Abstract
Purpose
The increasing rates of early-onset breast cancer (BC) and of woman survival render fertility preservation (FP) a pressing issue. We probe women’s experiences of FP counseling and decision making, aiming to identify emergent counseling patterns.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 women, who had been diagnosed with BC at the ages of 24–38, 1 to 5 years prior to the interview. BC survivors were recruited through posts in online fora, consented to participate, and were invited to tell their FP stories. The transcribed interviews were analyzed thematically, using the phenomenological paradigm.
Findings
Doctors’ FP recommendations belong into three categories: (a) direct clinical rationale—grounding recommendations in the woman’s clinical condition by direct reference to tumor characteristics and prognosis, (b) indirect clinical rationale—reference to the woman’s clinical condition by outlining a pressing time-frame, and (c) sociodemographic rationale—focus on the woman’s family status. Women’s responses revealed primarily detachment and compliance alongside initiative and proactivism.
Conclusion and implications for cancer survivors
Beyond its contribution to women’s future ability to conceive, FP may constitute an arena of personal autonomy and a coping resource for young BC patients. Raising awareness to this significance may sensitize healthcare providers to the role that FP may play in the moment of cancer diagnosis in adding, alongside sickness and prognosis, a focus on family future planning. As such, FP may affect women’s quality of life and even survival.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klemp JR, Kim SS (2012) ISFP practice committee, fertility preservation in young women with breast cancer. J Assist Reprod Genet 29:469–472
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Oktay K (2010) Fertility preservation in women with breast cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol 53:753–762
Wyndham N, Figueira-Marin PG, Patrizio P (2012) A persistent misperception: assisted reproductive technology can reverse the “aged biological clock”. Fertil Steril 97:1044–1047
Valdivieso M, Kujawa AM, Jones T, Baker LH (2012) Cancer survivors in the United States: a review of the literature and a call to action. Int J Med Sci 9:163–173
Canada AL, Schover LR (2012) The psychosocial impact of interrupted childbearing in long-term female cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncol 21:134–143
Gorman JR, Su HI, Roberts SC, Dominick SA, Malcarne VL (2015) Experiencing reproductive concerns as a female cancer survivor is associated with depression. Cancer 121:935–942
Howard-Anderson J, Ganz PA, Bower JE, Stanton AL (2012) Quality of life, fertility concerns, and behavioral health outcomes in younger breast cancer survivors: a systematic review. J Natl Cancer Inst 104:386–405
Dryden A, Ussher JM, Perz J (2014) Young women’s construction of their post-cancer fertility. Psychol Health 29:1341–1360
Leiblum SR, Greenfield DA (1997) The course of infertility: immediate and long term reactions. In: Leiblum SR (ed) Infertility: psychological issues and counseling strategies. Wiley, New York, pp 83–102
Penrose R, Beatty L, Mattiske J, Koczwara B (2012) Fertility and cancer—a qualitative study of Australian cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 20(6):1259–1265
Banerjee R, Tsiapali E (2016) Occurrence and recall rates of fertility discussions with young breast cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 24:163–171
Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Gwede CK, Miree C, King LM, Clayton HB, Wilson C, Munster P (2007) Discussion of fertility preservation with newly diagnosed patients: oncologists’ views. J Cancer Surviv 1:146–155
Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Lee JH, Jacobsen PB, Bepler G, Lancaster J, Keefe DL, Albrecht TL (2009) Physician referral for fertility preservation in oncology patients: a national study of practice behaviors. J Clin Oncol 7:5952–5957
Thewes B, Meiser B, Taylor A, Phillips KA, Pendlebury S, Capp A, Dalley D, Goldstein D, Baber R, Friedlander ML (2005) Fertility- and menopause-related information needs of younger women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:5155–5165
Diesch T, Rovo A, von der Weid N, Faraci M, Pillon M, Dalissier A, Dalle JH, Bader P (2017) Fertility preservation practices in pediatric and adolescent cancer patients undergoing HSCT in Europe: a population-based survey. Bone Marrow Transplant. doi:10.1038/bmt.2016.363
Ben-Aharon I, Abir R, Perl G, Stein J, Gilad G, Toledano H, Elitzur S, Avrahami G, Ben-Haroush A, Oron G, Freud E, Kravarusic D, Ben-Arush M, Herzel G, Yaniv I, Stemmer SM, Fisch B, Ash S (2016) Optimizing the process of fertility preservation in pediatric female cancer patients—a multidisciplinary program. BMC Cancer 9(16):620
Srikanthan A, Amir E, Warner E (2016) Does a dedicated program for young breast cancer patients affect the likelihood of fertility preservation discussion and referral? Breast 27:22–26
Louwé LA, Stiggelbout AM, Overbeek A, Hilders CG, van den Berg MH, Wendel E, van Dulmen-den Broeder E, Ter Kuile MM (2016) Factors associated with frequency of discussion of or referral for counselling about fertility issues in female cancer patients. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). doi:10.1111/ecc.12602
Goossens J, Delbaere I, Van Lancker A, Beeckman D, Verhaeghe S, Van Hecke A (2014) Cancer patients’ and professional caregivers’ needs, preferences and factors associated with receiving and providing fertility-related information: a mixed-methods systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 51:300–319
Loren AW, Mangu PB, Beck LN, Brennan L, Magdalinski AJ, Partridge AH, Quinn G, Wallace WH, Oktay K (2013) Fertility preservation for patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 31:2500–2510
Cardoso F, Loibi S, Pagani O, Graziottin A, Panizza P, Martincich L, Gentilini O, Peccatori F, Fourquet A, Delaloge S, Marotti L, Penault-Llorca F, Kotti-Kitromilidou AM, Rodger A, Harbeck N (2012) The European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists Recommendations for the Management of Young Women with Breast Cancer. Eur J Cancer 48:3355–3377
Partridge AH, Gelber S, Peppercorn J, Sampson E, Knudsen K, Laufer M, Rosenberg R, Przypyszny M, Rein A, Winer EP (2004) Web-based survey of fertility issues in young women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:4174–4183
Niemasik EE, Letourneau J, Dohan D, Katz A, Melisko M, Rugo H, Rosen M (2012) Patient perceptions of reproductive health counseling at the time of cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of female California cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv 6:324–332
Paluch-Shimon S, Pagani O, Partridge AH, Bar-Meir E, Fallowfield L, Fenlon D, Friedman E, Gelmon K, Gentilini O, Geraghty J, Harbeck N, Higgins S, Loibl S, Moser E, Peccatori F, Raanani H, Kaufman B, Cardoso F (2016) Second international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY2). Breast 26:87–99
Peate M, Meiser B, Friedlander M, Zorbas H, Rovelli S, Sansom-Daly H, Sangster J, Hadzi-Pavlovic D, Hickey M (2011) It’s now or never: fertility-related knowledge, decision-making preferences, and treatment intentions in young women with breast cancer—an Australian fertility decision aid collaborative group study. J Clin Oncol 29:1670–1677
Rutten LJ, Arora NK, Bakos AD, Aziz N, Rowland J (2005) Information needs and sources of information among cancer patients: a systematic review of research (1980-2003). Patient Educ Couns 57:250–261
Hershberger PE, Finnegan L, Altfeld S, Lake S, Hirshfeld-Cytron J (2013) Toward theoretical understanding of the fertility preservation decision-making process: examining information processing among young women with cancer. Res Theory Nurs Pract 27:257–275
Zebrack B, Isaacson S (2012) Psychosocial care of adolescent and young adult patients with cancer and survivors. J Clin Oncol 30:1221–1226
Kim J, Mersereau JE (2015) Early referral makes the decision-making about fertility preservation easier: a pilot survey study of young female cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 23:1663–1667
Peddie VL, Porter MA, Barbour R, Culligan D, MacDonald G, King D, Horn J, Bhattacharya S (2012) Factors affecting decision making about fertility preservation after cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 119:1049–1057
Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JH (2014) Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 28(1):CD001431. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4
Salloch S, Ritter P, Wäscher S, Vollmann J, Schildmann J (2014) Medical expertise and patient involvement: a multiperspective qualitative observation study of the patient’s role in oncological decision making. Oncologist 19:654–660
Schildmann J, Ritter P, Salloch S, Uhl W, Vollmann J (2013) ‘One also needs a bit of trust in the doctor ...’: a qualitative interview study with pancreatic cancer patients about their perceptions and views on information and treatment decision-making. Ann Oncol 24:2444–2449
Birenbaum Carmeli D (2016) Thirty five years of ART in Israel. Reproductive BioMedicine and Society Online 2:16–23
Renzetti CM, Lee RM (1993) The problems of researching sensitive topics: an overview and introduction. In: Renzetti CM, Lee RM (eds) Researching sensitive topics. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 3–13
Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Newbury Park
Lincoln YS, Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic inquiry. Sage, Newbury Park
Metzger ML, Meacham LR, Patterson B, Casillas JS, Constine LS, Hijiya N, Kenney LB, Leonard M, Lockart BA, Likes W, Green DM (2013) Female reproductive health after childhood, adolescent, and young adult cancers: guidelines for the assessment and management of female reproductive complications. J Clin Oncol 31:1239–1247
Mintziori G, Lambrinoudaki I, Ceausu I, Depypere H, Erel CT, Pérez-López FR, Schenck-Gustafsson K, van der Schouw YT, Simoncini T, Tremollieres F, Tarlatzis BC, Rees M, Goulis DG (2014) EMAS position statement: fertility preservation. Maturitas 77:85–89
Mersereau JE, Goodman LR, Deal AM, Gorman JR, Whitcomb BW, Su HI (2013) To preserve or not to preserve. Cancer 119:4044–4050
Snyder KA, Pearse W (2011) Discussing fertility preservation options with patients with cancer. J Am Med 306:202–203
Bastings L, Baysal Ö, Beerendonk CC, IntHout J, Traas MAF, Verhaak CM, Braat DD, Nelen WL (2014) Deciding about fertility preservation after specialist counselling. Hum Reprod 29:1721–1729
Baysal Ö, Bastings L, Beerendonk CC, Postma SA, IntHout J, Verhaak CM, Braat DD, Nelen WL (2015) Decision-making in female fertility preservation is balancing the expected burden of fertility preservation treatment and the wish to conceive. Hum Reprod 30:1625–1634
Chiavari L, Gandini S, Feroce I, Guerrieri-Gonzaga A, Russell-Edu W, Bonanni B, Peccatori FA (2015) Difficult choices for young patients with cancer: the supportive role of decisional counselling. Supp Care Cancer 23:3555–3562
Quinn GP, Vadaparampil ST, Bell-Ellison BA, Gwede CK, Albrecht TL (2008) Patient-physician communication barriers regarding fertility preservation among newly diagnosed cancer patients. Soc Sci Med 66:784–789
Russo A, De Luca R, Cicero G, Civilleri A, Bronte G, Dispenza J, Vieni S, Guarneri R, Cascio VL, Guadagna FP, Foddai E, Pace F (2014) Well-being among Italian medical oncologists: an exploratory study. Oncology 86:72–78
Snyder KA, Tate AL (2013) What to do now? How women with breast cancer make fertility preservation decisions. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care 39:172–178
Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Dagan E, Modiano GS Worse comes to worst—I know I have a safety net fertility preservation in single young Jewish breast cancer patients in Israel. In: Wynn LL, Foster AM (eds) Abortion pills, test tube babies, and sex toys: emerging sexual and reproductive technologies in the Middle East and North Africa. Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the women who participated in the interviews for their efforts and for devoting their time and willingness to share their experience.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the University of Haifa.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study was funded by the Cheryl Spencer Department of Nursing, University of Haifa Internal Grant, and the University of Haifa research authority internal grant (grant numbers are not available).
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All the personal identifiers have been disguised so the patients described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dagan, E., Modiano-Gattegno, S. & Birenbaum-Carmeli, D. “My choice”: breast cancer patients recollect doctors fertility preservation recommendations. Support Care Cancer 25, 2421–2428 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3648-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-017-3648-1