Skip to main content
Log in

Voice Outcomes in Surgical Repair of Zenker’s Diverticulum

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to define the impact of Zenker’s diverticula on voice and potential benefit from repair. Retrospective chart review of prospectively collected data from eleven patients with a Zenker’s diverticulum treated surgically in a tertiary care center from November 2014 through January 2016. The voice handicap index-10 (VHI-10) and eating assessment tool-10 (EAT-10) questionnaires were collected as part of pre- and post-operative evaluation, with an average post-operative follow-up of 69 days. Surgical techniques included: trans-oral endoscopic diverticulotomy with laser assistance, or trans-cervical approach with diverticulopexy or diverticulectomy. The primary outcome was subjective voice improvement. Secondary outcome was swallowing function improvement. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks and Mann–Whitney U tests. In patients undergoing surgical treatment of Zenker’s diverticula, there is a statistically significant improvement (p = 0.001) in patient-reported dysphagia symptoms measured by the EAT-10. There is also a clinically relevant improvement in subjective voice quality (average pre-operative total 6.55, post-operative 2.09, p = 0.022) as measured by the VHI-10. Many patients suffering from Zenker’s diverticula experience subjective voice handicap. Most note improvement in voice quality post-operatively, which we were able to quantify using the voice handicap index. We consider this a relevant consideration in pre-operative evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Veenker EA, Andersen PE, Cohen JI. Cricopharyngeal spasm and zenker’s diverticulum. Head Neck. 2003;25:681–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cook IJ, Blumbergs P, Cash K, Jamieson GG, Shearman DJ. Structural abnormalities of the cricopharyngeus muscle in patients with pharyngeal (zenker’s) diverticulum. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1992;7:556–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mcconnel FMS, Hood D, Jackson K, O’Connorn A. Analysis of intrabolus forces in patients with zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope. 1994;104:571–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Laing MR, Murthy P, Cockburn SW. Surgery for pharyngeal pouch: audit of management with short- and long-term follow up. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 1995;35:315–8.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yip HT, Leonard R, Kendall KA. Cricopharyngeal myotomy normalizes the opening size of the upper esophageal sphincter in cricopharyngeal dysfunction. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:93–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Seth R, Rajasekaran K, Lee WT, et al. Patient reported outcomes in endoscopic and open transcervical treatment for zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope. 2014;124:119–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shahawy S, Janisiewicz AM, Annino D, Shapiro J. A comparative study of outcomes for endoscopic diverticulotomy versus external diverticulectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;151:646–51.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Wilken R, Whited C, Scher RL. Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for zenker’s diverticulum: review of experience in 337 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124:21–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang CY, Payyapilli RJ, Scher RL. Endoscopic staple diverticulostomy for zenker’s diverticulum: review of literature and experience in 159 consecutive cases. Laryngoscope. 2003;113:957–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonavina L, Aiolfi A, Scolari F, Bona D, Lovece A, Asti E. Long-term outcome and quality of life after transoral stapling for zenker diverticulum. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:1167–72.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Palmer AD, Herrington HC, Rad IC, Cohen JI. Dysphagia after endoscopic repair of zenker’s diverticulum. Laryngoscope. 2007;117:617–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Anagiotos A, Feyka M, Eslick GD, et al. Long-term symptom control after endoscopic laser-assisted diverticulotomy of zenker’s diverticulum. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2014;41:568–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Belafsky PC, Mouadeb DA, Rees CJ, et al. Validity and reliability of the eating assessment tool (EAT-10). Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2008;117:919–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosen CA, Lee AS, Osborne J, Zullo T, Murry T. Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10. Laryngoscope. 2004;114:1549–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Arffa RE, Krishna P, Gartner-Schmidt J, Rosen CA. Normative values for the voice handicap index-10. J Voice. 2012;26:462–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Melissa Mosley, CMA for her assistance in data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Daniero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare they have no conflicts of interest.

Disclosures

The authors declare they have no financial disclosures.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schoeff, S., Freeman, M. & Daniero, J. Voice Outcomes in Surgical Repair of Zenker’s Diverticulum. Dysphagia 32, 678–682 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9813-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-017-9813-3

Keywords

Navigation