Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Optimal radial force and size for palliation in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a comparative analysis of current stent technology

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The optimal use of esophageal stents for malignant and benign esophageal strictures continues to be plagued with variability in pain tolerance, migration rates, and reflux-related symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the differences in radial force exhibited by a variety of esophageal stents with respect to the patient’s esophageal stricture.

Methods

Radial force testing was performed on eight stents manufactured by four different companies using a hydraulic press and a 5000 N force gage. Radial force was measured using three different tests: transverse compression, circumferential compression, and a three-point bending test. Esophageal stricture composition and diameters were measured to assess maximum diameter, length, and proximal esophageal diameter among 15 patients prior to stenting.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference in mean radial force for transverse compression tests at the middle (range 4.25–0.66 newtons/millimeter N/mm) and at the flange (range 3.32–0.48 N/mm). There were also statistical differences in mean radial force for circumferential test (ranged from 1.19 to 10.50 N/mm, p < 0.001) and the three-point bending test (range 0.08–0.28 N/mm, p < 0.001). In an evaluation of esophageal stricture diameters and lengths, the smallest median diameter of the stricture was 10 mm (range 5–16 mm) and the median proximal diameter normal esophagus was 25 mm (range 22–33 mm), which is currently outside of the range of stent diameters.

Conclusions

Tested stents demonstrated significant differences in radial force, which provides further clarification of stent pain and intolerance in certain patients, with either benign or malignant disease. Similarly, current stent diameters do not successfully exclude the proximal esophagus, which can lead to obstructive-type symptoms. Awareness of radial force, esophageal stricture composition, and proximal esophageal diameter must be known and understood for optimal stent tolerance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hindy P, Hong J, Lam-Tsai Y, Gress F (2012) A comprehensive review of esophageal stents. Gastroenterol Hepatol 8:526–534

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sharma P, Kozarek R, Practice Parameters Committee of American College of G. (2010) Role of esophageal stents in benign and malignant diseases. Am J Gastroenterol 105: 258–273; quiz 274

  3. Hirdes MM, Vleggaar FP, de Beule M, Siersema PD (2013) In vitro evaluation of the radial and axial force of self-expanding esophageal stents. Endoscopy 45:997–1005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Moon T, Hong D, Chun HJ, Jeen YT, Hyun JH, Lee KB (2001) New approach to radial expansive force measurement of self expandable esophageal metal stents. ASAIO J 47:646–650

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan AC, Shin FG, Lam YH et al (1999) A comparison study on physical properties of self-expandable esophageal metal stents. Gastrointest Endosc 49:462–465

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Isayama H, Nakai Y, Toyokawa Y et al (2009) Measurement of radial and axial forces of biliary self-expandable metallic stents. Gastrointest Endosc 70:37–44

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jedwab MR, Clerc CO (1993) A study of the geometrical and mechanical properties of a self-expanding metallic stent–theory and experiment. J Appl Biomater 4:77–85

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grenacher L, Ganger E, Lubienski A, Dux M, Kauffmann GW, Richter GM (2004) Experimental functional analysis of self-expanding stents using a new developed ex vivo model. Invest Radiol 39:374–383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nathanson LK, Brunott N, Cavallucci D (2012) Adult esophagogastric junction distensibility during general anesthesia assessed with an endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP(R)). Surg Endosc 26:1051–1055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Siersema PD (2008) Treatment options for esophageal strictures. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:142–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Verschuur EM, Repici A, Kuipers EJ, Steyerberg EW, Siersema PD (2008) New design esophageal stents for the palliation of dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer: a randomized trial. Am J Gastroent 103:304–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Dua KS, Kozarek R, Kim J et al (2001) Self-expanding metal esophageal stent with anti-reflux mechanism. Gastrointest Endosc 53:603–613

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shim CS, Jung IS, Cheon YK et al (2005) Management of malignant stricture of the esophagogastric junction with a newly designed self-expanding metal stent with an antireflux mechanism. Endoscopy 37:335–339

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Louisville, 315 E. Broadway – M10 - Rm#312, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA

    Nsehniitooh Mbah, Prejesh Philips & Robert C. G. Martin II

  2. Biomedical Engineering Laboratory, University of Louisville, 315 E. Broadway – M10 - Rm#312, Louisville, KY, 40202, USA

    Michael J. Voor

Authors
  1. Nsehniitooh Mbah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Prejesh Philips
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael J. Voor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Robert C. G. Martin II
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert C. G. Martin II.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Drs. Nsehniitooh Mbah, Prejesh Philips, Michael J. Voor, and Robert C. G. Martin II have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mbah, N., Philips, P., Voor, M.J. et al. Optimal radial force and size for palliation in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: a comparative analysis of current stent technology. Surg Endosc 31, 5076–5082 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5571-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5571-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation