Skip to main content
Log in

High-density lipoprotein (HDL) has an impact on myeloma outcome: Lower HDL associates with worse progression-free survival

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Multiple myeloma (MM) staging is based on beta‑2 MG, albumin, LDH levels, and the presence of chromosomal abnormalities. We aimed to evaluate the impact of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) on myeloma outcomes.

Materials and methods

This study included 148 individuals; 68 patients diagnosed with MM and 80 age, sex, comorbidity-matched controls. The relationship between HDL and myeloma stage and the association between HDL and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.

Results

Sixty-five percent of patients were male in each group. Mean HDL level was higher in the control group than myeloma group (52.6 ± 15.02 mg/dl versus 33.79 ± 12.71) (p < 0.001). According to ISS, 39 patients (57%) had advanced stage (ISS-III) disease. To assess the optimal cut-point for HDL that makes a difference in PFS, the X‑tile software program was used and in line with the created plots, the myeloma cohort was divided into two groups as HDL < 28 and ≥ 28 mg/dl. Twenty-two patients (32.4%) were in HDL < 28 group. According to the ISS, HDL < 28 group had more advanced disease than the HDL ≥ 28 group (p = 0.008). Twenty-nine patients (42.6%) progressed or died during the follow-up and 15 of these were in the HDL < 28 group. Time to progression was shorter in patients who were in the HDL < 28 group (median, 22 versus 40 months, p = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference between these groups in terms of overall survival (p = 0.708).

Conclusion

Myeloma patients have lower HDL than controls and HDL < 28 mg/dl associates with advanced-stage disease and shorter PFS. Therefore, HDL can be a surrogate prognostic marker in myeloma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greipp PR, Miguel JS, Durie BG, Crowley JJ, Barlogie B, Bladé J, Boccadoro M, Child JA, Avet-Loiseau H, RAJJoco K. International staging system for multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(15):3412–20. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2005.04.242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Palumbo A, Avet-Loiseau H, Oliva S, Lokhorst HM, Goldschmidt H, Rosinol L, Richardson P, Caltagirone S, Lahuerta JJ, Facon T. Revised international staging system for multiple myeloma: a report from International Myeloma Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(26):2863–9. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.61.2267.

  3. Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, Blade J, Merlini G, Mateos M‑V, Kumar S, Hillengass J, Kastritis E, Richardson P. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538–e48. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yang S, Damiano MG, Zhang H, Tripathy S, Luthi AJ, Rink JS, Ugolkov AV, Singh AT, Dave SS, Gordon LI. Biomimetic, synthetic HDL nanostructures for lymphoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110(7):2511–6. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1213657110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Li HY, Appelbaum FR, Willman CL, Zager RA, Banker DE. Cholesterol-modulating agents kill acute myeloid leukemia cells and sensitize them to therapeutics by blocking adaptive cholesterol responses. Blood. 2003;101(9):3628–34. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2002-07-2283.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goncalves RP, Rodrigues DG, Maranhao RC. Uptake of high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesteryl esters by human acute leukemia cells. Leuk Res. 2005;29(8):955–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2005.01.013.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jafri H, Alsheikh-Ali AA, Karas RH. Baseline and on-treatment high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and the risk of cancer in randomized controlled trials of lipid-altering therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(25):2846–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.069.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mogilenko DA, Shavva VS, Dizhe EB, Orlov SV, Perevozchikov AP. PPARγ activates ABCA1 gene transcription but reduces the level of ABCA1 protein in HepG2 cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2010;402(3):477–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.053.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jeong SM, Choi T, Kim D, Han K, Kim SJ, Rhee SY, Giovannucci EL, Shin DW. Association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level and risk of hematologic malignancy. Leukemia. 2021;35(5):1356–64. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-01081-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganjali S, Ricciuti B, Pirro M, Butler AE, Atkin SL, Banach M, Sahebkar A. High-density lipoprotein components and functionality in cancer: state-of-the-art. Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2019;30(1):12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tem.2018.10.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuliszkiewicz-Janus M, Malecki R, Mohamed AS. Lipid changes occuring in the course of hematological cancers. Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2008;13(3):465–74. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11658-008-0014-9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Yavasoglu I, Tombuloglu M, Kadikoylu G, Donmez A, Cagirgan S, Bolaman Z. Cholesterol levels in patients with multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol. 2008;87(3):223–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-007-0375-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ozturk E. The relationship between hematological malignancy and lipid profile. Medeni Med J. 2021;36(2):146. https://doi.org/10.5222/MMJ.2021.91145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Poorey VK, Thakur P. Alteration of lipid profile in patients with head and neck malignancy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;68(2):135–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-015-0829-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shen JG, Jin LD, Dong MJ, Wang LB, Zhao WH, Shen J. Low level of serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in gastric cancer correlates with cancer progression but not survival. Transl Cancer Res TCR. 2020;9(10):6206–13. https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-20-1220.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu X, Xu P, Wang L, Zhang C, Wang M, Ouyang J, Chen B. Cholesterol levels provide prognostic information in patients with multiple myeloma. Clin Lab. 2020; https://doi.org/10.7754/Clin.Lab.2019.190824.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cartier S, Zhang B, Rosen VM, Zarotsky V, Bartlett JB, Mukhopadhyay P, Wagner S, Davis C. Relationship between treatment effects on progression-free survival and overall survival in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published clinical trial data. Oncol Res Treat. 2015;38(3):88–94. https://doi.org/10.1159/000375392.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang L, Li J, Fu H, Liu X, Liu P. Identification of high serum apolipoprotein A1 as a favorable prognostic indicator in patients with multiple myeloma. J Cancer. 2019;10(20):4852–9. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.31357.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang H, Chen B, Shao R, Liu W, Xiong L, Li L, Lu Y. A new prediction model integrated serum lipid profile for patients with multiple myeloma. Cancer. 2022;13(6):1796–807. https://doi.org/10.7150/jca.69321.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gordon DJ. Factors affecting high-density lipoproteins. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998;27(3):699–709. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70034-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all of our colleagues and also patients for their assistance.

Funding

This paper was not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

IEÖ, EK, TE, and EÖ performed the research and analyzed and interpreted the data. IEÖ and EK created the figures and wrote the manuscript. IEÖ and TE performed the data analyses and EÖ reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Işıl Erdoğan Özünal MD.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

I. Erdoğan Özünal, E. Kılıçaslan, T. Elibol and E. Öztürk declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

The study was approved by the local ethics committee of Medeniyet University and approved by the provincial health directorate, Istanbul, per the ethical standards formulated in the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Erdoğan Özünal, I., Kılıçaslan, E., Elibol, T. et al. High-density lipoprotein (HDL) has an impact on myeloma outcome: Lower HDL associates with worse progression-free survival. Wien Klin Wochenschr (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-023-02239-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-023-02239-8

Keywords

Navigation