Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of preoperative EUS-FNA for distal resectable pancreatic cancer: Is it really effective enough to take risks?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is frequently used for the preoperative histologic diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. However, debate continues regarding the clinical merits of preoperative EUS-FNA for the management of resectable pancreatic cancer. We aimed to evaluate the benefits and safety of preoperative EUS-FNA for resectable distal pancreatic cancer.

Methods

The medical records of 304 consecutive patients with suspected distal pancreatic cancer who underwent EUS-FNA were retrospectively reviewed to evaluate the clinical benefits of preoperative EUS-FNA. We also reviewed the medical records of 528 patients diagnosed with distal pancreatic cancer who underwent distal pancreatectomy with or without EUS-FNA. The recurrence rates and cancer-free survival periods of patients who did or did not undergo preoperative EUS-FNA were compared.

Results

The diagnostic accuracy of preoperative EUS-FNA was high (sensitivity, 87.5%; specificity, 100%; positive predictive value 100%; accuracy, 90.7%; negative predictive value, 73.8%). Among patients, 26.7% (79/304) avoided surgery based on the preoperative EUS-FNA findings. Of the 528 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy, 193 patients received EUS-FNA and 335 did not. During follow-up (median 21.7 months), the recurrence rate was similar in the two groups (EUS-FNA, 72.7%; non-EUS-FNA, 75%; P = 0.58). The median cancer-free survival was also similar (P = 0.58); however, gastric wall recurrence was only encountered in the patients with EUS-FNA (n = 2).

Conclusion

Preoperative EUS-FNA is not associated with increased risks of cancer-specific or overall survival. However, clinicians must consider the potential risks of needle tract seeding, and care should be taken when selecting patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baek HW, Park MJ, Rhee YY, Lee KB, Kim MA, Park IA (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic lesions. J Pathol Transl Med 49:52–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen G, Liu S, Zhao Y, Dai M, Zhang T (2013) Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer: a meta-analysis. Pancreatology 13:298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim SH, Woo YS, Lee KH, Lee JK, Lee KT, Park JK, Kang SH, Kim JW, Park JK, Park SW (2018) Preoperative EUS-guided FNA: effects on peritoneal recurrence and survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc 88:926–934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kudo T, Kawakami H, Kuwatani M, Eto K, Kawahata S, Abe Y, Onodera M, Ehira N, Yamato H, Haba S, Kawakubo K, Sakamoto N (2014) Influence of the safety and diagnostic accuracy of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for resectable pancreatic cancer on clinical performance. World J Gastroenterol 20:3620–3627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hewitt MJ, McPhail MJ, Possamai L, Dhar A, Vlavianos P, Monahan KJ (2012) EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 75:319–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Minaga K, Takenaka M, Katanuma A, Kitano M, Yamashita Y, Kamata K, Yamao K, Watanabe T, Maguchi H, Kudo M (2017) Needle tract seeding: an overlooked rare complication of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. Oncology 93(Suppl 1):107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chong A, Venugopal K, Segarajasingam D, Lisewski D (2011) Tumor seeding after EUS-guided FNA of pancreatic tail neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 74:933–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beane JD, House MG, Cote GA, DeWitt JM, Al-Haddad M, LeBlanc JK, McHenry L, Sherman S, Schmidt CM, Zyromski NJ, Nakeeb A, Pitt HA, Lillemoe KD (2011) Outcomes after preoperative endoscopic ultrasonography and biopsy in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy. Surgery 150:844–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cosgrove ND, Yan L, Siddiqui A (2015) Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in potentially resectable patients: Is this safe? Endosc Ultrasound 4:81–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ngamruengphong S, Swanson KM, Shah ND, Wallace MB (2015) Preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration does not impair survival of patients with resected pancreatic cancer. Gut 64:1105–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hartwig W, Schneider L, Diener MK, Bergmann F, Buchler MW, Werner J (2009) Preoperative tissue diagnosis for tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg 96:5–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Volmar KE, Vollmer RT, Jowell PS, Nelson RC, Xie HB (2005) Pancreatic FNA in 1000 cases: a comparison of imaging modalities. Gastrointest Endosc 61:854–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Agarwal B, Abu-Hamda E, Molke KL, Correa AM, Ho L (2004) Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and multidetector spiral CT in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol 99:844–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levy MJ, Wiersema MJ (2005) EUS-guided Trucut biopsy. Gastrointest Endosc 62:417–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. van Riet PA, Larghi A, Attili F, Rindi G, Nguyen NQ, Ruszkiewicz A, Kitano M, Chikugo T, Aslanian H, Farrell J, Robert M, Adeniran A, Van Der Merwe S, Roskams T, Chang K, Lin F, Lee JG, Arcidiacono PG, Petrone M, Doglioni C, Iglesias-Garcia J, Abdulkader I, Giovannini M, Bories E, Poizat F, Santo E, Scapa E, Marmor S, Bucobo JC, Buscaglia JM, Heimann A, Wu M, Baldaque-Silva F, Moro CF, Erler NS, Biermann K, Poley JW, Cahen DL, Bruno MJ (2019) A multicenter randomized trial comparing a 25-gauge EUS fine-needle aspiration device with a 20-gauge EUS fine-needle biopsy device. Gastrointest Endosc 89:329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. El Chafic AH, Dewitt J, Leblanc JK, El H II, Cote G, House MG, Sherman S, McHenry L, Pitt HA, Johnson C, Mohamadnejad M, Al-Haddad M (2013) Impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration on postoperative recurrence and survival in cholangiocarcinoma patients. Endoscopy 45:883–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ikezawa K, Uehara H, Sakai A, Fukutake N, Imanaka K, Ohkawa K, Tanakura R, Ioka T, Tanaka S, Ishikawa O, Katayama K (2013) Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer. J Gastroenterol 48:966–972

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Tsutsumi H, Hara K, Mizuno N, Hijioka S, Imaoka H, Tajika M, Tanaka T, Ishihara M, Yoshimura K, Shimizu Y, Niwa Y, Sasaki Y, Yamao K (2016) Clinical impact of preoperative endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Endosc Ultrasound 5:94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) Grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No. NRF-2017R1D1A1B04032097) and INHA University Grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

J-SP: conception and design, analysis and interpretation of the data, drafting of the article. JHL: drafting of the article and provision of study materials or patients. TJS: conception and design, critical revision of the article for important intellectual content, administration, and final approval of the article. JSL: collection and assembly of data and provision of study materials or patients. SJJ: analysis and interpretation of the data and administrative and technical support. DWO: collection and assembly of data and provision of study materials or patients. KBS, DWH, DHP, SSL, SCK, DWS, SKL, M-HK: critical revision of the article for important intellectual content and provision of study materials or patients.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tae Jun Song.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Jin-Seok Park, Jae Hoon Lee, Tae Jun Song, Joune Seup Lee, Seok Jung Jo, Dong Wook Oh, Ki Byung Song, Dae Wook Hwang, Do Hyun Park, Sang Soo Lee, Song Cheol Kim, Dong Wan Seo, Sung Koo Lee, and Myung-Hwan Kim have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Park, JS., Lee, J.H., Song, T.J. et al. The impact of preoperative EUS-FNA for distal resectable pancreatic cancer: Is it really effective enough to take risks?. Surg Endosc 36, 3192–3199 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08627-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08627-3

Keywords

Navigation