Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Many studies have shown that robotic gastrectomy requires a longer operation time than laparoscopic gastrectomy. However, no study has analyzed the exact reason for this difference in detail. We therefore investigated the reasons why more time is needed in robotic gastrectomy.

Methods

Ten consecutive cases of robotic distal gastrectomy (RDG) performed in our institution were selected to measure the operation time in detail. Ten cases of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) performed during the same period were chosen for comparison. The operation videos and electronic medical records of these 20 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The overall operation time, operation time in each step, and time required for instrument changes were measured. The number of intraoperative instrument changes and camera cleanings were also counted.

Results

The overall operation time (including effective time and junk time) was 56.8 min longer for RDG than LDG (273.7 vs. 216.9 min, respectively; p = 0.000). The effective time was only 15.3 min longer for RDG than LDG (145.9 vs. 130.6 min, respectively; p = 0.094). The time needed for the six technical steps was also not significantly different between the two groups. However, the junk time (instrument setup and docking or positioning of surgical arms) was 41.5 min longer for RDG than LDG (127.8 vs. 86.2 min, respectively; p = 0.001). The number of instrument changes was not different between RDG and LDG (p = 0.277), but the time required for each was longer for RDG than LDG (p = 0.000). The number of camera cleanings was lower for RDG than LDG (10.7 vs. 15.5 times, respectively; p = 0.005).

Conclusions

To reduce the operation time in RDG, a smarter and simpler system for setup should be developed to reduce the junk time. Additionally, a system for swifter instrument changes and more sophisticated energy devices are warranted to reduce the effective time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87–108. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2017) Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4) Gastric Cancer 20:1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kinoshita T, Kaito A (2017) Current status and future perspectives of laparoscopic radical surgery for advanced gastric cancer. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol 2:43. https://doi.org/10.21037/tgh.2017.04.05

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, Yoshida K, Takagane A, Kojima K, Sakuramoto S, Shiraishi N, Kitano S (2015) A Multi-institutional, prospective, phase II feasibility study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection for locally advanced gastric cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg 39:2734–2741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park YK, Yoon HM, Kim YW, Park JY, Ryu KW, Lee YJ, Jeong O, Yoon KY, Lee JH, Lee SE, Yu W, Jeong SH, Kim T, Kim S, Nam BH; COACT group(2017) Laparoscopy-assisted versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: results from a randomized phase II multicenter clinical trial (COACT 1001). Ann Surg. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G (2016) Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic versus open D2 distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 34:1350–1357. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G (2003) Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg 138(7):777–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Park JY, Kim YW, Ryu KW, Eom BW, Yoon HM, Reim D (2013) Emerging role of robot-assisted gastrectomy: analysis of consecutive 200 cases. J Gastric Cancer 13:255–262. https://doi.org/10.5230/jgc.2013.13.4.255

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Suda K, Man-I M, Ishida Y, Kawamura Y, Satoh S, Uyama I (2015) Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study. Surg Endosc 29:673–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3718-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song J, Kang WH, Oh SJ, Hyung WJ, Choi SH, Noh SH (2009) Role of robotic gastrectomy using da Vinci system compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy: initial experience of 20 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 23:1204–1211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-009-0351-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pan JH, Zhou H, Zhao XX, Ding H, Qin L, Pan YL (2017) Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic gastrectomy versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 31:4244–4251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5891-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen K, Pan Y, Zhang B, Maher H, Wang XF, Cai XJ (2017) Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis. BMC Surg 17:93. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-017-0290-2

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Japanese Gastric Cancer Association (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-011-0041-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaito A, Kinoshita T (2017) Educational system of laparoscopic gastrectomy for trainee-how to teach, how to learn. J Vis Surg 3:16. https://doi.org/10.21037/jovs.2016.12.13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katayama H, Kurokawa Y, Nakamura K, Ito H, Kanemitsu Y, Masuda N, Tsubosa Y, Satoh T, Yokomizo A, Fukuda H, Sasako M (2016) Extended Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: Japan Clinical Oncology Group postoperative complications criteria. Surg Today 46:668–685. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-015-1236-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang SY, Roh KH, Kim YN, Cho M, Lim SH, Son T, Hyung WJ, Kim HI (2017) Surgical outcomes after open, laparoscopic, and robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 24:1770–1777. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5851-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fong Y, Woo Y, Giulianotti PC (2017) Robotic surgery: the promise and finally the progress. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 6:219–221. https://doi.org/10.21037/hbsn.2017.04.04

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to extend thanks to Ms. Tamae Takeuchi for her dedication to writing this manuscript. We also thank Angela Morben, DVM, ELS, from Edanz Group (http://www.edanzediting.com/ac), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan

    Heli Liu, Takahiro Kinoshita, Akiko Tonouchi, Akio Kaito & Masanori Tokunaga

  2. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, People’s Republic of China

    Heli Liu

Authors
  1. Heli Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takahiro Kinoshita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Akiko Tonouchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Akio Kaito
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Masanori Tokunaga
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takahiro Kinoshita.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Heli Liu, Takahiro Kinoshita, Akiko Tonouchi, Akio Kaito, and Masanori Tokunaga have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, H., Kinoshita, T., Tonouchi, A. et al. What are the reasons for a longer operation time in robotic gastrectomy than in laparoscopic gastrectomy for stomach cancer?. Surg Endosc 33, 192–198 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6294-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6294-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation