Skip to main content
Log in

Quality of D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: is laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy as effective as open distal gastrectomy?

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine by meta-analysis, whether D2 lymphadenectomy at laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) is as effective as that during open distal gastrectomy (ODG) for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Data sources and review methods

All clinical trials that compared laparoscopic with open D2 lymphadenectomy for AGC published in English from January 1995 to June 2013 were identified in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library searches. A modified scale was used to assess the quality of the literature. We analyzed the number of harvested lymph nodes (HLNs), body mass index (BMI), tumor size, serosa invasion status, and positive lymph node rate. Meta-analyses were performed using weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous variables, and risk differences (RD) or odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous variables.

Results

No eligible randomized trials were identified, but eight non-randomized trials were analyzed. In the pooled data of 677 patients who underwent LADG and 687 ODG, there were no significant differences the number of HLN (WMD: −0.98, 95 % confidence interval, CI −3.21 to 1.26), BMI (WMD: −1.20, 95 % CI −2.64 to 0.24), tumor size (WMD: −0.30, 95 % CI −0.65 to 0.05), serosa invasion status (RD: 0.04, 95 % CI −0.03 to 0.11), and positive lymph node rate (OR: 0.66, 95 % CI −0.44 to 1.01) between the groups.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that for patients with comparable BMI and tumor status, surgical technique did not significantly influence the number of HLNs, suggesting that D2 lymphadenectomy performed laparoscopically is as effective as an open procedure in AGC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Songun I PH, Kranenbarg E MK et al. (2010) Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial. Lancet Oncol 11(5):439–449

  2. Miura S, Kodera Y, Fujiwara M et al (2004) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with systemic lymph node dissection: a critical reappraisal from the viewpoint of lymph node retrieval. J Am Coll Surg 198:933–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee JH, Kim YW, Ryu KW et al (2007) A phase-II clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with d2 lymph node dissection for gastric cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol 14:3148–3153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ikeda O, Sakaguchi Y, Toh Y et al (2012) Evaluation of oncological adequacy of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with special attention to lymph node dissection: a comparison with conventional open gastrectomy. Hepato-gastroenterol 59:627–632

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chun HT, Kim KH, Kim MC, Jung GJ (2012) Comparative Study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open subtotal gastrectomy for pT2 Gastric Cancer. Yonsei Med J 53:952–959

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Du XH, Li R, Chen L, Shen D, Li SY, Guo Q (2009) Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: initial experience. Chin Med J (Engl) 122:1404–1407

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huang JL, Wei HB, Zheng ZH et al (2010) Laparoscopy-assisted D2 radical distal gastrectomy for advanced Gastric Cancer. Dig Surg 27:291–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hur H, Jeon HM, Kim W (2008) Laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for T2b advanced gastric cancers: three years’ experience. J Surg Oncol 98:515–519

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scatizzi M, Kroning KC, Lenzi E, Moraldi L, Cantafio S, Feroci F (2011) Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a case-control study. Updates Surg 63:17–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shuang JB, Qi SB, Zheng JY et al (2011) A case-control study of laparoscopy-assisted and open distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. J Gastrointest Surg 15:57–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao Y, Yu P, Hao Y et al (2011) Comparison of outcomes for laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 25:2960–2966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ziqiang W, Feng Q, Zhimin C et al (2006) Comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open radical distal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer management. Surg Endosc 20:1738–1743

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. (JGCA) JGCA (2011) Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma: 3rd English edition. Gastric Cancer 14:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobin L GMK, Wittekind C e. (2009) TNM classification of malignant tumours. 7th edn. Wiley & Blackwell

  15. Slim K, Nini E, Forestier D, Kwiatkowski F (2003) Methodological index for non-randomized studies (MINORS): development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg 73:712–716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hozo SP, Djulbegovic B, Hozo I (2005) Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample. BMC Med Res Methodol 5:13

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sterne JAC (2008) Meta-analysis in Stata™[J]. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context. Second edn. p 347–369

  18. Huscher C, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G et al (2005) Value of extended lymphadenectomy in laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer. J Am Coll Surg 200:314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cui M, Xing JD, Yang W et al (2012) D2 dissection in laparoscopic and open gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol 18:833–839

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reyes CD, Weber KJ, Gagner M, Divino CM (2001) Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. A retrospective review. Surg Endosc 15:928–931

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G et al (2005) Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 241:232–237

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH (2005) A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. Surg Endosc 19:168–173

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Abraham NS, Byrne CJ, Young JM et al (2010) Meta-analysis of well-designed nonrandomized comparative studies of surgical procedures is as good as randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 63:238–245

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Drs. Canrong Lu, Sixin Zhou, Zheng Peng and Lin Chen have no conflict of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin Chen.

Additional information

Canrong Lu and Sixin Zhou contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, C., Zhou, S., Peng, Z. et al. Quality of D2 lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric cancer: is laparoscopic-assisted distal gastrectomy as effective as open distal gastrectomy?. Surg Endosc 29, 1537–1544 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3838-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-3838-6

Keywords

Navigation