Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Primary surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: comparative results of three surgical techniques

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose

To determine which of the three surgical techniques for acute unilateral complete rupture of Achilles tendons in use at the University Clinical Centre Maribor gives the best short-term functional results.

Methods

In the retrospective analysis of the results of 3 surgical techniques, 262 patients of which 244 (93.1%) were men (mean age 41.6 ± 10.0 years, range 21.5—83.0 years) operated on during the period from 2000 to 2008 were included. Group A (open technique with fascial augmentation) included 42 (16%) patients, group B (original modification of percutaneous suturing according to Čretnik and Kosanović) included 159 (60.7%) patients, and group C (original percutaneous fixation with two embracing and crossed loops according to Kruščić) included 61 (23.3%) patients. The rehabilitation protocol for group C included use of individually manufactured closed ankle functional orthosis, which replaced the plaster cast after 2 weeks of immobilization and permits early ankle range-of-motion exercising and full weight bearing. The functional outcome and incidence of postsurgical complications were analysed from medical records covering the period of 6 months.

Results

Patients from group C achieved the best functional results in the shortest time. The duration of immobilization (5.3 ± 0.1 weeks) and use of crutches (5.3 ± 0.5 weeks) were the shortest. The ability to rise up on toes on the affected leg, to walk on toes and heels, and duration of restriction of physical activities including sports were shorter than in the other two groups (p < 0.001 for all variables). Two reruptures were experienced in group B, one in group C, and none in group A.

Conclusions

Good functional results and a relatively small number of postsurgical complications advocate the use of percutaneous suturing techniques. The best and fastest functional recovery was attained in the group treated with the original technique of percutaneous fixation with two embracing and crossed thread loops according to Kruščić.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Khan RJ, Carey Smith RL. Surgical interventions for treating acute Achilles tendon ruptures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; doi:10.1002/14651858.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mafulli M. Rupture of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81A:1019–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nyyssönen T, Lüthje P, Kröger H. The increasing incidence and difference in sex distribution of Achilles tendon rupture in Finland in 1987–1999. Scand J Surg. 2008;97(3):275–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Unger F. Zdravje je blagostanje – vodilna vloga Evrope pri skrbi za zdravje. Acta Medico Biotech. 2008;1:11–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Čretnik A, Frank A. Incidence and outcome of rupture of the Achilles tendon. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004;116(Suppl 2):33–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Soroceanu A, Sidhwa F, Aarabi S, Kaufman A, Glazebrook M. Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2012;94:2136–43.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Čretnik A, Kosanović M, Smrkolj V. Percutaneous versus open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon. A comparative study. Am J Sports Med. 2005;33:1369–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amendola A. Outcomes of open surgery versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture. Clin J Sport Med. 2014;24(1):90–1. doi:10.1097/JSM.0000000000000064.2202-10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cetti R, Christensen SE, Ejsted R, et al. Operative versus nonoperative treatment of Achilles tendon rupture: a prospective randomised study and review of the literature. Am J Sports Med. 1993;21:791–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kocher MS, Bishop J, Marshall R, Briggs KK, Hawkins RJ. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute Achilles tendon rupture: expected-value decision analysis. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:783–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma GWC, Griffith TG. Percutaneous repair of acute closed ruptured Achillles tedon. Clin Orthop. 1977;128:247–55.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Čretnik A, Kosanović M, Smrkolj V. Percutaneous suturing of the ruptured Achilles tendon under local anesthesia. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2004;43:72–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kauranen K, Kangas J, Leppilahti J. Recovering motor performance of the foot after Achilles rupture repair: a randomized clinical study about early functional treatment vs. early immobilization of Achilles tendon in tension. Foot Ankle Int. 2002;23:60–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Suchak AA, Spooner C, Reid DC, Jomha NM. Postoperative rehabilitation protocols for Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006;445:216–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Suchak AA, Bostick GF, Beaupré LA, Durand DC, Jomha NM. The influence of early weight-bearing compared to non-weight-bearing after surgical repair of the Achilles tendon. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(9):1876–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Müller ME, Allgöwer M, Shnaeider R, Willenegger H. Udžbenik osteosinteze AO – metoda. Zagreb: Jumena; 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pauwels F. (editor) Gesamte Abhandlungen zur funktionellen Anatomie des Bewegungsapparates. Berlin: Springer; 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nikolić V, Hudec M. Biomehanika potpornog sustava. Principi i elementi biomehanike. Zagreb: Školska knjiga; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wong J, Barras V, Maffulli N. Quantitative review of operative and nonoperative management of Achilles tendon ruptures. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30:565–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Khan RJK, Fick D, Keogh A, Crawford J, Brammar T, Parker M. Treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials 2005. http://www.udel.edu/bioms/seminararchives/09_10/Khan%20RJ%20Treatment%20of%20acute%20achilles%20tendon%20rupture%20metananlysis.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Haji A, Sahai A, Symes A, et al. Percutaneous versus open tendo Achillis repair. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:215–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hockenbury RT, Johns JC. A biomechanical in vitro comparison of open versus percutaneous repair of tendon Achilles. Foot Ankle Int. 1990;11:67–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Webb JM, Banister GC. Percutaneous repair of the ruptured tendo Achillis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:877–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lim J, Dalal R, Waseem M. Percutaneous vs. open repair of the ruptured Achilles tendon: a prospective randomized controlled study. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:559–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Twaddle BC, Poon P. Early motion for Achilles tendon ruptures: is surgery important? A randomized, prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:2033–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van der Eng DM, Schepers T, Goslings JC, Schep NWL. Rerupture rate after early weightbearing in operative versus conservative treatments of Achilles tendon ruptures: a meta-analysis. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(5):622–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jomha NM, Suchak A, Beaupre L. et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing early weight bearing vs. non-weight bearing after Achilles tendon rupture. Presented at the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society 23rd Annual Summer Meeting. July 13–15, 2007. Toronto 2007. http://www.orthosupersite.com/view.asp?rID=22850. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, University Clinical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia

    Dragan Lonzarić & Breda Jesenšek Papež

  2. Emergency Surgery Department, University Clinical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia

    Aleksandar Kruščić

  3. Department for Biomedicine Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Maribor, Taborska 8, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia

    Dejan Dinevski

  4. Centre for Interdisciplinary and Multidisciplinary Research and Studies (CIMRS), University of Maribor, Krekova 2, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia

    Petra Povalej Bržan

Authors
  1. Dragan Lonzarić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aleksandar Kruščić
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dejan Dinevski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Petra Povalej Bržan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Breda Jesenšek Papež
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dragan Lonzarić.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

D. Lonzarić, A. Kruščić, D. Dinevski, P. Povalej Bržan and B. Jesenšek Papež declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lonzarić, D., Kruščić, A., Dinevski, D. et al. Primary surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture: comparative results of three surgical techniques. Wien Klin Wochenschr 129, 176–185 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1158-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-016-1158-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation