Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Statistical scale-up of 3D particle-tracking simulation for non-Fickian dispersive solute transport modeling

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical techniques for subsurface flow and transport modeling are often limited by computational limitations including fine mesh and small time steps to control artificial dispersion. Particle-tracking simulation offers a robust alternative for modeling solute transport in subsurface formations. However, the modeling scale usually differs substantially from the rock measurement scale, and the scale-up of measurements have to be made accounting for the pattern of spatial heterogeneity exhibited at different scales. Therefore, it is important to construct accurate coarse-scale simulations that are capable of capturing the uncertainties in reservoir and transport attributes due to scale-up. A statistical scale-up procedure developed in our previous work is extended by considering the effects of unresolved (residual) heterogeneity below the resolution of the finest modeling scale in 3D. First, a scale-up procedure based on the concept of volume variance is employed to construct realizations of permeability and porosity at the (coarse) transport modeling scale, at which flow or transport simulation is performed. Next, to compute various effective transport parameters, a series of realizations exhibiting detailed heterogeneities at the fine scale, whose domain size is the same as the transport modeling scale, are generated. These realizations are subjected to a hybrid particle-tracking simulation. Probabilistic transition time is considered, borrowing the idea from the continuous time random walk (CTRW) technique to account for any sub-scale heterogeneity at the fine scale level. The approach is validated against analytical solutions and general CTRW formulation. Finally, coarse-scale transport variables (i.e., dispersivities and parameterization of transition time distribution) are calibrated by minimizing the mismatch in effluent history with the equivalent averaged models. Construction of conditional probability distributions of effective parameters is facilitated by integrating the results over the entire suite of realizations. The proposed method is flexible, as it does not invoke any explicit assumption regarding the multivariate distribution of the heterogeneity. In contrast to other hierarchical CTRW formulation for modeling multi-scale heterogeneities, the proposed approach does not impose any length scale requirement regarding sub-grid heterogeneities. In fact, it aims to capture the uncertainty in effective reservoir and transport properties due to the presence of heterogeneity at the intermediate scale, which is larger than the finest resolution of heterogeneity but smaller than the representative elementary volume, but it is often comparable to the transport modeling scale.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bear J (1979) Hydraulics of groundwater. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson DA, Aquino T, Bolster D, Engdahl N, Henri CV, Fernàndez-Garcia D (2017) A comparison of Eulerian and Lagrangian transport and non-linear reaction algorithms. Adv Water Resour 99:15–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Scher H (1995) On characterization of anomalous dispersion in porous and fractured media. Water Resour Res 31(6):1461–1466

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Scher H (1997) Anomalous transport in random fracture networks. Phys Rev Lett 79:4038–4041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Klafter J, Metzler R, Scher H (2002) Physical pictures of transport in heterogeneous media: advection-dispersion, random-walk, and fractional derivative formulations. Water Resour Res 38(10):1191. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001WR001030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkowitz B, Cortis A, Dentz M, Scher H (2006) Modeling non-Fickian transport in geological formations as a continuous time random walk. Rev Geophys 44(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005RG000178

  • Cortis A, Berkowitz B (2005) Computing “anomalous” contaminant transport in porous media: the CTRW MATLAB toolbox. Ground Water 43(6):947–950

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cortis A, Gallo C, Scher H, Berkowitz B (2004) Numerical simulation of non-Fickian transport in geological formations with multiple-scale heterogeneities. Water Resour Res 40(4). https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002750

  • Cortis A, Emmanuel S, Rubin S, Willbrand K, Berkowitz B (2010) The CTRW Matlab toolbox v3.1: a practical user’s guide. Retrieved from http://www.weizmann.ac.il/ESER/People/Brian/CTRW

  • Dagan G (1989) Flow and transport in porous formations. Springer, New-York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Delay F, Ackerer P, Danquigny C (2005) Simulating solute transport in porous or fractured formations using random walk particle tracking. Vadose Zone J 4(2):360–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dentz M, Carrera J (2007) Mixing and spreading in stratified flow. Phys Fluids 19(1):017107–017117

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dentz M, Cortis A, Scher H, Berkowitz B (2004) Time behavior of solute transport in heterogeneous media: transition from anomalous to normal transport. Adv Water Resour 27(2):155–173

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dentz M, Le Borgne T, Englert A, Bijeljic B (2011) Mixing, spreading and reaction in heterogeneous media: a brief review. J Contam Hydrol 120:1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.05.002

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch CV, Journel AG (1998) Geostatistical software library and users guide. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira JA, Pinto L (2014) Non-Fickian tracer transport in porous media. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on computational and mathematical methods in science and engineering. CMMSE, Rota (Cádiz), Spain, pp 543–554

  • Ferreira JA, Pinto L (2015) An integro-differential model for non-Fickian tracer transport in porous media: validation and numerical simulation. Math Methods Appl Sci 39:4736–4749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao G, Zhan H, Feng S, Huang G, Mao X (2009) Comparison of alternative models for simulating anomalous solute transport in a large heterogeneous soil column. J Hydrol 377(3):391–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger S, Cortis A, Birkholzer JT (2010) Upscaling solute transport in naturally fractured porous media with the continuous time random walk method. Water Resour Res 46(12). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010WR009133

  • Gelhar LW (1986) Stochastic subsurface hydrology from theory to applications. Water Resour Res 22(9s):135S–145S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelhar LW, Welty C, Rehfeldt KR (1992) A critical review of data on field-scale dispersion in aquifers. Water Resour Res 28(7):1955–1974

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Hernández JJ, Franssen HJ, Sahuquillo A (2003) Stochastic conditional inverse modeling of subsurface mass transport: a brief review and the self-calibrating method. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 17(5):319–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty R, Gorelick SM (1995) Multiple-rate mass transfer for modeling diffusion and surface reactions in media with pore-scale heterogeneity. Water Resour Res 31(10):2383–2400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hathhorn WE (1996) A second look at the method of random walks. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 10(4):319–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hristopulos DT, Žukovič M (2011) Relationships between correlation lengths and integral scales for covariance models with more than two parameters. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 25(1):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha RK, Bryant S, Lake LW (2011) Effect of diffusion on dispersion. SPE J 16(1):65–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Journel AG, Huijbregts CJ (1978) Mining geostatistics. Academic press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenkre VM, Montroll EW, Shlesinger MF (1973) Generalized master equations for continuous-time random walks. J Stat Phys 9(1):45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitanidis PK (1988) Prediction by the method of moments of transport in a heterogeneous formation. J Hydrol 102(1):453–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitanidis PK (1992) Analysis of macrodispersion through volume-averaging: moment equations. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 6(1):5–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch DL, Brady JF (1987) A non-local description of advection-diffusion with application to dispersion in porous media. J Fluid Mech 180:387–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kreft A, Zuber A (1978) On the physical meaning of the dispersion equation and its solutions for different initial and boundary conditions. Chem Eng Sci 33(11):1471–1480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lake LW, Srinivasan S (2004) Statistical scale-up of reservoir properties: concepts and applications. J Pet Sci Eng 44(1):27–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leung JY, Srinivasan S (2011) Analysis of uncertainty introduced by scaleup of reservoir attributes and flow response in heterogeneous reservoirs. SPE J 16(3):713–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leung JY, Srinivasan S (2012) Scale-up of mass transfer and recovery performance in heterogeneous reservoirs. J Pet Sci Eng 86–87:71–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leung JY, Srinivasan S (2016) Effects of reservoir heterogeneity on scaling of effective mass transfer coefficient for solute transport. J Contam Hydrol 192:181–193

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Koike T, Pathmathevan M (2004) A very fast simulated re-annealing (VFSA) approach for land data assimilation. Comput Geosci 30(3):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li L, Zhou H, Gómez-Hernández JJ (2011) A comparative study of three-dimensional hydraulic conductivity upscaling at the macro-dispersion experiment (MADE) site, Columbus Air Force Base, Mississippi (USA). J Hydrol 404(3):278–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolin G, Dentz M, Berkowitz B (2003) Continuous time random walk and multirate mass transfer modeling of sorption. Chem Phys 295(1):71–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metzler R, Klafter J (2000) The random walk’s guide to anomalous diffusion: a fractional dynamics approach. Phys Rep 339:1–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neretnieks I, Eriksen T, Tähtinen P (1982) Tracer movement in a single fissure in granitic rock: some experimental results and their interpretation. Water Resour Res 18(4):849–858

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neuman SP, Zhang YK (1990) A quasi-linear theory of non-Fickian and Fickian subsurface dispersion: 1. Theoretical analysis with application to isotropic media. Water Resour Res 26(5):887–902

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JC (1984) Analysis of solute transport in column tracer studies. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48(4):719–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JC, Genuchten MT (1984) Flux-averaged and volume-averaged concentrations in continuum approaches to solute transport. Water Resour Res 20(7):866–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedretti D, Fernàndez-Garcia D, Sanchez-Vila X, Bolster D, Benson DA (2014) Apparent directional mass-transfer capacity coefficients in three-dimensional anisotropic heterogeneous aquifers under radial convergent transport. Water Resour Res 50(2):1205–1224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins TK, Johnston OC (1963) A review of diffusion and dispersion in porous media. SPE J 3(01):70–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pulloor Kuttanikkad S (2009) Pore-scale direct numerical simulation of flow and transport in porous media (Dissertation). Heidelberg University, Germany

  • Rhodes ME, Bijeljic B, Blunt MJ (2008) Pore-to-field simulation of single-phase transport using continuous time random walks. Adv Water Resour 31(12):1527–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riva M, Guadagnini L, Guadagnini A (2010) Effects of uncertainty of lithofacies, conductivity and porosity distributions on stochastic interpretations of a field scale tracer test. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 24(7):955–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin Y (2003) Applied stochastic hydrogeology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin Y, Sun A, Maxwell R, Bellin A (1999) The concept of block-effective macrodispersivity and a unified approach for grid-scale-and plume-scale-dependent transport. J Fluid Mech 395:161–180

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Vila X, Solís-Delfín J (1999) Solute transport in heterogeneous media: the impact of anisotropy and non-ergodicity in risk assessment. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 13(5):365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivakovskaya D, Heemink AW, Schoenmakers JG (2007) Two-particle models for the estimation of the mean and standard deviation of concentrations in coastal waters. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 21(3):235–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan G, Tartakovsky DM, Dentz M, Viswanathan H, Berkowitz B, Robinson BA (2010) Random walk particle tracking simulations of non-Fickian transport in heterogeneous media. J Comput Phys 229(11):4304–4314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Boogaard HF, Hoogkamer MJ, Heemink AW (1993) Parameter identification in particle models. Stoch Hydrol Hydraul 7(2):109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishal V, Leung JY (2015) Modeling impacts of subscale heterogeneities on dispersive solute transport in subsurface systems. J Contam Hydrol 182:63–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vishal V, Leung JY (2017) Statistical scale-up of dispersive transport in heterogeneous reservoir. In: Gómez-Hernández J, Rodrigo-Ilarri J, Rodrigo-Clavero M, Cassiraga E, Vargas-Guzmán J (eds) Geostatistics Valencia 2016. Springer, Berlin, pp 733–743

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Kitanidis PK (1999) Analysis of macrodispersion through volume averaging: comparison with stochastic theory. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 13(1–2):66–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Cardenas MB, Deng W, Bennett PC (2012) Theory for dynamic longitudinal dispersion in fractures and rivers with Poiseuille flow. Geophys Res Lett 39(5):L05401. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011GL050831

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Daniel Fernàndez-Garcia for providing RW3D-MRMT transport-simulation code and the valuable suggestions. This work was supported by the Discovery Grants Program (No. 402433), which is administered by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. The computing resources were provided by WestGrid and Compute/Calcul Canada.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mining and Petroleum Engineering, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Donadeo Innovation Centre for Engineering, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1H9, Canada

    Vikrant Vishal & Juliana Y. Leung

Authors
  1. Vikrant Vishal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juliana Y. Leung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana Y. Leung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vishal, V., Leung, J.Y. Statistical scale-up of 3D particle-tracking simulation for non-Fickian dispersive solute transport modeling. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 32, 2075–2091 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1501-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-017-1501-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation