Skip to main content
Log in

Games with incomplete information and uncertain payoff: from the perspective of uncertainty theory

  • Methodologies and Application
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a game with incomplete information, players do not possess full information about their opponents. For such a game, Bayesian approaches which are based on probability theory were employed to find the equilibria. Sometimes, players are lack of data for probabilistic reasoning in which case Bayesian methods cannot be used. In this paper, we adopt a new mathematical framework—uncertainty theory to solve such a game. The player’s type (incomplete information) is modeled as an uncertain variable. In addition to previous studies, the payoff for each player is uncertain in our research, which is a realistic assumption in practice. We first define the games with incomplete information with uncertain payoff (Iu-game). Then, we create a new game (U-game) as a method to solve Iu-game. A theorem is provided to show that the equilibria are the same for both games. We use an example to illustrate the application of the proposed theorem. Finally, we generalize the form of U-game and show the equilibria are independent of the incomplete information.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The normal form of a game with some indeterminacy is a determinate game where the payoff is taken the expected value with respect to the random or uncertain variables. In this paper, equilibria are associated with the normal form of the game.

  2. We adopt the basic logic of Harsanyi (1967) but differ him on assumptions of how the Nature selects the players’ types. He assumed the process of selection is a random process (\(c_i\) is a random variable), while we assume the process of selection is an uncertain process (\(c_i\) is an uncertain variable).

References

  • Athey S (2001) Single crossing properties and the existence of pure strategy equilibria in games of incomplete information. Econometrica 69(4):861–889

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bergemann D, Morris S (2013) Robust predictions in games with incomplete information. Econometrica 81(4):1251–1308

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bergemann D, Morris S (2016) Bayes correlated equilibrium and the comparison of information structures in games. Theor Econ 11(2):487–522

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Brunner N, Linden N (2013) Connection between bell nonlocality and Bayesian game theory. Nat Commun 4(7):2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Dan AR (2012) B-spline method of uncertain statistics with applications to estimate travel distance. J Uncertain Syst 6(4):256–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekel E, Fudenberg D, Levine DK (2004) Learning to play Bayesian games. Games Econ Behav 46(2):282–303

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ebenbach DH, Moore CF (2000) Incomplete information, inferences, and individual differences: the case of environmental judgments. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 81(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J (2013) Uncertain bimatrix game with applications. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 12(1):65–78

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y (2012a) Uncertain inference control for balancing an inverted pendulum. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 11(4):481–492

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gao Y (2012b) Uncertain models for single facility location problems on networks. Appl Math Model 36(6):2592–2599

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I, Marinacci M (2016) Ambiguity and the Bayesian paradigm. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gilboa I, Postlewaite A, Schmeidler D (2008) Probabilities in economic modeling. J Econ Perspect 22:173–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi JC (1967) Games with incomplete information played by ‘Bayesian’ players, I. The basic model. Manag Sci 14(3):159–182

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi JC (1968a) Games with incomplete information played by ‘Bayesian’ players, part II. Bayesian equilibrium points. Manag Sci 14(5):320–334

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi JC (1968b) Games with incomplete information played by ‘Bayesian’ players, part III. The basic probability distribution of the game. Manag Sci 14(7):486–502

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(5):863–877

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu SC, Wang TC (2011) Solving multi-criteria decision making with incomplete linguistic preference relations. Exp Syst Appl 38(9):10882–10888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2007) Uncertainty theory. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2009a) Some research problems in uncertainty theory. J Uncertain Syst 3(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2009b) Theory and practice of uncertain programming. Springer, Berlin

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2010a) Uncertain set theory and uncertain inference rule with application to uncertain control. J Uncertain Syst 4(2):83–98

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2010b) Uncertainty theory: a branch of mathematics for modeling human uncertainty. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B (2012) Why is there a need for uncertainty theory. J Uncertain Syst 6(1):3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Ning Y, Yu X (2013) Reverse logistics network in uncertain environment. Inf Jpn 16(2):1243

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet I (1997) The effectiveness of alternative preference elicitation methods in the analytic hierarchy process. J Multi-criteria Decis Anal 6(1):41–51

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Myerson R (2004) Harsanyi’s games with incomplete information. Manag Sci 50:1818–1824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng J, Yao K (2011) A new option pricing model for stocks in uncertainty markets. Int J Oper Res 8(2):18–26

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Ureña R, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2015a) Confidence-consistency driven group decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations. Knowl Based Syst 89(C):86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ureña R, Chiclana F, Morente-Molinera JA, Herrera-Viedma E (2015b) Managing incomplete preference relations in decision making: a review and future trends. Inf Sci 302(C):14–32

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O (1953) Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wen M, Qin Z, Kang R (2014) The \(\alpha \)-cost minimization model for capacitated facility location-allocation problem with uncertain demands. Fuzzy Optim Decis Making 13(3):345–356

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Gao J (2013) Uncertain differential games with application to capitalism. J Uncertainty Anal Appl 1(1):17

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Gao J (2014) Uncertain core for coalitional game with uncertain payoffs. J Uncertain Syst 8(1):13–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Gao J (2016) Linear quadratic uncertain differential game with application to resource extraction problem. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 24(4):819–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Gao J (2017) Bayesian equilibria for uncertain bimatrix game with asymmetric information. J Intell Manuf 28(3):515–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao K (2013) Extreme values and integral of solution of uncertain differential equation. J Uncertainty Anal Appl 1(1):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao K, Li X (2012) Uncertain alternating renewal process and its application. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(6):1154–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang Q, Zhou J (2013) Two uncertain programming models for inverse minimum spanning tree problem. Ind Eng Manag Syst 12(1):9–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong S, Chen Y, Zhou J, Liu Y (2017) An interactive satisficing approach for multi-objective optimization with uncertain parameters. J Intell Manuf 28(3):535–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, He X, Wang K (2014) Uncertain quadratic minimum spanning tree problem. J Commun 9(5):385–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China Nos. 71704007, 61703014, the Base Project of Beijing Social Science Foundation No. 17JDGLB019

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuchen Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Loia.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

The research framework is displayed in Fig. 2.

Fig. 2
figure 2

The research framework

We introduce some fundamental concepts and properties in uncertainty theory including uncertain measure, uncertain variable and expected value.

Definition 7

(Liu 2007) Let \(\mathcal {L}\) be a \(\sigma \)-algebra on a nonempty set \(\varGamma \). A set function \(\mathcal {M}: \mathcal {L}\rightarrow [0,1]\) is called an uncertain measure if it satisfies the following axioms,

Axiom 1.\(\mathcal {M}\{\varGamma \}=1\)for the universal set\(\varGamma \);

Axiom 2.\(\mathcal {M}\{\varLambda \}+\mathcal {M}\{\varLambda ^{c}\}=1\)for any event\(\varLambda \);

Axiom 3. For every countable sequence of events \(\varLambda _1, \varLambda _2,\) \(\ldots ,\) we have

$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle \mathcal {M}\left\{ \bigcup _{i=1}^{\infty }\varLambda _i\right\} \le \sum _{i=1}^{\infty }\mathcal {M}\{\varLambda _i\}. \end{aligned}$$

In order to provide the operational law, Liu (2009a) defined the product uncertain measure on the product \(\sigma \)-algebra \(\mathcal {L}\), called product axiom.

Axiom 4. Let\((\varGamma _k,\mathcal {L}_k,\mathcal {M}_k)\)be uncertainty spaces for\(k=1, 2, \ldots \)The product uncertain measure\(\mathcal {M}\)is an uncertain measure satisfying

$$\begin{aligned} \displaystyle \mathcal {M}\left\{ \prod _{k=1}^\infty \varLambda _k\right\} =\bigwedge _{k=1}^\infty \mathcal {M}_k\{\varLambda _k\} \end{aligned}$$

where\(\varLambda _k\)are arbitrarily chosen events from\(\mathcal {L}_k\)for\(k=1, 2, \ldots \), respectively.

Definition 8

(Liu 2007) An uncertain variable \(\xi \) is a function from an uncertainty space \((\varGamma ,\mathcal {L},\mathcal {M})\) to the set of real numbers such that for any Borel set B of real numbers, the set

$$\begin{aligned} \{\xi \in B\} = \{\gamma \in \varGamma |\xi (\gamma )\in B\} \end{aligned}$$

is an event.

In order to describe uncertain variable in practice, uncertainty distribution \(\varPhi :\mathfrak {R}\rightarrow [0,1]\) of an uncertain variable \(\xi \) is defined as \(\varPhi (x)=\mathcal {M}\left\{ \xi \le x\right\} \). An uncertainty distribution \(\varPhi (x)\) is said to be regular if it is a continuous and strictly increasing function with respect to x at which \(0<\varPhi (x)<1\), and

$$\begin{aligned} \lim _{x\rightarrow -\infty }\varPhi (x)=0,\lim _{x\rightarrow +\infty }\varPhi (x)=1. \end{aligned}$$

If \(\xi \) is an uncertain variable with regular uncertainty distribution \(\varPhi \), then we call the inverse function \(\varPhi ^{-1}(\alpha )\) as the inverse uncertainty distribution of \(\xi \).

An uncertain variable \(\xi \) is called linear if it has a linear uncertainty distribution

$$\begin{aligned} \varPhi (x)=\left\{ \begin{array}{ll} 0, &{}\quad {x< a }\\ \displaystyle \frac{x-a}{b-a},&{} \quad {a \le x < b}\\ 1, &{} \quad {x \ge b} \end{array}\right. \end{aligned}$$

denoted by \(\mathcal {L}(a,b)\), where a and b are real numbers with \(a<b\). The inverse uncertainty distribution of linear uncertain variable \(\mathcal {L}(a,b)\) is

$$\begin{aligned} \varPhi ^{-1}(\alpha )=(1-\alpha )a+\alpha b. \end{aligned}$$

Definition 9

(Liu 2009a) The uncertain variables \(\xi _1,\xi _2,\ldots ,\xi _m\) are said to be independent if

$$\begin{aligned} \mathcal {M}\left\{ \bigcap \limits _{i=1}^m\left\{ \xi _i\in B_i\right\} \right\} =\bigwedge _{i=1}^m\mathcal {M}\left\{ \xi _i\in B_i\right\} \end{aligned}$$

for any Borel sets \(B_1,B_2,\ldots ,B_m\) of real numbers.

The expected value operator of uncertain variable, proposed by Liu (2007), is the average value of uncertain variable in the sense of uncertain measure and represents the size of uncertain variable.

Definition 10

(Liu 2007) Let \(\xi \) be an uncertain variable. Then the expected value of \(\xi \) is defined as

$$\begin{aligned} {E}[\xi ]=\int _0^{+\infty }\mathcal {M}\{\xi \ge x\}\mathrm{d}x- \int _{-\infty }^0\mathcal {M}\{\xi \le x\}\mathrm{d}x \end{aligned}$$

provided that at least one of the two integrals is finite.

For an uncertain variable \(\xi \) with uncertainty distribution \(\varPhi (x)\), Liu (2010b) showed that its expected value can be obtained by

$$\begin{aligned} {E}[\xi ]=\displaystyle \int _{-\infty }^{+\infty }x\mathrm{d}\varPhi (x). \end{aligned}$$
(3)

Furthermore, if \(\varPhi (x)\) is regular, then

$$\begin{aligned} {E}[\xi ]=\displaystyle \int _0^{1}\varPhi ^{-1}(\alpha )\mathrm{d}\alpha . \end{aligned}$$
(4)

Theorem 3

(Liu 2009a) Let \(\xi \) and \(\eta \) be independent uncertain variables with finite expected values. Then for any real numbers a and b, we have

$$\begin{aligned} {E}[a\xi +b\eta ]=a{E}[\xi ]+b{E}[\eta ]. \end{aligned}$$

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Y., Yang, Z. Games with incomplete information and uncertain payoff: from the perspective of uncertainty theory. Soft Comput 23, 13669–13678 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03906-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-019-03906-7

Keywords

Navigation