Abstract
Introduction
This study compares outcomes after LESS cholecystectomy utilizing epidural versus general anesthesia.
Methods
Patients undergoing LESS Cholecystectomy were randomized into receiving epidural or general anesthesia by protocol. Patients used a Visual Analog Scale to rate pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Data presented as median (mean ± standard deviation).
Results
75 patients underwent LESS cholecystectomy with general anesthesia [32 patients (22% men) after five patients withdrew consent] or epidural anesthesia [23 patients (22% men) after 15 patients withdrew consent]. Respectively, they were of age 38 years (41 ± 15.1) and 47 years (48 ± 13.9), BMI 29 (28 ± 4.9) kg/m2 and 28 (28 ± 3.8) kg/m2, and ASA 2 (2 ± 0.5) and 2 (2 ± 0.3) (p > 0.05 for all). LOS for patients receiving general vs. epidural anesthesia was 72 min (122 ± 104.4) vs. 95 min (113 ± 77.5) (p = 0.25). On POD 0, patients receiving general anesthesia rated pain as 4 (4 ± 2.9) vs. 0 (1 ± 2.2) for epidural anesthesia (p = 0.02). On POD 1, they rated pain as 6 (5 ± 2.3) vs. 6 (6 ± 2.9) (p = 0.68). On POD 6, patients rated pain as 3 (3 ± 2.7) vs. 4 (3 ± 2.2) (p = 1.00). For patient satisfaction with incisional scars for those receiving general vs. epidural anesthesia, patients rated their scars to be 10 (8 ± 3.6) vs. 10 (9 ± 1.2) (p = 0.21). Total costs for the hospital using general vs. epidural anesthesia were found $6,909 (7,167 ± 2,083.8) vs. $6,225 (5,848 ± 1530.1) (p = 0.014), respectively. Patients self-assessed satisfaction on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best) as a 5 (5 ± 0).
Conclusions
Patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy with general vs. epidural anesthesia had similar demographics, LOS, and pain scores. Patients that received epidural anesthesia reported less pain and incurred less cost. Utilization of epidural anesthesia in lieu of general anesthesia for LESS cholecystectomy is safe, reduces pain, and offers potential cost savings.
References
Ansari D, Gianotti L, Schroder J, Andersson R (2013) Fast-track surgery: procedure-specific aspects and future direction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:29–37
Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheimh T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aersether E, Wiklund P, Patel HRH (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 32:879–887
Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38:1531–1541
Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N, Zurich Fast Track Study Group (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136 (842):847
Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S, Griesser AC, Blanc C, Hubner M, Schafer M, Demartines N (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114
Stokes CS, Krawczyk M, Lammert F (2011) Gallstones: environment, lifestyle and genes. Dig Dis 29:191–201
Hernandez J, Ross S, Morton C, McFarlin K, Dahal S, Golkar F, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2010) The learning curve of laparoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy: definable, short, and safe. J Am Coll Surg 211:652–657
Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross SB, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:188–192
Ross SB, Mangar D, Karlnoski R, Camporesi E, Downes K, Luberice K, Haines K, Rosemurgy AS (2013) Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy with epidural vs. general anesthesia. Surg Endosc 27:1810–1819
Mavridou P, Dimitriou V, Manataki A, Arnaoutoglou E, Papadopoulos G (2012) Patient’s anxiety and fear of anesthesia: effect of gender, age, education, and previous experience of anesthesia. A survey of 400 patients. J Anesth 27:104–108
Ruhaiyem ME, Alshehri AA, Saade M, Shoabi TA, Zahoor H, Tawfeeq NA (2016) Fear of going under general anasthesia: a cross-sectional study. Saudi J Anaesth 10:317–321
Peron A, Schliemann AL, Almeida FA (2014) Understanding the reasons for the refusal of cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis: how to help them in their decision? Arg Bras Cir Dig 27:114–119
Aldrete JA (1998) Modifications to the postanesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs 13:148–155
Glisson SN, Kumar P, Balasaraswathi K (1980) Hemodynamic stability with epidural anesthesia? Anesthesiology 53:S235
Donmez T, Erdem VM, Uzman S, Yildirim D, Avaroglu H, Ferahman S, Sunamak O (2017) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:136–142
Yu G, Wen Q, Qiu L, Bo L, Yu J (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia vs. general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 15:176–180
Aono H, Takeda A, Tarver SD, Goto H (1998) Stress responses in three different anesthetic techniques for carbon dioxide laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Anesth 10:546–550
Nicholls AJ, Wen SW, Hall P, Hickey MJ, Wong CHY (2018) Activation of the sympathetic nervous system modulates neutrophil function. J Leukoc Biol 103:295–309
Wang J, Yin Y, Zhu Y, Xu P, Sun Z, Miao C, Zhong J (2019) Thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia ameliorates surgery-induced stress response and postoperative pain in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy. J Int Med Res 47:6160–6170
Longo MA, Cavalheiro BT, de Oliveira Filho GR (2017) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under neuraxial anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analyses. J Clin Anesth 41:48–54
Bessa SS, Katri KM, Abdel-Salam WN, El-Kayal A, Tawfik TA (2012) Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 22:550–555
Tzovaras G, Fafoulakis F, Pratsas K, Georgopoulou S, Stamatiou G, Hatzitheofilou C (2008) Spinal vs general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial. Arch Surg 143:497–501
Funding
No funding sources specific to this paper.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Dr. Sharona B. Ross is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical (Sunnyvale, CA) and Ethicon (Cincinnati, OH). Dr. Sharona B. Ross receives educational grants for the Women in Surgery Career Symposium from Intuitive Surgical and Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN). Maria Christodoulou, Nicole Ross, Iswanto Sucandy, Kenneth Lubrice, Sneha Saravanan, and Alexander Rosemurgy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ross, S.B., Christodoulou, M., Ross, N. et al. Epidural versus general anesthesia for laparo-endoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 38, 1414–1421 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10628-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10628-3