Skip to main content
Log in

Mesocarnivores vary in their spatiotemporal avoidance strategies at communications hubs of an apex carnivore

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mesocarnivores face interspecific competition and risk intraguild predation when sharing resources with apex carnivores. Within a landscape, carnivores across trophic levels may use the same communication hubs, which provide a mix of risks (injury/death) and rewards (gaining information) for subordinate species. We predicted that mesocarnivores would employ different strategies to avoid apex carnivores at shared communication hubs, depending on their trophic position. To test our prediction, we examined how different subordinate carnivore species in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California, USA, manage spatial overlap with pumas (Puma concolor), both at communication hubs and across a landscape-level camera trap array. We estimated species-specific occurrence, visitation rates, temporal overlap, and Avoidance–Attraction Ratios from camera traps and tested for differences between the two types of sites. We found that mesocarnivores generally avoided pumas at communication hubs, and this became more pronounced when pumas scent-marked during their most recent visit. Coyotes (Canis latrans), the pumas’ closest subordinate competitor in our system, exhibited the strongest avoidance at communication hubs. Gray foxes (Urocyon cinereoargenteus) avoided pumas the least, which may suggest possible benefits from pumas suppressing coyotes. Overall, mesocarnivores exhibited various spatiotemporal avoidance strategies at communication hubs rather than outright avoidance, likely because they benefit from information gained while ‘eavesdropping’ on puma activity. Variability in avoidance strategies may be due to differential predation risks, as apex carnivores often interact more aggressively with their closest competitors. Combined, our results show how apex carnivores trigger complex species interactions across the entire carnivore guild and how trophic position determines behavioral responses and subsequent space use of subordinate mesocarnivores across the landscape.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available by authors for any reasonable request.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Allen ML, Wittmer HU, Wilmers CC (2014) Puma scrape and communication behaviors: understanding functional use and variation by sex and age. Behav 151:819–840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen ML, Elbroch LM, Wilmers CC, Wittmer HU (2015a) The comparative effects of large carnivores on the acquisition of carrion by scavengers. Am Nat 185:822–833

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen ML, Wallace CF, Wilmers CC (2015b) Patterns in bobcat (Lynx rufus) scent marking and communication behaviors. J Ethol 33:9–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen ML, Wilmers CC, Elbroch LM, Golla JM, Wittmer HU (2016) The importance of motivation, weapons and foul odors in driving encounter competition in carnivores. Ecology 97:1905–1912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Allen ML, Gunther MS, Wilmers CC (2017) The scent of your enemy is my friend? The acquisition of large carnivore scent by a smaller carnivore. J Ethol 35:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apps P, Rafiq K, McNutt JW (2019) Do carnivores have a world wide web of interspecific scent signals? In Chemical signals in vertebrates, vol 14. Springer, Cham, pp 182–202

  • Brown JS, Laundre JW, Gurung M (1999) The ecology of fear: optimal foraging, game theory, and trophic interactions. J Mammal 80:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton AC, Neilson E, Moreira D, Ladle A, Steenweg R, Fisher JT, Bayne E, Boutin S (2015) Wildlife camera trapping: a review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. J Appl Ecol 52(3):675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornhill KL, Kerley GI (2020a) Cheetah behaviour at scent-marking sites indicates differential use by sex and social rank. Ethology 126:976–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornhill KL, Kerley GI (2020b) Cheetah communication at scent-marking sites can be inhibited or delayed by predators. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis CL, Rich LN, Farris ZJ, Kelly MJ, Di Bitetti MS, Blanco YD, Albanesi S, Farhadinia MS, Gholikhani N, Hamel S, Harmsen BJ (2018) Ecological correlates of the spatial co-occurrence of sympatric mammalian carnivores worldwide. Ecol Let 21:1401–1412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donadio E, Buskirk SW (2006) Diet, morphology, and interspecific killing in carnivora. Am Nat 167:524–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elbroch LM, Wittmer HU (2012) Table scraps: inter-trophic food provisioning by pumas. Biol Let 8:776–779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estes JA, Terborgh J, Brashares JS, Power ME, Berger J, Bond WJ, Carpenter SR, Essington TE, Holt RD, Jackson JBC, Marquis RJ, Oksanen L, Oksanen T, Paine RT, Pikitch EK, Ripple WJ, Sandin SA, Scheffer M, Schoener TW, Shurin JB, Sinclair ARE, Soule ME, Virtanen R, Wardle DA (2011) Trophic downgrading of planet earth. Science 333:301–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan SP, Gantchoff MG, Hill JE, Siveira L, Torres NM, Jacomo AT, Uzal A (2021) “When the felid’s away, the mesocarnivores will play”: seasonal temporal segregation in a neotropic carnivore guild. Mammal Biol 101:631–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garvey PM, Glen AS, Pech RP (2016) Dominant predator odour triggers caution and eavesdropping behavior in a mammalian mesopredator. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 70:481–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmsen BJ, Foster RJ, Gutierrez SM, Marin SY, Doncaster CP (2010) Scrape-marking behavior of jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor). J Mammal 91:1225–1234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes NK, Price CJ, Banks PB (2010) Predators are attracted to the olfactory signals of prey. PLoS ONE 5:e13114

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson K, Wilmers CC, Wittmer HU, Allen ML (2021) First documentation of scent marking behaviors in striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). Mammal Res 66:399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krofel M, Hocevar L, Allen ML (2017) Does human infrastructure shape scent marking in a solitary felid? Mammal Biol 87:36–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi T, Wilmers CC (2012) Wolves–coyotes–foxes: a cascade among carnivores. Ecol 93:921–929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J, Schaller GB, McCarthy TM, Wang D, Jiagong Z, Cai P, Basang L, Lu Z (2013) A communal sign post of snow leopards (Panthera uncia) and other species on the Tibetan Plateau. China Int J Biodiv 2013:370905

    Google Scholar 

  • Meredith M, Ridout M (2014) Overlap: estimates of coefficient of overlapping for animal activity patterns R package version 0.2.3. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=overlap; http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=overlap

  • Moller AP, Christiansen SS, Mousseau TA (2011) Sexual signals, risk of predation and escape behavior. Behav Ecol 22:800–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy K, Ruth TK (2009) Diet and prey selection of a perfect predator. In: Hornocker M, Negri S (eds) Cougar: ecology and conservation. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp 118–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome TM, Ripple WJ (2015) A continental scale trophic cascade from wolves through coyotes to foxes. J Anim Ecol 84:49–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connell AF, Nichols JD, Karanth KU (2011) Camera traps in animal ecology: methods and analyses, vol 271. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons AW, Bland C, Forrester T, Baker-Whatton MC, Schuttler SG, McShea WJ, Costello R, Kays R (2016) The ecological impact of humans and dogs on wildlife in protected areas in eastern North America. Biol Conserv 203:75–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prugh LR, Sivy KJ (2020) Enemies with benefits: integrating positive and negative interactions among terrestrial carnivores. Ecol Let 23:902–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prugh LR, Cunningham CX, Windell RM, Kertson BN, Ganz TR, Walker SL, Wirsing AJ (2023) Fear of large carnivores amplifies human-caused mortality for mesopredators. Science 380:754–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rafiq K, Jordan NR, Meloro C, Wilson AM, Hayward MW, Wich SA, McNutt JW (2020) Scent-marking strategies of a solitary carnivore: boundary and road scent marking in the leopard. Anim Behav 161:115–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridout MS, Linkie M (2009) Estimating overlap of daily activity patterns from camera trap data. J Agr Biol Environ Stat 14:322–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripple WJ, Estes JA, Beschta RL, Wilmers CC, Ritchie EG, Hebblewhite M, Berger J, Elmhagen B, Letnic M, Nelson MP, Schmitz OJ, Smith DW, Wallach AD, Wirsing AJ (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343:1241484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rowcliffe M (2021) Activity: animal activity statistics. CRAN

  • Sikes RS, Gannon WL, the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists (2011) Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. J Mammal 92:235–253

  • Sivy KJ, Pozzanghera CB, Grace JB, Prugh LR (2017) Fatal attraction? Intraguild facilitation and suppression among predators. Am Nat 190:663–679

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith JLD, McDougal C, Miquelle D (1989) Scent marking in free–ranging tigers, Panthera tigris. Anim Behav 37:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Allen ML, Wilmers CC (2015) Mesopredator spatial and temporal responses to large predators and human development in the Santa Cruz Mountains of California. Biol Conserv 190:23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wikenros C, Jarnemo A, Frisén M, Kuijper DP, Schmidt K (2017) Mesopredator behavioral response to olfactory signals of an apex predator. J Ethol 35:161–168

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilmers CC, Wang Y, Nickel B, Houghtaling P, Shakeri Y, Allen ML, Kermish-Wells J, Yovovich V, Williams T (2013) Scale dependent behavioral responses to human development by a large predator, the puma. PLoS ONE 8:e60590

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yovovich V, Allen ML, Macaulay LT, Wilmers CC (2020) Using spatial characteristics of apex carnivore communication and reproductive behaviors to predict responses to future human development. Biodiv Conserv 29:2589–2603

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Mid-Peninsula Open Space District, California State Parks, Santa Cruz Land Trust, Santa Clara Parks, San Mateo Parks, and many private landowners for giving us access to their land. The authors thank P. Houghtaling, R. King, C. Fust, S. McCain, and many others for their contributions to the fieldwork.

Funding

Funding was provided by National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. #0963022 and #1255913 and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MLA and CCW conceived and designed the experiments. MLA performed the fieldwork and annotated images. ACA and MLA analyzed the data. MLA wrote the manuscript, and all other authors provided editorial advice.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian L. Allen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All field experimental procedures were performed within the guidelines set by the Independent Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of California, Santa Cruz (Protocols Wilmc0709 and Wilmc1101) and the American Society of Mammalogists (Sikes et al. 2011).

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Communicated by Michael Sheriff .

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Allen, M.L., Avrin, A.C., Wittmer, H.U. et al. Mesocarnivores vary in their spatiotemporal avoidance strategies at communications hubs of an apex carnivore. Oecologia (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05541-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-024-05541-y

Keywords

Navigation