Abstract
Background
Using the Ideal Development Exploration Assessment and Long-term study (IDEAL) paradigm, Halls et al. created risk-adjusted cumulative sum (RA-CUSUM) curves concluding that Pioneers (P) and Early Adopters (EA) of minimally invasive (MI) liver resection obtained similar results after fewer cases. In this study, we applied this framework to a MI Hepatic-Pancreatic and Biliary fellowship-trained surgeon (FT) in order to assess where along the curves this generation fell.
Methods
The term FT was used to designate surgeons without previous independent operative experience who went from surgical residency directly into fellowship. Three phases of the learning curve were defined using published data on EAs and Ps of MI Hepatectomy, including phase 1 (initiation) (i.e., the first 17 or 50), phase 2 (standardization) (i.e., cases 18–46 or 1–50) and phase 3 (proficiency) (i.e., cases after 46, 50 or 135). Data analysis was performed using the Social Science Statistics software (www.socscistatistics.com). Statistical significance was defined as p < .05.
Results
From November 2007 until April 2018, 95 MI hepatectomies were performed by a FT. During phase 1, the FT approached larger tumors than the EA group (p = 0.002), that were more often malignant (94.1%) when compared to the P group (52.5%) (p < 0.001). During phase 2, the FT operated on larger tumors and more malignancies (93.1%) when compared to the Ps (p = 0.004 and p = 0.017, respectively). However, there was no difference when compared to the EA. In the phase 3, the EAs tended to perform more major hepatectomies (58.7) when compared to either the FT (30.6%) (p = 0.002) or the P’s cases 51–135 and after 135 (35.3% and 44.3%, respectively) (both p values < 0.001). When compared to the Ps cases from 51–135, the FT operated on more malignancies (p = 0.012), but this was no longer the case after 135 cases by the Ps (p = 0.164). There were no statistically significant differences when conversions; major complications or 30- and 90-day mortality were compared among these 3 groups.
Discussion
Using the IDEAL framework and RA-CUSUM curves, a FT surgeon was found to have curves similar to EAs despite having no previous independent experience operating on the liver. As in our study, FTs may tend to approach larger and more malignant tumors and do more concomitant procedures in patients with higher ASA classifications than either of their predecessors, without statistically significant increases in major morbidity or mortality.
Conclusion
It is possible that the ISP (i.e., initiation, standardization, proficiency) model could apply to other innovative surgical procedures, creating different learning curves depending on where along the IDEAL paradigm surgeons fall.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Eubanks TR et al (1999) An objective scoring system for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg 189(6):566–574
Gumbs AA, Hogle NJ, Fowler DL (2007) Evaluation of resident laparoscopic performance using global operative assessment of laparoscopic skills. J Am Coll Surg 204(2):308–313
Hopmans CJ et al (2014) Assessment of surgery residents’ operative skills in the operating theater using a modified objective structured assessment of technical skills (OSATS): a prospective multicenter study. Surgery 156(5):1078–1088
Gofton WT et al (2012) The Ottawa Surgical Competency Operating Room Evaluation (O-SCORE): a tool to assess surgical competence. Acad Med 87(10):1401–1407
Fahim C et al (2018) Assessment of technical skills competence in the operating room: a systematic and scoping review. Acad Med 93(5):794–808
McCulloch P et al (2009) No surgical innovation without evaluation: the IDEAL recommendations. Lancet 374(9695):1105–1112
Halls MC et al (2019) A Comparison of the learning curves of laparoscopic liver surgeons in differing stages of the IDEAL paradigm of surgical innovation: standing on the shoulders of pioneers. Ann Surg 269(2):221–228
Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2007a) The medical and surgical department of digestive diseases and minimally invasive HPB fellowship at IMM. HPB (Oxford) 9(6):470–471
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240(2):205–213
Wang M et al (2016) Learning curve for laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a CUSUM analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 20(5):924–935
Chiow AK et al (2015) Learning curve in laparoscopic liver surgery: a fellow’s perspective. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 4(6):411–416
Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J (1992) Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumor. Surg Endosc 6:99
Cherqui D et al (2000) Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Ann Surg 232(6):753–762
Cherqui D (2001) Benign liver tumors. J Chir (Paris) 138(1):19–26
Cherqui D (2002) Laparoscopic hepatic resection. Useful or futile? Ann Chir 127(3):171–174
Cherqui D et al (2002) Laparoscopic living donor hepatectomy for liver transplantation in children. Lancet 359(9304):392–396
Cherqui D (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection. Br J Surg 90(6):644–646
Laurent A et al (2003) Laparoscopic liver resection for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma complicating chronic liver disease. Arch Surg 138(7): p. 763–9; discussion 769
Lesurtel M et al (2003) Laparoscopic versus open left lateral hepatic lobectomy: a case-control study. J Am Coll Surg 196(2):236–242
Vibert E, Denet C, Gayet B (2003) Major digestive surgery using a remote-controlled robot: the next revolution. Arch Surg 138(9):1002–1006
Buell JF et al (2004) An initial experience and evolution of laparoscopic hepatic resectional surgery. Surgery 136(4):804–811
Gayet B et al (2005) Laparoscopic liver surgery for metastases of colorectal cancer: analysis of a monocentric experience. Suppl Tumori 4(3):S135–S137
Cherqui D et al (2006) Laparoscopic liver resection for peripheral hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic liver disease: midterm results and perspectives. Ann Surg 243(4):499–506
Chang S et al (2007) Laparoscopy as a routine approach for left lateral sectionectomy. Br J Surg 94(1):58–63
Bryant R et al (2008) Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 17(3): 607–633, ix
Buell JF et al (2008) Experience with more than 500 minimally invasive hepatic procedures. Ann Surg 248(3):475–486
Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2007b) Totally laparoscopic left hepatectomy. Surg Endosc 21(7):1221
Gumbs AA, Bar-Zakai B, Gayet B (2008) Totally laparoscopic extended left hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1152
Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008a) Totally laparoscopic central hepatectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1153
Buell JF et al (2009) The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg 250(5):825–830
Gumbs AA, Gayet B (2008b) Video: the lateral laparoscopic approach to lesions in the posterior segments. J Gastrointest Surg 12(7):1154
Coles SR et al (2015) Total laparoscopic management of lesions involving liver segment 7. Surg Endosc 29(11):3190–3195
Wakabayashi G et al (2015) Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka. Ann Surg 261(4):619–629
Cipriani F et al (2015) Laparoscopic parenchymal-sparing resections for nonperipheral liver lesions, the diamond technique: technical aspects, clinical outcomes, and oncologic efficiency. J Am Coll Surg 221(2):265–272
Martinez-Cecilia D et al (2018) Laparoscopic parenchymal sparing resections in segment 8: techniques for a demanding and infrequent procedure. Surg Endosc 32(4):2012–2019
Abu Hilal M et al (2018) The Southampton consensus guidelines for laparoscopic liver surgery: from indication to implementation. Ann Surg 268(1):11–18
Medbery RL et al (2014) Laparoscopic vs open right hepatectomy: a value-based analysis. J Am Coll Surg 218(5):929–939
Brown KM, Geller DA (2016) What is the learning curve for laparoscopic major hepatectomy? J Gastrointest Surg 20(5):1065–1071
Fretland AA et al (2018) Laparoscopic versus open resection for colorectal liver metastases: the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg 267(2):199–207
Ishizawa T et al (2012) Laparoscopic segmentectomy of the liver: from segment I to VIII. Ann Surg 256(6):959–964
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Dr. Andrew A. Gumbs, Professor Mohamed Abu-Hilal, Professor Roland Croner, Professor Michel Gayet, Professor Brice Gayet and Professor Elie Chouillard have no financial ties or disclosures to report.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gumbs, A.A., Hilal, M.A., Croner, R. et al. The initiation, standardization and proficiency (ISP) phases of the learning curve for minimally invasive liver resection: comparison of a fellowship-trained surgeon with the pioneers and early adopters. Surg Endosc 35, 5268–5278 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08122-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-020-08122-1