Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of Bolus Types and Swallowing Maneuvers on Laryngeal Elevation: Analysis of Healthy Young Adult Men and Healthy Older Men

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peak velocity, distance, and time of laryngeal elevation during swallowing were measured with a laryngeal motion measurement system in eight healthy young adult men in their 20 and 30 s (33.0 ± 4.3 years) and ten healthy older men in their 60 and 70 s (74.0 ± 3.9 years). The participants performed swallowing five times each for a total of eight conditions: two bolus types (saliva and water) and four swallowing methods (normal swallow, effortful swallow, super-supraglottic swallow, and Mendelsohn maneuver). When the bolus type was saliva, peak velocity and distance increased more for swallowing maneuvers (effortful swallow, super-supraglottic swallow, and Mendelsohn maneuver) than for normal swallow. On the other hand, when the bolus type was water, there was no difference in peak velocity or distance between normal swallow and swallowing maneuvers. In healthy older men, distance was greater with Mendelsohn maneuver than with normal swallow, and peak velocity was increased with swallowing maneuvers than with normal swallow. Healthy young adult men had increased peak velocity and distance with water rather than saliva. The increase in peak velocity and distance obtained by swallowing maneuvers was influenced by age and bolus, suggesting that the subjects and conditions used are important in terms of promoting safer oral intake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. Austin: PRO-ED; 1998.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Logemann JA. Evaluation and treatment of swallowing disorders. 2nd ed. Austin: PRO-ED; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bartolome G, Neumann S. Swallowing therapy in patients with neurological disorders causing cricopharyngeal dysfunction. Dysphagia. 1993;8:146–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02266995.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kahrilas PJ, Logemann JA, Krugler C, Flanagan E. Volitional augmentation of upper esophageal sphincter opening during swallowing. Am J Physiol. 1991;260:G450-456. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpgi.1991.260.3.G450.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lazarus C, Logemann JA, Gibbons P. Effects of maneuvers on swallowing function in a dysphagic oral cancer patient. Head Neck. 1993;15:419–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2880150509.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Neumann S. Swallowing therapy with neurologic patients: results of direct and indirect therapy methods in 66 patients suffering from neurological disorders. Dysphagia. 1993;8:150–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02266996.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bülow M, Olsson R, Ekberg O. Videomanometric analysis of supraglottic swallow, effortful swallow and chin tuck in healthy volunteers. Dysphagia. 1999;14:16–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00009589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hegland KW, Ashford JA, Frymark T, McCabe D, Mullen R, Musson N, Hammond CS, Schooling T. Evidence-based systematic review: oropharyngeal dysphagia behavioral treatments. Part II- impact of dysphagia treatment on normal swallow function. JRRD. 2009;46:185–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ohmae Y, Logemann JA, Hanson KP, DG, Kahrilas PJ,. Effects of two breath-holding maneuvers on oropharyngeal swallow. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1996;105:123–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949610500207.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boden K, Hallgren A, Hedström HW. Effects of three different swallow maneuvers analyzed by videomanometry. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:628–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841850600774043.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ding R, Larson CR, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW. Surface electromyographic and electroglottographic studies in normal subjects under two swallow conditions: normal and during the Mendelsohn maneuver. Dysphagia. 2012;27:418–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-001-0095-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoffman MR, Mielens JD, Ciucci MR, Jones CA, Jiang J, McCulloch TM. High-resolution manometry of pharyngeal swallow pressure events associated with effortful swallow and the Mendelsohn maneuver. Dysphagia. 2012;27:418–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-011-9385-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lazarus C, Logemann JA, Song CW, Rademaker AW, Kahrilas PJ. Effects of voluntary maneuvers on tongue base function for swallowing. Folia Phoniatr Logop. 2002;54:171–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000063192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Logemann JA, Pauloski B, Rademaker A, Colangelo L. Super-supraglottic swallow in irradiated head and neck cancer patients. Head Neck. 1997;19:535–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199709)19:6%3c535::AID-HED11%3e3.0.CO;2-4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tallgren A, Beni S. Hyoid bone position, facial morphology and head posture in adults. Eur J Orthod. 1987;9:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/9.1.1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Logemann JA, Pauloski BR, Rademaker AW, Colangelo LA, Kahrilas PJ, Smith CH. Temporal and biomechanical characteristics of oropharyngeal swallow in younger and older men. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2000;43:1264–74. https://doi.org/10.1044/jslhr.4305.1264.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Furukawa K. Cineradiographic analysis of laryngeal movement during deglutition. J Otolaryngol Jpn. 1984;87:169–81. https://doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.87.169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nakagawa K, Matsuo K. In: Saitoh E, Ueda K, editors. Age-related changes in swallowing function dysphagia rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Tokyo: Ishiyaku Publishers; 2018. p. 113–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nakao Y, Onishi H, Haji T, Shiromoto O, Saito S, Nanto T, Uchiyama Y, Domen K. Impact of thickened liquids on laryngeal movement velocity in patients with dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2022;37:207–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10267-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Humbert IA, Lokhande A, Christopherson H, German R, Stone A. Adaptation of swallowing hyo-laryngeal kinematics is distinct in oral vs. pharyngeal sensory processing. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:1698–705. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01534.2011.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Steele CM, Miller AJ. Sensory input pathways and mechanisms in swallowing: a review. Dysphagia. 2010;25:323–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9301-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Humbert IA, Sunday KL, Karagiorgos E, Vose AK, Gould F, Greene L, Azola A, Tolar A, Rivet A. Swallowing kinematic differences across frozen, mixed, and ultrathin liquid boluses in healthy adults: age, sex, and normal variability. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61:1544–59. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-S-17-0417.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ueda N, Nohara K, Kotani Y, Okuno K, Sakai T. Effect of the bolus volume on hyoid movements in normal individuals. J Oral Rehabil. 2013;40:491–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nagy A, Molfenter SM, Péladeau-Pigeon M, Stokely S, Steele CM. The effect of bolus consistency on hyoid velocity in healthy swallowing. Dysphagia. 2015;30:445–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9621-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Nakao Y, Onishi H, Haji T, Shiromoto O, Fukuoka T, Saito S, Tabe Y, Kodama N, Domen K. A quantitative analysis of the laryngeal moving velocity during swallowing: the effect of bolus viscosity on laryngeal movement in healthy males. Deglutition. 2017;6:79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nakao Y, Fukuoka T, Shiromoto O, Kodama N, Domen K. Quantitative analysis of hyoid/laryngeal movement velocity while swallowing: effect of peak velocity on the severity of swallowing disorders. Jpn J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;15:11–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wong SM, Kamarunas E, Ludlow CL. Impaired movement scaling and reduced synchrony with vestibule closure characterize swallowing in severe dysphagia. Dysphagia. 2020;35:643–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-019-10067-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Clark HM. Specificity of training in the lingual musculature. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:657–67. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2011/11-0045).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Clark HM. Neuromuscular treatments for speech and swallowing: a tutorial. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;12:400–15. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2003/086).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Macaluso A, De Vito G. Muscle strength, power and adaptations to resistance training in older people. Eur J of Appl Physiol. 2004;91:450–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-003-0991-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Physiological variability in the deglutition literature: hyoid and laryngeal kinematics. Dysphagia. 2011;26:67–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-010-9309-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Temporal variability in the deglutition literature. Dysphagia. 2012;27:162–77. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9397-x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Variation in temporal measures of swallowing: sex and volume effects. Dysphagia. 2013;28:226–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9437-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Haji T. The evaluation of laryngeal movement during swallowing using a laryngeal motion measurement system with photoelectric distance sensors. Otologia Fukuoka. 2021;67:200–10. https://doi.org/10.11334/jibi.67.3_200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Inamoto Y. Update on swallowing with 3D-CT. In: Saitoh E, Ueda K, editors. Dysphagia rehabilitation. 3rd ed. Tokyo: Ishiyaku Publishers; 2018. p. 79–82.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Leonard RJ, Kendall KA, McKenzie S, Gonçalves MI, Walker A. Structural displacements in normal swallowing: a videofluoroscopic study. Dysphagia. 2000;15:146–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004550010017.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jang HJ, Leigh JH, Seo HG, Han TR, Oh BM. Effortful swallow enhances vertical hyolaryngeal movement and prolongs duration after maximal excursion. J Oral Rehabil. 2015;42:765–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12312.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Okada S, Kagaya H, Shibata S, Ota K, Baba M, Fujii N, Katada K, Wattanapan P, Palmer JB. The effect of bolus viscosity on laryngeal closure in swallowing: kinematic analysis using 320-row area detector CT. Dysphagia. 2013;28:33–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-012-9410-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Inamoto Y, Saitoh E, Fujii N. Swallowing CT : swallowing reseach and clinical application using 320 area detector CT. Jpn J Clin Radiol. 2014;59:1732–42.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Huckabee ML, Steele CM. An analysis of lingual contribution to submental surface electromyographic measures and pharyngeal pressure during effortful swallow. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1067–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.019.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ding R, Larson CR, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW. Surface electromyographic and electroglottographic studies in normal subjects under two swallow conditions: normal and during the Mendelsohn manuever. Dysphagia. 2002;17:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-001-0095-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Saigusa H, Niimi S, Yagi T. Direct indirect training approach to rehabilitation of dysphagia patients: a new method for rehabilitation with a feeding-tube. J Otolaryngol Jpn. 1998;101:1012–21. https://doi.org/10.3950/jibiinkoka.101.8_1012.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Saigusa H, Niimi S, Yagi T. “Direct” indirect training approach for the rehabilitation of dysphagia, and its functional analysis. Otologia Fukuoka. 1999;45:123–7. https://doi.org/10.11334/jibi1954.45.2_123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Miyaji H, Umezaki T, Yamaguchi Y, Adachi K, Sawatsubashi M, Kikuchi Y, Komune S. The difference between liquid and jelly in pharyngeal deglutition: a clinical study using LEDT. Otologia Fukuoka. 2010;56:S138–44. https://doi.org/10.11334/jibi.56.S138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Miyaji H, Umezaki T, Adachi K, Sawatsubashi M, Kiyohara H, Inoguchi T, To S, Komune S. Videofluoroscopic assessment of pharyngeal stage delay reflects pathophysiology after brain infarction. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:2793–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.23588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Molfenter SM, Hsu CY, Lu Y, Lazarus CL. Alterations to swallowing physiology as the result of effortful swallowing in healthy seniors. Dysphagia. 2018;33:380–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9863-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the participants of this study for their time, patience, and cooperation. We thank Prof. Go Mizumoto (Kumamoto Health Science University) for confirmation of the statistical methods used in this study.

Funding

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI 23K10444).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: FO; Methodology: FO and MFK; Formal analysis and investigation: FO and KW; Writing and original draft preparation: FO; Writing, reviewing, and editing of the manuscript: MFK and TY; Funding acquisition: FO.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumitaka Omori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in relation to this research.

Ethical Approval

The purpose and methods of the study were explained to participants in writing. Participation in the study was voluntary and their right to withdraw from the study and their anonymity were ensured. This study was approved by the Ethical Review Committees of Fukuoka Dental College (Permit No. 587).

Informed Consent

Written consent was obtained from all participants.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Omori, F., Fujiu-Kurachi, M., Wada, K. et al. Effects of Bolus Types and Swallowing Maneuvers on Laryngeal Elevation: Analysis of Healthy Young Adult Men and Healthy Older Men. Dysphagia (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-023-10638-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-023-10638-2

Keywords

Navigation