Skip to main content
Log in

Plastic pigtail vs lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis (PROMETHEUS study): an open-label, multicenter randomized trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) have displaced double-pigtail plastic stents (DPS) as the standard treatment for walled-off necrosis (WON),β but evidence for exclusively using LAMS is limited. We aimed to assess whether the theoretical benefit of LAMS was superior to DPS.

Methods

This multicenter, open-label, randomized trial was carried out in 9 tertiary hospitals. Between June 2017, and Oct 2020, we screened 99 patients with symptomatic WON, of whom 64 were enrolled and randomly assigned to the DPS group (n = 31) or the LAMS group (n = 33). The primary outcome was short-term (4-weeks) clinical success determined by the reduction of collection. Secondary endpoints included long-term clinical success, hospitalization, procedure duration, recurrence, safety, and costs. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03100578.

Results

A similar clinical success rate in the short term (RR, 1.41; 95% CI 0.88–2.25; p = 0.218) and in the long term (RR, 1.2; 95% CI 0.92–1.58; p = 0.291) was observed between both groups. Procedure duration was significantly shorter in the LAMS group (35 vs. 45-min, p = 0.003). The hospital admission after the index procedure (median difference, − 10 [95% CI − 17.5, − 1]; p = 0.077) and global hospitalization (median difference − 4 [95% CI − 33, 25.51]; p = 0.82) were similar between both groups. Reported stent-related adverse events were similar for the two groups (36 vs.45% in LAMS vs. DPS), except for de novo fever, which was significantly 26% lower in LAMS (RR, 0.26 [0.08–0.83], p = 0.015).

Conclusions

The clinical superiority of LAMS over DPS for WON therapy was not proved, with similar clinical success, hospital stay and similar safety profile between both groups, yet a significant reduction in procedure time was observed.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03100578.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. van Brunschot S, van Grinsven J, van Santvoort HC, Bakker OJ, Besselink MG, Boermeester MA, Bollen TL, Bosscha K, Bouwense SA, Bruno MJ, Cappendijk VC, Consten EC, Dejong CH, van Eijck CH, Erkelens WG, van Goor H, van Grevenstein WMU, Haveman JW, Hofker SH, Jansen JM, Laméris JS, van Lienden KP, Meijssen MA, Mulder CJ, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Poley JW, Quispel R, de Ridder RJ, Römkens TE, Scheepers JJ, Schepers NJ, Schwartz MP, Seerden T, Spanier BWM, Straathof JWA, Strijker M, Timmer R, Venneman NG, Vleggaar FP, Voermans RP, Witteman BJ, Gooszen HG, Dijkgraaf MG, Fockens P, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group (2018) Endoscopic or surgical step-up approach for infected necrotising pancreatitis: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 391:51–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bang JY, Arnoletti JP, Holt BA, Sutton B, Hasan MK, Navaneethan U, Feranec N, Wilcox CM, Tharian B, Hawes RH, Varadarajulu S (2019) An endoscopic transluminal approach compared with minimally invasive surgery reduces complications and costs for patients with necrotizing pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 156:1027–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Itoi T, Binmoeller KF, Shah J, Sofuni A, Itokawa F, Kurihara T, Tsuchiya T, Ishii K, Tsuji S, Ikeuchi N, Moriyasu F (2012) Clinical evaluation of a novel lumen-apposing metal stent for endosonography-guided pancreatic pseudocyst and gallbladder drainage (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 75:870–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gornals JB, De la Serna-Higuera C, Sánchez-Yague A, Loras C, Sánchez-Cantos AM, Pérez-Miranda M (2013) Endosonography-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections with a novel lumen-apposing stent. Surg Endosc 27:1428–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lang GD, Fritz C, Bhat T, Das KK, Murad FM, Early DS, Edmundowicz SA, Kushnir VM, Mullady DK (2018) EUS-guided drainage of peripancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents and plastic double-pigtail stents: comparison of efficacy and adverse event rates. Gastrointest Endosc 87:150–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brimhall B, Han S, Tatman PD, Clark TJ, Wani S, Brauer B, Edmundowicz S, Wagh MS, Attwell A, Hammad H, Shah RJ (2018) Increased incidence of pseudoaneurysm bleeding with lumen-apposing metal stents compared to double pigtail plastic stents in patients with peripancreatic fluid collections. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 16:1521–1528

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Stecher SS, Simon P, Friesecke S, Glitsch A, Kühn JP, Lerch MM, Mayerle J (2017) Delayed severe bleeding complications after treatment of pancreatic fluid collections with lumen-apposing metal stents. Gut 66:1871–1872

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Baron TH, DiMaio CJ, Wang AY, Morgan KA (2020) American gastroenterological association clinical practice update: management of pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 158:67–75

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Guzmán-Calderón E, Chacaltana A, Díaz R, Li B, Martinez-Moreno B, Aparicio JR (2022) Head-to-head comparison between endoscopic ultrasound guided lumen apposing metal stent and plastic stents for the treatment of pancreatic fluid collections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 29:198–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Albert J, Badaoui A, Bali MA, Barthet M, Besselink M, Deviere J, Oliveira Ferreira A, Gyökeres T, Hritz I, Hucl T, Milashka M, Papanikolaou IS, Poley JW, Seewald S, Vanbiervliet G, van Lienden K, van Santvoort H, Voermans R, Delhaye M, van Hooft J (2018) Endoscopic management of acute necrotizing pancreatitis: european society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) evidence-based multidisciplinary guidelines. Endoscopy 50:524–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teoh AYB, Dhir V, Kida M, Yasuda I, Jin ZD, Seo DW, Almadi M, Ang TL, Hara K, Hilmi I, Itoi T, Lakhtakia S, Matsuda K, Pausawasdi N, Puri R, Tang RS, Wang HP, Yang AM, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S, Yasuda K, Ho LKY (2018) Consensus guidelines on the optimal management in interventional EUS procedures: results from the Asian EUS group RAND/UCLA expert panel. Gut 67:1209–1228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bang JY, Navaneethan U, Hassan M, Sutton B, Hawes R, Varadarajulu S (2019) Non-superiority of lumen-apposing metal stents over plastic stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis in a randomised trial. Gut 68:1200–1209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Karstensen JG, Novovic S, Hansen EF, Jensen AB, Jorgensen HL, Lauritsen ML, Werge MP, Schmidt PN (2023) EUS-guided drainage of large walled-off pancreatic necroses using plastic versus lumen-apposing metal stents: a single-centre randomised controlled trial. Gut 72:1167–1173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boxhoorn L, Verdonk RC, Besselink MG, Boermeester M, Bollen TL, Bouwense SA, Cappendijk VC, Curvers WL, Dejong CH, van Dijk SM, van Dullemen HM, van Eijck CH, van Geenen EJ, Hadithi M, Hazen WL, Honkoop P, van Hooft JE, Jacobs MA, Kievits JE, Kop MP, Kouw E, Kuiken SD, Ledeboer M, Nieuwenhuijs VB, Perk LE, Poley JW, Quispel R, de Ridder RJ, van Santvoort HC, Sperna Weiland CJ, Stommel MW, Timmerhuis HC, Witteman BJ, Umans DS, Venneman NG, Vleggaar FP, van Wanrooij RL, Bruno MJ, Fockens P, Voermans RP, Dutch Pancreatitis Study Group (2023) Comparison of lumen-apposing metal stents versus double-pigtail plastic stents for infected necrotising pancreatitis. Gut 72:66–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gornals JB, Perez-Miranda M, Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Vila J, Esteban JM, Gonzalez-Huix F, Guarner-Argente C, Sanchez-Yague A, Teran A, Bas-Cutrina F, De La Serna C, De Paredes AG, Ballester R, Velasquez-Rodriguez J, Salord S, Tebe C, Hereu P, Videla S, Spanish Working Group on Pancreatic Collection Therapy (2019) Multicenter study of plastic vs. self-expanding metal stents in endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of walled-off pancreatic necrosis—PROMETHEUS:a randomized controlled trial protocol. Trials 20:791

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, Gooszen HG, Johnson CD, Sarr MG, Tsiotos GG, Vege SS, Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group (2013) Classification of acute pancreatitis–2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut 62:102–111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gornals JB, Consiglieri CF, Busquets J, Salord S, de-la Hera M, Secanella L, Redondo S, Pelaez N, Fabregat J (2016) Endoscopic necrosectomy of walled-off pancreatic necrosis using a lumen-apposing metal stent and irrigation technique. Surg Endosc 30:2592–2602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yasuda I, Nakashima M, Iwai T, Isayama H, Itoi T, Hisai H, Inoue H, Kato H, Kanno A, Kubota K, Irisawa A, Igarashi H, Okabe Y, Kitano M, Kawakami H, Hayashi T, Mukai T, Sata N, Kida M, Shimosegawa T (2013) Japanese multicenter experience of endoscopic necrosectomy for infected walled-off pancreatic necrosis: the JENIPaN study. Endoscopy 45:627–634

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Izquierdo-Romero M, Bas-Cutrina F, Gornals JB (2020) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided ostomy repermeabilization as a rescue technique to resolve a deeply buried lumen-apposing stent. Dig Endosc 32:84–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nayar M, Leeds JS, UK & Ireland LAMS Colloborative, Oppong K (2022) Lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: does timing of removal matter. Gut 71:850–853

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Larghi A, Facciorusso A (2023) Lumen-apposing metal stents versus double-pigtail plastic stents for infected necrotising pancreatitis: more doubts than answers. Gut 72:1025–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Samanta J, Dhar J (2023) Plastic is as good as metal: is the ‘debris clearance’ debate for walled-off necrosis drainage finally over? Gut 72:1223–1224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Puga M, Consiglieri CF, Busquets J, Pallarès N, Secanella L, Peláez N, Fabregat J, Castellote J, Gornals JB (2018) Safety of lumen-apposing stent with or without coaxial plastic stent for endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a retrospective study. Endoscopy 50:1022–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Vanek P, Falt P, Vitek P, Zoundjiekpon V, Horinkova M, Zapletalova J, Lovecek M, Urban O (2023) EUS-guided transluminal drainage using lumen-apposing metal stents with or without coaxial plastic stents for treatment of walled-off necrotizing pancreatitis: a prospective bicentric randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 97:1070–1080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Chavan R, Nabi Z, Lakhtakia S, Gupta R, Jahangeer B, Talukdar R, Singh AP, Karyampudi A, Yarlagadda R, Ramchandani M, Kalapala R, Jagtap N, Reddy M, Tandan M, Rao GV, Reddy ND (2022) Impact of transmural plastic stent on recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection after metal stent removal in disconnected pancreatic duct: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy 54:861–868

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Basha J, Lakhtakia S, Nabi Z, Pal P, Chavan R, Talukdar R, Ramchandani M, Gupta R, Kalapala R, Venkat Rao G, Reddy DN (2021) Impact of disconnected pancreatic duct on recurrence of fluid collections and new-onset diabetes: do we finally have an answer? Gut 70:447–449

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Consiglieri CF, Gornals JB, Busquets J, Peláez N, Secanella L, De-La-Hera M, Sanzol R, Fabregat J, Castellote J (2018) Fluoroscopy-assisted vs fluoroless endoscopic ultrasound-guided transmural drainage of pancreatic fluid collections: a comparative study. Gastroenterol Hepatol 41:12–21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rizzatti G, Rimbaş M, Larghi A (2019) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage for infected necrotizing pancreatitis: better than surgery but still lacking treatment protocol standardization. Gastroenterology 157:582–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

To Maria Puigcerver-Mas for her selfless artwork (visual abstract). To the collaborators of the Spanish Working Group on Pancreatic Collection who have contributed to the study: Sergi Bazaga and Claudia F Consiglieri (Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Barcelona), Manuel Vazquez-Romero (Endoscopy Unit, Hospital Clinico San Carlos, Madrid), and Raquel Ballester (Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida) who assisted in the enrolment of patients. Monica Domi from Clinical Research and Clinical Trial Unit (UICEC IDIBELL), SCReN platform, applying the different amendments to each version of the trial protocol. David Leiva from Radiology department, of Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, for his imaging report assistance. To the Spanish Platform of Clinical Research and Clinical Trials, SCReN (Spanish Clinical Research Network), financed by the ISCIII-General Sub directorate for the Evaluation and Promotion of Research, through project PT13 / 0002/00585 integrated in the State Plan of R + D + I 2013–2016 and co-financed by and the European Regional Development Fund (FEDER). To the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SEED, beca investigación 2015); and to the Catalan Society of Gastroenterology (SCD, beca d’intensificació 2016). To the CERCA Programme/Generalitat de Catalunya for institutional support.

Funding

The PROMETHEUS study was supported by a grant (PI15/00585, 2015) from the Instituto-de-Salud-Carlos-III (ISCIII), Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Spain), and cofinanced by the European Development Regional Fund ‘‘A way to achieve Europe’’; a grant from the Spanish Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SEED) in 2015; and from the Catalan Society of Gastroenterology (SCD) in 2016. The funding bodies had no role in the trial design or interpretation of the data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

EVS, MPM, JJV, and JBG conceived the project. SV, MPM, EVS, JJV, PH, CT, and JBG participated in the design of the study. The study design was discussed in research meetings with all authors. JGV, FBC, AGG, JME, AT, FGH, MPM, CGA, JJV, AGS, JRF, JFV, MM, IMS, CSH, MMP, ASY, SRO, and JB promoted the enrolment of patients, conducted the study, and acquired the data. JGV, and JBG collected, interpreted, and analyzed the data, and verified the underlying data. JGV, FBC, PH, SV, and JBG coordinated the study. JGV, CT, and JBG did the statistical analysis. RM, JGV, and JBG calculated the cost analysis. JBG drafted the manuscript under supervision of EVS. All authors read, revised, and provided a critical review of the draft manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript. JBG had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joan B. Gornals.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

M. Perez-Miranda is consultant and speaker for Medtronic, Olympus, Taewoong, Boston Sc and M. I. Tech; E Vazquez-Sequeiros is consultant for Boston Sc; F Gonzalez-Huix is consultant for Boston Sc; JB Gornals is consultant for Boston Sc and Fujifilm; JG Velasquez is a PhD student at the Universitat de Barcelona, and this paper is part of his doctoral project. JB Gornals acts as a PhD Director. Francesc Bas-Cutrina, Ana Garcia Garcia De Paredes, Jose-Miguel Esteban, Alvaro Teran, Carlos Guarner-Argente, Juan J Vila, Albert Garcia-Sumalla, Jose Ramon Foruny, Joaquin Fisac-Vazquez, Maria Moris, Isabel Miquel-Salas, Carlos De-la-Serna Higuera, Marianette Murzi-Pulgar, Andres Sanchez-Yague, Silvia Salord, Sandra Ruiz-Osuna, Juli Busquets, Mireia Sanllorente-Melenchon, Sebas Videla, Ramon Moreno, Cristian Tebe-Cordomi, Pilar Hereu have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Collaborators of the of the Spanish Working Group on Pancreatic Collection Therapy are listed in Acknowledgment Section.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 534 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gornals, J.B., Velasquez-Rodriguez, J.G., Bas-Cutrina, F. et al. Plastic pigtail vs lumen-apposing metal stents for drainage of walled-off necrosis (PROMETHEUS study): an open-label, multicenter randomized trial. Surg Endosc 38, 2148–2159 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10699-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10699-w

Keywords

Navigation