Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Single-centre empirical analysis of double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases: A retrospective study of 466 cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objective

The diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases (SBDs) has always been a challenge. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases.

Method

The clinical data of 466 patients who underwent double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) in the Endoscope Center of Gastroenterology Department of the First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province from Jan. 2015 to Dec. 2020 were analysed retrospectively. The factors included age, sex, indications, endoscopic treatment results, pathological results, discharge diagnosis and so on.

Results

A total of 370 patients underwent 466 double-balloon enteroscopies, among whom 274 underwent one examination and 96 received two-way examinations (oral and transanal approaches). Abnormalities were detected in 299 cases, with a detection rate of 80.81% (299/370). The common indications were occult gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB) (30.8%, 114/370) and abdominal pain (28.3%, 105/370). The diagnosis rates were 64.9% and 77.1%, respectively. The common positive findings included nonspecific inflammation/erosion (60 cases), ulcers (34 cases), diverticulum (32 cases), polyps (26 cases) and Crohn's disease (CD) (24 cases). The common tumours were lymphoma(12 cases), adenocarcinoma(11 cases) and stromal tumour(8 cases). Lymphoma was mostly located in the ileum, while stromal tumours and adenocarcinoma were mostly located in the duodenum and jejunum. The main endoscopic intervention measures were haemostasis and polypectomy, including haemostatic clip, argon plasma coagulation (APC), endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR), endoscopic trap resection, endoscopic foreign body extraction and other operations, without serious complications.

Conclusion

DBE has a high success rate in the diagnosis and treatment of some SBDs, and it is a safe and effective management method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y, Higashizawa T, Miyata T, Iino S, Ido K, Sugano K (2001) Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method. Gastrointest Endosc 53:216–220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hong SN, Kim ER, Ye BD, Jang HJ, Jeon SR, Park SJ, Im JP, Kim JH, Choi CH, Choi H, Chang DK (2016) Indications, diagnostic yield, and complication rate of balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) during the first decade of its use in Korea. Dig Endosc 28:443–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tang L, Huang LY, Cui J, Wu CR (2018) Effect of double-balloon enteroscopy on diagnosis and treatment of small-bowel diseases. Chin Med J (Engl) 131:1321–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohmiya N, Nakagawa Y, Nagasaka M, Tahara T, Shibata T, Nakamura M, Hirooka Y, Goto H, Hirata I (2015) Obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: diagnosis and treatment. Dig Endosc 27:285–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang YX, Bian J, Zhu HY, Dong YH, Fang AQ, Li ZS, Du YQ (2019) The role of double-balloon enteroscopy in reducing the maximum size of polyps in patients with Peutz-Jeghers syndrome: 12-year experience. J Dig Dis 20:415–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gao Y, Xin L, Wang YX, Dong YH, Liao Z, Li ZS, Du YQ (2020) Double-balloon enteroscopy for retrieving retained small-bowel video capsule endoscopes: a systematic review. Scand J Gastroenterol 55:105–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang R, Wang Y, Li D, Yu L, Liu G, Ma J, Wang W (2016) Application of carbon nanoparticles to mark locations for re-inspection after colonic polypectomy. Surg Endosc 30:1530–1533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang P, Wang Y, Dong Y, Guo J, Fu H, Li Z, Du Y (2021) Outcomes and safety of double-balloon enteroscopy in small bowel diseases: a single-center experience of 1531 procedures. Surg Endosc 35:576–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. May A, Nachbar L, Ell C (2005) Double-balloon enteroscopy (push-and-pull enteroscopy) of the small bowel: feasibility and diagnostic and therapeutic yield in patients with suspected small bowel disease. Gastrointest Endosc 62:62–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Force USPST, Davidson KW, Barry MJ, Mangione CM, Cabana M, Caughey AB, Davis EM, Donahue KE, Doubeni CA, Krist AH, Kubik M, Li L, Ogedegbe G, Owens DK, Pbert L, Silverstein M, Stevermer J, Tseng CW, Wong JB (2021) Screening for colorectal cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. JAMA 325:1965–1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Disibeyaz S, Suna N, Kuzu UB, Saygili F, Oztas E, Odemis B, Onal IK, Kilic ZM, Akdogan M, Kayacetin E (2016) Double balloon enteroscopy: a 7-year experience at a tertiary care centre. Eur J Intern Med 33:108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Akarsu M, Akkaya Ozdinc S, Celtik A, Akpinar H (2014) Diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy of double-balloon endoscopy in patients with small intestinal diseases: single-center experience in 513 procedures. Turk J Gastroenterol 25:374–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ohmiya N (2020) Management of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding: comparison of guidelines between Japan and other countries. Dig Endosc 32:204–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sunada K, Yamamoto H (2009) Double-balloon endoscopy: past, present, and future. J Gastroenterol 44:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gomollon F, Dignass A, Annese V, Tilg H, Van Assche G, Lindsay JO, Peyrin-Biroulet L, Cullen GJ, Daperno M, Kucharzik T, Rieder F, Almer S, Armuzzi A, Harbord M, Langhorst J, Sans M, Chowers Y, Fiorino G, Juillerat P, Mantzaris GJ, Rizzello F, Vavricka S, Gionchetti P, Ecco, (2017) 3rd European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of crohn’s disease 2016: part 1: diagnosis and medical management. J Crohns Colitis 11:3–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chen WG, Shan GD, Zhang H, Li L, Yue M, Xiang Z, Cheng Y, Wu CJ, Fang Y, Chen LH (2013) Double-balloon enteroscopy in small bowel tumors: a Chinese single-center study. World J Gastroenterol 19:3665–3671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Riff BP, DiMaio CJ (2016) Exploring the Small Bowel: Update on Deep Enteroscopy. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 18:28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Murino A, Nakamura M, Despott EJ, Fraser C (2014) Factors associated with reduced insertion depth at double balloon enteroscopy: a retrospective, multivariate analysis. Dig Liver Dis 46:956–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Study conception and design (PW, HT); acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data (LL, TH, MF, PW); drafting of the manuscript (LL, CY, XB); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (LL, YY, PW); study supervision (PW, HT). The article has been approved by all authors to be published.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ping Wan or Hui Tang.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Liming Lu, Chao Yang, Tian He, Xuan Bai, Minmin Fan, Yajing Yin, Ping Wan and Hui Tang stated that they do not have any conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, L., Yang, C., He, T. et al. Single-centre empirical analysis of double-balloon enteroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of small bowel diseases: A retrospective study of 466 cases. Surg Endosc 36, 7503–7510 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09179-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09179-w

Keywords

Navigation