Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Training value of laparoscopic colorectal videos on the World Wide Web: a pilot study on the educational quality of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy videos

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Instructive laparoscopy videos with appropriate exposition could be ideal for initial training in laparoscopic surgery, but unfortunately there are no guidelines for annotating these videos or agreed methods to measure the educational content and the safety of the procedure presented. Aim of this study is to systematically search the World Wide Web to determine the availability of laparoscopic colorectal surgery videos and to objectively establish their potential training value.

Methods

A search for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy videos was performed on the three most used English language web search engines Google.com, Bing.com, and Yahoo.com; moreover, a survey among 25 local trainees was performed to identify additional websites for inclusion. All laparoscopic right hemicolectomy videos with an English language title were included. Videos of open surgery, single incision laparoscopic surgery, robotic, and hand-assisted surgery were excluded. The safety of the demonstrated procedure was assessed with a validated competency assessment tool specifically designed for laparoscopic colorectal surgery and data on the educational content of the video were extracted.

Results

Thirty-one websites were identified and 182 surgical videos were included. One hundred and seventy-three videos (95%) detailed the year of publication; this demonstrated a significant increase in the number of videos published per year from 2009. Characteristics of the patient were rarely presented, only 10 videos (5.4%) reported operating time and only 6 videos (3.2%) reported 30-day morbidity; 34 videos (18.6%) underwent a peer-review process prior to publication. Formal case presentation, the presence of audio narration, the use of diagrams, and snapshots and a step-by-step approach are all characteristics of peer-reviewed videos but no significant difference was found in the safety of the procedure.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic videos can be a useful adjunct to operative training. There is a large and increasing amount of material available for free on the internet, but this is currently unregulated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kerr B, O’Leary JP (1999) The training of the surgeon: Dr. Halsted’s greatest legacy. Am Surg 65:1101–1102

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Varley I, Keir J, Fagg P (2006) Changes in caseload and the potential impact on surgical training: a retrospective review of one hospital’s experience. BMC Med Educ 6:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bell RH, Biester TW, Tabuenca A et al (2009) Operative experience of residents in US general surgery programs: a gap between expectation and experience. Ann Surg 249:719–724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Guillou PJ, Quirke P, Thorpe H et al (2005) Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 365:1718–1726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Faiz O, Warusavitarne J, Bottle A et al (2009) Laparoscopically assisted vs. open elective colonic and rectal resection: a comparison of outcomes in English National Health Service Trusts between 1996 and 2006. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1695–1704

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM et al (2012) Learning curve and case selection in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: systematic review and international multicenter analysis of 4852 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 55:1300–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kim J, Edwards E, Bowne W et al (2007) Medial-to-lateral laparoscopic colon resection: a view beyond the learning curve. Surg Endosc 21:1503–1507

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Scott DJ, Young WN, Tesfay ST et al (2001) Laparoscopic skills training. Am J Surg 182:137–142

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stein S, Stulberg J, Champagne B (2012) Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing? Surg Endosc 26:488–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Celentano V, Finch D, Forster L et al (2015) Safety of supervised trainee performed laparoscopic surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Int J Colorectal Dis 30:639–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozyurda F, Dökmeci F, Palaoğlu O et al (2002) The role of interactive training skills courses in medical education at the Ankara University School of Medicine. Teach Learn Med 14:189–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Nageswari KS, Malhotra AS, Kapoor N et al (2004) Pedagogical effectiveness of innovative teaching methods initiated at the Department of Physiology, Government Medical College, Chandigarh. Adv Physiol Educ 28:51–58

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McEwen A, Moorthy C, Quantock C et al (2007) The effect of videotaped preoperative information on parental anxiety during anesthesia induction for elective pediatric procedures. Paediatr Anaesth 17:534–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Saab BR, Usta J, Major S et al (2009) Impact of a communication skills audiovisual package on medical students’ knowledge. J Med Liban 57:226–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hall JC (2002) Imagery practice and the development of surgical skills. Am J Surg 184:465–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mukhopadhyay S, Kruger E, Tennant M (2014) YouTube: a new way of supplementing traditional methods in dental education. J Dent Educ 78:1568–1571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer J, Geurts J, Valderrabano V et al (2013) Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis. J Clin Rheumatol 19:373–376

  18. Jaffar AA (2012) YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ 5:158–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Dinscore A, Andres A (2010) Surgical videos online: A survey of prominent sources and future trends. Med Ref Serv Q 29:10–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Singh AG, Singh S, Singh PP (2012) YouTube for information on rheumatoid arthritis–a wakeup call? J Rheumatol 39:899–903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Duncan I, Yarwood-Ross L, Haigh C (2013) YouTube as a source of clinical skills education. Nurse Educ Today 33:1576–1580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mackenzie H, Ni M, Miskovic D et al (2015) Clinical validity of consultant technical skills assessment in the English National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery. Br J Surg 102(8):991–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Miskovic D, Ni M, Wyles SM et al (2013) Is competency assessment at the specialist level achievable? A study for the national training programme in laparoscopic colorectal surgery in England. Ann Surg 257:476–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mullins JK, Borofsky MS, Allaf ME et al (2012) Live robotic surgery: are outcomes compromised? Urology 80:602–607

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kallmes DF, Cloft HJ, Molyneux A et al (2011) Live case demonstrations: patient safety, ethics, consent, and conflicts. Lancet 377:1539–1541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Khan SA, Chang RT, Ahmed K et al (2014) Live surgical education: a perspective from the surgeons who perform it. BJU Int. doi:10.1111/Bju.12283 [1464–410X (Electronic), LID]

    Google Scholar 

  27. Duty B, Okhunov Z, Friedlander J et al (2012) Live surgical demonstrations: an old, but increasingly controversial practice. Urology 79:e7–e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Challacombe B, Weston R, Coughlin G et al (2010) Live surgical demonstrations in urology: valuable educational tool or putting patients at risk? BJU Int 106:1571–1574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Health on the net foundation. The HON Code of Conduct for medical and health Web sites (HONcode). Available at https://www.healthonnet.org/

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors declare no fundings were received for the preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Celentano.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

V. Celentano, M. Browning, C. Hitchins, M. C. Giglio, and M. G. Coleman have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 232 KB)

Supplementary material 2 (DOC 50 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Celentano, V., Browning, M., Hitchins, C. et al. Training value of laparoscopic colorectal videos on the World Wide Web: a pilot study on the educational quality of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy videos. Surg Endosc 31, 4496–4504 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5504-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5504-2

Keywords

Navigation