Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of posterior retroperitoneal and transabdominal lateral approaches in robotic adrenalectomy: an analysis of 200 cases

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Although numerous studies have been published on robotic adrenalectomy (RA) in the literature, none has done a comparison of posterior retroperitoneal (PR) and transabdominal lateral (TL) approaches. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of robotic PR and TL adrenalectomy.

Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Between September 2008 and January 2017, perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing RA through PR and TL approaches were recorded into an IRB-approved database. Clinical and perioperative parameters were compared using Student’s t test, Wilcoxon rank-sum test, and χ 2 test. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine factors associated with total operative time.

Results

188 patients underwent 200 RAs. 110 patients were operated through TL and 78 patients through PR approach. Overall, conversion rate to open was 2.5% and 90-day morbidity 4.8%. The perioperative outcomes of TL and PR approaches were similar regarding estimated blood loss, rate of conversion to open, length of hospital stay, and 90-day morbidity. PR approach resulted in a shorter mean ± SD total operative time (136.3 ± 38.7 vs. 154.6 ± 48.4 min; p = 0.005) and lower visual analog scale pain score on postoperative day #1 (4.3 ± 2.5 vs. 5.4 ± 2.4; p = 0.001). After excluding tumors larger than 6 cm operated through TL approach, the difference in operative times persisted (136.3 ± 38.7 vs. 153.7 ± 45.7 min; p = 0.009). On multivariate regression analysis, increasing BMI and TL approaches were associated with longer total operative time.

Conclusion

This study shows that robotic PR and TL approaches are equally safe and efficacious. With experience, shorter operative time and less postoperative pain can be achieved with PR technique. This supports the preferential utilization of PR approach in high-volume centers with enough experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piazza L, Caragliano P, Scardilli M, Sgroi AV, Marino G, Giannone G (1999) Laparoscopic robot-assisted right adrenalectomy and left ovariectomy (case reports). Chir Ital 51:465–466

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Karabulut K, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Robotic vs laparoscopic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Arch Surg 147:272–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandao LF, Autorino R, Zargar H, Krishnan J, Laydner H, Akca O, Mir MC, Samarasekera D, Stein R, Kaouk J (2014) Robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: step-by-step technique and comparative outcomes. Eur Urol 66:898–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dickson PV, Alex GC, Grubbs EG, Jimenez C, Lee JE, Perrier ND (2013) Robotic-assisted retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy: making a good procedure even better. Am Surgeon 79:84–89

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Karabulut K, Agcaoglu O, Aliyev S, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Comparison of intraoperative time use and perioperative outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 151:537–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Morelli L, Tartaglia D, Bronzoni J, Palmeri M, Guadagni S, Di Franco G, Gennai A, Bianchini M, Bastiani L, Moglia A, Ferrari V, Fommei E, Pietrabissa A, Di Candio G, Mosca F (2016) Robotic assisted versus pure laparoscopic surgery of the adrenal glands: a case-control study comparing surgical techniques. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 401:999–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Winter JM, Talamini MA, Stanfield CL, Chang DC, Hundt JD, Dackiw AP, Campbell KA, Schulick RD (2006) Thirty robotic adrenalectomies: a single institution’s experience. Surg Endosc 20:119–124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brunaud L, Ayav A, Zarnegar R, Rouers A, Klein M, Boissel P, Bresler L (2008) Prospective evaluation of 100 robotic-assisted unilateral adrenalectomies. Surgery 144:995–1001 (discussion 1001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giulianotti PC, Buchs NC, Addeo P, Bianco FM, Ayloo SM, Caravaglios G, Coratti A (2011) Robot-assisted adrenalectomy: a technical option for the surgeon? Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 7:27–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Berber E, Mitchell J, Milas M, Siperstein A (2010) Robotic posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy: operative technique. Arch Surg 145:781–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Berber E, Tellioglu G, Harvey A, Mitchell J, Milas M, Siperstein A (2009) Comparison of laparoscopic transabdominal lateral versus posterior retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. Surgery 146:621–625 (discussion 625–626)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Agcaoglu O, Sahin DA, Siperstein A, Berber E (2012) Selection algorithm for posterior versus lateral approach in laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surgery 151:731–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Taskin HE, Berber E (2013) Robotic adrenalectomy. Cancer J 19:162–166

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bittner JG, Gershuni VM, Matthews BD, Moley JF, Brunt LM (2013) Risk factors affecting operative approach, conversion, and morbidity for adrenalectomy: a single-institution series of 402 patients. Surg Endosc 27:2342–2350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gupta PK, Natarajan B, Pallati PK, Gupta H, Sainath J, Fitzgibbons RJ Jr (2011) Outcomes after laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Surg Endosc 25:784–794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Economopoulos KP, Phitayakorn R, Lubitz CC, Sadow PM, Parangi S, Stephen AE, Hodin RA (2016) Should specific patient clinical characteristics discourage adrenal surgeons from performing laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy? Surgery 159:240–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eren Berber.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Eren Berber is a consultant to Ethicon Inc. and Aesculap Inc. His activities involve consultation on product development for open and laparoscopic liver procedures and has received honoraria from both companies. Bora Kahramangil declared no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kahramangil, B., Berber, E. Comparison of posterior retroperitoneal and transabdominal lateral approaches in robotic adrenalectomy: an analysis of 200 cases. Surg Endosc 32, 1984–1989 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5894-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5894-1

Keywords

Navigation