Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Surgical trainee association with operative outcomes is controversial. Studies are conflicting, possibly due to insufficient control of confounding variables such as operative time, case complexity, and heterogeneous patient populations. As operative complications worsen long-term outcomes in oncologic patients, understanding effect of trainee involvement during laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is of utmost importance. Here, we hypothesized that resident involvement was associated with worsened 30-day mortality and 30-day overall morbidity in this patient population.

Methods

Patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy for oncologic diagnosis from 2005 to 2012 were assessed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset. Propensity score matching accounted for demographics, comorbidities, case complexity, and operative time. Attending only cases were compared to junior, middle, chief resident, and fellow level cohorts to assess primary outcomes of 30-day mortality and 30-day overall morbidity.

Results

A total of 13,211 patients met inclusion criteria, with 4075 (30.8%) cases lacking trainee involvement and 9136 (69.2%) involving a trainee. Following propensity matching, junior (PGY 1–2) and middle level (PGY 3–4) resident involvement was not associated with worsened outcomes. Chief (PGY 5) resident involvement was associated with worsened 30-day overall morbidity (15.5 vs. 18.6%, p = 0.01). Fellow (PGY > 5) involvement was associated with worsened 30-day overall morbidity (16.0 vs. 21.0%, p < 0.001), serious morbidity (9.3 vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001), minor morbidity (9.8 vs. 13.1%, p = 0.002), and surgical site infection (7.9 vs. 10.5%, p = 0.006). No differences were seen in 30-day mortality for any resident level.

Conclusion

Following propensity-matched analysis of cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy, chief residents, and fellows were associated with worsened operative outcomes compared to attending along cases, while junior and mid-level resident outcomes were no different. Further study is necessary to determine what effect the PGY surgical trainee level has on post-operative morbidity in cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy in the context of multiple collinear factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Index 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Core Measures (2016). https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/QualityMeasures/Core-Measures.html. Accessed July 2017

  2. Balk EM, Bonis PA, Moskowitz H, Schmid CH, Ioannidis JP, Wang C, Lau J (2002) Correlation of quality measures with estimates of treatment effect in meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. JAMA 287:2973–2982

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kasten KR, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, Read TE, Schoetz DJ, Hall JF, Francone TD, Ricciardi R (2015) All things not being equal: readmission associated with procedure type. J Surg Res 194:430–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. LaPar DJ, Kron IL, Jones DR, Stukenborg GJ, Kozower BD (2012) Hospital procedure volume should not be used as a measure of surgical quality. Ann Surg 256:606–615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Donabedian A (1988) The quality of care. How can it be assessed? JAMA 260:1743–1748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Artinyan A, Orcutt ST, Anaya DA, Richardson P, Chen GJ, Berger DH (2015) Infectious postoperative complications decrease long-term survival in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer: a study of 12,075 patients. Ann Surg 261:497–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li QG, Li P, Tang D, Chen J, Wang DR (2013) Impact of postoperative complications on long-term survival after radical resection for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 19:4060–4065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu ZR, Rajendran N, Lynch AC, Heriot AG, Warrier SK (2016) Anastomotic leaks after restorative resections for rectal cancer compromise cancer outcomes and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 59:236–244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barlesi F, Doddoli C, Chetaille B, Torre JP, Giudicelli R, Thomas P, Kleisbauer JP, Fuentes P (2003) Survival and postoperative complication in daily practice after neoadjuvant therapy in resectable stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2:558–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Becker K, Furch C, Schmid I, von Schweinitz D, Haberle B (2015) Impact of postoperative complications on overall survival of patients with hepatoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 62:24–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Tevis SE, Kohlnhofer BM, Stringfield S, Foley EF, Harms BA, Heise CP, Kennedy GD (2013) Postoperative complications in patients with rectal cancer are associated with delays in chemotherapy that lead to worse disease-free and overall survival. Dis Colon Rectum 56:1339–1348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Birkmeyer NJ, Goodney PP, Stukel TA, Hillner BE, Birkmeyer JD (2005) Do cancer centers designated by the National Cancer Institute have better surgical outcomes? Cancer 103:435–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheung MC, Hamilton K, Sherman R, Byrne MM, Nguyen DM, Franceschi D, Koniaris LG (2009) Impact of teaching facility status and high-volume centers on outcomes for lung cancer resection: an examination of 13,469 surgical patients. Ann Surg Oncol 16:3–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pfister DG, Rubin DM, Elkin EB, Neill US, Duck E, Radzyner M, Bach PB (2015) Risk adjusting survival outcomes in hospitals that treat patients with cancer without information on cancer stage. JAMA Oncol 1:1303–1310

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Allard CB, Meyer CP, Gandaglia G, Chang SL, Chun FK, Gelpi-Hammerschmidt F, Hanske J, Kibel AS, Preston MA, Trinh QD (2015) The effect of resident involvement on perioperative outcomes in transurethral urologic surgeries. J Surg Educ 72:1018–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bhayani NH, Gupta A, Kurian AA, Dunst CM, Sharata AH, Reavis KM, Swanstrom LL, Halpin VJ (2012) Does fellow participation in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass affect perioperative outcomes? Surg Endosc 26:3442–3448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Montroni I, Ghignone F, Rosati G, Zattoni D, Manaresi A, Taffurelli M, Ugolini G (2014) The challenge of education in colorectal cancer surgery: a comparison of early oncological results, morbidity, and mortality between residents and attending surgeons performing an open right colectomy. J Surgical Educ 71:254–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mizrahi I, Mazeh H, Levy Y, Karavani G, Ghanem M, Armon Y, Vromen A, Eid A, Udassin R (2013) Comparison of pediatric appendectomy outcomes between pediatric surgeons and general surgery residents. J Surg Res 180:185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pastor C, Cienfuegos JA, Baixauli J, Arredondo J, Sola JJ, Beorlegui C, Hernandez-Lizoain JL (2013) Surgical training on rectal cancer surgery: do supervised senior residents differ from consultants in outcomes? Int J Colorectal Dis 28:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Relles DM, Burkhart RA, Pucci MJ, Sendecki J, Tholey R, Drueding R, Sauter PK, Kennedy EP, Winter JM, Lavu H, Yeo CJ (2014) Does resident experience affect outcomes in complex abdominal surgery? Pancreaticoduodenectomy as an example. J Gastrointest Surg 18:279–285 discussion 285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Barber EL, Harris B, Gehrig PA (2016) Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 215:215-e1-7

  22. Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Sakai Y, Okuchi Y, Murakami T, Hata H, Fukuda M, Ikai I (2014) Short- and mid-term outcomes after early surgical training in laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery: trainees’ performance has no negative impact. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech Part A 24:475–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hernandez-Irizarry R, Zendejas B, Ali SM, Lohse CM, Farley DR (2012) Impact of resident participation on laparoscopic inguinal hernia repairs: are residents slowing us down? J Surg Educ 69:746–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Papandria D, Rhee D, Ortega G, Zhang Y, Gorgy A, Makary MA, Abdullah F (2012) Assessing trainee impact on operative time for common general surgical procedures in ACS-NSQIP. Journal of surgical education 69:149–155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Saliba AN, Taher AT, Tamim H, Harb AR, Mailhac A, Radwan A, Jamali FR (2016) Impact of Resident Involvement in Surgery (IRIS-NSQIP): looking at the bigger picture based on the American College of Surgeons-NSQIP database. J Am Coll Surg 222:30–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Fukuda M, Murakami T, Okuchi Y, Hata H, Sakai Y, Ikai I (2012) Laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer performed by trainees: impact on short-term outcomes and selection of suitable patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:1215–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsigonis AM, Landercasper J, Al-Hamadani M, Linebarger JH, Vang CA, Johnson JM, Marchese E, Marcou KA, Hudak JM (2015) Are breast cancer outcomes compromised by general surgical resident participation in the operation? J Surg Educ 72:1109–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelly M, Bhangu A, Singh P, Fitzgerald JE, Tekkis PP (2014) Systematic review and meta-analysis of trainee- versus expert surgeon-performed colorectal resection. Br J Surg 101:750–759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Venkat R, Valdivia PL, Guerrero MA (2014) Resident participation and postoperative outcomes in adrenal surgery. J Surg Res 190:559–564

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wilkiemeyer M, Pappas TN, Giobbie-Hurder A, Itani KM, Jonasson O, Neumayer LA (2005) Does resident post graduate year influence the outcomes of inguinal hernia repair? Ann Surg 241:879–882 discussion 882–874

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Peersman G, Laskin R, Davis J, Peterson MG, Richart T (2006) Prolonged operative time correlates with increased infection rate after total knee arthroplasty. HSS J 2:70–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Reames BN, Bacal D, Krell RW, Birkmeyer JD, Birkmeyer NJ, Finks JF (2015) Influence of median surgeon operative duration on adverse outcomes in bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis 11:207–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tan TW, Kalish JA, Hamburg NM, Rybin D, Doros G, Eberhardt RT, Farber A (2012) Shorter duration of femoral-popliteal bypass is associated with decreased surgical site infection and shorter hospital length of stay. J Am Coll Surg 215:512–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Caetano Lde V, Enokihara MM, Porro AM (2015) Recurrent angular cheilitis in a patient with mucocutaneous pemphigus vulgaris. Clin Exp Dermatol 40:819–821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Midura EF, Hanseman D, Davis BR, Atkinson SJ, Abbott DE, Shah SA, Paquette IM (2015) Risk factors and consequences of anastomotic leak after colectomy: a national analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 58:333–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Iannuzzi JC, Chandra A, Rickles AS, Kumar NG, Kelly KN, Gillespie DL, Monson JR, Fleming FJ (2013) Resident involvement is associated with worse outcomes after major lower extremity amputation. J Vasc Surg 58(827–831):e821

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lim S, Jordan SW, Jain U, Kim JY (2014) Predictors and causes of unplanned re-operations in outpatient plastic surgery: a multi-institutional analysis of 6749 patients using the 2011 NSQIP database. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 48:270–275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Merkow RP, Bentrem DJ, Cohen ME, Paruch JL, Weber SM, Ko CY, Bilimoria KY (2013) Effect of cancer surgery complexity on short-term outcomes, risk predictions, and hospital comparisons. J Am Coll Surg 217:685–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mohanty S, Paruch J, Bilimoria KY, Cohen M, Strong VE, Weber SM (2015) Impact of gastrectomy procedural complexity on surgical outcomes and hospital comparisons. Surgery 158:522–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Sippey M, Spaniolas K, Manwaring ML, Pofahl WE, Kasten KR (2016) Surgical resident involvement differentially affects patient outcomes in laparoscopic and open colectomy for malignancy. Am J Surg 211:1026–1034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2017). https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/program-specifics/data. Accessed July 2017

  42. American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program: User Guide (2013). https://www.facs.org/quality-programs/acs-nsqip/program-specifics/participant-use. Accessed July 2017

  43. Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Demakis J, Aust JB, Chong V, Fabri PJ, Gibbs JO, Grover F, Hammermeister K, Irvin G 3rd, McDonald G, Passaro E Jr, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF (1998) The Department of Veterans Affairs’ NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg 228:491–507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Spaniolas K, Laycock WS, Adrales GL, Trus TL (2014) Laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: advanced age is associated with minor but not major morbidity or mortality. J Am Coll Surg 218:1187–1192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Spaniolas K, Trus TL, Adrales GL, Quigley MT, Pories WJ, Laycock WS (2014) Early morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and gastric bypass in the elderly: a NSQIP analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis 10:584–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Sippey M, Spaniolas K, Kasten KR (2016) Elucidating trainee effect on outcomes for general, gynecologic, and urologic oncology procedures. J Invest Surg 1–9

  47. Shirah GR, Hsu CH, Heberer MA, Wikholm LI, Goodman JJ, Bouton ME, Komenaka IK (2016) Teaching residents may affect the margin status of breast-conserving operations. Surg Today 46:437–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hutter MM, Glasgow RE, Mulvihill SJ (2000) Does the participation of a surgical trainee adversely impact patient outcomes? A study of major pancreatic resections in California. Surgery 128:286–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Praseedom RK, Paisley A, Madhavan KK, Garden OJ, Carter DC, Paterson-Brown S (1999) Supervised surgical trainees can perform pancreatic resections safely. J R Coll Surg Edinb 44:16–18

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Raval MV, Wang X, Cohen ME, Ingraham AM, Bentrem DJ, Dimick JB, Flynn T, Hall BL, Ko CY (2011) The influence of resident involvement on surgical outcomes. J Am Coll Surg 212:889–898

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mishra A, Agarwal G, Agarwal A, Mishra SK (1999) Safety and efficacy of total thyroidectomy in hands of endocrine surgery trainees. Am J Surg 178:377–380

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Reinisch A, Malkomes P, Liese J, Schreckenbach T, Holzer K, Bechstein WO, Habbe N (2016) Education in thyroid surgery: a matched-pair analysis comparing residents and board-certified surgeons. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 401:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Changoor NR, Ortega G, Ekladios M, Zogg CK, Cornwell EE 3rd, Haider AH (2015) Racial disparities in surgical outcomes: does the level of resident surgeon play a role? Surgery 158:547–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Senagore AJ (2015) Adoption of laparoscopic colorectal surgery: it was quite a journey. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 28:131–134

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Keller DS, Parikh N, Senagore AJ (2017) Predicting opportunities to increase utilization of laparoscopy for colon cancer. Surg Endosc 31:1855–1862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hallowell PT, Dahman MI, Stokes JB, LaPar DJ, Schirmer BD (2013) Minimally invasive surgery fellowship does not adversely affect general surgery resident case volume: a decade of experience. Am J Surgery 205:307–311 discussion 311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KRK had full access to all the data in the study, and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: KRK, ACC, LT, KS. Acquisition of data: KRK, ACC, LT, KS. Analysis and interpretation of data: KRK, ACC, LT, KS. Drafting of the manuscript: KRK, ACC, LT, MLM, KS. Critical revision of the manuscript: KRK, ACC, LT, MLM, KS. Study supervision: KRK.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kevin R. Kasten.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Kasten, Celio, Trakimas, Manwaring, and Spaniolas have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kasten, K.R., Celio, A.C., Trakimas, L. et al. Trainee-associated outcomes in laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: propensity score analysis accounting for operative time, procedure complexity and patient comorbidity. Surg Endosc 32, 702–711 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5726-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5726-3

Keywords

Navigation