Abstract
Introduction/Background
After its initial description in 1990, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has emerged as the minimally invasive approach for lung resection in early lung cancer.
Methods
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent robotic pulmonary resection for cancer by a single surgeon, between years 2009 and 2013, was performed. Age, gender, type and duration of surgery, length of stay, estimated blood loss, early and late complications, follow-up time, and local recurrence were reviewed and analyzed descriptively.
Results
Three hundred and thirty-one patients underwent the procedure for pulmonary neoplasm. Two hundred and fifty-nine (79 %) patients underwent anatomic lobectomies, 56 (17 %) patients had wedge resection, while five (1.5 %) patients underwent pneumonectomy. In 11 patients, no pulmonary resection was performed for different reasons. Most common neoplasm was adenocarcinoma (185, 56 %). All procedures involved a systematic mediastinal and hilar lymph node exploration and removal of suspicious nodes. Twenty-six (6.9 %) procedures were converted to open thoracotomy. Mean duration of surgery was 185.63 min. Mean length of hospital stay was 5.52 days. Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 47.85 ml. Mean follow-up was 249.41 days (20–1550 days), and five (1.5 %) patients developed local recurrence. Early complications were seen in 29 patients (8.8 %), most commonly cardiac arrhythmias (20, 6 %).
Conclusion
Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery is feasible in lung lesions, with all the advantages of VATS in terms of decreased length of stay and decreased blood loss with local recurrence rate and complication rate comparable to open procedures. There is a clear need for more studies comparing the apparent advantages of robotic-assisted surgery with increased cost of technology.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
http://www.cdc.gov/media/releases/2014/p0109-lung-cancer.html. Accessed 20th March 2014
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/treatment/non-small-celllung/healthprofessional/page4
Walker WS, Carnochan FM, Pugh GC (1993) Thoracoscopic pulmonary lobectomy. Early operative experience and preliminary clinical results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 106:1111–1117
Yan TD, Black D, Bannon PG et al (2009) Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and nonrandomized trials on safety and efficacy of video-assisted thoracic surgery lobectomy for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:2553–2562
Boffa DJ, Allen MS, Grab JD et al (2008) Data from Society of Thoracic Surgeons General thoracic surgery database: the surgical management of primary lung tumors. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:247–254
Ashton RC Jr, Connery CP, Swistel DG et al (2003) Robot assisted lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 126:292–293
LaPietra A, Grossi EA, Derivaux CC et al (2000) Robotic assisted instruments enhance minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 70:835–838
Maeso S, Reza M, Mayol JA et al (2010) Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 252:254–262
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Skylizard L, Minnich DJ (2011) Initial consecutive experience of completely portal robotic pulmonary resection with 4 arms. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 142:740–746
Jheon S, Yang HC, Cho S (2012) Video-assisted thoracic surgery for lung cancer. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 60(5):255–260
Paul S, Altorki NK, Sheng S, Lee PC, Harpole DH, Onaitis MW et al (2010) Thoracoscopic lobectomy is associated with lower morbidity than open lobectomy: a propensity-matched analysis from the STS database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139(2):366–378
Cao C, Manganas C, Ang SC, Yan TD (2012) A meta-analysis of unmatched and matched patients comparing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy and conventional open lobectomy. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1(1):16–23
Park BJ (2012) Robotic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): multi-center registry study of long-term oncologic results. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 1(1):24–26
Melfi FM, Mussi A (2008) Robotically assisted lobectomy: learning curve and complications. Thorac Surg Clin 18:289–295
Veronesi G, Galetta D, Maisonneuve P et al (2010) Four arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 140:19–25
Radkani P, Joshi D, Barot T, Williams RF (2015) Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection for lung tumors: a community tertiary care center experience over four years. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-015-4249-z
Dylewski MR, Ohaeto AC, Pereira JF (2011) Pulmonary resection using a total endoscopic robotic video-assisted approach. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 23:36–42
Veronesi G, Agoglia BG, Melfi F et al (2011) Experience with Robotic Lobectomy for lung cancer. Innovations 63:355–360
Park BJ, Flores RM (2008) Cost comparison of robotic, video-assisted thoracic surgery and thoracotomy approaches to pulmonary lobectomy. Thorac Surg Clin 18:297–300
Disclosures
Drs. Pejman Radkani, Tushar Barot, Devendra Joshi, and Roy F. Williams have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radkani, P., Joshi, D., Barot, T. et al. Robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic lung resection for lung tumors: a community tertiary care center experience over four years. Surg Endosc 30, 619–624 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4249-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4249-z