Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Patients with bone metastases from solid tumors initiating treatment with a bone-targeted agent in 2011: a descriptive analysis using oncology clinic data in the US

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Three bone-targeted agents (BTAs) are approved in the USA for prevention of bone complications among solid tumor patients with bone metastases: two intravenous bisphosphonates (IV BP) (pamidronate and zoledronic acid), and one subcutaneous receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB (RANK) ligand inhibitor (denosumab). Using electronic medical record data from outpatient community and hospital-affiliated oncology clinics, we examined the characteristics of patients who initiated treatment with a BTA in 2011 and followed them for a maximum of 12 months.

Methods

Adult patients with bone metastasis secondary to solid tumors newly treated with a BTA during 2011 were identified from the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records (OSCER) database. We examined patient characteristics at BTA initiation, treatment patterns, and compliance during a 12-month period. Sensitivity analyses were performed in a subgroup of patients who had confirmed 12 months of follow-up data.

Results

Denosumab patients (N = 1,594) were older (65 % ≥65 years vs. 60 % ≥65 years), further along in their disease progression (time since bone metastasis diagnosis: 16 % ≥2 years vs. 10 % ≥2 years), less likely to switch BTA (overall: 6 vs. 14 %; subgroup: 8 vs. 19 %), and more compliant with treatment (overall: median doses of 7 vs. 4; subgroup: 11 vs. 8) compared to IV BP patients (N = 1,975). Findings were consistent across gender, age, tumor type, naïve, and transition strata.

Conclusions

Patients receiving denosumab and IV BPs may differ. Despite higher age and more advanced disease, patients treated with denosumab are more likely to stay on treatment and have better compliance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coleman RE (2006) Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity. Clin Cancer Res 12(20 Pt 2):6243s–6249s. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-0931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Coleman RE (1997) Skeletal complications of malignancy. Cancer 80(8 Suppl):1588–1594

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Paes FM, Ernani V, Hosein P, Serafini AN (2011) Radiopharmaceuticals: when and how to use them to treat metastatic bone pain. J Support Oncol 9(6):197–205. doi:10.1016/j.suponc.2011.06.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN, Simeone J, Knight RD, Mellars K, Reitsma DJ, Heffernan M, Seaman JJ (2000) Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer 88(5):1082–1090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saad F, McKiernan J, Eastham J (2006) Rationale for zoledronic acid therapy in men with hormone-sensitive prostate cancer with or without bone metastasis. Urol Oncol 24(1):4–12. doi:10.1016/j.urolonc.2005.06.020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian NS, Yanagihara R, Hirsh V, Krzakowski M, Pawlicki M, De Souza P, Zheng M, Urbanowitz G, Reitsma D, Seaman J (2004) Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cancer 100(12):2613–2621. doi:10.1002/cncr.20308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Norgaard M, Jensen AO, Jacobsen JB, Cetin K, Fryzek JP, Sorensen HT (2010) Skeletal related events, bone metastasis and survival of prostate cancer: a population based cohort study in Denmark (1999 to 2007). J Urol 184(1):162–167. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Yong M, Jensen AO, Jacobsen JB, Norgaard M, Fryzek JP, Sorensen HT (2011) Survival in breast cancer patients with bone metastases and skeletal-related events: a population-based cohort study in Denmark (1999–2007). Breast Cancer Res Treat 129(2):495–503. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1475-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schulman KL, Kohles J (2007) Economic burden of metastatic bone disease in the U.S. Cancer 109(11):2334–2342. doi:10.1002/cncr.22678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Weinfurt KPCL, Li Y, Timbie JW, Glendenning GA, Schulman KA (2004) Health-related quality of life among patients with breast cancer receiving Zometa or pamidronate disodium for metastatic bone lesions. Med Care 42:164–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. von Moos R, Sternberg C, Body JJ, Bokemeyer C (2013) Reducing the burden of bone metastases: current concepts and treatment options. Support Care Cancer 21(6):1773–1783. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1755-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Berenson JR, Lichtenstein A, Porter L, Dimopoulos MA, Bordoni R, George S, Lipton A, Keller A, Ballester O, Kovacs M, Blacklock H, Bell R, Simeone JF, Reitsma DJ, Heffernan M, Seaman J, Knight RD (1998) Long-term pamidronate treatment of advanced multiple myeloma patients reduces skeletal events. Myeloma Aredia Study Group. J Clin Oncol 16(2):593–602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lipton A, Small E, Saad F, Gleason D, Gordon D, Smith M, Rosen L, Kowalski MO, Reitsma D, Seaman J (2002) The new bisphosphonate, Zometa (zoledronic acid), decreases skeletal complications in both osteolytic and osteoblastic lesions: a comparison to pamidronate. Cancer Investig 20(Suppl 2):45–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stopeck AT, Lipton A, Body JJ, Steger GG, Tonkin K, de Boer RH, Lichinitser M, Fujiwara Y, Yardley DA, Viniegra M, Fan M, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Jun S, Braun A (2010) Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study. J Clin Oncol 28(35):5132–5139. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lau EC, Mowat FS, Kelsh MA, Legg JC, Engel-Nitz NM, Watson HN, Collins HL, Nordyke RJ, Whyte JL (2011) Use of electronic medical records (EMR) for oncology outcomes research: assessing the comparability of EMR information to patient registry and health claims data. Clin Epidemiol 3:259–272. doi:10.2147/CLEP.S23690

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Borja MT, Chow E, Bovett G, Davis L, Gillies C (2004) The correlation among patients and health care professionals in assessing functional status using the karnofsky and eastern cooperative oncology group performance status scales. Support Cancer Ther 2(1):59–63. doi:10.3816/SCT.2004.n.024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jensen PB, Jensen LJ, Brunak S (2012) Mining electronic health records: towards better research applications and clinical care. Nat Rev Genet 13(6):395–405. doi:10.1038/nrg3208

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R, Tchekmedyian S, Venner P, Lacombe L, Chin JL, Vinholes JJ, Goas JA, Chen B (2002) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of zoledronic acid in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 94(19):1458–1468

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mortimer JE, Pal SK (2010) Safety considerations for use of bone-targeted agents in patients with cancer. Semin Oncol 37(Suppl 1):S66–S72. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2010.06.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cleeland CS, Body JJ, Stopeck A, von Moos R, Fallowfield L, Mathias SD, Patrick DL, Clemons M, Tonkin K, Masuda N, Lipton A, de Boer R, Salvagni S, Oliveira CT, Qian Y, Jiang Q, Dansey R, Braun A, Chung K (2013) Pain outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer and bone metastases: results from a randomized, double-blind study of denosumab and zoledronic acid. Cancer 119(4):832–838. doi:10.1002/cncr.27789

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Vadhan-Raj S, von Moos R, Fallowfield LJ, Patrick DL, Goldwasser F, Cleeland CS, Henry DH, Novello S, Hungria V, Qian Y, Feng A, Yeh H, Chung K (2012) Clinical benefit in patients with metastatic bone disease: results of a phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid. Ann Oncol 23(12):3045–3051. doi:10.1093/annonc/mds175

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Matza LS CZ, Chung K, et al (2012) Health state perferences associated with subcutaneous injections and intravenous infusions for treatment of bone metastases. Presented at: Annual Congress of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, Chicago, Illinois, US, 1-5 June

  23. Arellano J, Mohamed AF, Hauber B, Collins H, Hechmati G, Gatta F, Qian Y (2013) Physicians’ preferences for bone metastases treatments in the US. European ISPOR Annual Meeting

  24. Qian Y, Mohamed AF, Hauber B, Collins H, Hechmati G, Gatta F, Arellano J (2013) Patients’ and caregivers’ preferences for bone metastases (BM) treatments in the US. European ISPOR Annual Meeting

  25. Fizazi K, Carducci M, Smith M, Damiao R, Brown J, Karsh L, Milecki P, Shore N, Rader M, Wang H, Jiang Q, Tadros S, Dansey R, Goessl C (2011) Denosumab versus zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in men with castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind study. Lancet 377(9768):813–822. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62344-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Henry DH, Costa L, Goldwasser F, Hirsh V, Hungria V, Prausova J, Scagliotti GV, Sleeboom H, Spencer A, Vadhan-Raj S, von Moos R, Willenbacher W, Woll PJ, Wang J, Jiang Q, Jun S, Dansey R, Yeh H (2011) Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 29(9):1125–1132. doi:10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hatoum HT, Lin SJ, Smith MR, Barghout V, Lipton A (2008) Zoledronic acid and skeletal complications in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases: analysis of a national medical claims database. Cancer 113(6):1438–1445. doi:10.1002/cncr.23775

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank David C. Hallett, University of Toronto, for editorial support for manuscript submission to journal.

Conflict of interest

This work was funded by Amgen, Inc. R. Hernandez, J. Arellano, and A. Liede are employees and stockholders of Amgen, Inc. K. Chen was an employee of Amgen, Inc. at the time of initial manuscript submission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Liede.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hernandez, R.K., Quigley, J., Pirolli, M. et al. Patients with bone metastases from solid tumors initiating treatment with a bone-targeted agent in 2011: a descriptive analysis using oncology clinic data in the US. Support Care Cancer 22, 2697–2705 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2251-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2251-y

Keywords

Navigation