Abstract
We estimate the total mass of ash fall deposits for individual eruptions of Sakurajima Volcano, southwest Japan based on distribution maps of the tephra fallout. Five ash-sampling campaigns were performed between 2011 and 2015, during which time Sakurajima continued to emit ash from frequent Vulcanian explosions. During each survey, between 29 and 53 ash samplers were installed in a zone 2.2–43 km downwind of the source crater. Total masses of erupted tephra were estimated using several empirical methods based on the relationship between the area surrounded by a given isopleth and the thickness of ash fall within each isopleth. We obtained 70–40,520 t (4.7 × 10−8–2.7 × 10−5-km3 DRE) as the minimum estimated mass of erupted materials for each eruption period. The minimum erupted mass of tephra produced during the recorded events was calculated as being 890–5140 t (5.9 × 10−7–3.6 × 10−6-km3 DRE). This calculation was based on the total mass of tephra collected during any one eruptive period and the number of eruptions during that period. These values may thus also include the contribution of continuous weak ash emissions before and after prominent eruptions. We analyzed the meteorological effects on ash fall distribution patterns and concluded that the width of distribution area of an ash fall is strongly controlled by the near-ground wind speed. The direction of the isopleth axis for larger masses is affected by the local wind direction at ground level. Furthermore, the wind direction influences the direction of the isopleth axes more at higher altitude. While a second maximum of ash fall can appear, the influence of rain might only affect the finer particles in distal areas.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The JMA uses their own criteria for eruptions: an “eruption” is defined as activity with an eruptive column more than 1000 m above the crater and an “explosive eruption” is an eruption with explosion sounds, infrasonic waves, emission of volcanic bombs out of the crater, or accompanying earthquakes.
References
Bonadonna C, Houghton BF (2005) Total grain-size distribution and volume of tephra-fall deposits. Bull Volcanol 67(5):441–456
Bonadonna C, Ernst G, Sparks R (1998) Thickness variations and volume estimates of tephra fall deposits: the importance of particle Reynolds number. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 81:173–187
Eto T (1984) Amount of volcanic ash fall ejected from Sakurajima Volcano. Earthquakes and Volcanoes in Kagoshima Prefecture, Kagoshima Prefectural Government 13-15:45–53
Fierstein J, Nathenson M (1992) Another look at the calculation of fallout tephra volumes. Bull Volcanol 54(2):156–167
Folch A (2012) A review of tephra transport and dispersal models: evolution, current status, and future perspectives. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 235-236:96–115
Froggatt PC (1982) Review of methods of estimating rhyolitic tephra volumes; application to the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 14:301–318
Furukawa R, Geshi N, Nakano S, Hoshizumi H, Takarada S, Takeuchi S, Toshida K, Tajima Y, Tsutsumi M (2011) Urgent survey of the eruptive deposit from the Shinmoedake Volcano, Mt. Kirishima, South Kyushu, Japan, in January 2011. Abstracts of the Japan Geoscience Union Meeting 2011 SVC050–05 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Hayakawa Y (1985) Pyroclastic geology of Towada Volcano. Bull Earthq Inst Univ Tokyo 60:507–592
Iguchi M (2013) Magma movement from the deep to shallow Sakurajima Volcano as revealed by geophysical observations. Bull Volcanol Soc Jpn 58:1–18
Kobayashi T, Ezaki K (1997) Sakurajima Volcano, reexamination of its history of eruption. Chikyu Monthly 19:227–231 (in Japanese)
Legros F (2000) Minimum volume of a tephra fallout deposit estimated from a single isopach. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 96:25–32
Nakamura M (2002) The change in volume of volcanic ash fall deposits erupted from Sakurajima Volcano. Quart J Seismol 65:135–143
Nishiki K, Oikawa T, Furukawa R, Oishi M, Nakano S, Miyagi I (2013) Amount of tephra-fall deposits from Shinmoedake Volcano, Kirishima vVolcanoes from March 2011–February 2012: a preliminary study for the immediate estimation of the eruptive mass. Bull Volcanol Soc Jpn 58:353–363 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Okuno M (1997) Radiocarbon dating of the Sakurajima tephra group. Chikyu Monthly 19:231–235 (in Japanese)
Okuno M (2002) Chronology of tephra layers in south Kyushu, SW Japan, for the last 30,000 years. Q Res 41:225–236 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Ono M, Yamakawa S, Oishi M, Takahashi K, Ueno T, Ida T (2005) Using aggregated particles to estimate the cloud height—sedimentation process of the September 23, 2004, pyroclastic fall during the Asama Volcano eruption. Bull Volcanol Soc Jpn 50:535–554 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Poulidis A, Takemi T, Iguchi M, Renfrew I (2017) Orographic effects on the transport and deposition of volcanic ash: a case study of Mount Sakurajima, Japan. J Geophys Res 122(17):9332–9350
Pyle DM (1989) The thickness, volume and grain size of tephra fall deposits. Bull Volcanol 51(1):1–15
Rose WI, Bonis S, Stoiber RE, Keller M, Bickford T (1973) Studies of volcanic ash from two recent central American eruptions. Bull Volcanol 37(3):338–364
Scasso RA, Corbella H, Tiberi P (1994) Sedimentological analysis of the tephra from the 12–15 August 1991 eruption of the Hudson volcano. Bull Volcanol 56(2):121–132
Scollo S, Folch A, Costa A (2008) A parametric and comparative study of different tephra fallout models. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 176:199–211
Sulpizio R (2005) Three empirical methods for the calculation of distal volume of tephra-fall deposit. J Volcanol Geotherm Res 145:315–336
Sulpizio R, Bonasia R, Dellino P, Di Vito MA, La Volpe L, Mele D, Zanchetta G, Sadori L (2008) Discriminating the long distance dispersal of fine ash from sustained columns or near ground ash clouds: the example of the Pomici di Avellino eruption (Somma-Vesuvius, Italy). J Volcanol Geotherm Res 177:263–276
Tajima Y, Tamura K, Yamakoshi T, Tsune A, Tsurumoto S (2013) Ellipse-approximated isopach maps for estimating the ash fall volume at the Sakurajima Volcano. Bull Volcanol Soc Jpn 58:291–306 (in Japanese with English abstract)
Takahashi M, Otsuka T, Sako H, Kawamata H, Yasui M, Kanamaru T, Otsuki M, Kobayashi T, Ishihara K, Miki D (2013) Temporal variation for magmatic chemistry of the Sakurajima Volcano and Aira Caldera region, southern Kyushu, southwest Japan, since 61 ka and its implications for the evolution of magma chamber system. Bull Volcanol Soc Jpn 58:19–42
Acknowledgements
We express our gratitude to the Sakurajima Volcano Research Center of Kyoto University, Kagoshima Local Meteorological Observatory of Japan Meteorological Agency and to the Sabo Branch Office of Osumi Office of the River, and National Highway in Sakurajima. The present study was supported by the result of “Research and Development of Margin Assessment Methodology of Decay Heat Removal Function against External Hazards” entrusted to the Japan Atomic Energy Agency by the Ministry of Education, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT). We also thank R. Sulpizio, S. Mueller, and S. Self for their helpful reviews and advice for our manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Editorial responsibility: S. Self
Electronic supplementary material
Appendix 1
Detailed information on the eruptions that occurred during the surveys of 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015. Data are from the Kagoshima Local Meteorological Observatory of the Japan Meteorological Agency. (JPEG 922 kb)
Appendix 2
Weight results from the surveys in 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014, and 2015. For each period, the values in the left column show the weight of samples (g), while those in the right column show the weight per unit area (g/m2). (JPEG 782 kb)
ESM 1
(JPEG 1322 kb)
ESM 2
(JPEG 899 kb)
ESM 3
(JPEG 981 kb)
ESM 4
(JPEG 1237 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oishi, M., Nishiki, K., Geshi, N. et al. Distribution and mass of tephra-fall deposits from volcanic eruptions of Sakurajima Volcano based on posteruption surveys. Bull Volcanol 80, 42 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1215-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-018-1215-3