Skip to main content
Log in

Colon capsule endoscopy following incomplete colonoscopy in routine clinical settings

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) was introduced in our department on two indications; following incomplete colonoscopy as an alternative to CT colonography, and in patients with a history of incomplete colonoscopy as an alternative to anesthesia-assisted (AA) colonoscopy. We aimed to compare the quality of CCE, defined by completion rate and polyp detection rate (PDR), with that of CT colonography and AA colonoscopy, respectively.

Methods

Patients referred for CCE from May 2020 until November 2021 were consecutively included in this prospective cohort study. Demographics, indication and CCE outcomes were registered from the electronic patient record. Completion rate and PDR in CCE as an alternative to CT colonography were compared with those of a historical cohort undergoing CT colonography following incomplete colonoscopy. Completion rate and PDR in CCE as an alternative to AA colonoscopy were compared with those of a time true parallel cohort undergoing AA colonoscopy.

Results

In 65 patients undergoing CCE, 36 (57%) were referred as an alternative to CT colonography. The completion rate in this group was 44% compared to 96% in CT colonography (p < 0.001). The PDR in complete CCE in this group was 75% in CCE compared to 20% in CT colonography (p < 0.001). The remaining 27 (43%) of the sample were referred for CCE as an alternative to AA colonoscopy. The completion rate in this group was 33% compared to 100% in AA colonoscopy (p < 0.001). The PDR in complete CCE in this group was 78% in CCE compared to 35% in AA colonoscopy (p = 0.013).

Conclusions

The completion rate of CCE following incomplete colonoscopy is inferior to that of CT colonography and AA colonoscopy. The PDR of CCE was high, indicating an acceptable sensitivity in complete investigations, but in our settings the completion rate of CCE on this indication is unacceptably low.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04307901 (ClinicalTrials.gov, March 13, 2020).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reumkens A, Rondagh EJ, Bakker CM, Winkens B, Masclee AA, Sanduleanu S (2016) Post-colonoscopy complications: a systematic review, time trends, and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Am J Gastroenterol 111(8):1092–1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2016.234

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ridolfi TJ, Valente MA, Church JM (2014) Achieving a complete colonic evaluation in patients with incomplete colonoscopy is worth the effort. Dis Colon Rectum 57(3):383–387. https://doi.org/10.1097/dcr.0000000000000072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bowles CJ, Leicester R, Romaya C, Swarbrick E, Williams CB, Epstein O (2004) A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow? Gut 53(2):277–283. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.2003.016436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Marshall JB, Barthel JS (1993) The frequency of total colonoscopy and terminal ileal intubation in the 1990s. Gastrointest Endosc 39(4):518–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70162-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lieberman DA, Weiss DG, Bond JH, Ahnen DJ, Garewal H, Chejfec G (2000) Use of colonoscopy to screen asymptomatic adults for colorectal cancer. veterans affairs cooperative study group 380. N Engl J Med 343(3):162–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200007203430301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spada C, Hassan C, Bellini D, Burling D, Cappello G, Carretero C, Dekker E, Eliakim R, de Haan M, Kaminski MF, Koulaouzidis A, Laghi A, Lefere P, Mang T, Milluzzo SM, Morrin M, McNamara D, Neri E, Pecere S, Pioche M, Plumb A, Rondonotti E, Spaander MC, Taylor S, Fernandez-Urien I, van Hooft JE, Stoker J, Regge D (2020) Imaging alternatives to colonoscopy: CT colonography and colon capsule. European society of gastrointestinal endoscopy (ESGE) and European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR) guideline - Update 2020. Endoscopy 52(12):1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1258-4819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Spada C, Hassan C, Barbaro B, Iafrate F, Cesaro P, Petruzziello L, Minelli Grazioli L, Senore C, Brizi G, Costamagna I, Alvaro G, Iannitti M, Salsano M, Ciolina M, Laghi A, Bonomo L, Costamagna G (2015) Colon capsule versus CT colonography in patients with incomplete colonoscopy: a prospective, comparative trial. Gut 64(2):272–281. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Deding U, Herp J, Havshoei AL, Kobaek-Larsen M, Buijs MM, Nadimi ES, Baatrup G (2020) Colon capsule endoscopy versus CT colonography after incomplete colonoscopy. application of artificial intelligence algorithms to identify complete colonic investigations. United Eur Gastroenterol J 8(7):782–789. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640620937593

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deding U, Kaalby L, Bøggild H, Plantener E, Wollesen MK, Kobaek-Larsen M, Hansen SJ, Baatrup G (2020) Colon capsule endoscopy vs CT colonography following incomplete colonoscopy: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Cancers (Basel). https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12113367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Haan MC, van Gelder RE, Graser A, Bipat S, Stoker J (2011) Diagnostic value of CT-colonography as compared to colonoscopy in an asymptomatic screening population: a meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 21(8):1747–1763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2104-8

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Alarcon-Fernandez O, Ramos L, Adrian-de-Ganzo Z, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Nicolas-Perez D, Jimenez A, Quintero E (2013) Effects of colon capsule endoscopy on medical decision making in patients with incomplete colonoscopies. Clinical Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(5):534–40.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2012.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Negreanu L, Smarandache G, Mateescu RB (2014) Role of capsule endoscopy Pillcam COLON 2 in patients with known or suspected Crohn’s disease who refused colonoscopy or underwent incomplete colonoscopic exam: a case series. Tech Coloproctol 18(3):277–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-013-1054-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Triantafyllou K, Viazis N, Tsibouris P, Zacharakis G, Kalantzis C, Karamanolis DG, Ladas SD (2014) Colon capsule endoscopy is feasible to perform after incomplete colonoscopy and guides further workup in clinical practice. Gastrointest Endosc 79(2):307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2013.07.061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Nogales O, Garcia-Lledo J, Lujan M, Nicolas D, Juanmartinena JF, Gonzalez-Suarez B, Sanchez Ceballos F, Couto I, Olmedo J, Garfia C, Carretero C, Fernandez Urien I, Rodriguez S, Asteinza M, Olivencia P, Masedo A, Munoz-Navas M, Merino B, Gonzalez Asanza C (2017) Therapeutic impact of colon capsule endoscopy with PillCam COLON 2 after incomplete standard colonoscopy: a Spanish multicenter study. Rev Esp De Enferm Dig 109(5):322–327. https://doi.org/10.17235/reed.2017.4369/2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hussey M, Holleran G, Stack R, Moran N, Tersaruolo C, McNamara D (2018) Same-day colon capsule endoscopy is a viable means to assess unexplored colonic segments after incomplete colonoscopy in selected patients. United Eur Gastroenterol J 6(10):1556–1562. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050640618800629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baltes P, Bota M, Albert J, Philipper M, Horster HG, Hagenmuller F, Steinbruck I, Jakobs R, Bechtler M, Hartmann D, Neuhaus H, Charton JP, Mayershofer R, Hohn H, Rosch T, Groth S, Nowak T, Wohlmuth P, Keuchel M (2018) PillCamColon2 after incomplete colonoscopy—a prospective multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol 24(31):3556–3566. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v24.i31.3556

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Deding U, Kaalby L, Baatrup G, Kobaek-Larsen M, Thygesen MK, Epstein O, Bjorsum-Meyer T (2022) The effect of prucalopride on the completion rate and polyp detection rate of colon capsule endoscopies. Clin Epidemiol 14:437–444. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S353527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Koulaouzidis A, Dabos K, Philipper M, Toth E, Keuchel M (2021) How should we do colon capsule endoscopy reading: a practical guide. Therap Adv Gastrointest Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1177/26317745211001983

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

No funding was obtained for the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ulrik Deding.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Miss Sofie Sajan Jensen, Mr. Lasse Kaalby, Mr. Ulrik Deding, and Drs. Anne-Line Volden Havshoi, Per Vadgaard Andersen and Issam Al-Najami have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Havshoi, AL.V., Deding, U., Jensen, S.S. et al. Colon capsule endoscopy following incomplete colonoscopy in routine clinical settings. Surg Endosc 37, 2749–2755 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09783-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09783-w

Keywords

Navigation