Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of pCLE in the bile duct: final results of EMID study

pCLE: impact in the management of bile duct strictures

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Pre-operative histology of bile duct stenosis is associated with low accuracy. Probe confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) enables optical biopsy or in vivo histology. The definitive results of the EMID study are presented here, comparing optical biopsies with definitive histology.

Aims and methods

Sixty one patients with a biliary stricture without any previous histology were included (July 2007–May 2012). An endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) had to be conducted before the ERCP procedure. pCLE was done using CholangioFlex during the ERCP procedure. Results were compared to those of definitive histology obtained by biopsy or surgery in case of malignant lesions, and by surgery or 1-year follow-up in case of benign lesions.

Results

Six patients were excluded because no definitive histology was available. There were 41 malignant lesions and 14 benign lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy with combination of pCLE with endobiliary and EUS biopsies were 100, 71, 91, 100, and 93 %, respectively (with a significant increase of accuracy compared with endobiliary and EUS biopsies without pCLE, p = 0.03). 19 patients had a biliary stricture without individualized mass (6 malignant lesions, 13 benign lesions). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for pCLE were 83, 77, 62, 91, and 79 %, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy for combination of pCLE with endobiliary and EUS biopsies were 100, 69, 60, 100, and 79 %, respectively.

Conclusion

The addition of a pCLE procedure in the diagnostic histologic examination of a biliary stricture permits a significant increase in diagnostic reliability and allows for a VPN of 100 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel EL et al (2002) Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (part 1). Gastrointest Endosc 56:552–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. De Bellis M, Sherman S, Fogel EL et al (2002) Tissue sampling at ERCP in suspected malignant biliary strictures (part 2). Gastrointest Endosc 56:720–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Verbeek PCM, Van leeuwen DJ, De Wit LT, Reeders JW, Smits NJ, Bosma A, Huibregtse K, Van der Heyde MN (1992) Benign fibrosing disease at the hepatic confluence mimicking Klatskin tumors. Surgery 112:866–871

  4. Gerhards MF, Vos P, Van Gulik TM, Rauws EA, Bosma A, Gouma DJ (2001) Incidence of benign lesion in patients resected for suspicious hilar obstruction. Br J Surg 88:48–51

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Knoefel WT, Prenzel KL, Peiper M, Hosch SB, Gundlach M, Eisenberger CF, Strate T, Scheunemann P, Rogiers X, Izbicki JR (2003) Klatskin mimicking lesions of the biliary tree. EJSO 29:658–661

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Uhlmann D, Wiedmann M, Schmidt F, Kluge R, Tammapfel A, Berr F, Hauss J, Witzigmann H (2006) Management and outcome in patient with Klatskin-Mimicking lesions of the biliary tree. J Gastrointest Surg 10:1144–1150

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Giovannini M, Bories E, Monges G, Pesenti C, Caillol F, Delpero JR (2011) Results of a phase I-II study on intraductal confocal microscopy (IDCM) in patients with common bile duct (CBD) stenosis. Surg Endosc 25:2247–2253

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Meining A, Frimberger E, Becker V, Von Delius S, Von Weyhern CH, Schmid RM, Prinz C (2008) Detection of cholangiocarcinoma in vivo using miniprobe-based confocal fluorescence microscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 6:1057–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Meining A, Chen YK, Plewkow, Stevens P, Shah RJ, Chuttani R, Michalek J, Slivka A (2011) Direct visualization of indeterminate pancreaticobiliary strictures with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy: a multicenter experience. Gastrointest Endosc 5:961–968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen YK, Pleskow DK, Chuttani R, Slivka A, Stevens PD, Giovannini M, Meining A (2010) Miami classification (MC) of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) findings in the pancreaticobiliary (PB) system for evaluation of indeterminate strictures: interim results from an international multicentre registry. Gastrointest Endosc 71:AB134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Loeser CS, Robert ME, Mennone A, Nathanson MH, Jamidar P (2011) Confocal endomicroscopic examination of malignant biliary strictures and histologic correlation with lymphatics. J Clin Gastroenterol 45(3):246–252

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iglesias-Garcia J, Poley JW, Larghi A, Giovannini M, Petrone MC, Abdulkader I, Monges G, Costamagna G, Arcidiacono P, Biermann K, Rindi G, Bories E, Dogloni C, Bruno M, Dominguez-Muñoz JE (2011) Feasibility and yield of a new EUS histology needle: results from a multicenter, pooled, cohort study. Gastrointest Endosc 73(6):1189–1196. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2011.01.053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sendler A, Avril N, Helberger H, Stollfuss J, Weber W, Bengel F, Schwaiger M, Rodger JD, Sievert JR (2000) World J Surg 24(9):1121–1129

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Böttger TC, Junginger T (1999) Treatment of tumors of the pancreatic head with suspected but unproved malignancy: is a nihilistic approach justified? World J Surg 23(2):158–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson JS, Murayama KM, Edney JA, Rikkers LF (1994) Pancreaticoduodenectomy for suspected but unproven malignancy. Am J Surg 168(6):571–573 discussion 573–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamaguchi K, Chijiiwa K, Saiki S, Nakatsuka A, Tanaka M (1996) “Mass-forming” pancreatitis masquerades as pancreatic carcinoma. Int J Pancreatol 20(1):27–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Manzia TM, Toti L, Lenci I, Attia M, Tariciotti L, Brahmhall SR, Buckels JAC, Mirza DF (2010) Benign disease and unexpected histological findings after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the role of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle aspiration. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 92:295–301

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hurtuk MG, Shoup M, Oshima K, Yong S, Aranha GV (2010) Pancreaticoduodenectomies in patients without periampullary neoplasm: lesions that masquerade as cancer. Am J Surg 199:372–376

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Heerde MJ, Biermann K, Zondervan PE, Kazemier G, Van Eijck CHJ, Pek C, Kuipers EJ, Van Buuren HR (2012) Prevalence of autoimmune pancreatitis and other benign disorders in pancreatoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy of the pancreatic head. Dig Dis Sci 57:2458–2465

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yarandi SS, Runge T, Wang L, Liu Z, Jiang Y, Chawla S, Woods KE, Keilin S, Willingham FF, Xu H, Cai Q (2014) Increased incidence of benign pancreatic pathology following pancreaticoduodenectomy for presumed malignancy over 10 years despite increased use of endoscopic ultrasound. Diagn Ther Endosc 2014:701535

  21. Heif M, Yen RD, Shah RJ (2013) ERCP with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy for the evaluation of dominant biliary stenoses in primary sclerosing cholangitis patients. Dig Dis Sci 58(7):2068–2074. doi:10.1007/s10620-013-2608-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levy MJ, Baron TH, Clayton AC et al (2008) Prospective evaluation of advanced molecular markers and imaging techniques in patients with indeterminate bile duct strictures. Am J Gastroenterol 103:1263–1270

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Asbun HJ, Conlon K, Fernadez-Cruz L et al (2014) When to perform a pancreatoduodenectomy in the absence of positive histology? A consensus statement by the international study group of pancreatic surgery. Surgery 155(5):887–892

  24. Caillol F, Filoche B, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M (2013) Refined probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy classification for biliary strictures: the Paris Classification. Dig Dis Sci 58(6):1784–1789. doi:10.1007/s10620-012-2533-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Caillol F, Bories E, Poizat F, Pesenti C, Esterni B, Monges G, Giovannini M (2013) Endomicroscopy in bile duct: inflammation interferes with pCLE applied in the bile duct; a prospective study of 54 patients. UEGJ 1(2):120–127

    Google Scholar 

  26. Shieh FK, Drumm H, Nathanson MH, Jamidar PA (2011) High-definition confocal endomicroscopy of the common bile duct. J Clin Gastroenterol 46(5):1–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. F. Caillol, Dr. E. Bories, Miss A. Autret, Dr. F. Poizat, Dr. C. Pesenti, Dr. J. Ewald, Dr. O. Turrini, Pr. JR Belpero, Dr. G. Monges, Dr. M. Giovannini have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabrice Caillol.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Caillol, F., Bories, E., Autret, A. et al. Evaluation of pCLE in the bile duct: final results of EMID study. Surg Endosc 29, 2661–2668 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3986-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3986-8

Keywords

Navigation