Abstract
Introduction
Robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery has emerged as an alternative to traditional laparoscopy and may offer some clinical benefits when performing complex hiatal hernia repairs. Many institutions may choose to not invest in robotic surgery because of perceived higher costs, and when they already have proficient laparoscopic surgeons. We hypothesized that the robotic approach would yield lower profits overall due to higher supply costs, while offering comparable outcomes to the traditional laparoscopic approach.
Methods
Financial and outcomes data from a single quaternary academic center was retrospectively reviewed from a prospectively collected database from July 2020 to May 2021. Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repairs and robotic-assisted repairs were compared for metrics including length of stay, operative time, hospital and supply cost, payments, and profits. Metrics of these two groups were compared using t-test analyses with significance set to p < 0.05.
Results
Seventy-three patients were included with 31 in the robotic group (42.5%) and 42 in the laparoscopic group (57.5%). There were no significant differences in length of stay (robotic mean 2.0 days, laparoscopic 2.55 days, p = 0.09) or operative time (257.6 min vs 256.7 min, p = 0.48) between the two approaches. The robotic approach was associated with higher supply costs ($2,655 vs $2,028, p < 0.001) and patient charges ($63,997 vs $56,276, p < 0.05). Despite higher costs associated with robotics, hospital profits were not different between the two groups ($7,462 vs $7,939, p = 0.42).
Conclusion
Despite higher supply costs and charges for robotic-assisted hiatal hernia repair, hospital profits were similar when comparing robotic and laparoscopic approaches. Short-term clinical outcomes were also similar. Programs should do their own analysis to understand their individual cost issues.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
O’Sullivan KE, Kreaden US, Hebert AE, Eaton D, Redmond KC (2019) A systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open and video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery Approaches for lobectomy. Interact Cardiovasc and Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivy315,April12019
Guo F, Ma D, Li S (2019) Compare the prognosis of Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Thoracic Surgery (RATS) with video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) for non-small cell lung cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000017089
Soliman BG, Nguyen DT, Chan EY, Chihara RK, Meisenbach LM, Graviss EA, Kim MP (2020) Impact of da vinci XI robot in pulmonary resection. J Thorac Dis. https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-720
Kent M, Wang T, Whyte R, Curran T, Flores R, Gangadharan S (2014) Open, video-assisted thoracic surgery, and robotic lobectomy: review of a national database. Ann Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.117
Kneuertz PJ, Singer E, D’Souza DM, Abdel-Rasoul M, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Merritt RE (2019) Hospital cost and clinical effectiveness of robotic-assisted versus video-assisted thoracoscopic and open lobectomy: a propensity score–weighted comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.12.101
Nelson DB, Mehran RJ, Mitchell KG, Rajaram R, Correa AM, Bassett RL, Antonoff MB, Hofstetter WL, Roth JA, Sepesi B, Swisher SG, Walsh GL, Vaporciyan AA, Rice DC (2019) Robotic-assisted lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer: a comprehensive institutional experience. Ann Thorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2019.03.051
O’Connor SC, Mallard M, Desai SS, Couto F, Gottlieb M, Ewing A, Cobb WS, Carbonell AM, Warren JA (2020) Robotic versus laparoscopic approach to Hiatal hernia repair: results after 7 years of robotic experience. Am Surg. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003134820943547
Nocera F, Wilhelm A, Schneider R, Koechlin L, Daume D, Fourie L, Steinemann DC, von Flüe M, Peterli R, Angehrn F, Bolli M (2022) Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic repair of complete upside-down stomach hiatal hernia (the rather-study): a prospective comparative single center study. Surg Endosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08307-2
Singer E, Kneuertz PJ, D’Souza DM, Moffatt-Bruce SD, Merritt RE (2019) Understanding the financial cost of robotic lobectomy: calculating the value of innovation? Ann Cardiothorac Surg. https://doi.org/10.21037/acs.2018.05.18
Barbash GI, Glied SA (2010) New Technology and health care costs—the case of robot-assisted surgery. N Engl J Med. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmp1006602
Sheetz KH, Claflin J, Dimick JB (2020) Trends in the adoption of robotic surgery for common surgical procedures. JAMA Netw Open. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.18911
Attaluri V, McLemore EC (2016) The cost of robotic surgery. Semin Colon Rectal Surg. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.scrs.2016.04.004
Rashidi L, Neighorn C, Bastawrous A (2017) Outcome comparisons between high-volume robotic and laparoscopic surgeons in a large healthcare system. Am J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.03.034
Korsholm M, Sørensen J, Mogensen O, Wu C, Karlsen K, Jensen PT (2018) A systematic review about costing methodology in robotic surgery: evidence for low quality in most of the studies. Health Econ Review. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-018-0207-5
Childers CP, Maggard-Gibbons M (2018) Estimation of the acquisition and operating costs for robotic surgery. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.9219
Acknowledgements
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Rishindra Reddy-Intuitive Surgical (Teaching Site), Auris Health (Consultant), Genentech (Advisory Board), Medtronic (Advisory Board). Andrew Lekarczyk, Hana Sinha, Danielle Dvir, Joshua Goyert, Austin Airhart-No Disclosures.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Lekarczyk, A., Sinha, H., Dvir, D. et al. Similar hospital profits with robotic-assisted paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair, despite higher or supply costs. Surg Endosc 37, 3952–3955 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09513-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09513-2