Skip to main content
Log in

Caregiving and mutuality among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies: qualitative study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The cancer caregiving literature focuses on the early phases of survivorship, but caregiving can continue for decades when cancer creates disability. Survivors with an ostomy following colorectal cancer (CRC) have caregiving needs that may last decades. Mutuality has been identified as a relationship component that can affect caregiving. This paper discusses how mutuality may affect long-term ostomy caregiving.

Methods

We conducted semi-structured, in-depth interviews with 31 long-term CRC survivors with ostomies and their primary informal caregivers. Interviewees were members of an integrated health care delivery system in the USA. We used inductive theme analysis techniques to analyze the interviews.

Results

Most survivors were 71 years of age or older (67%), female (55%), and with some college education (54%). Two thirds lived with and received care from spouses. Caregiving ranged from minimal support to intimate assistance with daily ostomy care. While some survivors received caregiving far beyond what was needed, others did not receive adequate caregiving for their health care needs. Low mutuality created challenges for ostomy caregiving.

Conclusions

Mutuality impacts the quality of caregiving, and this quality may change over time, depending on various factors. Emotional feedback and amplification is the proposed mechanism by which mutuality may shift over time. Survivorship care should include assessment and support of mutuality as a resource to enhance health outcomes and quality of life for survivors with long-term caregiving needs and their caregivers. Appropriate questionnaires can be identified or developed to assess mutuality over the survivorship trajectory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We use “ostomy” to refer to colostomy and ileostomy.

References

  1. Salsman JM, Yost KJ, West DW, Cella D (2011) Spiritual well-being and health-related quality of life in colorectal cancer: a multi-site examination of the role of personal meaning. Support Care in Cancer 19(6):757–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rajandram RK, Jenewein J, McGrath C, Zwahlen RA (2009) Coping processes relevant to posttraumatic growth: an evidence-based review. Psychooncology 18(1):30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jansen L, Hoffmeister M, Chang-Claude J, Brenner H, Arndt V (2011) Benefit finding and post-traumatic growth in long-term colorectal cancer survivors: prevalence, determinants, and associations with quality of life. Support Care in Cancer 19(5):583–589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emslie C, Browne S, MacLeod U, Rozmovitz L, Mitchell E, Ziebland S (2009) “Getting through” not “going under”: a qualitative study of gender and spousal support after diagnosis with colorectal cancer. Soc Sci Med 68:1169–1175

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Schumacher KL, Stewart BJ, Archbold PG, Caparro M, Mutale F, Agrawal S (2008) Effects of caregiving demand, mutuality, and preparedness on family caregiving outcomes during cancer treatment. Oncol Nurs Forum 35(1):49–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kayser K, Watson LE, Andrade JT (2007) Cancer as a “we disease”: examining the process of coping from a relational perspective. Families, Systems, Health 25(4):404–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dumont S, Jacobs P, Turcotte V, Anderson D, Harel F (2010) Measurement challenges of informal caregiving: a novel measurement method applied to a cohort of palliative care patients. Soc Sci Med 71:1890–1895

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berry LL, Dalwadi SM, Jacobson JO. (2016) Supporting the supporters: what family caregivers need to care for a loved one with cancer. J Oncol Practice, Dec 20 Epub ahead of print

  9. Havyer RD, van Ryn M, Wilson PM, Griffin JM. (2016). The effect of routine training on the self-efficacy of informal caregivers of colorectal cancer patients. Support Care Cancer, Nov 26 Epub ahead of print

  10. Bevans M, Sternberg EM (2012) Caregiving burden, stress, and health effects among family caregivers of adult cancer patients. JAMA 307(4):398–403

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Schumacher KL, Stewart BJ, Archbold PG (2007) Mutuality and preparedness moderate the effects of caregiving demand on cancer family caregiving outcomes. Nurs Res 56(6):425–433

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. McLean LM, Walton T, Rodin G, Esplen MJ, Jones JM (2013) A couple-based intervention for patients and caregivers facing end-stage cancer: outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology 22(1):28–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Kalemkerian G, Zalupski M, Lorusso P, et al. (2012) Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psychooncology, 22(3), 555–563

  14. Northouse LL, Mood DW, Schafenacker A, Montie JE, Sandler HM, Forman JD, Hussain M et al (2007) Randomized clinical trial of family intervention for prostate cancer patients and their spouses. Cancer 110(12):2809–2818

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. McMullen CK, Wasserman J, Altschuler A, Grant ML, Hornbrook MC, Liljestrand P et al (2011) Untreated peristomal skin complications among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Clin J Oncol Nurs 15(6):644–650

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. McMullen CK, Hornbrook MC, Grant M, Baldwin CM, Wendel SC, Mohler MJ et al (2008) The greatest challenges reported by long-term colorectal cancer survivors with stomas. J Support Oncol 6(4):175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Douglas M (1966) Purity and danger. Routledge, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. American Cancer Society (2017) Cancer facts & figures 2017. American Cancer Society, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ramirez, M., Altschuler A., McMullen C., Grant M., Hornbrook M.C., Krouse R.S. (2013) ‘I didn’t feel like I was a person anymore’: realigning full adult personhood after ostomy surgery. Med Anthropol Q, in press

  20. Ramirez M, McMullen C, Grant M, Altschuler A, Hornbrook MC, Krouse RS (2009) Figuring out sex in a reconfigured body: experiences of female colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Women & Health 49(8):608–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Altschuler A, Ramirez M, Grant M, Hornbrook MC, Herrinton L, Krouse RS (2009) The influence of husbands’ support on their wives’ psychosocial adjustment to having an ostomy resulting from colorectal cancer. J Wound, Ostomy Continence Nurs 36(3):299–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Notter J, Burnard P (2006) Preparing for loop ileostomy surgery: women’s accounts from a qualitative study. Int J Nurs Stud 43(2):147–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Manderson L (2005) Boundary breaches: the body, sex and sexuality after stoma surgery. Soc Sci Med 61:405–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Downing A, Morris EJ, Richards J, Corner J, Wright P, Sebag-Montefiore D, Finan P, Dind P, Wood C, Lawton S, Feltbower R, Wagland R, Vernon S, Thomas J, Glaser AW (2015) Health-related quality of life after colorectal cancer in England: a patient-reported outcomes study of individuals 123–36 months after diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 33:616–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Krouse R, Grant M, Ferrell B, Dean G, Nelson R, Chu D (2007) Quality of life outcomes in 599 cancer and non-cancer patients with colostomies. J Surg Res 138(1):79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Grant M, McMullen CK, Altschuler A, Mohler MJ, Hornbrook MC, Herrinton LJ, Wendel CS, Baldwin CM, Krouse RS (2011) Gender differences in quality of life among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Oncology Nursing Forum 38(5):587–596 PMCID:PMC3251903

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Morse J (1994) Critical issues in qualitative research methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  28. Quinn C, Clare L, Woods RT (2012) What predicts whether caregivers of people with dementia find meaning in their role? Int J Geriatr Psychiatr 27(11):1195–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Poulin MJ, Brown SL, Ubel PA, Smith DM, Jankovic A, Langa KM (2011) Does a helping hand mean a heavy heart? Helping behavior and well-being among spouse caregivers. Psychol Aging 25(1):108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lyons KS, Stewart BJ, Archbold PG, Carter JH (2009) Optimism, pessimism, mutuality, and gender: predicting 10-year role strain in Parkinson’s disease spouses. The Gerontologist 49(3):378–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Shim B, Landerman LR, Davis LL (2011) Correlates of care relationship mutuality among carers of people with Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease. J Adv Nurs 67(8):1729–1738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Godwin KM, Swank PR, Vaeth P, Ostwald SK (2013) The longitudinal and dyadic effects of mutuality on perceived stress for stroke survivors and their spousal caregivers. Aging Ment Health 17(4):423–431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Mackenzie A, Greenwood N (2012) Positive experiences of caregiving in stroke: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 34(17):1413–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Archbold PG, Stewart BJ, Greenlick MR, Harvath T (1990) Mutuality and preparedness as predictors of caregiver role strain. Res Nurs Health 13(6):375–384

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Hirschfeld M (1983) Homecare versus institutionalization: family caregiving and senile brain disease. Int J Nurs Stud 20:23–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Cantor MH (1983) Strain among caregivers: a study of experience in the United States. The Gerontologist 23:597–604

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Noelker LS and Poulshock SW (1982) The effects on families of caring for impaired elderly in residence. Washington DC: Final Report submitted to the Administration on Aging

  38. Horowitz A Family caregiving to the frail elderly. Ann Rev Gerontol Geriatr 5:194–246

  39. Hornbrook MC, Wendel CS, Coons SJ, Grant M, Herrinton LJ, Mohler MJ et al (2011) Complications among colorectal cancer survivors: SF-6D preference-weighted quality of life scores. Med Care 49(3):321–326

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu L, Herrinton LJ, Hornbrook MC, Wendel CS, Grant M, Krouse RS (2010) Early and late complications among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomy or anastomosis. Dis Colon rectum 53(2):200–212

  41. Lofland J, Lofland L (1995) Analyzing social settings: a guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Wadsworth Publishing; New York

  42. Coeling H, Biordi D, Theis S (2003) Negotiating dyadic identity between caregivers and care receivers. J Nurs Scholarsh 35:21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Richards L (1999) Using NVivo in qualitative research. Sage, Los Angeles, CA

    Google Scholar 

  44. Luborsky M (1994) The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In: Gubrium GF, Sankar A (eds) Qualitative methods in aging research. Sage, New York, NY, pp 189–210

    Google Scholar 

  45. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J (2007) Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 19:349–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Hallet T (2003) Emotional feedback and amplification in social interaction. Sociol Q 44(4):705–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Fletcher BS, Miaskowski C, Given B, Schumacher K (2012) The cancer family caregiving experience: an updated and expanded conceptual model. Eur J Oncol Nurs 16(4):389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Forsythe L, Parry C, Alfano C, Kent E, Leach C, Haggstrom D, Ganz P, Aziz N, Rowland JH (2013) Use of survivorship care plans in the United States: associations with survivorship care. J Natl Cancer Inst, 16 105(20):1579–1587

  49. McCabe MS, Faithfull S, Makin W, Wengstrom Y (2013) Survivorship programs and care planning. Cancer 119(Suppl 11):2179–2186

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stricker CT, Jacobs LA, Risendal B, Jones A, Panzer S, Ganz PA et al (2011) Survivorship care planning after the Institute of Medicine recommendations: how are we faring? J Cancer Surviv 5:358–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Menne HL, Tucke SS, Whitlatch CJ, Feinberg LF (2008) Decision-making involvement scale for individuals with dementia and family caregivers. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Dement 23(1):23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McCullough LB, Wilson NL, Teasdale TT, Kolpakchi AL, Skelly JR (1993) Mapping personal, familial and professional values in long term care decisions. The Gerontologist 33:324–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Drigotas SM, Rusbult CE, Verette J (1999) Level of commitment, mutuality of commitment, and couple well-being. Pers Relat 6:389–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Siefert ML, Williams A, Dowd MF, Chappal-Aiken L, McCorkle R (2008) The caregiving experience in a racially diverse sample of cancer family caregivers. Cancer Nurs 31(5):399–407

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Catherine Briggs for her invaluable assistance as an interviewer and gratefully acknowledge the individuals who agreed to participate in this study and share their experiences with us.

Funding

This study was funded by a grant from the National Cancer Institute (1R21 CA129887).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Altschuler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altschuler, A., Liljestrand, P., Grant, M. et al. Caregiving and mutuality among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies: qualitative study. Support Care Cancer 26, 529–537 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3862-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3862-x

Keywords

Navigation