cancer and comfort with the AS protocol over time and experience slight decreases in anxious preoccupation, cancer-related avoidance thoughts and behaviors, and fight-against-cancer reactions. For those men who find it difficult to cope with AS, psychological monitoring and interventions could be helpful throughout the monitoring journey.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Best M, Aldridge L, Butow P, Olver I, Webster F (2015) Conceptual analysis of suffering in cancer: a systematic review. Psycho-oncology 24(9):977–986

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sharpley CF, Bitsika V, Christie DR (2018) “The Worst Thing Was…”: prostate cancer patients’ evaluations of their diagnosis and treatment experiences. Am J Mens Health 12(5):1503–1509

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Davison BJ, Degner LF (1997) Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 20:187–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Linden W, Vodermaier A, MacKenzie R, Greig D (2012) Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. J Affect Disord 141(2):343–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp 150–153

  6. Watson M, Young J, Inayat Q, Burgess C, Robertson B (1988) Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. Psychol Med 18(1):203–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1980) An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav 21(3):219–239

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roesch SC, Adams L, Hines A, Palmores A, Vyas P, Tran C, Pekin S, Vaughn AA (2005) Coping with prostate cancer: a meta-analytic review. J Behav Med 28(3):281–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Greer S, Moorey S, Watson M (1989) Patients’ adjustment to cancer: the mental adjustment to cancer (MAC) scale vs clinical ratings. J Psychosom Res 33(3):373–377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Brien CW, Moorey S (2010) Outlook and adaptation in advanced cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology 19(12):1239–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Steineck G, Helgesen F, Adolfsson J, Dickman PW, Johansson JE, Norlén BJ, Holmberg L, Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4 (2002) Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med 347:790–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bellardita L, Valdagni R, Van Den Bergh R, Randsdorp H, Repetto C, Venderbos LDF et al (2015) How does active surveillance for prostate cancer affect quality of life? A systematic review. Eur Urol 67(4):637–645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bokhorst LP, Valdagni R, Rannikko A, Kakehi Y, Pickles T, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ (2016) A decade of active surveillance in the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 70(6):954–960

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marenghi C, Alvisi MF, Palorini F, Avuzzi B, Badenchini F, Bedini N et al (2017) Eleven-year management of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: what have we learned? Tumori 103(5):464–474

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Bangma CH, Valdagni R, Carroll PR, Van Poppel H, Klotz L, Hugosson J (2015) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: developments to date. Eur Urol 67(4):646–648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Venderbos LD, Brandhof SD, Korfage IJ (2018) How does QoL compare between surveillance and active treatment? In: Klotz L (ed) Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. Humana Press, Cham, pp 169–181

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Venderbos LD, Aluwini S, Roobol MJ, Bokhorst LP, Oomens EH, Bangma CH, Korfage IJ (2017) Long-term follow-up after active surveillance or curative treatment: quality-of-life outcomes of men with low-risk prostate cancer. Qual Life Res 26(6):1635–1645

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Venderbos LD, Van Den Bergh RC, Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, Essink-Bot ML, Bangma CH et al (2015) A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels. Psychooncology 24(3):348–354

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Daubenmier JJ, Weidner G, Marlin R, Crutchfield L, Dunn-Emke S, Chi C et al (2006) Lifestyle and health-related quality of life of men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Urology 67(1):125–130

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruinsma SM, Bangma CH, Carroll PR, Leapman MS, Rannikko A, Petrides N et al (2016) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines. Nat Rev Urol 13(3):151–167

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V et al (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59(1):61–71

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klotz L (2012) Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: background, patient selection, triggers for intervention, and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep 13(2):153–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, Busby JE, D'Amico A, Eastham JA, Enke CA, George D, Horwitz EM, Huben RP, Kantoff P, Kawachi M, Kuettel M, Lange PH, Macvicar G, Plimack ER, Pow-Sang JM, Roach M 3rd, Rohren E, Roth BJ, Shrieve DC, Smith MR, Srinivas S, Twardowski P, Walsh PC (2010) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8(2):162–200. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2010.0012

  24. Villa S, Alvisi MF, Rancati T, Delor JPM, Avuzzi B, Bosetti D, Marenghi C, Magnani T, Morlino S, Salvioni R, Nicolai N, Torelli T, Valdagni R, Bellardita L (2016) Facing untreated prostate cancer on active surveillance: who is at risk for increased anxiety? Anticancer Res 36(5):2565–2566

  25. Bellardita L, Rancati T, Alvisi MF, Villani D, Magnani T, Marenghi C, Nicolai N, Procopio G, Villa S, Salvioni R, Valdagni R (2013) Predictors of health-related quality of life and adjustment to prostate cancer during active surveillance. Eur Urol 64(1):30–36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Villa S, Kendel F, Venderbos L, Rancati T, Bangma C, Carroll P et al (2017) Setting an agenda for assessment of health-related quality of life among men with prostate cancer on active surveillance: a consensus paper from a European School of Oncology task force. Eur Urol 71(2):274–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mader EM, Li HH, Lyons KD, Morley CP, Formica MK, Perrapato SD et al (2017) Qualitative insights into how men with low-risk prostate cancer choosing active surveillance negotiate stress and uncertainty. BMC Urol 17(1):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yanez B, Bustillo NE, Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Dahn J, Kava B, Penedo FJ (2015) The importance of perceived stress management skills for patients with prostate cancer in active surveillance. J Behav Med 38(2):214–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Grassi L, Buda P, Cavana L, Annunziata MA, Torta R, Varetto A (2005) Styles of coping with cancer: the Italian version of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) scale. Psychooncology 14(2):115–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, DeLongis A, Gruen RJ (1986) Dynamics of a stressful encounter. Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(5):992–1003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Billings AG, Moos RH (1984) Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. J Pers Soc Psychol 46(4):877–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Billings AG, Moos RH (1981) The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. J Behav Med 4(2):139–157

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pearlin LI, Schooler C (1978) The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 19(1):2–21

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Lashbrook MP, Valery PC, Knott V, Kirshbaum MN, Bernardes CM (2018) Coping strategies used by breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: a literature review. Cancer Nurs 41(5):E23–E39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Fondazione Italo Monzino for support for the project “Per un sentire condiviso: l’uomo e il tumore alla prostrate.”

Funding

The study was financially supported by the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC IG16087).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Dordoni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 291 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dordoni, P., Badenchini, F., Alvisi, M.F. et al. How do prostate cancer patients navigate the active surveillance journey? A 3-year longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer 29, 645–651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05524-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05524-8

Keywords

Navigation