Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Endovascular versus operative treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a comparison of results from a low-volume neurosurgical centre

  • original article
  • Published:
Wiener klinische Wochenschrift Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Background

Subarachnoid haemorrhage is a debilitating disease. The treatment options include surgical clipping or endovascular embolisation. Still, many controversies exist about which method is more convenient.

Methods

In the retrospective study from January 2006 to December 2013, 129 patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage were analysed. They were classified according to the WFNS grade and Fisher scale. The diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms was based on computerised tomographic angiography and digital subtraction angiography. All patients received the standard therapy against vasospasm. The treatment outcome was evaluated with Glasgow Outcome Scale.

Results

Of 129 patients, surgery was employed in 40, endovascular obliteration in 86 patients and 3 patients received both forms of treatment. Four factors were statistically significant for worse results in the univariate analysis: the age, WFNS grade, Fisher grade and the presence of clinical vasospasm. In the multivariate analysis, only the age, WFNS grade and the presence of clinical vasospasm remained statistically significant for the outcome. There was a trend towards better outcome for the patients that had endovascular treatment compared with patients who were treated surgically, although the difference was not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Although the endovascular embolisation in relation to the surgical clipping is becoming a more popular treatment method for ruptured cerebral aneurysms it cannot offer reliable endovascular exclusion in all types of aneurysms. Based on our experience, it is therefore necessary to look at these two methods as complementary that may both be used separately or in combination for the well-being of the patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2. Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(1):8–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V. Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1. Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg. 1991;75(1):1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elias T, Ogungbo B, Connolly D, Gregson B, Mendelow AD, Gholkar A. Endovascular treatment of anterior communicating artery aneurysms: results of clinical and radiological outcome in Newcastle. Br J Neurosurg. 2003;17(3):278–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman JA, Nichols DA, Meyer FB, Pichelmann MA, Mclver JI, Toussaint LG, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms: retrospective review of a 10-year single center experience. Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;24(3):526–33.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lampert TE, Malek AM, Halbach VV, Phatouros CC, Meyers PM, Dowd CF, et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured posterior circulation cerebral aneurysms. Clinical and angiographic outcomes. Stroke. 2000;31(1):100–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, Gobin YP, Jahan R, Frazee J, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience. J Neurosurg. 2003;98(5):959–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ng P, Khangure MS, Phatouros CC, Bynevelt M, ApSimon H, McAuliffe W. Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: analysis of midterm angiographic and clinical outcomes. Stroke. 2002;33(1):210–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McKissock W, Richardson A, Walsh L. Posterior communicating aneurysms: a controlled trial of conservative and surgical treatment of ruptured aneurysms of the internal carotid artery at or near the point of origin of the posterior communicating artery. Lancet. 1960;1:203–6.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McKissock W, Richardson A, Walsh L. Anterior communicating aneurysms: a trial of conservative and surgical treatment. Lancet. 1965;1(7391):873–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. McKissock W, Richardson A, Walsh L. Middle crebral aneurysms: further results of controlled trial of conservative and surgical treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms. Lancet. 1962;2:417–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Powell J, Kitchen N, Heslin J, Greenwood R. Psychosocial outcomes at three and nine months after good neurological recovery from aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage: predictors and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72(6):772–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Vannienen R, Koivisto T, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: acute endovascular treatment with electrolytically detachable coils: a prospective randomized study. Radiology. 1999;211(2):325–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. Stroke. 2003;31(10):2369–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimptom J, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms; International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group: a randomised trial. Lancet. 2002;360(9342):1267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Minh T, Hwang PYK, Nguyen KC, Ng I. Neurosurgical management of intracranial aneurysms following unsuccessful or incomplete endovascular therapy. Br J Neurosurg. 2006;20:306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Helland CA, Krakenes J, Moen G, Wester K. A population-based study of neurosurgical and endovascular treatment of ruptured, intracranial aneurysms in a small neurosurgical unit. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(6):1168–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bunc G, Ravnik J, Seruga T. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: report from a low-volume center. Wien Klin Wochensch. 2006;118(2):6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Choudhari KA. ISUIA, ISAT and the National Study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: changing trends and implications for neurovascular services in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Br J Neurosurg. 2006;20(6):375–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fraser JF, Riina H, Mitra N, Gobin YP, Simon AS, Stieg PE. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: looking to the past to register the future. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(6):1157–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindsay KW. The impact of the International Subarachnoid Aneurysms Treatment Trial (ISAT) on neurosurgical practice. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003;145(2):97–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Takao H, Nojo T, Ohtomo K. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a decision analysis. Br J Radiol. 2008;81(964):299–303.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bakker NA, Metzemaekers JD, Groen RJM, Mooij JJ, Van Dijk JMC. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial 2009: endovascular coiling of ruptured intracranial aneurysms has no significant advantage over neurosurgical clipping. Neurosurgery. 2010;66(5):961–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lanzino G, Fraser K, Kanaan Y, Wagenbach A. Treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms since the International Subarachnoid Aneurysms Trial: practice utilizing clip ligation and coil embolization as individual or complementary therapies. J Neurosurg. 2006;104(3):344–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ausman JI. Why is surgical neurology publishing a series on surgery for cerebral aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2007;67(1):5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pierot L, Cognard C, Anxionnat R, Ricolfi F. Remodeling technique for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms had a higher rate of adequate postoperative occlusion than did conventional coil embolization with comparable safety. Radiology. 2011;258(2):246–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tenjin H, Takadou M, Ogawa T, Mandai A, Umebayashi D, Osaka Y, et al. Treatment selection for ruptured aneurysm and outcomes: clipping or coil embolization. Neurol Med Chir. 2011;51:23–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pierot L, Cognard C, Anixonnat R, Ricolfi F. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: factors affecting the rate and outcome of endovascular treatment complications in a series of 782 patients (CLARITY Study). Radiology. 2010;256(3):916–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Ghodke B, Britz GW, Bhagawati D, Temkin N. Outcomes of ruptured intracranial aneurysms treated by microsurgical clipping and endovascular coiling in a high-volume center. J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(4):753–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lafuente J, Maurice-Williams RS. Ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the outcome of surgical treatment in experienced hands in the period prior to the advent of endovascular coiling. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2003;74(12):1680–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Naso WB, Rhea AH, Poole A. Management and outcomes in a low-volume cerebral aneurysm practice. Neurosurgery. 2003;48(1):959–66.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lindekleiv HM, Jacobsden EA, Kloster R, Sandell T, Isaksen JG, Romner B, et al. Introduction of endovascular embolization for intracranial aneurysms in a low-volume institution. Acta Radiol. 2013;50(5):554–61.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Seule MA, Steinen MN, Gautschi OP, Richter H, Desbiolles L, Leschka S, et al. Surgical treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in a low-volume hospital—outcome and review of literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114(6):668–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Seruga T. Interventional neuroradiology in endovascular treatment of central nervous system disorders. Med Razgl. 1999;38:113–24.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Seruga T, Milojkovic V, Bunc G, Klein GE. Endovascular treatment of intracranial artery aneurysms. Zdrav Vestn. 2000;69:607–12.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Heros RC. Clip ligation or coil occlusion? J Neurosurg. 2006;104:341–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Qureshi AI, Vazquez G, Tariq N, Suri MFK, Lakshminarayan K, Lanzino G. Impact of international subarachnoid aneurysm trial results on treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United States. J Neurosurg. 2011;114(3):834–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Tetickovic E, Menih M, Magdic J. TCD monitoring of cerebral blood flow. Acta Medico-biotechnica. 2009;2:11–8.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Clinical Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Maribor, Ljubljanska ulica 5, 2000, Maribor, Slovenia

    Gorazd Bunc, Janez Ravnik, Matjaz Vorsic, Tomaz Smigoc & Tomaz Velnar

  2. Department of Radiology, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia

    Tomaz Seruga & Marko Jevsek

Authors
  1. Gorazd Bunc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Janez Ravnik
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matjaz Vorsic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomaz Seruga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marko Jevsek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tomaz Smigoc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Tomaz Velnar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomaz Velnar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there are no actual or potential conflicts of interest in relation to this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bunc, G., Ravnik, J., Vorsic, M. et al. Endovascular versus operative treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a comparison of results from a low-volume neurosurgical centre. Wien Klin Wochenschr 128, 354–359 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0908-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-015-0908-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation