Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Training residents in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is supervised surgery safe?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Colorectal resections are increasingly performed laparoscopically, and training in laparoscopic resections in the Netherlands has shifted from a post-residency fellowship to training in residency. The question remains if this supervised surgery affects short-term patient outcome.

Methods

Between January 2010 and July 2014, 523 consecutive patients, who underwent laparoscopic colorectal resection, were selected from a prospective single-center database. All data were obtained from the maintained database and retrospectively analyzed. We compared the short-term outcome of patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery by a supervised fifth- or sixth-year resident compared to patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed by a dedicated colorectal surgeon. Statistical analysis was performed using the Chi-square test for categorical variables and the t test for continuous variables.

Results

Almost 40 % of operations were performed by a resident with an even distribution in type of resection, except for the abdominal–perineal resection (residents vs. surgeon 3.57 vs. 8.26 %, p = 0.04) and the total number of patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiation (resident vs. surgeon 6.66 vs. 20.65 %, p = 0.04). No difference was found in operative time or per-operative blood loss. A higher conversion rate was found when surgery was performed by a supervised resident (residents vs. surgeon 17.34 vs. 9.17 %, p = 0.01), which could be attributed to case selection and one single year. No differences in major complications, oncological outcome and construction of a stoma were found. In the case of minor complications, a significantly increased percentage of bladder retention was found in the surgeon group (residents vs. surgeon 1 vs. 4.6 %, p = 0.03).

Conclusions

In this study, we found that patient safety and short-term outcome are not adversely affected when laparoscopic colorectal surgery is performed by a supervised fifth- or sixth-year resident.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lacy AM, Garcia-Valdecasas JC, Delgado S, Castells A, Taurá P, Pigué JM, Visa J (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bonjer HJ, Deijen CL, Abis GA, Cuesta MA, van der Pas MH, de Lange-de Klerk ES, Lacy AM, Bemelman WA, Andersson J, Angenete E, Rosenberg J, Fuerst A, Haglind E, COLOR II Study Group (2015) A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 372(14):1324–1332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy Study Group (2004) A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer. N Enl J Med 350:2050–22059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dutch Colorectal Surgical Audit. DICA yearly report 2014. http://www.clinicalaudit.nl/jaarrapportage/2014/assets/uploads/DICA-JAAR-OFFLINE-2014.pdf

  5. SCHERP end-terms. http://heelkunde.nl/sites/heelkunde.nl/files/Eindtermen-differentiatiejaar-v3.0%281%29.pdf

  6. MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341(8843):457–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (1997) Recommendations guiding physicians in biomedical research involving human subjects. JAMA 277:925–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ogiso S, Yamaguchi T, Fukuda M, Murakami T, Okuchi Y, Hata H, Sakai Y, Ikai I (2012) Laparoscopic resection for sigmoid and rectosigmoid colon cancer performed by trainees: impact on short-term outcomes and selection of suitable patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 27(9):1215–1222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Pastor C, Cienfuegos J, Baixauli J, Arredondo J, Sola J, Beorlegui C, Hernandez-Lizoain J (2013) Surgical training on rectal cancer surgery: do supervised senior residents differ from consultants in outcomes? Int J Colorectal Dis 28:671–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Maslekar S, Sharma A, Macdonald A, Gunn J, Monson JR, Hartley JE (2006) Do supervised colorectal trainees differ from consultants in terms of quality of TME surgery? Colorectal Dis 8(9):790–794

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stein S, Stulberg J, Champagne B (2012) Learning laparoscopic colectomy during colorectal residency: what does it take and how are we doing. Surg Endosc 26:488–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Miskovic D, Wyles SM, Ni M, Darzi AW, Hanna GB (2010) Systematic review on mentoring and simulation in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 252(6):943–951

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. W. Nijhof.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Authors H. W. Nijhof, R. Silvis, R. C. L. M. Vuylsteke, S. J. Oosterling, H. Rijna, H. B. A. C. Stockmann have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nijhof, H.W., Silvis, R., Vuylsteke, R.C.L.M. et al. Training residents in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: is supervised surgery safe?. Surg Endosc 31, 2602–2606 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5268-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-5268-0

Keywords

Navigation