Skip to main content
Log in

The 100 ml-Timed Water Swallow Test: Pilot Data from Children with No Dysphagia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dysphagia screening tests are useful in identifying possible dysphagia for further evaluation and in supporting feeding recommendations. This study aimed to investigate swallowing parameters in children, while widening the pool of data available, using the ‘100 ml-Timed Water Swallow Test’ (100 ml-TWST). Sixty Singaporean children aged 4 to 18 years old completed the 100 ml-TWST via a cup and a straw. Task completion, presence of cough, choke or throat clear, post-swallow voice quality, total time taken and number of swallows were observed. Subsequently, analysis of time per swallow (T/S), volume per swallow (V/S) and volume per time or swallowing capacity (V/T) were performed. Higher tendencies for coughing and task incompletion were observed in younger participants. A shorter time taken, fewer number of swallows, greater V/S and greater swallowing capacity were observed for adolescent or male participants, or via the mode of cup drinking. These could be due to oropharyngeal structural changes and swallow maturation with age, an increased capacity of oropharyngeal structures for swallowing in adolescent males, and more controlled or paced drinking from a straw. A plateau in time taken, number of swallows and swallowing capacity in adolescence were also observed, possibly indicating an emerging maturation of swallow functions during that period. Interestingly, speed of bolus movement was largely unaffected by age, gender and mode of drinking. Pilot data for children with no dysphagia have been established, while gaining insight into the swallowing parameters and maturation process in the paediatric population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Dodrill P, Gosa MM. Pediatric dysphagia: physiology, assessment, and management. Ann Nutr Metab. 2015;66(5):24–31. https://doi.org/10.1159/000381372.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Weir K, McMahon S, Barry L, Ware R, Masters IB, Chang AB. Oropharyngeal aspiration and pneumonia in children. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2007;42(11):1024–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.20687.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Suiter DM, Leder SB. Clinical utility of the 3-ounce WST. Dysphagia. 2008;23:244–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-007-9127-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Suiter DM, Leder SB, Karas DE. The 3-ounce (90-cc) water swallow challenge: a screening test for children with suspected oropharyngeal dysphagia. Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg. 2009;140(2):187–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otohns.2008.11.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hughes TAT, Wiles CM. Clinical measurement of swallowing in health and in neurogenic dysphagia. QJM: Monthly J Assoc Physicians. 1996;89(2):109–16. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/89.2.109.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. DePippo KL, Holas MA, Reding MJ. Validation of the 3-oz WST for aspiration following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1992;49:1259–61. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1992.00530360057018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilinc HE, Alemdaroglu-Gurbuz I, Bulut N, Serel Aslan S, Karaduman A, Yilmaz O. A description of oral and swallowing characteristics in pediatric patients with neuromuscular diseases. Clin Exp Health Sci. 2020;10:292–6. https://doi.org/10.33808/clinexphealthsci.674812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nathadwarawala K, Nicklin J, Wiles CM. A timed test of V/T/swallowing capacity for neurological patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992;55:822–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.55.9.822.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ismail Z, Thirumanjari K, Ranjani VS, Fathima ST, Babu MR, Premalatha BS. Comparative analysis of swallowing efficacy in young adults and geriatric population by 100 ml water swallow test. J Indian Speech Lang Hear Assoc. 2019;33(1):47–51. https://doi.org/10.4103/jisha.JISHA_7_18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hägglund P, Karlsson P, Karlsson F. The Timed Water Swallow Test (TWST): normative data on swallowing capacity for healthy people aged 60 years and older. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2022.2096925.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Miller N, Allcock L, Hildreth AJ, Jones D, Noble E, Burn DJ. Swallowing problems in Parkinson disease: frequency and clinical correlates. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2009;80(9):1047–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.2008.157701.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wu MC, Chang YC, Wang TG, Lin LC. Evaluating swallowing dysfunction using a 100-ml water swallowing test. Dysphagia. 2004;19(1):43–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-003-0030-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sarve AR, Krishnamurthy R, Balasubramanium RK. The timed water test of swallowing: reliability, validity, and normative data from Indian population. Int J Health Sci. 2021;15(2):14–20.

    Google Scholar 

  14. World Health Organisation. (2023). Adolescent Health. https://www.who.int/health-topics/adolescent-health

  15. Ministry of Education Singapore. (2021, May). Studying in Singapore. https://www.moe.gov.sg/international-students/studying-in-singapore

  16. Ministry of Health Singapore. (2023). Health Hub: Parent Hub. https://www.healthhub.sg/programmes/183/parent-hub

  17. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2005;4:287–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/pst.185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cichero J, Murdoch BE. Dysphagia: foundation, theory and practice. John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jaghbeer M, Sutt AL, Bergström L. Dysphagia management and cervical auscultation: reliability and validity against FEES. Dysphagia. 2023;38(1):305–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10468-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. Pro-Ed; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Fitch W, Giedd J. Morphology and development of the human vocal tract: a study using magnetic resonance imaging. J Acoustical Soc Am. 1999;106:1511–22. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.427148.

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ronen O, Malhotra A, Pillar G. Influence of gender and age on upper-airway length during development. Pediatrics. 2007;120(4):e1028–34. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2006-3433.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Alfonsi E, Cosentino G, Mainardi L, Schindler A, Fresia M, Brighina F, et al. Electrophysiological investigations of shape and reproducibility of oropharyngeal swallowing: interaction with bolus volume and age. Dysphagia. 2015;30:540–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9634-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Moreira GM, Pereira SR. Performance of Brazilian elderly on the 100 ml water swallowing test. Rev Soc Br Fonoaudiol. 2012;17(2):9–14. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-80342012000100004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank the following people for their support and advice for this study. Goh Siew Li for conceiving the original idea of the study and her support and advice throughout the study process. Tan Man Ling Stacy for her advice with the methodology and manuscript. Leo Wei Zhi for her advice with the methodology. Ong Chengsi for her advice with the manuscript. The KKH Speech Language Therapy Service for supporting this study. All the participants and their parents/guardians for their time in participating in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xue Ting Joelle Mok.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board. It took place in Singapore and informed consent for participation in the study was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Performance of Participants for Observed Variables (Completion of the TWSTs, Presence of Coughing, Choking, Throat Clearing or Gagging and Post-trial Voice Quality), Stratified by Age, Mode of Drinking and Gender

Incompletion of 100 ml-TWST

Age (years)

Gender

Total number

Number incomplete

Cup

Straw

4–6

Male

5

3

3

Female

7

7–9

Male

8

Female

4

10–12

Male

7

Female

5

13–15

Male

7

1

1

Female

5

16–18

Male

5

Female

7

Total number

60

4

4

Presence of Cough, Choke, Throat Clear or Gag

Age (years)

Gender

Total number

Cup

Straw

4–6

Male

5

2

Female

7

1

7–9

Male

8

Female

4

10–12

Male

7

Female

5

13–15

Male

7

Female

5

16–18

Male

5

Female

7

1

Total number

 

60

4

0

Post-trial Voice Quality

Age (years)

Gender

Total number

Voice quality change in baseline post-trial

Cup

Straw

4–6

Male

5

Female

7

7–9

Male

8

Female

4

10–12

Male

7

Female

5

13–15

Male

7

Female

5

16–18

Male

5

Female

7

Total number

 

60

0

0

Appendix 2: Performance of Participants for Time Taken, Number of Swallows, T/S, V/S and V/T (Swallowing Capacity), Stratified by Age, Mode of Drinking and Gender

Time Taken (s)

Age (years)

Gender

Cup

Straw

Mean

SD

Min–Max

Mean

SD

Min–Max

4–6

Male

16.61

10.76

9.00–24.22

21.61

12.79

12.56–30.65

Female

34.09

25.11

10.18–78.38

50.94

56.33

14.84–172.94

7–9

Male

12.80

8.27

6.03–27.47

16.53

8.40

9.57–34.87

Female

22.65

6.76

14.91–30.44

27.95

18.13

17.50–54.97

10–12

Male

10.40

5.88

5.22–21.22

17.68

16.01

6.10–52.50

Female

17.76

4.51

13.63–23.56

29.48

15.32

17.50–55.58

13–15

Male

6.82

1.97

4.72–8.94

10.32

2.85

7.19–14.06

Female

8.24

3.42

5.81–14.15

12.03

2.34

10.32–16.00

16–18

Male

6.62

2.32

4.32–10.15

10.24

2.42

7.31–13.81

Female

7.89

2.32

6.06–11.72

11.65

2.63

8.63–16.09

Number of Swallows

Age (years)

Gender

Cup

Straw

Mean

SD

Min–Max

Mean

SD

Min–Max

4–6

Male

14.50

9.19

8.00–21.00

8.50

0.71

8.00–9.00

Female

17.29

9.43

7.00–31.00

18.71

11.31

7.00–38.00

7–9

Male

7.38

3.62

4.00–15.00

9.00

1.85

6.00–11.00

Female

12.25

0.96

11.00–13.00

15.50

6.86

10.00–25.00

10–12

Male

5.57

1.72

3.00–8.00

7.43

2.99

3.00–12.00

Female

9.20

2.59

5.00–12.00

12.40

5.77

7.00–22.00

13–15

Male

5.00

2.19

2.00–8.00

7.83

3.43

5.00–14.00

Female

4.60

1.14

3.00–6.00

6.60

1.94

5.00–10.00

16–18

Male

3.40

0.89

2.00–4.00

4.60

1.82

3.00–7.00

Female

5.71

1.38

4.00–8.00

8.43

2.44

5.00–11.00

T/S (s)

Age (years)

Gender

Cup

Straw

Mean

SD

Min–Max

Mean

SD

Min–Max

4–6

Male

1.14

0.14

1.13–1.15

2.62

1.721

1.40–3.83

Female

1.93

0.93

1.20–3.79

2.44

1.30

1.34–4.55

7–9

Male

1.68

0.48

1.13–2.75

1.82

0.74

1.24–3.49

Female

1.85

0.53

1.36–2.54

1.76

0.53

1.09–2.20

10–12

Male

1.77

0.49

1.18–2.65

2.19

1.08

1.22–4.38

Female

2.01

0.51

1.51–2.73

2.46

0.84

1.53–3.54

13–15

Male

1.54

0.65

1.03–2.66

1.42

0.44

1.00–2.22

Female

1.82

0.64

1.21–2.83

1.94

0.63

1.08–2.67

16–18

Male

2.04

0.82

1.25–3.38

2.61

1.45

1.40–4.60

Female

1.42

0.45

0.91–2.34

1.45

0.39

0.99–1.91

V/S (ml)

Age (years)

Gender

Cup

Straw

Mean

SD

Min–Max

Mean

SD

Min–Max

4–6

Male

8.63

5.47

4.76–12.50

11.81

0.98

11.11–12.50

Female

7.59

4.26

3.23–14.29

7.38

4.44

2.63–14.29

7–9

Male

16.07

6.46

6.67–25.00

11.59

2.72

9.09–16.67

Female

8.20

0.67

7.69–9.09

7.34

2.74

4.00–10.00

10–12

Male

19.78

7.23

12.50–33.33

16.11

8.46

8.33–33.33

Female

11.89

4.64

8.33–20.00

9.31

3.57

4.55–14.29

13–15

Male

24.47

13.56

12.50–50.00

14.57

5.19

7.14–20.00

Female

23.00

6.50

16.67–33.33

16.00

3.65

10.00–20.00

16–18

Male

31.67

10.87

25.00–50.00

24.52

8.97

14.29–33.33

Female

18.35

4.20

12.50–25.00

12.89

4.23

9.09–20.00

V/T / Swallowing Capacity (ml/s)

Age (years)

Gender

Cup

Straw

Mean

SD

Min–Max

Mean

SD

Min–Max

4–6

Male

7.62

4.94

4.13–11.11

5.61

3.32

3.26–7.96

Female

4.62

3.12

1.28–9.82

3.73

2.36

0.58–6.74

7–9

Male

10.31

4.72

3.64–16.58

7.07

2.47

2.87–10.45

Female

4.75

1.50

3.29–6.71

4.46

1.84

1.82–5.71

10–12

Male

12.30

5.99

4.71–19.16

8.73

4.96

1.90–16.39

Female

5.92

1.44

4.24–7.34

3.99

1.52

1.80–5.71

13–15

Male

15.75

4.55

11.19–21.19

10.32

2.78

7.11–13.91

Female

13.45

4.05

7.07–17.21

8.53

1.40

6.25–9.69

16–18

Male

16.53

5.27

9.85–23.15

10.20

2.39

7.24–13.68

Female

13.54

3.48

8.53–16.50

8.94

1.85

6.22–11.59

Time taken, number of swallows, T/S, V/S and V/T/swallowing capacity were based only on participants who completed the 100 ml-TWST (i.e. incomplete trials were excluded).

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mok, X.T.J. The 100 ml-Timed Water Swallow Test: Pilot Data from Children with No Dysphagia. Dysphagia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-023-10664-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-023-10664-0

Keywords

Navigation