Skip to main content
Log in

Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture

  • Physiological ecology – original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many plant traits respond to changes in water availability and might be useful for understanding ecosystem properties such as net primary production (NPP). This is especially evident in grasslands where NPP is water-limited and primarily determined by the traits of dominant species. We measured root and shoot morphology, leaf hydraulic traits, and NPP of four dominant North American prairie grasses in response to four levels of soil moisture in a greenhouse experiment. We expected that traits of species from drier regions would be more responsive to reduced water availability and that this would make these species more resistant to low soil moisture than species from wetter regions. All four species grew taller, produced more biomass, and increased total root length in wetter treatments. Each species reduced its leaf turgor loss point (TLP) in drier conditions, but only two species (one xeric, one mesic) maintained leaf water potential above TLP. We identified a suite of traits that clearly distinguished species from one another, but, surprisingly, these traits were relatively unresponsive to reduced soil moisture. Specifically, more xeric species produced thinner roots with higher specific root length and had a lower root mass fraction. This suggest that root traits are critical for distinguishing species from one another but might not respond strongly to changing water availability, though this warrants further investigation in the field. Overall, we found that NPP of these dominant grass species responded similarly to varying levels of soil moisture despite differences in species morphology, physiology, and habitat of origin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and relevant R code can be found in the supplementary information.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the greenhouse staff at Colorado State University as well as Victoria Klimkowski for assistance with maintaining treatments.

Funding

Primary support for this project came from the NSF Macrosystems Biology Program (DEB‐1137378, 1137363, and 1137342) with additional funding from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Award 2019–67011-29615).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

RJGN, AJF, and IJS conceived, designed, and performed the experiment with input and funding support from AKK and MDS. RJGN analyzed the data and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript; all authors provided editorial advice.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Griffin-Nolan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by Heather Throop.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1281 KB)

Supplementary file1 (ZIP 72 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Griffin-Nolan, R.J., Felton, A.J., Slette, I.J. et al. Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture. Oecologia 201, 311–322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y

Keywords

Navigation