Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A needs assessment for simulation in African surgical education

  • New Technology
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

There is a critical need for comprehensive surgical training in African countries given the unmet surgical burden of disease in this region. Collaborative and progressive initiatives in global surgical education will have the greatest impact on trainees. Little is known about surgical education needs from the perspective of practicing surgeons and trainees in low-middle-income countries (LMICs). Even less is known about the potential role for simulation to augment training.

Methods

A modified Delphi methodology with 2 rounds of responses was employed to survey program directors (PD) and associate program directors (APD) of Pan-African Association of Christian Surgeons (PAACS) general surgery residency programs across eight low-middle-income countries in Africa. 3 PD/APDs and 2 surgical residents participated in semi-structured interviews centered around the role of simulation in training. Descriptive analysis was performed to elicit key themes and illustrative examples.

Results

The survey of program directors revealed that teaching residents the psychomotor skills need to perform intracorporeal suturing was both high priority and desired in multiple training sites. Other high priority skills were laparoscopic camera driving and medial visceral rotation. The interviews revealed a specific desire to perform laparoscopic surgery and a need for a simulation curriculum to familiarize staff and trainees with laparoscopic techniques. Several barriers to laparoscopic surgery exist, such as lack of staff familiarity with the equipment, lack of public buy in, and lack of generalizable and adaptable educational modules. Trainees saw utility in the use of simulation to optimize time in the operating room and sought opportunities to improve their laparoscopic skills.

Conclusion

Faculty and surgical trainees in LMICs have interest in learning advanced surgical techniques, such as laparoscopy. Developing a simulation curriculum tailored to the trainees’ local context has the potential to fill this need.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. O’Flynn E, Andrew J, Hutch A et al (2016) The specialist surgeon workforce in East, Central and Southern Africa: a situation analysis. World J Surg 40(11):2620–2627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-016-3601-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bickler SW, Weiser TG, Kassebaum N, Higashi H, Chang DC, Barendregt JJ, Noormahomed EV, Vos T (2015) Chapter 2: global burden of surgical conditions. In: Debas HT, Donkor P, Gawande A, Jamison DT, Kruk ME, Mock CN (eds) Essential surgery: disease control priorities, 3rd edn, vol 1. The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank © 2015 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/The World Bank, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meara JG, Leather AJ, Hagander L et al (2015) Global surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet 386(9993):569–624. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60160-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khine M, Leung E, Morran C, Muthukumarasamy G (2011) Homemade laparoscopic simulators for surgical trainees. Clin Teach 8(2):118–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-498X.2011.00441.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagendran M, Toon CD, Davidson BR, Gurusamy KS (2014) Laparoscopic surgical box model training for surgical trainees with no prior laparoscopic experience. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1:CD010479. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010479.pub2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Munz Y, Kumar BD, Moorthy K, Bann S, Darzi A (2004) Laparoscopic virtual reality and box trainers: is one superior to the other? Surg Endosc 18(3):485–494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-003-9043-7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Derossis AM, Fried GM, Abrahamowicz M, Sigman HH, Barkun JS, Meakins JL (1998) Development of a model for training and evaluation of laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 175(6):482–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00080-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhariwal AK, Prabhu RY, Dalvi AN, Supe AN (2007) Effectiveness of box trainers in laparoscopic training. J Minim Access Surg 3(2):57–63. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-9941.33274

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Braun V, Clarke V (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 3(2):77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chapman AL, Hadfield M, Chapman CJ (2015) Qualitative research in healthcare: an introduction to grounded theory using thematic analysis. J R Coll Phys Edinb 45(3):201–205. https://doi.org/10.4997/jrcpe.2015.305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, Reed DA, Cook DA (2014) Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 89(9):1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000000388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ryder RM, Vaughan MC (1999) Laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Methods, effectiveness, and sequelae. Obstet Gynecol Clin N Am 26(1):83–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0889-8545(05)70059-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chao TE, Mandigo M, Opoku-Anane J, Maine R (2016) Systematic review of laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: benefits, challenges, and strategies. Surg Endosc 30(1):1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4201-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Udwadia TE (2001) One world, one people, one surgery. Surg Endosc 15(4):337–343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640080027

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bendinelli C, Leal T, Moncade F, Dieng M, Toure CT, Miccoli P (2002) Endoscopic surgery in senegal. Benefits, costs and limits. Surg Endosc 16(10):1488–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-9188-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oosting RM, Wauben L, Madete JK, Groen RS, Dankelman J (2020) Availability, procurement, training, usage, maintenance and complications of electrosurgical units and laparoscopic equipment in 12 African countries. BJS Open 4(2):326–331. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs5.50255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Wilkinson E, Aruparayil N, Gnanaraj J, Brown J, Jayne D (2021) Barriers to training in laparoscopic surgery in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Trop Doct 51(3):408–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049475521998186

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Morrow E, Bekele A, Tegegne A et al (2016) Laparoscopic simulation for surgical residents in Ethiopia: course development and results. Am J Surg 212(4):645–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.06.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jooma U, Numanoglu A, Cox S (2020) Paediatric surgery training in South Africa: trainees’ perspectives. Pediatr Surg Int 36(12):1489–1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04744-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel N, Leusink AL, Singh N, Koto MZ, Luvhengo T (2018) Registrar perceptions on general surgical training in South Africa: a report by the South African Society of Surgeons in Training (SASSiT). S Afr J Surg 56(2):10–14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Apostolou C, Panieri E (2007) National survey of surgeons’ attitudes to laparoscopic surgical training in South Africa. S Afr J Surg 45(3):86–91

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nyundo M, Umugwaneza N, Bekele A, Chikoya L, Gashegu J, Detry O (2023) Assessment of resource capacity and barriers to effective practice of laparoscopic surgery in training hospitals affiliated with the College of Surgeons of East, Central and Southern Africa (COSECSA). Surg Endosc 37(7):5121–5128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-09985-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the members of the Pan-African Association of Christian Surgeons for their time responding to surveys and participating in these interviews.

Funding

No funding source was used to conduct this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joy E. Obayemi.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Joy Obayemi, John Donkersloot, Erin Kim, Keir Thelander, Mary Byrnes, and Grace Kim have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 14 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obayemi, J.E., Donkersloot, J., Kim, E. et al. A needs assessment for simulation in African surgical education. Surg Endosc 38, 1654–1661 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10665-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10665-y

Keywords

Navigation