Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surgeons have knowledge gaps in the safe use of energy devices: a multicenter cross-sectional study

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Despite the widespread use of surgical energy devices and the potential for rare but serious complications, pilot data from North America suggest that surgeons and surgical trainees have knowledge gaps in their safe use. The purpose of this study was to determine baseline knowledge of general surgeons and surgical trainees regarding the safe use of electrosurgery (ES) across varying levels of experience in Japan.

Methods

Participants completed a 35-item multiple-choice question examination, testing critical knowledge of ES. The examination was developed according to the objectives and blueprints of SAGES’ Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ curriculum. Sections of the examination included: “principles of ES,” “ES-related adverse events,” “monopolar and bipolar devices,” and “pediatric considerations and interference with implantable devices.” Scores were compared between PGY > 5 and PGY 1–5 participants.

Results

A total of 145 general surgeons and surgical trainees of all years after medical school (PGY 1–5: 57, PGY > 5: 88) from ten academic and five community hospitals completed the assessment (mean age 35; 91 % male). The mean score in the entire cohort was 58 ± 12 % (range 23–83 %), with significantly higher scores in the PGY > 5 group compared to the PGY 1–5 group (60 ± 11 vs. 53 ± 12 %, p < 0.01). Among all participants, 92 % were not familiar with best practices when using ES on patients with a pacemaker; 44 % believe that ES uses thermal energy from cautery; 19 % did not know how to manage an operating room fire; 16 % thought that a dispersive electrode should be cut to fit a child; and 27 % believe that insulation failure in minimally invasive surgical instruments is mostly visible under careful inspection.

Conclusions

General surgeons and trainees at all levels have knowledge gaps in the safe and effective use of energy devices, regardless of years of experience. There is a need for educational curricula to help address these gaps and contribute to safer surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aigner N, Fialka C, Fritz A, Wruhs O, Zöch G (1997) Complications in the use of diathermy. Burns 23:256–264

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Govekar HR, Robinson TN, Varosy PD, Girard G, Montero PN, Dunn CL, Jones EL, Stiegmann GV (2012) Effect of monopolar radiofrequency energy on pacemaker function. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2279-3

    Google Scholar 

  3. Robinson TN, Varosy PD, Guillaume G, Dunning JE, Townsend NT, Jones EL, Paniccia A, Stiegmann GV, Weyer C, Rozner MA (2014) Effect of radiofrequency energy emitted from monopolar “Bovie” instruments on cardiac implantable electronic devices. J Am Coll Surg 219:399–406

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nduka CC, Super PA, Monson JR, Darzi AW (1994) Cause and prevention of electrosurgical injuries in laparoscopy. ACS 179:161–170

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldman LS, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Mischna J, Schwaitzberg SD, FUSE (Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™) Task Force (2012) Surgeons don’t know what they don’t know about the safe use of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-012-2263-y

    Google Scholar 

  6. Madani A, Watanabe Y, Vassiliou MC, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg SD, Fried GM, Feldman LS (2014) Impact of a hands-on component on learning in the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ (FUSE) curriculum: a randomized-controlled trial in surgical trainees. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3544-4

    Google Scholar 

  7. Madani A, Jones DB, Fuchshuber P, Robinson TN, Feldman LS (2014) Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ (FUSE): a curriculum on surgical energy-based devices. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-014-3623-6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mayooran Z, Pearce S, Tsaltas J (2004) Ignorance of electrosurgery among obstetricians and gynaecologists. BJOG 111:1413–1418. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00334.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feldman LS, Brunt LM, Fuchshuber P, Jones DB, Jones SB, Mischna J, Munro MG, Rozner MA, Schwaitzberg SD, SAGES FUSE™ Committee (2013) Rationale for the Fundamental Use of Surgical Energy™ (FUSE) curriculum assessment: focus on safety. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-3059-4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sankaranarayanan G, Resapu RR, Jones DB, Schwaitzberg S, De S (2013) Common uses and cited complications of energy in surgery. Surg Endosc. doi:10.1007/s00464-013-2823-9

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Ayumi Takahashi for finalizing the translation of the examination. We acknowledge Dr. Takeyoshi Yumiba and Dr. Yoshio Yamasaki at JCHO Osaka Hospital; Dr. Hiroyasu Kano at Kameta Memorial Center; and Dr. Shunichi Okushiba and Dr. Hiroyuki Kato at KKR Tonan Hospital for their contributions to this multicenter project. We would also like to acknowledge all participants. Without the generosity of all of the participants, this study would have been not possible.

Conflict of interest

Drs. Yusuke Watanabe, Yo Kurashima, Amin Madani, Liane S. Feldman Akihiko Oshita, Takeshi Naitoh, Kazuhiro Noma, Keigo Yasumasa, Hiroshi Nagata, Fumitaka Nakamura, Koichi Ono, Yoshinori Suzuki, Nobuhisa Matsuhashi, Toshiaki Shichinohe, Satoshi Hirano, and Minoru Ishida have nothing to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusuke Watanabe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Watanabe, Y., Kurashima, Y., Madani, A. et al. Surgeons have knowledge gaps in the safe use of energy devices: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Surg Endosc 30, 588–592 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4243-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-015-4243-5

Keywords

Navigation