Skip to main content
Log in

Should palonosetron be a preferred 5-HT3 receptor antagonist for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) continues to be a common side effect of systemic anticancer therapy, decreasing quality of life and increasing resource utilization. The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate the comparative efficacy and safety of palonosetron relative to other 5-HT3RAs.

Methods

A literature search was carried out in Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Full-text references were then screened and included in this meta-analysis if they were an RCT and had adequate data regarding one of the five primary endpoints—complete response (CR), complete control (CC), no emesis, no nausea, or no rescue medications.

Results

A total of 24 RCTs were included in this review. Palonosetron was statistically superior to other 5-HT3RAs for 10 of the 19 assessed endpoints. Only one endpoint—emesis in the overall phase—had noticeable more favorable data for palonosetron to the point that it approached the 10% risk difference (RD) threshold as specified by the MASCC/ESMO antiemetic panel; another two endpoints (CR in the overall phase and nausea in the delayed phase) approached the 10% threshold.

Conclusions

Palonosetron seems to be more efficacious and safe than other 5-HT3RAs—statistically superior in 10 of 19 endpoints. It is, however, only clinically significant in one endpoint and approached clinically significant difference in another two endpoints. Within the limits of this meta-analysis, our results indicate that palonosetron may not be as superior in efficacy and safety as reported in a previous meta-analysis, and supports the recent MASCC/ESMO, ASCO, and NCCN guidelines in not generally indicating palonosetron as the 5-HT3RA of choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chiu L, Chow R, Popovic M, Navari RM, Shumway NM, Chiu N, Lam H, Milakovic M, Pasetka M, Vuong S, Chow E, DeAngelis C (2016) Efficacy of olanzapine for the prophylaxis and rescue of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 24:2381–2392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chow R, Chiu L, Navari R, Passik S, Chiu N, Popovic M, Lam H, Pasetka M, Chow E, DeAngelis C (2016) Efficacy and safety of olanzapine for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) as reported in phase I and II studies: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 24:1001–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Osoba D, Zee B, Warr D, Latreille J, Kaizer L, Pater J (1997) Effect of postchemotherapy nausea and vomiting on health-related quality of life. Support Care Cancer 5(4):307–313

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Diemunsch P, Grelot L (2000) Potential of substance P antagonists as anti-emetics. Drugs 60:533–546

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Aapro M, Rugo H, Rossi G, Rizzi G, Borroni ME, Bondarenko I, Sarosiek T, Oprean C, Cardona-Huerta S, Lorusso V, Karthaus M, Schwartzberg L, Grunberg S (2014) A randomized phase III study evaluating the efficacy and safety of NEPA, a fixed-dosed combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 25:1328–1333

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow R, Popovic M, Chiu L et al (2016) The combination of NK1 receptor antagonist, palonosetron and dexamethasone compared to palonosetron and/or dexamethasone for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J. Pain Manag 9(1):11–22

    Google Scholar 

  7. Saito M, Aogi K, Sekine I, Yoshizawa H, Yanagita Y, Sakai H, Inoue K, Kitagawa C, Ogura T, Mitsuhashi S (2009) Palonosetron plus dexamethasone versus granisetron plus dexamethasone for prevention of nausea and vomiting during chemotherapy: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, comparative phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 10:115–124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Srivastava M, Brito-Dellan N, Davis MP, Leach M, Lagman R (2003) Olanzapine as an antiemetic in refractory nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer. J Pain Symptom Manag 25(6):578–582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Popovic M, Warr DG, DeAngelis C, Tsao M, Chan KKW, Poon M, Yip C, Pulenzas N, Lam H, Zhang L, Chow E (2014) Efficacy and safety of palonosetron for the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Support Care Cancer 22:1685–1697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Botrel TEA, Clark OAC, Clark L, Paladini L, Faleiros E, Pegoretti B (2011) Efficacy of palonosetron (PAL) compared to other serotonin inhibitors (5-HT3R) in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving moderately or highly emetogenic (MoHE) treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 19:823–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Likun Z, Xiang J, Yi B, Xin D, Tao ZL (2011) A systematic review and meta-analysis of intravenous palonosetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults. Oncologist 16:207–216

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Jin Y, Sun W, Gu D et al (2013) Comparative efficacy and safety of palonosetron with the first 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer Care 22:41–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Roila F, Molassiotis A, Herrstedt J, Aapro M, Gralla RJ, Bruera E, Clark-Snow RA, Dupuis LL, Einhorn LH, Feyer P, Hesketh PJ, Jordan K, Olver I, Rapoport BL, Roscoe J, Ruhlmann CH, Walsh D, Warr D, van der Wetering M, participants of the MASCC/ESMO Consensus Conference Copenhagen 2015 (2016) 2016 MASCC and ESMO guideline update for the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting and of nausea and vomiting in advanced cancer patients. Ann Oncol 27:v119–v133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Basch E, Bohlke K, Barbour SY, Clark-Snow RA, Danso MA, Dennis K, Dupuis LL, Dusetzina SB, Eng C, Feyer PC, Jordan K, Noonan K, Sparacio D, Somerfield MR, Lyman GH (2017) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update. J Clin Oncol DOI 35:3240–3261. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.74.4789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Eisenberg P, Figueroa-Vadillo J, Zamora R, Charu V, Hajdenberg J, Cartmell A, Macciocchi A, Grunberg S, 99-04 Palonosetron Study Group (2003) Improved prevention of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting with palonosetron, a pharmacologically novel 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. Cancer 98(11):2473–2482

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gralla R, Lichinitser M, Van der Vegt S et al (2003) Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron. Ann Oncol 14:1570–1577

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aapro MS, Grunberg SM, Manikhas GM, Olivares G, Suarez T, Tjulandin SA, Bertoli LF, Yunus F, Morrica B, Lordick F, Macciocchi A (2006) A phase III, double-blind, randomized trial of palonosetron compared with ondansetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 17:1441–1449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen YX, Qin SK, Cheng Y et al (2007) A multicenter, double-blind, randomized control clinical trial of palonosetron hydrochloride injection to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Chin Clin Oncol 12:161–165

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li ZQ, Xu JM, Liu DQ et al (2009) Phase II trial of hydrochloride in the prevention of moderately to severely emetogenic chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting. Chin Clin Oncol 14:487–490

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yu Z, Liu W, Wang L, Liang H, Huang Y, Si X, Zhang H, Liu D, Zhang H (2009) The efficacy and safety of palonosetron compared with granisetron in preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced vomiting in the Chinese cancer patients: a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, comparative clinical trial. Support Care Cancer 17:99–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ghosh S, Dey S (2010) Comparing different antiemetic regiments for chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting. Int J Collab Res Int Med Pub Health 2(5):142–156

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kaushal J, Gupta MC, Kaushal V, Bhutani G, Dhankar R, Atri R, Verma S (2010) Clinical evaluation of two antiemetic combinations palonosetron dexamethasone versus ondansetron dexamethasone in chemotherapy of head and neck cancer. Singap Med J 51(11):871–875

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dong X, Huang J, Cao R, Liu L (2011) Palonosetron for prevention of acute and delayed nausea and vomiting in non-small-cell lung carcinoma patients. Med Oncol 28:1425–1429

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tian W, Wang Z, Zhou J, Zhang S, Wang J, Chen Q, Huang C, Pan L, Zhang L, Huang J, Shen H, Lin T (2011) Randomized, double-blind, crossover study of palonosetron compared with granisetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in a Chinese population. Med Oncol 28:71–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Huang J, Wang XJ, Yu D et al (2013) The effect of palonosetron hydrochloride in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced moderate and severe nausea and vomiting. Exp Ther Med 5:1418–1426

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Kilickap S, Kacan T, Akgul Babacan N (2013) The efficacy of palonosetron compared with granisetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a randomized study. Eur J Cancer 49:S272

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wenzell CM, Berger MJ, Blazer MA, Crawford BS, Griffith NL, Wesolowski R, Lustberg MB, Phillips GS, Ramaswamy B, Mrozek E, Flynn JM, Shapiro CL, Layman RM (2013) Pilot study on the efficacy of an ondansetron- versus palonosetron-containing antiemetic regimen prior to highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21(10):2845–2851

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Raftopoulos H, Boccia R, Cooper W et al (2015) Comparison of an extended-release formulation of granisetron (APF530) versus palonosetron for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy: results ofa prospective, randomized, double-blind, noninferiority phase 3 trial. Support Care Cancer 23:723–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Fujiwara S, Terai Y, Tsunetoh S et al (2015) Palonosetron versus granisetron in combination with aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with gynecologic cancer. J Gynceol Oncol 26(4):311.319

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kaushal P, Atri R, Soni A et al (2015) Comparative evaluation of triplet antiemetic schedule versus doublet antiemetic schedule in chemotherapy-induced emesis in head and neck cancer. ecancer 9:567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kimura H, Yamamoto N, Shirai T, Nishida H, Hayashi K, Tanzawa Y, Takeuchi A, Igarashi K, Inatani H, Shimozaki S, Kato T, Aoki Y, Higuchi T, Tsuchiya H (2015) Efficacy of triplet regimen antiemetic therapy for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in bone and soft tissue sarcoma patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy, and an efficacy comparison of single-shot granisetron and consecutive-day granisetron for CINV in a randomized, single-blinded crossover study. Cancer Med 4(3):333–341

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Matsumoto K, Takahashi M, Sato K et al (2015) Palonosetron or granisetron for prevention of CINV in patients with breast cancer receiving dexamethasone and fosaprepitant following anthracycline plus cyclophosphamide (AC) regimen. J Clin Oncol 33:9598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ohzawa H, Miki A, Hozumi Y et al (2015) Comparison between antiemetic effects of palonosetron and granisetron in breast cancer patients with anthracycline-based regimens. Oncol Lett 9:119–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ptushkin V, Sharkunov N, Mayorova S et al (2016) Randomised comparison of palonosetron and ondansetron both combined with dexamethasone in prevention of emesis in lymphoma patients receiving moderately emetogenic regimen bendamustine and rituximab. Haematologica 101(489):132732

    Google Scholar 

  35. Seol YM, Kim HJ, Choi YJ, Lee EM, Kim YS, Oh SY, Koh SJ, Baek JH, Lee WS, Joo YD, Lee HG, Yun EY, Chung JS (2016) Transdermal granisetron versus palonosetron for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a multicenter, randomized, open-label, cross-over, active-controlled, and phase IV study. Support Care Cancer 24(2):945–952

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Suzuki K, Yamanaka T, Hashimoto H, Shimada Y, Arata K, Matsui R, Goto K, Takiguchi T, Ohyanagi F, Kogure Y, Nogami N, Nakao M, Takeda K, Azuma K, Nagase S, Hayashi T, Fujiwara K, Shimada T, Seki N, Yamamoto N (2016) Randomized, double-blind, phase III trial of palonosetron versus granisetron in the triplet regimen for preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting after highly emetogenic chemotherapy: TRIPLE study. Ann Oncol 27:1601–1606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsuneizumi M, Saito M, Ogata H et al (2016) Trial of antiemetic triplet therapy comparing palonosetron and granisetron in breast cancer patients receiving AC chemotherapy: double blind randomized comparative phase III study. Support Care Cancer 24(Suppl 1):S87

    Google Scholar 

  38. Berger MJ, Ettinger DS, Aston J, Barbour S, Bergsbaken J, Bierman PJ, Brandt D, Dolan DE, Ellis G, Kim EJ, Kirkegaard S, Kloth DD, Lagman R, Lim D, Loprinzi C, Ma CX, Maurer V, Michaud LB, Nabell LM, Noonan K, Roeland E, Rugo HS, Schwartzberg LS, Scullion B, Timoney J, Todaro B, Urba SG, Shead DA, Hughes M (2017) NCCN Guidelines Insights: Antiemesis, Version 2.2017. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw 15:883–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Roila F, Donati D, Tamberi S, Margutti G (2002) Delayed emesis: incidence, pattern, prognostic factors and optimal treatment. Support Care Cancer 10:88–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald Chow.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 1 Search strategy

Appendix 2

Fig. 7
figure 7

PRISMA flow diagram

Appendix 3

Table 2 Characteristics of included randomized controlled trials among adults

Appendix 4

Table 3 Absolute risk difference between palonosetron versus other 5-HT3RAs intervention arms for all included efficacy chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting endpoints among adult studies

Appendix 5

Fig. 8
figure 8figure 8

Efficacy of palonosetron compared with other 5-HT3RAs in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—complete response. a Acute phase, b delayed phase, and c overall phase

Appendix 6

Fig. 9
figure 9

Efficacy of palonosetron compared with other 5-HT3RAs in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—complete control. a Acute phase, b delayed phase, and c overall phase

Appendix 7

Fig. 10
figure 10

Efficacy of palonosetron compared with other 5-HT3RAs in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—no emesis. a Acute phase, b delayed phase, and c overall phase

Appendix 8

Fig. 11
figure 11

Efficacy of palonosetron compared with other 5-HT3RAs in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—no nausea. a Acute phase, b delayed phase, and c overall phase

Appendix 9

Fig. 12
figure 12

Efficacy of palonosetron compared with other 5-HT3RAs in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—no rescue medication. a Acute phase, b delayed phase, and c overall phase

Appendix 10

Fig. 13
figure 13figure 13

Safety of palonosetron compared with other 5-HT3RAs in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting—treatment-related adverse events. a Constipation, b headache, c dizziness, and d diarrhea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chow, R., Warr, D.G., Navari, R.M. et al. Should palonosetron be a preferred 5-HT3 receptor antagonist for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer 26, 2519–2549 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4237-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4237-7

Keywords

Navigation