Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with internal ureteral stent placement for malignant extrinsic ureteral obstruction

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The optimal management of malignant extrinsic ureteral obstruction (MUO) remains unclear. It is necessary to assess the patient prognosis in deciding the adaptation of drainage of renal pelvis. In this study, we investigated the clinical outcomes after ureteral stenting for MUO and the predictive factors for overall survival in order to create a risk-stratification model.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical and laboratory data of 93 patients with radiologically significant hydronephrosis associated with MUO who underwent successful stent placement between May 2005 and May 2018.

Results

The median survival duration after the initial stent insertion was 266 days. Of the 93 patients, 70 died, and the median interval from the first stent insertion to death was 160 days. Multivariate analysis showed that gastric cancer as the primary disease, poor performance status before stenting, and treatment after stent insertion were significant predictors of survival. According to these three factors, we stratified patients into the following four prognostic groups: no-factor (43 patients), one-factor (23 patients), two-factor (23 patients), and three-factor (4 patients) groups. This classification was effective for predicting survival, and the median survival durations in these groups were 807, 269, 44, and 12 days, respectively (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Our stratification model of patients with a poor prognosis after ureteral stent placement for MUO may allow urologists and clinicians to identify patients who will benefit from ureteral stenting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Turgut B, Bayraktar AM, Bakdık S, Hamarat MB, Öncü F, Gönen M, Tolu I (2019) Placement of double-J stent in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction: antegrade or retrograde approach? Clin Radiol 19:30379–30374

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allen DJ, Longhorn SE, Philp T, Smith RD, Choong S (2010) Percutaneous urinary drainage and ureteric stenting in malignant disease. Clin Oncol 22:733–739

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Pavlovic K, Lange D, Chew BH (2016) Stents for malignant ureteral obstruction. Asian J Urol 3:142–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sountoulides P, Mykoniatis I, Dimasis N (2014) Palliative management of malignant upper urinary tract obstruction. Hippokratia. 18:292–297

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Elsamra SE, Leavitt DA, Motato HA, Friedlander JI, Siev M, Keheila M, Hoenig DM, Smith AD, Okeke Z (2015) Stenting for malignant ureteral obstruction: tandem, metal or metal-mesh stents. Int J Urol 22:629–636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ganatra AM, Loughlin KR (2005) The management of malignant ureteral obstruction treated with ureteral stents. J Urol 174:2125–2128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kamiyama Y, Matsuura S, Kato M, Abe Y, Takyu S, Yoshikawa K, Arai Y (2011) Stent failure in the man-agement of malignant extrinsic ureteral obstruction: risk factors. Int J Urol 18:379–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Yossepowitch O, Lifshitz DA, Dekel Y, Gross M, Keidar DM, Neuman M, Livne PM, Baniel J (2001) Predicting the success of retrograde stenting for managing ureteral obstruction. J Urol 66:1746–1749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishioka J, Kageyama Y, Inoue M, Higashi Y, Kihara K (2008) Prognostic model for predicting survival after palliative urinary diversion for ureteral obstruction: analysis of 140 cases. J Urol 180:618–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cordeiro MD, Coelho RF, Chade DC, Pessoa RR, Chaib MS, Colombo-Júnior JR, Pontes-Júnior J, Guglielmetti GB, Srougi M (2016) A prognostic model for survival after palliative urinary diversion for malignant ureteric obstruction: a prospective study of 208 patients. BJU Int 117:266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Alawneh A, Tuqan W, Innabi A, Al-Nimer Y, Azzouqah O, Rimawi D, Taqash A, Elkhatib M, Klep-stad P (2016) Clinical factors associated with a short survival time after percutaneous nephrostomy for ureteric obstruction in cancer patients: an updated model. J Pain Symptom Manag 251:255–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Azuma T, Nagase Y, Oshi M (2013) Prognostic marker for patients with malignant ureter obstruction. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11:353–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Song Y, Fei X, Song Y (2012) Percutaneous nephrostomy versus indwelling ureteral stent in the management of gynecological malignancies. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22:697–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lienert A, Ing A, Mark S (2009) Prognostic factors in malignant ureteric obstruction. BJU Int 104:938–941

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jeong IG, Han KS, Joung JY, Seo HK, Chung J (2007) The outcome with ureteric stents for managing non-urological malignant ureteric obstruction. BJU Int 100:1288–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ohtaka M, Kawahara T, Takamoto D, Mochizuki T, Hattori Y, Teranishi J, Makiyama K, Miyoshi Y, Yumura Y, Yao M, Uemura H (2018) Gastrointestinal cancer and bilateral hydronephrosis resulted in a high risk of ureteral stent failure. BMC Urol 18:35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Migita K, Watanabe A, Samma S, Ohyama T, Ishikawa H, Kagebayashi Y (2011) Clinical outcome and management of ureteral obstruction secondary to gastric cancer. World J Surg 35:1035–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kulkarni R (2014) Metallic stents in the management of ureteric strictures. Indian J Urol 30:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang JY, Zhang HL, Zhu Y, Qin XJ, Dai BO, Ye DW (2016) Predicting the failure of retrograde ureteral stent insertion for managing malignant ureteral obstruction in outpatients. Oncol Lett 11:879–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Baumgarten AS, Hakky TS, Carrion RE, Lockhart JL, Spiess PE (2014) A single-institution experience with metallic ureteral stents: a cost-effective method of managing deficiencies in ureteral drainage. Int Braz J Urol 40:225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zita Ficko and Elias S. Hyams (2018) Complications of upper tract drainage. in: Samir S. Taneja MD and Ojas Shah MD (ed) Complications of urologic surgery, 5th. Elsevier, New York, pp 218–225

  23. Khoo CC, Abboudi H, Cartwright R, El-Husseiny T, Dasgupta R (2018) Metallic ureteric stents in malignant ureteric obstruction: a systematic review. Urology 118:12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We greatly thank the urologists enrolled in our hospital.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Matsuura.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Matsuura, H., Arase, S. & Hori, Y. Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with internal ureteral stent placement for malignant extrinsic ureteral obstruction. Support Care Cancer 28, 5743–5750 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05413-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-020-05413-0

Keywords

Navigation