Skip to main content
Log in

Multi-attribute group decision-making in site selection of solar photovoltaic cells under triangular Pythagorean fuzzy environment

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper aims to present a multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) technique where inputs of the decision-makers (DMs) have been collected using triangular Pythagorean fuzzy numbers (TPFNs) to capture the uncertainty of the real-world scenario better. The correlation consensus degree has been calculated to determine the weights of DMs. The correlation between a DM’s judgment and collective judgment has been estimated to determine how much any individual judgment resembles the collective judgment. Accordingly, weights have been allocated to the DMs. Dombi aggregation operator (DAO), known for demonstrating good flexibility with the operational parameter, has been developed in the triangular Pythagorean fuzzy environment for information fusion. Furthermore, the properties of the newly introduced operator, namely the triangular Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation (TPFDA) operator, are described. To determine the criteria weights, preference and non-preference of one criterion over another are expressed in terms of the strength and weakness scores based on the advantage and disadvantage scores, respectively. An optimization model is developed for maximizing the overall satisfaction degree utilizing the strength and weakness scores. The methodology has been applied for the site selection problem for installing solar photovoltaic (PV) cells in India. Many analyses have been performed to demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The manuscript has no associated data. The data used is included in the manuscript.

References

  • Akram M, Dudek WA, Dar JM (2019) Pythagorean Dombi fuzzy aggregation operators with application in multicriteria decision-making. Int J Intell Syst 34(11):3000–3019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Ramzan N, Deveci M (2023) Linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy CRITIC-EDAS method for multiple-attribute group decision analysis. Eng Appl Artif Intell 119:105777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akram M, Nawaz HS, Deveci M (2023) Attribute reduction and information granulation in Pythagorean fuzzy formal contexts. Expert Syst Appl 222:119794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Khan MS, Abdullah S, Ali A (2019) Multiattribute group decision-making based on Pythagorean fuzzy Einstein prioritized aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 34(5):1001–1033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali Z, Mahmood T (2022) Some Dombi aggregation operators based on complex q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets and their application to multi-attribute decision making. Comput Appl Math 41(1):1–40

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Arora H, Naithani A, Gupta S (2022) Distance measures of Pythagorean fuzzy TOPSIS approach for online food delivery apps. Int J Eng Res 35(10):1877–1886

    Google Scholar 

  • Atanassov KT (1999) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. In: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Springer, pp 1–137

  • Aydin S, Kahraman C, Kabak M (2020) Development of harmonic aggregation operator with trapezoidal Pythagorean fuzzy numbers. Soft Comput 24(15):11791–11803

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ayyildiz E, Erdogan M, Taskin Gumus A (2021) A Pythagorean fuzzy number-based integration of AHP and WASPAS methods for refugee camp location selection problem: a real case study for Istanbul, Turkey. Neural Comput Appl 33(22):15751–15768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Debnath K, Roy SK (2023) Power partitioned neutral aggregation operators for t-spherical fuzzy sets: an application to H2 refuelling site selection. Expert Syst Appl 216:119470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhiman HS, Deb D (2020) Fuzzy TOPSIS and fuzzy COPRAS based multi-criteria decision making for hybrid wind farms. Energy 202:117755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombi J (1982) A general class of fuzzy operators, the DeMorgan class of fuzzy operators and fuzziness measures induced by fuzzy operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 8(2):149–163

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Donyatalab Y, Farrokhizadeh E, Garmroodi SDS, Shishavan SAS (2019) Harmonic mean aggregation operators in spherical fuzzy environment and their group decision making applications. J Mult Valued Log Soft Comput 33(6):565–592

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • El-Bayeh CZ, Alzaareer K, Brahmi B, Zellagui M, Eicker U (2021) An original multi-criteria decision-making algorithm for solar panels selection in buildings. Energy 217:119396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H (2018) A linear programming method based on an improved score function for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy numbers and its application to decision-making. Int J Uncertain Fuzz 26(1):67–80

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Garg H (2018) Generalised Pythagorean fuzzy geometric interactive aggregation operators using Einstein operations and their application to decision making. J Exp Theor Artif Intell 30(6):763–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghenai C, Albawab M, Bettayeb M (2020) Sustainability indicators for renewable energy systems using multi-criteria decision-making model and extended SWARA/ARAS hybrid method. Renew Energy 146:580–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Roy SK, Fügenschuh A (2022) The multi-objective solid transportation problem with preservation technology using Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Fuzzy Syst 24(6):2687–2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh S, Küfer KH, Roy SK, Weber GW (2022) Carbon mechanism on sustainable multi-objective solid transportation problem for waste management in Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy environment. Complex Intell Syst 8(5):4115–4143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gökmener S, Oğuz E, Deveci M, Göllü K (2023) Site selection for floating photovoltaic system on dam reservoirs using sine trigonometric decision making model. Ocean Eng 281:114820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Arteaga T, De Andrés Calle R, Chiclana F (2016) A new measure of consensus with reciprocal preference relations: the correlation consensus degree. Knowl Based Syst 107:104–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guan T (2022) Green logistics partner selection based on Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy set and multiobjective optimization. Math Probl Eng 2022:6993066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Lin CT, Mehlawat MK, Grover N (2015) A new method for intuitionistic fuzzy multiattribute decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Syst 46(9):1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Ahemad F (2021) An MAGDM approach with q-rung orthopair trapezoidal fuzzy information for waste disposal site selection problem. Int J Intell Syst 36(9):4524–4559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Ahemad F (2023) Selection of renewable energy sources: a novel VIKOR approach in an intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic environment. Environ Dev Sustain 25(4):3429–3467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Lin M, Xu Z (2020) Pythagorean fuzzy MULTIMOORA method based on distance measure and score function: its application in multicriteria decision making process. Knowl Inf Syst 62(11):4373–4406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IREDA (2022) Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency Limited. https://www.ireda.in/home/. Accessed Jul 2022

  • Jana J, Roy SK (2023) Linguistic Pythagorean hesitant fuzzy matrix game and its application in multi-criteria decision making. Appl Intell 53(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jana C, Senapati T, Pal M (2019) Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its applications in multiple attribute decision-making. Int J Intell Syst 34(9):2019–2038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing N, Xian S, Xiao Y (2017) Pythagorean triangular fuzzy linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application for multi-attribute decision making. In: 2017 2nd IEEE international conference on computational intelligence and applications (ICCIA). IEEE, pp 435–439

  • Khanlari A, Alhuyi Nazari M (2022) A review on the applications of multi-criteria decision-making approaches for power plant site selection. J Therm Anal Calorim 147:4473–4489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar K, Chen SM (2022) Multiple attribute group decision making based on advanced linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy weighted averaging aggregation operator of linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers. Inf Sci 587:813–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei F, Lu J, Wei G, Wu J, Wei C, Guo Y (2020) GRA method for waste incineration plants location problem with probabilistic linguistic multiple attribute group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 39(3):2909–2920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Liu X, Ma G, Liang Z, Wang C, Alsaadi FE (2020) A multi-attribute group decision-making method based on linguistic intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 19(2):499–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Xu H, Geng Y (2020) Normal wiggly hesitant fuzzy linguistic power Hamy mean aggregation operators and their application to multi-attribute decision-making. Comput Ind Eng 140:106224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Khan Q, Mahmood T, Khan RA, Khan HU (2021) Some improved Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi power aggregation operators with application in multiple-attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 40(5):9237–9257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luqman A, Akram M, Alcantud JCR (2021) Digraph and matrix approach for risk evaluations under Pythagorean fuzzy information. Expert Syst Appl 170:114518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood T, Rehman UU (2022) A method to multi-attribute decision making technique based on Dombi aggregation operators under bipolar complex fuzzy information. Comput Appl Math 41(1):1–23

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MNRE (2022) Ministry of new and renewable energy. https://mnre.gov.in/. Accessed Jul 2022

  • Mondal A, Roy SK (2022) Application of Choquet integral in interval type-2 Pythagorean fuzzy sustainable supply chain management under risk. Int J Intell Syst 37(1):217–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norouzi M, Fleet DJ, Salakhutdinov RR (2012) Hamming distance metric learning. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 25

  • Ozdemir S, Sahin G (2018) Multi-criteria decision-making in the location selection for a solar PV power plant using AHP. Measurement 129:218–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qahtan S, Alsattar HA, Zaidan AA, Deveci M, Pamucar D, Martinez L (2023) A comparative study of evaluating and benchmarking sign language recognition system-based wearable sensory devices using a single fuzzy set. Knowl Based Syst 269:110519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin J (2017) Interval type-2 fuzzy Hamy mean operators and their application in multiple criteria decision making. Granul Comput 2(4):249–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman K, Abdullah S, Ali A, Amin F (2020) Pythagorean fuzzy ordered weighted averaging aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute group decision-making. EURO J Decis Process 8:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz M, Athar Farid HM, Kalsoom H, Pamučar D, Chu YM (2020) A robust q-rung orthopair fuzzy Einstein prioritized aggregation operators with application towards MCGDM. Symmetry 12(6):1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saeed M, Ahmad MR, Rahman AU (2023) Refined Pythagorean fuzzy sets: properties, set-theoretic operations and axiomatic results. J Comput Cogn Eng 2(1):10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Saraswat S, Digalwar AK, Yadav S, Kumar G (2021) MCDM and GIS based modelling technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India. Renew Energy 169:865–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar A, Biswas A (2022) Interval-valued hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Archimedean aggregation operators and their application to multicriteria decision-making. Decis Anal 4:100097

    Google Scholar 

  • Sindhu S, Nehra V, Luthra S (2017) Investigation of feasibility study of solar farms deployment using hybrid AHP-TOPSIS analysis: Case study of India. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 73:496–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun G, Wang M, Li X (2022) Centroid coordinate ranking of Pythagorean fuzzy numbers and its application in group decision making. Cogn Comput 14(2):602–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolga AC, Parlak IB, Castillo O (2020) Finite-interval-valued type-2 Gaussian fuzzy numbers applied to fuzzy TODIM in a healthcare problem. Eng Appl Artif Intell 87:103352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umer R, Touqeer M, Omar AH, Ahmadian A, Salahshour S, Ferrara M (2021) Selection of solar tracking system using extended TOPSIS technique with interval type-2 Pythagorean fuzzy numbers. Optim Eng 22(4):2205–2231

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Verma R, Mittal A (2023) Multiple attribute group decision-making based on novel probabilistic ordered weighted cosine similarity operators with Pythagorean fuzzy information. Granul Comput 8(1):111–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wan SP, Jin Z, Dong JY (2020) A new order relation for Pythagorean fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making. Knowl Inf Syst 62(2):751–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Liu X (2012) Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(5):923–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang JJ, Yang DL (2007) Using a hybrid multi-criteria decision aid method for information systems outsourcing. Comput Oper Res 34(12):3691–3700

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CN, Nguyen NAT, Dang TT, Bayer J (2021) A two-stage multiple criteria decision making for site selection of solar photovoltaic (PV) power plant: a case study in Taiwan. IEEE Access 9:75509–75525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang CN, Dang TT, Nguyen NAT, Wang JW (2022) A combined data envelopment analysis (DEA) and grey based multiple criteria decision making (G-MCDM) for solar PV power plants site selection: a case study in Vietnam. Energy Rep 8:1124–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Zhang B, Wu C, Zhang T, Liu F (2019) Optimal site selection for parabolic trough concentrating solar power plant using extended PROMETHEE method: a case in China. Renew Energy 143:1910–1927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xing Y, Zhang R, Wang J, Bai K, Xue J (2020) A new multi-criteria group decision-making approach based on q-rung orthopair fuzzy interaction Hamy mean operators. Neural Comput Appl 32(11):7465–7488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu W, Shang X, Wang J (2021) Multiple attribute group decision-making based on cubic linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy sets and power Hamy mean. Complex Intell Syst 7(3):1673–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28(5):436–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazbek HA, Surriya F, Khan SU, Jan N, Marinkovic D (2023) A novel approach to model the economic characteristics of an organization by interval-valued complex Pythagorean fuzzy information. J Comput Cogn Eng 2(1):75–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Su P (2022) Research on the English classroom teaching effect evaluation with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy grey relational analysis method. Math Probl Eng 2022:7445250

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Ma W, Chen L (2014) New similarity of triangular fuzzy number and its application. Sci World J 2014:215047

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao M, Wei G, Wei C, Wu J (2021) Pythagorean fuzzy TODIM method based on the cumulative prospect theory for MAGDM and its application on risk assessment of science and technology projects. Int J Fuzzy Syst 23(4):1027–1041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou L, Wu J, Chen H (2014) Linguistic continuous ordered weighted distance measure and its application to multiple attributes group decision making. Appl Soft Comput 25:266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Guest Editor, Editorial Board, and all the reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestion in improving the article. The second author acknowledges research grant provided by the Institution of Eminence, University of Delhi, Delhi110007 under Faculty Research Program.

Funding

There is no funding to report for this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have equally contributed to the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The authors confirm that they have abided to the publication ethics and state that this work is original and has not been used for publication anywhere before.

Informed consent

This article does not involve any human participants or animals.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sharma, P., Mehlawat, M.K., Verma, S. et al. Multi-attribute group decision-making in site selection of solar photovoltaic cells under triangular Pythagorean fuzzy environment. Soft Comput (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09009-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-023-09009-8

Keywords

Navigation