Skip to main content
Log in

Hospice enrollment among cancer patients in Texas covered by Medicare managed care and traditional fee-for-service plans: a statewide population-based study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although rates of hospice use have increased over time, insurance plan- and racial/ethnic-based disparities in rates have been reported in the USA. We hypothesized that increased rates of hospice use would reduce or eliminate insurance plan-based disparities and that racial/ethnic disparities would be eliminated in managed care (MC) insurance plans.

Methods

We studied the use of hospice care in the final 30 days of life among 40,184 elderly Texas Medicare beneficiaries who died from primary breast, colorectal, lung, pancreas, or prostate cancer between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2013, using statewide Medicare claims linked to cancer registry data. Rates of hospice use were computed by race/ethnicity and insurance plan (MC or fee-for-service (FFS)). We used logistic regression to account for the impact of confounding factors.

Results

Rates of hospice use increased significantly over time, from 68.9% in 2007 to 76.1% in 2013. By 2013, differences in hospice use rates between MC and FFS plans had been reduced from 10% to < 5%. However, after accounting for insurance plan and confounding factors, racial/ethnic minority beneficiaries’ hospice use was significantly lower than non-Hispanic white beneficiaries’ (p < 0.0001). This disparity was observed among both FFS and MC beneficiaries.

Conclusions

Hospice use in the final 30 days of life has increased among elderly cancer patients in Texas, virtually eliminating the difference between FFS and MC insurance plans. Despite these positive trends, racial/ethnic-based disparities persist. These disparities are not explained by confounding factors. Future research should address social and behavioral influences on end-of-life decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Palliative Care, Version 2.2019 - February 8, 2019. In: Editor (ed)^(eds) Book NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) Palliative Care, Version 2.2019 - February 8, 2019, City

  2. The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Reporting Registry. In: Editor (ed)^(eds) Book The Quality Oncology Practice Initiative (QOPI) Reporting Registry, City

  3. Earle CC, Landrum MB, Souza JM, Neville BA, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ (2008) Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-care issue? J Clin Oncol 26:3860–3866

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB, Souza JM, Weeks JC, Block SD, Grunfeld E, Ayanian JZ (2005) Evaluating claims-based indicators of the intensity of end-of-life cancer care. Int J Qual Health Care 17:505–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Earle CC, Park ER, Lai B, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ, Block S (2003) Identifying potential indicators of the quality of end-of-life cancer care from administrative data. J Clin Oncol 21:1133–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodman DC FE, Chang C, Morden NE, Jacobson JO, Murray K, Miesfeldt S (2010) Quality of end-of-life cancer care for Medicare beneficiaries The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice

  7. Wallston KA, Burger C, Smith RA, Baugher RJ (1988) Comparing the quality of death for hospice and non-hospice cancer patients. Med Care 26:177–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright AA, Keating NL, Ayanian JZ, Chrischilles EA, Kahn KL, Ritchie CS, Weeks JC, Earle CC, Landrum MB (2016) Family perspectives on aggressive cancer care near the end of life. JAMA 315:284–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guadagnolo BA, Liao KP, Giordano SH, Elting LS, Shih YC (2015) Variation in intensity and costs of care by payer and race for patients dying of cancer in Texas: an analysis of registry-linked Medicaid, medicare, and dually eligible claims. Data Med Care 53:591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Koroukian SM, Schiltz NK, Warner DF, Given CW, Schluchter M, Owusu C, Berger NA (2017) Social determinants, multimorbidity, and patterns of end-of-life care in older adults dying from cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 8:117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ramey SJ, Chin SH (2012) Disparity in hospice utilization by African American patients with cancer. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 29:346–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Virnig BA, Kind S, McBean M, Fisher E (2000) Geographic variation in hospice use prior to death. J Am Geriatr Soc 48:1117–1125

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Virnig BA, Morgan RO, Persily NA, DeVito CA (1999) Racial and income differences in use of the hospice benefit between the medicare managed care and medicare fee-for-service. J Palliat Med 2:23–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Jarosek SL, Shippee TP, Virnig BA (2016) Place of death of individuals with terminal cancer: new insights from Medicare hospice place-of-service codes. J Am Geriatr Soc 64:1815–1822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McCarthy EP, Burns RB, Ngo-Metzger Q, Davis RB, Phillips RS (2003) Hospice use among Medicare managed care and fee-for-service patients dying with cancer. JAMA 289:2238–2245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Smith AK, Earle CC, McCarthy EP (2009) Racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life care in fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with advanced cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Stevenson DG, Ayanian JZ, Zaslavsky AM, Newhouse JP, Landon BE (2013) Service use at the end-of-life in Medicare advantage versus traditional Medicare. Med Care 51:931–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Virnig BA, Fisher ES, McBean AM, Kind S (2001) Hospice use in Medicare managed care and fee-for-service systems. Am J Manag Care 7:777–786

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Virnig BA, Persily NA, Morgan RO, DeVito CA (1999) Do Medicare HMOs and Medicare FFS differ in their use of the Medicare hospice benefit? Hosp J 14:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Emanuel EJ, Ash A, Yu W, Gazelle G, Levinsky NG, Saynina O, McClellan M, Moskowitz M (2002) Managed care, hospice use, site of death, and medical expenditures in the last year of life. Arch Intern Med 162:1722–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morrison RS MD (1995) Managed Care At The end of life trends in health care, law & ethics 10: 91-96

  22. Keating NL, Herrinton LJ, Zaslavsky AM, Liu L, Ayanian JZ (2006) Variations in hospice use among cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 98:1053–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Barbera L, Seow H, Sutradhar R, Chu A, Burge F, Fassbender K, McGrail K, Lawson B, Liu Y, Pataky R, Potapov A (2015) Quality indicators of end-of-life care in patients with cancer: what rate is right? J Oncol Pract 11:e279–e287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. De Schreye R, Smets T, Annemans L, Deliens L, Gielen B, De Gendt C, Cohen J (2017) Applying quality indicators for administrative databases to evaluate end-of-life care for cancer patients in Belgium. Health Aff (Millwood) 36:1234–1243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith CEP, Kamal AH, Kluger M, Coke P, Kelley MJ (2019) National trends in end-of-life care for veterans with advanced cancer in the Veterans Health Administration: 2009 to 2016. J Oncol Pract:JOP1800559

Download references

Funding

Supported by a grant from the Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas, “CERCIT: Comparative Effectiveness Research on Cancer in Texas” RP160674

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Linda S. Elting.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

This research was supported by a grant from the Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas (RP160674). The funding source was uninvolved in the conduct of the research and the interpretation of results. The authors declare no conflicts of interest with the funder and none with other entities related to the research. The authors have full control of the data which were obtained under a Data Use Agreement from the Texas Cancer Registry and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. These data are confidential and cannot be shared.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elting, L.S., Liao, KP., Giordano, S.H. et al. Hospice enrollment among cancer patients in Texas covered by Medicare managed care and traditional fee-for-service plans: a statewide population-based study. Support Care Cancer 28, 3351–3359 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05142-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05142-z

Keywords

Navigation