Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Epidural versus general anesthesia for laparo-endoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

This study compares outcomes after LESS cholecystectomy utilizing epidural versus general anesthesia.

Methods

Patients undergoing LESS Cholecystectomy were randomized into receiving epidural or general anesthesia by protocol. Patients used a Visual Analog Scale to rate pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (severe pain). Data presented as median (mean ± standard deviation).

Results

75 patients underwent LESS cholecystectomy with general anesthesia [32 patients (22% men) after five patients withdrew consent] or epidural anesthesia [23 patients (22% men) after 15 patients withdrew consent]. Respectively, they were of age 38 years (41 ± 15.1) and 47 years (48 ± 13.9), BMI 29 (28 ± 4.9) kg/m2 and 28 (28 ± 3.8) kg/m2, and ASA 2 (2 ± 0.5) and 2 (2 ± 0.3) (p > 0.05 for all). LOS for patients receiving general vs. epidural anesthesia was 72 min (122 ± 104.4) vs. 95 min (113 ± 77.5) (p = 0.25). On POD 0, patients receiving general anesthesia rated pain as 4 (4 ± 2.9) vs. 0 (1 ± 2.2) for epidural anesthesia (p = 0.02). On POD 1, they rated pain as 6 (5 ± 2.3) vs. 6 (6 ± 2.9) (p = 0.68). On POD 6, patients rated pain as 3 (3 ± 2.7) vs. 4 (3 ± 2.2) (p = 1.00). For patient satisfaction with incisional scars for those receiving general vs. epidural anesthesia, patients rated their scars to be 10 (8 ± 3.6) vs. 10 (9 ± 1.2) (p = 0.21). Total costs for the hospital using general vs. epidural anesthesia were found $6,909 (7,167 ± 2,083.8) vs. $6,225 (5,848 ± 1530.1) (p = 0.014), respectively. Patients self-assessed satisfaction on a scale of 1 (worst) to 5 (best) as a 5 (5 ± 0).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing LESS cholecystectomy with general vs. epidural anesthesia had similar demographics, LOS, and pain scores. Patients that received epidural anesthesia reported less pain and incurred less cost. Utilization of epidural anesthesia in lieu of general anesthesia for LESS cholecystectomy is safe, reduces pain, and offers potential cost savings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Ansari D, Gianotti L, Schroder J, Andersson R (2013) Fast-track surgery: procedure-specific aspects and future direction. Langenbecks Arch Surg 398:29–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cerantola Y, Valerio M, Persson B, Jichlinski P, Ljungqvist O, Hubner M, Kassouf W, Muller S, Baldini G, Carli F, Naesheimh T, Ytrebo L, Revhaug A, Lassen K, Knutsen T, Aersether E, Wiklund P, Patel HRH (2013) Guidelines for perioperative care after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) society recommendations. Clin Nutr 32:879–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Greco M, Capretti G, Beretta L, Gemma M, Pecorelli N, Braga M (2014) Enhanced recovery program in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. World J Surg 38:1531–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M, Clavien PA, Demartines N, Zurich Fast Track Study Group (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136 (842):847

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roulin D, Donadini A, Gander S, Griesser AC, Blanc C, Hubner M, Schafer M, Demartines N (2013) Cost-effectiveness of the implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol for colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 100:1108–1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Stokes CS, Krawczyk M, Lammert F (2011) Gallstones: environment, lifestyle and genes. Dig Dis 29:191–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hernandez J, Ross S, Morton C, McFarlin K, Dahal S, Golkar F, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2010) The learning curve of laparoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy: definable, short, and safe. J Am Coll Surg 211:652–657

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodgett SE, Hernandez JM, Morton CA, Ross SB, Albrink M, Rosemurgy AS (2009) Laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 13:188–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross SB, Mangar D, Karlnoski R, Camporesi E, Downes K, Luberice K, Haines K, Rosemurgy AS (2013) Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy with epidural vs. general anesthesia. Surg Endosc 27:1810–1819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mavridou P, Dimitriou V, Manataki A, Arnaoutoglou E, Papadopoulos G (2012) Patient’s anxiety and fear of anesthesia: effect of gender, age, education, and previous experience of anesthesia. A survey of 400 patients. J Anesth 27:104–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ruhaiyem ME, Alshehri AA, Saade M, Shoabi TA, Zahoor H, Tawfeeq NA (2016) Fear of going under general anasthesia: a cross-sectional study. Saudi J Anaesth 10:317–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Peron A, Schliemann AL, Almeida FA (2014) Understanding the reasons for the refusal of cholecystectomy in patients with cholelithiasis: how to help them in their decision? Arg Bras Cir Dig 27:114–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Aldrete JA (1998) Modifications to the postanesthesia score for use in ambulatory surgery. J Perianesth Nurs 13:148–155

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Glisson SN, Kumar P, Balasaraswathi K (1980) Hemodynamic stability with epidural anesthesia? Anesthesiology 53:S235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Donmez T, Erdem VM, Uzman S, Yildirim D, Avaroglu H, Ferahman S, Sunamak O (2017) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal-epidural anesthesia vs. general anaesthesia: a prospective randomised study. Ann Surg Treat Res 92:136–142

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu G, Wen Q, Qiu L, Bo L, Yu J (2015) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal anesthesia vs. general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Anesthesiol 15:176–180

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Aono H, Takeda A, Tarver SD, Goto H (1998) Stress responses in three different anesthetic techniques for carbon dioxide laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Clin Anesth 10:546–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nicholls AJ, Wen SW, Hall P, Hickey MJ, Wong CHY (2018) Activation of the sympathetic nervous system modulates neutrophil function. J Leukoc Biol 103:295–309

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang J, Yin Y, Zhu Y, Xu P, Sun Z, Miao C, Zhong J (2019) Thoracic epidural anesthesia and analgesia ameliorates surgery-induced stress response and postoperative pain in patients undergoing radical esophagectomy. J Int Med Res 47:6160–6170

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Longo MA, Cavalheiro BT, de Oliveira Filho GR (2017) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under neuraxial anesthesia compared with general anesthesia: systematic review and meta-analyses. J Clin Anesth 41:48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bessa SS, Katri KM, Abdel-Salam WN, El-Kayal A, Tawfik TA (2012) Spinal versus general anesthesia for day-case laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 22:550–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tzovaras G, Fafoulakis F, Pratsas K, Georgopoulou S, Stamatiou G, Hatzitheofilou C (2008) Spinal vs general anesthesia for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: interim analysis of a controlled randomized trial. Arch Surg 143:497–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding sources specific to this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharona B. Ross.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Dr. Sharona B. Ross is a consultant for Intuitive Surgical (Sunnyvale, CA) and Ethicon (Cincinnati, OH). Dr. Sharona B. Ross receives educational grants for the Women in Surgery Career Symposium from Intuitive Surgical and Medtronic (Minneapolis, MN). Maria Christodoulou, Nicole Ross, Iswanto Sucandy, Kenneth Lubrice, Sneha Saravanan, and Alexander Rosemurgy have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ross, S.B., Christodoulou, M., Ross, N. et al. Epidural versus general anesthesia for laparo-endoscopic single-site cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc 38, 1414–1421 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10628-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-023-10628-3

Keywords

Navigation