Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients After a Partial or Total Glossectomy due to Oral Cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Excision of a part or the whole of tongue due to oral cancer disturbs swallowing and speech. Lower airways aspiration of the swallowed bolus in patients after such oral structures excision is a symptom of major swallowing disorder and may be the cause of aspiration pneumonia. Restoration of oral nutrition is possible after exclusion or reduction of aspiration threat in the patients. Video fluoroscopic evaluation of the swallowing performed at the beginning of the swallowing rehabilitation in 95 patients after a total or partial glossectomy due to oral cancer, who assessed their saliva swallowing as efficient on the day of examination, showed disturbances of all of the swallowing stages. The most common disturbances involved the oral stage: limited mobility of the oral tongue, impaired glossopalatal seal, and weak glossopharyngeal seal. The most serious among them involved pharyngeal stage of swallowing, as leakage into the larynx and aspiration. The patients used their own methods during barium suspension swallowing to facilitate the swallowing act. They used such methods as: changing the position of the head to the body, additional swallows, engaging the adjacent structures into sealing the oral fissure. We assumed that the compensatory mechanisms (CM) worked out by the patients before the swallowing examination will enable them efficient barium suspension swallowing. The CM were applied by 71 of 95 patients; 51 of the patients used more than one compensatory mechanism. Swallowing in 61 of the compensating patients was at least functional; swallowing in 10 of the compensating patients was non-efficient and caused recurrent aspiration. The results of our research negate the validity of multiple swallows (more than three) without apnea elongation because it may lead to aspiration. Aspiration was also recorded in patients with weak airways closure and immovable epiglottis, who complemented the impaired oral transport with gravitational oral transport by moving chin up during a swallow. The hypothesis that CM applied by the patients after oral cancer excision during saliva swallowing will be helpful in swallowing of the barium suspension was not proved. In 10 of all the patients recurring aspiration was found despite CM application. Determination of aspiration risk is the key to efficient swallowing rehabilitation. The assessment of CM applied spontaneously by the patients’ maintenance validity is particularly important. Video fluoroscopic examination of swallowing allows to assess the aforementioned issue and is crucial for better comprehension of CM applied by the patients in creating a new swallowing pattern after oral cancer excision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shah JP, Gil Z. Current concepts in management of oral cancer – Surgery. Oral Oncol. 2009;45:394–401.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mittal BB, Paulosky BR, Haraf DJ, et al. Swallowing dysfunction – preventative and rehabilitation strategies in patients with head and neck cancers treated with surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Critical view. Int J Radiation Oncol Bio Phys. 2003;57(5):1219–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Paulosky BR. Rehabilitation of Dysphagia Following Head and Neck Cancer. Phys Med Rehabilit Clin N Am. 2008;19(4):889–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Granell J, Garrido L, Millas T, Gutierrez-Fonseca R: Management of Oropharyngeal Dysphagia in Laryngeal and Hypopharyngeal Cancer. Int J of Otolaryng 2012: Article ID 157630, 2012;.

  5. Pizzorni N, Ginocchio D, Mozzanica F, Roncoroni L, Scarponil L, Schindler A. Head and neck diseases and disorders causing oropharyngeal dysphagia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res. 2014;3(10):1272–80.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Borggreven PA, Leeuw IVD, Rinkel RN, et al. Swallowing after major surgery of the oral cavity or oropharynx: a prospective and longitudinal assessment of patients treated by microvascular soft tissue reconstruction. Head Neck. 2007;29:638–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Su WF, Hsia J, Ch Chang Y, et al. Functional Comparison after Reconstruction with a Radial Forearm Free Flap Or Pectoralis Major flap for Cancer of the Tongue. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;128:412–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brown L, Rieger JM, Harris J, et al. A longitudinal study of functional outcomes after surgical resection and microvascular reconstruction for oral cancer: tongue mobility and swallowing function. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg. 2010;68:2690–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yu R. Reinnervated anterolateral thigh flap for tongue reconstruction. Head Neck. 2004;26:1038–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zuydam AC, Rogers SN, Brown JS, et al. Swallowing rehabilitation after oropharyngeal resection for squamous cell carcinoma. Brit J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2000;38:513–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tei K, Maekawa K, Kitada H, et al. Recovery from postsurgical swallowing dysfunction In patients with oral cancer. J Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65:1077–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Paulosky BR, Rademaker AW, Logemann JA, et al. Surgical variables affecting swallowing in treated oral/oropharyngeal cancer patients. Head Neck. 2004;26:625–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hirano M, Kuroiwa Y, Tanaka S, et al. Dysphagia following various degrees of surgical resection for oral cancer. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1992;101:138–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Chhabra A, Anandakrishna GN, Rao G, et al. Rehabilitation of partial maxillectomy with implants hollow bulb obturator prosthesis: a case report. J Indian Prosthodontic Soc. 2012;12(2):101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Xin P, Chi M, Guang-yan Y, et al. Maxillary reconstruction with the Free Fibula Flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115:1562–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Logemann JA, Paulosky BR, Rademaker AW, et al. Speech and swallowing rehabilitation for head and neck cancer patients. Review article. Oncology. 1997;11:651–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lazarus C, Logemann JA, Gibbons P. Effects of maneuvers on swallowing function in a dysphagic oral cancer patient. Head Neck. 1993;15:419–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rasley A, Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ, Rademaker AW, et al. Prevention of barium aspiration during videofuoroscopic swallowing studies: value of change in posture. AJR. 1993;160:1006–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dodds WJ, Stewart ET, Logemann JA. Physiology and radiology of the normal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:953–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dodds WJ, Logemann JA, Stewart ET. Radiologic assessment of abnormal oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:965–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchholtz DW, Bosma JF, Donner MW. Adaptation, Compensation and Decompensation of the Pharyngeal Swallow. Gastrointest Radiol. 1985;10:235–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Walther EK. Dysphagia after pharyngolaryngeal cancer surgery, part I patophysiology of postsurgical deglutition. Dysphagia. 1995;10:275–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Herberhold C, Walter EK. Dysphagia after pharyngolaryngeal cancer surgery. part II. Implications for reconstructive procedures. Dysphagia. 1995;10:2279–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Furia CLB, Carrara deAngelis E, Martins N, et al. Video fluoroscopic evaluation after glossectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Neck Head Surg. 2000;126:378–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Halczy-Kowalik L, Sulikowski M, Wysocki R, et al. The role of epiglottis In the swallow process after partial glossectomy due to a neoplasm. Dysphagia. 2012;27(1):20–31.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Sakuma T, Kida I. Relationship between ease of swallowing and deglutition related muscle activity in various postures. J Oral Rehab. 2010;37:583–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Logemann JA, Veis S, Colangelo LA. Screening procedure for oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia. 1999;14:44–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Halczy-Kowalik L, Posio V. Wiktor A et a: the assessment of aspiration risk resulting from swallowing In oral cancer patients. J Stomatol LVIII. 2005;10:723–30.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rosen A, Rhee TH, Kaufman R. Prediction of Aspiration in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Untreated Advanced Head and Neck Cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:975–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Castell JA, Castell DO, Georgeson S. Effect of head position on the dynamics of the upper esophageal sphincter and pharunx. Dysphagia. 1993;8:1–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Logeman JA, Rademaker AW, Paulosky BR. Effects on postural change on aspiration in head and neck surgical patients. Otoloryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;110:222–7.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shanahan TK, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, et al. Chin-Down Posture Effect on Aspiration in Dysphagic Patients. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 1993;74:736–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Welch MV, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, et al. Changes in Pharyngeal Dimensions Effected by Chin Tuck. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:178–85.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Posio V, Walecka A, Halczy-Kowalik L. Video fluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing disturbances after glossectomy due to neoplasm. Pol J Radiol. 2005;70(4):66–72.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludmiła Halczy-Kowalik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that no conflicts of interest exist.

Ethical approval

Video fluoroscopic evaluation of swallowing is a routine diagnostic examination in patients after the excision of oral cavity structures and it did not require the approval of the Bioethical Commission.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Halczy-Kowalik, L., Wiktor, A., Rzewuska, A. et al. Compensatory Mechanisms in Patients After a Partial or Total Glossectomy due to Oral Cancer. Dysphagia 30, 738–750 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9652-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-015-9652-z

Keywords

Navigation