Skip to main content
Log in

A novel group decision-making model based on triangular neutrosophic numbers

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In group decision-making (GDM) model, experts often evaluate their opinion by using triangular fuzzy numbers. The preference relations with triangular fuzzy numbers are in consistent in nature, so we turned to neutrosophic in this paper. It is very important to take into account consistency of expert opinion and consensus degree in GDM. In order to distinguish the typical consistency, the concept of additive approximation consistency is proposed for triangular neutrosophic additive reciprocal matrices. The properties of triangular neutrosophic additive reciprocal matrices with additive approximation consistency are studied in detail. Second, by using \((n-1)\) restricted preference values, a triangular neutrosophic additive reciprocal preference relation with additive approximation consistency is constructed. The differences among expert’s opinions are measured using consensus degree. For generating a collective triangular neutrosophic additive reciprocal matrix with additive approximation consistency, the neutrosophic triangular weighted aggregation operator is used. Finally, a novel algorithm for the group decision-making problem with triangular neutrosophic additive reciprocal preference relations is presented. A numerical example is carried out to illustrate the proposed definitions and algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez J, Delgado-Galván X, Izquierdo J, Pérez-García R (2012) Improving consistency in AHP decision-making processes. Appl Math Comput 219(2):2432–2441

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan G, Çifçi G (2012) A new incomplete preference relations based approach to quality function deployment. Inf Sci 206:30–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrerizo FJ, Pérez IJ, Herrera-Viedma E (2010) Managing the consensus in group decision making in an unbalanced fuzzy linguistic context with incomplete information. Knowl-Based Syst 23(2):169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2001) Integrating multiplicative preference relations in a multipurpose decision-making model based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 122(2):277–291

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D (2011) The role of fuzzy sets in decision sciences: old techniques and new directions. Fuzzy Sets Syst 184(1):3–28

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fan ZP, Ma J, Jiang YP, Sun YH, Ma L (2006) A goal programming approach to group decision making based on multiplicative preference relations and fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 174(1):311–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong ZW (2008) Least-square method to priority of the fuzzy preference relations with incomplete information. Int J Approx Reason 47(2):258–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F, Luque M (2004) Some issues on consistency of fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 154(1):98–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) Group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B (Cybern) 37(1):176–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Y, Xu Z, Gao M (2015) Methods for ranking intuitionistic multiplicative numbers by distance measures in decision making. Comput Ind Eng 88:100–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann A, Gupta MM (1988) Fuzzy mathematical models in engineering and management science. Elsevier Science Inc., Amsterdam

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng XJ, Merigó JM (2015) Framework of group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference information. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 23(1):1211–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao H, Xu Z, Zeng XJ, Xu DL (2016) An enhanced consensus reaching process in group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations. Inf Sci 329:274–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F (2009) Acceptable consistency analysis of interval reciprocal comparison matrices. Fuzzy Sets Syst 160(18):2686–2700

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu P, Wang Y (2014) Multiple attribute decision-making method based on single-valued neutrosophic normalized weighted Bonferroni mean. Neural Comput Appl 25(7–8):2001–2010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Zhang WG, Wang ZX (2012) A goal programming model for incomplete interval multiplicative preference relations and its application in group decision-making. Eur J Oper Res 218(3):747–754

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Zhang WG, Fu JH (2012) A new method of obtaining the priority weights from an interval fuzzy preference relation. Inf Sci 185(1):32–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Zhang WG, Zhang LH (2014) Consistency analysis of triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 235(3):718–726

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Liu F, Pedrycz W, Zhang WG (2016) Limited rationality and its quantification through the interval number judgments with permutations. IEEE Trans Cybern 99:1–13

  • Meng F, Chen X, Zhang Y (2016) Consistency-based linear programming models for generating the priority vector from interval fuzzy preference relations. Appl Soft Comput 41:247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Tan C, Chen X (2017) Multiplicative consistency analysis for interval fuzzy preference relations: A comparative study. Omega 68:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meng F, Lin J, Tan C, Zhang Q (2017) A new multiplicative consistency based method for decision making with triangular fuzzy reciprocal preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 315:1–25

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Pedrycz W, Song M (2011) Analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in group decision making and its optimization with an allocation of information granularity. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 19(3):527–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peneva V, Popchev I (2007) Aggregation of fuzzy preference relations to multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Optim Decis Mak 6(1):351–365

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):83–98

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL, Vargas LG (1987) Uncertainty and rank order in the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 32(1):107–117

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel OW, Asogbon GM, Sangaiah AK, Fang P, Li G (2017) An integrated decision support system based on ANN and Fuzzy_ AHP for heart failure risk prediction. Expert Syst Appl 68:163–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangaiah A, Thangavelu A (2013) An exploration of FMCDM approach for evaluating the outcome/success of GSD projects. Open Eng 3(3):419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangaiah AK, Gopal J, Basu A, Subramaniam PR (2017) An integrated fuzzy DEMATEL, TOPSIS, and ELECTRE approach for evaluating knowledge transfer effectiveness with reference to GSD project outcome. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smarandache F (2004) A geometric interpretation of the neutrosophic set—a generalization of the intuitionistic fuzzy set. arXiv preprint arXiv:math/0404520

  • Smarandache F (2005) A unifying field in logics: neutrosophic logic. neutrsophic logic. neutrosophy, neutrosophic set, neutrosophic probability. infinite study, neutrosophy, neutrosophic set, neutrosophic probability, American Research Press. ISBN 978-1-59973-080-6

  • Tanino T (1984) Fuzzy preference orderings in group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 12(2):117–131

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Urena R, Chiclana F, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E (2015) Confidence-consistency driven group decision making approach with incomplete reciprocal intuitionistic preference relations. Knowl-Based Syst 89:86–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZJ (2015) Consistency analysis and priority derivation of triangular fuzzy preference relations based on modal value and geometric mean. Inf Sci 314:169–183

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang TC, Chen YH (2007) Applying consistent fuzzy preference relations to partnership selection. Omega 35(1):384–388

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang TC, Chen YH (2008) Applying fuzzy linguistic preference relations to the improvement of consistency of fuzzy AHP. Inf Sci 178(19):3755–3765

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang ZJ, Tong X (2016) Consistency analysis and group decision making based on triangular fuzzy additive reciprocal preference relations. Inf Sci 361:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Yang JB, Xu DL (2005) Interval weight generation approaches based on consistency test and interval comparison matrices. Appl Math Comput 167(1):252–273

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Xu J (2012) A consistency and consensus based decision support model for group decision making with multiplicative preference relations. Decis Support Syst 52(3):757–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(3):1179–1187

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Chen J (2008) Group decision-making procedure based on incomplete reciprocal relations. Soft Comput A Fus Found Methodol Appl 12(3):515–521

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Chen J (2008) Some models for deriving the priority weights from interval fuzzy preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 184(1):266–280

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We all want to thank anonymous for the constructive suggestions that improved both the quality and clarity of the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arun Kumar Sangaiah.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this article.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Communicated by G. Yi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdel-Basset, M., Mohamed, M., Hussien, AN. et al. A novel group decision-making model based on triangular neutrosophic numbers. Soft Comput 22, 6629–6643 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2758-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-017-2758-5

Keywords

Navigation