Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Moment and Bayesian wavelet regression from spatially correlated functional data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A new wavelet-based estimation methodology, in the context of spatial functional regression, is proposed to discriminate between small-scale and large scale variability of spatially correlated functional data, defined by depth-dependent curves. Specifically, the discrete wavelet transform of the data is computed in space and depth to reduce dimensionality. Moment-based regression estimation is applied for the approximation of the scaling coefficients of the functional response. While its wavelet coefficients are estimated in a Bayesian regression framework. Both regression approaches are implemented from the empirical versions of the scaling and wavelet auto-covariance and cross-covariance operators, characterizing the correlation structure of the spatial functional response. Weather stations in ocean islands display high spatial concentration. The proposed estimation methodology overcomes the difficulties arising in the estimation of ocean temperature field at different depths, from long records of ocean temperature measurements in these stations. Data are collected from The World-Wide Ocean Optics Database. The performance of the presented approach is tested in terms of 10-fold cross-validation, and residual spatial and depth correlation analysis. Additionally, an application to soil sciences, for prediction of electrical conductivity profiles is also considered to compare this approach with previous related ones, in the statistical analysis of spatially correlated curves in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32
Fig. 33
Fig. 34

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Almeida A (2005) Wavelet bases in generalized Besov spaces. J Math Anal Appl 304:198–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelini C, De Canditiis D, Leblanc F (2003) Wavelet regression estimation in nonparametric mixed effect models. J Multivar Anal 85:267–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baladandayuthapani V, Mallick B, Hong M, Lupton J, Turner N, Caroll R (2008) Bayesian hierarchical spatially correlated functional data analysis with application to colon carcinoginesis. Biometrics 64:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basse, M., Diop, A., Dabo-Niang, S. (2008). Mean square properties of a class of kernel density estimates for spatial functional random variables. Annales De L’I.S.U.P. Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Université de Paris

  • Bosq D (2000) Linear processes in function spaces. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bosq D, Ruiz-Medina MD (2014) Bayesian estimation in a high dimensional parameter framework. Electron J Stat 8:1604–1640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Daubechies I, Vial P (1994) Wavelets on the interval and fast wavelet transforms. J Appl Comput Harmon Anal 1:54–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daubechies I (1992) Ten lectures on wavelets SIAM. The Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donoho DL (1993) Unconditional bases are optimal bases for data compression and for statistical estimation. J Appl Comput Harmon Anal 1:100–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finley AO, Banerjee S, Gelfand AE (2012) Bayesian dynamic modeling for large space-time datasets using Gaussian predictive processes. J Geogr Syst 14:29–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganggang, Xu, Faming, L. and Genton, M. (2013). A bayesian spatio-temporal geostatistical model with an auxiliary lattice for large datasets. Stat Sin. Preprint doi:10.5705/ss.2013.085w

  • Gaposhkin VF (1974) The haar system as an unconditional basis in \(L_{p}[0, 1]\). Math Notes Acad Sci USSR 15:108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo R, Delicado P, Mateu J (2010) Continuous time-varying kriging for spatial prediction of functional data: an environmental application. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 15:66–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giraldo R, Delicado P, Mateu J (2012) Hierarchical clustering of spatially correlated functional data. Stat Neerlandica 66:403–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillas S, Lai MJ (2010) Bivariate splines for spatial functional regression models. J R Stat Soc Ser B 22:477–497

    Google Scholar 

  • Katzfuss M, Cressie N (2012) Bayesian hierarchical spatio-temporal smoothing for very large datasets. Environmetrics 23:94–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelbert M, Leonenko NN, Ruiz-Medina MD (2005) Fractional random fields associated with stochastic fractional heat equations. Adv Appl Probab 108:108–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann EL, Casella G (1998) Theory of point estimation. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonenko NN, Ruiz-Medina MD (2006) Scaling laws for the multidimensional Burgers equation with quadratic external potencial. J Stat Phys 124:191–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monestiez P, Nerini D (2008) A cokriging method for spatial functional data with applications in oceanology. Functional and operational statistics. Contrib Stat 36:237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerini D, Monestiez P, Manté C (2010) Cokriging for spatial functional data. J Multivar Anal 101:409–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Medina MD, Espejo R, Romano E (2014) Spatial functional normal mixed effect approach for curve classification. Adv Data Anal Classif 8:257–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Medina MD (2011) Spatial autoregressive and moving average Hilbertian processes. J Multivar Anal 102:292–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Medina MD, Espejo RM (2012) Spatial autoregressive functional plug-in prediction of ocean surface temperature. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 26:335–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Medina MD, Espejo R (2013) Integration of spatial functional interaction in the extrapolation of ocean surface temperature anomalies due to global warming. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 22:27–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Medina MD, Fernndez-Pascual R (2010) Spatiotemporal filtering from fractal spatial functional data sequence. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 24:527–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandwell DT (1987) Biharmonic spline interpolation of GEOS-3 and SEASAT altimeter data. Geophys Res Lett 14:139–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang WH, Wikle CK, Holan SH, Sudduth K, Meyers DB (2015) Bayesian analysis of spatially-dependent functional responses with spatially-dependent multi-dimensional functional predictors. Stat Sin 25:205–223

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been supported in part by project MTM2012-32674 (co-funded with FEDER) of the DGI, MEC, Spain. We would like to thank Professors Yang, Wikley, Holanz, Myersx, and Sudduth for sending and allowing us to use their dataset to illustrate the estimation methodology proposed in this paper, which has been inspired and motivated by their proposal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. D. Ruiz-Medina.

Appendix

Appendix

In this appendix, for the ocean temperature, and the two covariates studied, salinity and relative fluorescence, we show the sample auto-correlation and cross-correlation functions, over the ten years analyzed, at nodes 1, 6 and 16, for certain depth intervals (see Figs. 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 below), for the first region analyzed with longitude–latitude interval \([-85, -45] x [-30, -60],\) as well as for the second region with longitude–latitude interval \([-60, -52]\times [-35, -55]).\) In both regions, it can be appreciated the absence of downward sloping, or gradually decay for increasing lags, that supports the stationarity assumption in time for the above three magnitudes.

Fig. 35
figure 35

Region 1. Ocean temperature. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 36
figure 36

Region 1. Salinity. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 37
figure 37

Region 1. Relative fluorescence. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 38
figure 38

Region 1. Ocean temperature. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 39
figure 39

Region 1. Salinity. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 40
figure 40

Region 1. Relative fluorescence. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 41
figure 41

Region 1. Ocean temperature. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 42
figure 42

Region 1. Salinity. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 43
figure 43

Region 1. Relative fluorescence. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 44
figure 44

Region 1. Ocean temperature. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 45
figure 45

Region 1. Salinity. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 46
figure 46

Region 1. Relative fluorescence. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 47
figure 47

Region 1. Ocean temperature. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 48
figure 48

Region 1. Salinity. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 49
figure 49

Region 1. Relative fluorescence. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 50
figure 50

Region 1. Ocean temperature. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 51
figure 51

Region 1. Salinity. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 52
figure 52

Region 1. Relative fluorescence. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 53
figure 53

Region 2. Ocean temperature. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 54
figure 54

Region 2. Salinity. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 55
figure 55

Region 2. Relative fluorescence. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 56
figure 56

Region 2. Ocean temperature. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 57
figure 57

Region 2. Salinity. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 58
figure 58

Region 2. Relative fluorescence. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 59
figure 59

Region 2. Ocean temperature. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 60
figure 60

Region 2. Salinity. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 61
figure 61

Region 2. Relative fluorescence. Sample ACF for 16 depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 62
figure 62

Region 2. Ocean temperature. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 63
figure 63

Region 2. Salinity. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 64
figure 64

Region 2. Relative fluorescence. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 1

Fig. 65
figure 65

Region 2. Ocean temperature. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 66
figure 66

Region 2. Salinity. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 67
figure 67

Region 2. Relative fluorescence. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 6

Fig. 68
figure 68

Region 2. Ocean temperature. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 69
figure 69

Region 2. Salinity. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 16

Fig. 70
figure 70

Region 2. Relative fluorescence. Sample cross correlation function for certain depth intervals at node 16

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fernández-Pascual, R.M., Espejo, R. & Ruiz-Medina, M.D. Moment and Bayesian wavelet regression from spatially correlated functional data. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30, 523–557 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1130-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1130-5

Keywords

Navigation