Abstract
Objective
To investigate whether prostate cancer (PCa) patients’ coping strategies (i.e., fighting spirit, anxious preoccupation, fatalism, helplessness/hopelessness, and avoidance) significantly change during the first 3-year follow-up period of active surveillance (AS).
Materials and methods
Altogether, 104 patients on AS completed the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) at baseline (T0), at 10 and 12 months after diagnostic biopsy (T1 and T2, respectively) and then at 24- (T3) and 36-month (T4) follow-up. Paired samples T test was used to detect statistically significant changes over time. Changes ≥ 1 point (or ≤ − 1) were hypothesized to be clinically relevant.
Results
During the first 3 years on AS, men experienced decreased anxiety, avoidance thoughts/behaviors, and fight-against-cancer attitudes, and these changes were found to be statistically significant. When considering clinically significant changes between inclusion in AS (T0) and 3-year follow-up (T4), avoidance decreased in 19% of patients.
Conclusions
Most patients were observed to have adopted functional coping strategies at baseline, which were maintained through the first 3 years on AS. Overall, men on AS may perceive increasing control over their cancer and comfort with the AS protocol over time and experience slight decreases in anxious preoccupation, cancer-related avoidance thoughts and behaviors, and fight-against-cancer reactions. For those men who find it difficult to cope with AS, psychological monitoring and interventions could be helpful throughout the monitoring journey.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Best M, Aldridge L, Butow P, Olver I, Webster F (2015) Conceptual analysis of suffering in cancer: a systematic review. Psycho-oncology 24(9):977–986
Sharpley CF, Bitsika V, Christie DR (2018) “The Worst Thing Was…”: prostate cancer patients’ evaluations of their diagnosis and treatment experiences. Am J Mens Health 12(5):1503–1509
Davison BJ, Degner LF (1997) Empowerment of men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. Cancer Nurs 20:187–196
Linden W, Vodermaier A, MacKenzie R, Greig D (2012) Anxiety and depression after cancer diagnosis: prevalence rates by cancer type, gender, and age. J Affect Disord 141(2):343–351
Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1984) Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer Publishing Company, New York, pp 150–153
Watson M, Young J, Inayat Q, Burgess C, Robertson B (1988) Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. Psychol Med 18(1):203–209
Folkman S, Lazarus RS (1980) An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. J Health Soc Behav 21(3):219–239
Roesch SC, Adams L, Hines A, Palmores A, Vyas P, Tran C, Pekin S, Vaughn AA (2005) Coping with prostate cancer: a meta-analytic review. J Behav Med 28(3):281–293
Greer S, Moorey S, Watson M (1989) Patients’ adjustment to cancer: the mental adjustment to cancer (MAC) scale vs clinical ratings. J Psychosom Res 33(3):373–377
O’Brien CW, Moorey S (2010) Outlook and adaptation in advanced cancer: a systematic review. Psychooncology 19(12):1239–1249
Steineck G, Helgesen F, Adolfsson J, Dickman PW, Johansson JE, Norlén BJ, Holmberg L, Scandinavian Prostatic Cancer Group Study Number 4 (2002) Quality of life after radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting. N Engl J Med 347:790–796
Bellardita L, Valdagni R, Van Den Bergh R, Randsdorp H, Repetto C, Venderbos LDF et al (2015) How does active surveillance for prostate cancer affect quality of life? A systematic review. Eur Urol 67(4):637–645
Bokhorst LP, Valdagni R, Rannikko A, Kakehi Y, Pickles T, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ (2016) A decade of active surveillance in the PRIAS study. Eur Urol 70(6):954–960
Marenghi C, Alvisi MF, Palorini F, Avuzzi B, Badenchini F, Bedini N et al (2017) Eleven-year management of prostate cancer patients on active surveillance: what have we learned? Tumori 103(5):464–474
Bangma CH, Valdagni R, Carroll PR, Van Poppel H, Klotz L, Hugosson J (2015) Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: developments to date. Eur Urol 67(4):646–648
Venderbos LD, Brandhof SD, Korfage IJ (2018) How does QoL compare between surveillance and active treatment? In: Klotz L (ed) Active surveillance for localized prostate cancer. Humana Press, Cham, pp 169–181
Venderbos LD, Aluwini S, Roobol MJ, Bokhorst LP, Oomens EH, Bangma CH, Korfage IJ (2017) Long-term follow-up after active surveillance or curative treatment: quality-of-life outcomes of men with low-risk prostate cancer. Qual Life Res 26(6):1635–1645
Venderbos LD, Van Den Bergh RC, Roobol MJ, Schröder FH, Essink-Bot ML, Bangma CH et al (2015) A longitudinal study on the impact of active surveillance for prostate cancer on anxiety and distress levels. Psychooncology 24(3):348–354
Daubenmier JJ, Weidner G, Marlin R, Crutchfield L, Dunn-Emke S, Chi C et al (2006) Lifestyle and health-related quality of life of men with prostate cancer managed with active surveillance. Urology 67(1):125–130
Bruinsma SM, Bangma CH, Carroll PR, Leapman MS, Rannikko A, Petrides N et al (2016) Active surveillance for prostate cancer: a narrative review of clinical guidelines. Nat Rev Urol 13(3):151–167
Heidenreich A, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, Joniau S, Mason M, Matveev V et al (2011) EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease. Eur Urol 59(1):61–71
Klotz L (2012) Active surveillance for favorable-risk prostate cancer: background, patient selection, triggers for intervention, and outcomes. Curr Urol Rep 13(2):153–159
Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, Busby JE, D'Amico A, Eastham JA, Enke CA, George D, Horwitz EM, Huben RP, Kantoff P, Kawachi M, Kuettel M, Lange PH, Macvicar G, Plimack ER, Pow-Sang JM, Roach M 3rd, Rohren E, Roth BJ, Shrieve DC, Smith MR, Srinivas S, Twardowski P, Walsh PC (2010) NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8(2):162–200. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2010.0012
Villa S, Alvisi MF, Rancati T, Delor JPM, Avuzzi B, Bosetti D, Marenghi C, Magnani T, Morlino S, Salvioni R, Nicolai N, Torelli T, Valdagni R, Bellardita L (2016) Facing untreated prostate cancer on active surveillance: who is at risk for increased anxiety? Anticancer Res 36(5):2565–2566
Bellardita L, Rancati T, Alvisi MF, Villani D, Magnani T, Marenghi C, Nicolai N, Procopio G, Villa S, Salvioni R, Valdagni R (2013) Predictors of health-related quality of life and adjustment to prostate cancer during active surveillance. Eur Urol 64(1):30–36
Villa S, Kendel F, Venderbos L, Rancati T, Bangma C, Carroll P et al (2017) Setting an agenda for assessment of health-related quality of life among men with prostate cancer on active surveillance: a consensus paper from a European School of Oncology task force. Eur Urol 71(2):274–280
Mader EM, Li HH, Lyons KD, Morley CP, Formica MK, Perrapato SD et al (2017) Qualitative insights into how men with low-risk prostate cancer choosing active surveillance negotiate stress and uncertainty. BMC Urol 17(1):1–8
Yanez B, Bustillo NE, Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Dahn J, Kava B, Penedo FJ (2015) The importance of perceived stress management skills for patients with prostate cancer in active surveillance. J Behav Med 38(2):214–223
Grassi L, Buda P, Cavana L, Annunziata MA, Torta R, Varetto A (2005) Styles of coping with cancer: the Italian version of the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer (Mini-MAC) scale. Psychooncology 14(2):115–124
Folkman S, Lazarus RS, Dunkel-Schetter C, DeLongis A, Gruen RJ (1986) Dynamics of a stressful encounter. Cognitive appraisal, coping, and encounter outcomes. J Pers Soc Psychol 50(5):992–1003
Billings AG, Moos RH (1984) Coping, stress, and social resources among adults with unipolar depression. J Pers Soc Psychol 46(4):877–891
Billings AG, Moos RH (1981) The role of coping responses and social resources in attenuating the stress of life events. J Behav Med 4(2):139–157
Pearlin LI, Schooler C (1978) The structure of coping. J Health Soc Behav 19(1):2–21
Lashbrook MP, Valery PC, Knott V, Kirshbaum MN, Bernardes CM (2018) Coping strategies used by breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer survivors: a literature review. Cancer Nurs 41(5):E23–E39
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Fondazione Italo Monzino for support for the project “Per un sentire condiviso: l’uomo e il tumore alla prostrate.”
Funding
The study was financially supported by the Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC IG16087).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 291 kb).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dordoni, P., Badenchini, F., Alvisi, M.F. et al. How do prostate cancer patients navigate the active surveillance journey? A 3-year longitudinal study. Support Care Cancer 29, 645–651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05524-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05524-8