Abstract
Objective
Obesity is a growing global health burden which is particularly challenging to manage. Bariatric surgery is considered the most effective means of sustained weight loss, and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is considered the most effective treatment for morbid obesity. The additional benefit of placing a non-adjustable band to form a banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has gained interest as a measure to improve weight loss; however, comparative data are few, and complications can be high.
Methods
We conducted a prospective case–control study of 484 patients aged 18 and over who received either banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a non-adjustable silastic ring or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patients were followed up for five years and evaluated for weight loss, percentage excess weight loss (%EWL), BMI, and band-related complications.
Results
No significant difference was detected in %EWL or BMI between BRYGB and RYGB. The mean raw weight loss, %EWL, and BMI for BRYGB verse RYGB were as follows: 27.49 SD (17.11) kg verse 34.46 SD (18.18) kg, 65.7% SD (30%) verse 62.2% SD (37%), and 32.33 SD (6.9) kg/m2 verse 32.43 SD (7.2) kg/m2. A total of 80 (21.7%) patients had the non-adjustable band removed for complications.
Conclusion
There is little difference in weight-loss results when comparing BRYGB to RYGB and non-adjustable bands may cause significant complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
WHO (1998) Consultation on obesity: preventing and managing the global epidemic. World Health Organization, Geneva
Dumon K, Savulionyte G (2014) Bariatric surgery produces greater weight loss and improvements in medical conditions than non-surgical treatment of obesity. Evid Based Med. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101669
Heneghan HM, Annaberdyev S, Eldar S, Rogula T, Brethauer S, Schauer P (2014) Banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10(2):210–216
Mahawar KK, Parikh C, Carr WRJ, Jennings N, Balupuri S, Small PK (2014) Primary banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review. Obesity Surg 24(10):1771–1792
Stubbs RS, O’Brien I, Jurikova L (2006) What ring size should be used in association with vertical gastric bypass? Obes Surg 16(10):1298–1303
Fobi MA, Lee H (1994) SILASTIC ring vertical banded gastric bypass for the treatment of obesity: two years of follow-up in 84 patients [corrected]. J Natl Med Assoc 86(2):125–128
Lemmens L (2017) Banded gastric bypass: better long-term results? a cohort study with minimum 5-year follow-up. Obes Surg 27(4):864–872
Cariani S, Nottola D, Grani S, Vittimberga G, Lucchi A, Amenta E (2001) Complications after gastroplasty and gastric bypass as a primary operation and as a reoperation. Obes Surg 11(4):487–490
Fobi M, Lee H, Igwe D, Felahy B, James E, Stanczyk M et al (2001) Band erosion: incidence, etiology, management and outcome after banded vertical gastric bypass. Obes Surg 11(6):699–707
Buchwald H, Buchwald JN, McGlennon TW (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of medium-term outcomes after banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 24(9):1536–1551
Zarate X, Arceo-Olaiz R, Montalvo Hernandez J, García-García E, Pablo Pantoja J, Herrera MF (2013) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing banded versus standard laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(3):395–397
Iannelli A, Schneck AS, Hébuterne X, Gugenheim J (2013) Gastric pouch resizing for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass failure in patients with a dilated pouch. Surg Obes Relat Dis 9(2):260–267
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Disclosures
Dr Adam Skidmore and Dr Jonathon Holt have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skidmore, A., Holt, J. Weight loss and complications of the banded Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: lessons learned from a prospective case control study. Surg Endosc 36, 7516–7520 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09184-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09184-z