Abstract
Many plant traits respond to changes in water availability and might be useful for understanding ecosystem properties such as net primary production (NPP). This is especially evident in grasslands where NPP is water-limited and primarily determined by the traits of dominant species. We measured root and shoot morphology, leaf hydraulic traits, and NPP of four dominant North American prairie grasses in response to four levels of soil moisture in a greenhouse experiment. We expected that traits of species from drier regions would be more responsive to reduced water availability and that this would make these species more resistant to low soil moisture than species from wetter regions. All four species grew taller, produced more biomass, and increased total root length in wetter treatments. Each species reduced its leaf turgor loss point (TLP) in drier conditions, but only two species (one xeric, one mesic) maintained leaf water potential above TLP. We identified a suite of traits that clearly distinguished species from one another, but, surprisingly, these traits were relatively unresponsive to reduced soil moisture. Specifically, more xeric species produced thinner roots with higher specific root length and had a lower root mass fraction. This suggest that root traits are critical for distinguishing species from one another but might not respond strongly to changing water availability, though this warrants further investigation in the field. Overall, we found that NPP of these dominant grass species responded similarly to varying levels of soil moisture despite differences in species morphology, physiology, and habitat of origin.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data and relevant R code can be found in the supplementary information.
References
Anderegg WRL, Schwalm C, Biondi F, Camarero JJ, Koch G, Litvak M et al (2015) Pervasive drought legacies in forest ecosystems and their implications for carbon cycle models. Science 349(6247):528–532. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab1833
Avolio ML, Forrestel EJ, Chang CC, La Pierre KJ, Burghardt KT, Smith MD (2019) Demystifying dominant species. New Phytol 223(3):1106–1126. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15789
Bartlett MK, Scoffoni C, Ardy R, Zhang Y, Sun S, Cao K, Sack L (2012) Rapid determination of comparative drought tolerance traits: using an osmometer to predict turgor loss point. Methods Ecol Evol 3(5):880–888. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-210X.2012.00230.x
Benson EJ, Hartnett DC, Mann KH (2004) Belowground bud banks and meristem limitation in tallgrass prairieplant populations. Am J Bot 91(3):416–421. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.91.3.416
Bloom AJ, Chapin FS, Mooney HA (1985) Resource limitation in plants: an economic analogy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:363–392. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.es.16.110185.002051
Bond WJ, Woodward FI, Midgley GF (2005) The global distribution of ecosystems in a world without fire. New Phytol 165(2):525–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01252.x
Bristiel P, Roumet C, Violle C, Volaire F (2019) Coping with drought: root trait variability within the perennial grass Dactylis glomerata captures a trade-off between dehydration avoidance and dehydration tolerance. Plant Soil 434(1):327–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-018-3854-8
Byrne KM, Lauenroth WK, Adler PB (2013) Contrasting effects of precipitation manipulations on production in two sites within the central grassland region, USA. Ecosystems 16(6):1039–1051. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9666-z
Carroll CJ, Slette IJ, Griffin-Nolan RJ, Baur LE, Hoffman AM et al (2021) Is a drought a drought in grasslands? productivity responses to different types of drought. Oecologia 197(4):1017–1026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04793-8
Chapin FS III, Bloom AJ, Field CB, Waring RH (1987) Plant re- sponses to multiple environmental factors: physiological ecology provides tools for studying how interacting environ- mental resources control plant growth. Bioscience 37:49–57. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310177
Chaves FA, Smith MD (2021) Resources do not limit compensatory response of a tallgrass prairie plant community to the loss of a dominant species. J Ecol 109(10):3617–3633. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13741
Chou W, Silver WL, Jackson RD, Thompson AW, Allen-Diaz B (2008) The sensitivity of annual grassland carbon cycling to the quantity and timing of rainfall. Glob Change Biol 14:1382–1394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01572.x
Craine JM, Ocheltree TW, Nippert JB, Towne E, Skibbe AM, Kembel SW, Fargione JE (2013) Global diversity of drought tolerance and grassland climate-change resilience. Nat Clim Chang 3(1):63–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1634
da Silva JM, Arrabaça MC (2004) Contributions of soluble carbohydrates to the osmotic adjustment in the C4 grass Setaria sphacelata: a comparison between rapidly and slowly imposed water stress. J Plant Physiol 161(5):551–555. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-01109
de Vries FT, Brown C, Stevens CJ (2016) Grassland species root response to drought: consequences for soil carbon and nitrogen availability. Plant Soil 409:297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-016-2964-4
Dwyer JM, Hobbs RJ, Mayfield MM (2014) Specific leaf area responses to environmental gradients through space and time. Ecology 95(2):399–410. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0412.1
Fay PA, Schultz MJ (2009) Germination, survival, and growth of grass and forb seedlings: effects of soil moisture variability. Acta Oecologica 35(5):679–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2009.06.007
Fisher MJ, Rao IM, Ayarza MA, Lascano CE, Sanz JI, Thomas RJ, Vera RR (1994) Carbon storage by introduced deep-rooted grasses in the South American savannas. Nature 371(6494):236–238. https://doi.org/10.1038/371236a0
Forrestel EJ, Donoghue MJ, Edwards EJ, Jetz W, du Toit JC, Smith MD (2017) Different clades and traits yield similar grassland functional responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114(4):705–710. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1612909114
Frank DA (2007) Drought effects on above-and belowground production of a grazed temperate grassland ecosystem. Oecologia 152(1):131–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-006-0632-8
Freschet GT, Roumet C, Comas LH, Weemstra M, Bengough AG, Rewald B et al (2021) Root traits as drivers of plant and ecosystem functioning: current understanding, pitfalls and future research needs. New Phytol 232(3):1123–1158. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17072
Funk JL, Larson JE, Ricks-Oddie J (2021) Plant traits are differentially linked to performance in a semiarid ecosystem. Ecology 102(5):e03318. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3318
Garbowski M, Avera B, Bertram JH, Courkamp JS, Gray J, Hein KM et al (2020) Getting to the root of restoration: considering root traits for improved restoration outcomes under drought and competition. Restor Ecol 28(6):1384–1395. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13291
Griffin-Nolan RJ, Bushey JA, Carroll CJ, Challis A, Chieppa J, Garbowski M et al (2018) Trait selection and community weighting are key to understanding ecosystem responses to changing precipitation regimes. Funct Ecol 32(7):1746–1756. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13135
Griffin-Nolan RJ, Blumenthal DM, Collins SL, Farkas TE, Hoffman AM, Mueller KE et al (2019a) Shifts in plant functional composition following long-term drought in grasslands. J Ecol 107(5):2133–2148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13252
Griffin-Nolan RJ, Ocheltree TW, Mueller KE, Blumenthal DM, Kray JA, Knapp AK (2019b) Extending the osmometer method for assessing drought tolerance in herbaceous species. Oecologia 189(2):353–363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04336-w
Grime JP (1998) Benefits of plant diversity to ecosystems: immediate, filter and founder effects. J Ecol 86(6):902-910. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1998.00306.x
Grime JP, Brown VK, Thompson K, Masters GJ, Hillier SH, Clarke IP et al (2000) The response of two contrasting limestone grasslands to simulated climate change. Science 289(5480):762–765. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.289.5480.762
Harrison S, LaForgia M (2019) Seedling traits predict drought-induced mortality linked to diversity loss. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(12):5576–5581. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1818543116
Hoover DL, Knapp AK, Smith MD (2014a) Resistance and resilience of a grassland ecosystem to climate extremes. Ecology 95(9):2646–2656. https://doi.org/10.1890/13-2186.1
Hoover DL, Knapp AK, Smith MD (2014b) Contrasting sensitivities of two dominant C4 grasses to heat waves and drought. Plant Ecol 215(7):721–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-014-0345-8
Huxman TE, Smith MD, Fay PA, Knapp AK, Shaw MR, Loik ME, Williams DG (2004) Convergence across biomes to a common rain-use efficiency. Nature 429(6992):651–654. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature02561
IPCC, 2021: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte, V., P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S.L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, N. Caud, Y. Chen, L. Goldfarb, M.I. Gomis, M. Huang, K. Leitzell, E. Lonnoy, J.B.R. Matthews, T.K. Maycock, T. Waterfield, O. Yelekçi, R. Yu, and B. Zhou (eds)]. Cambridge University Press. In Press.
Iversen CM, McCormack ML, Powell AS, Blackwood CB, Freschet GT, Kattge J et al (2017) A global Fine-Root Ecology Database to address below-ground challenges in plant ecology. New Phytol 215(1):15–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14486
Jackson RB, Canadell J, Ehleringer JR, Mooney HA, Sala OE, Schulze ED (1996) A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108(3):389–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00333714
Jardine EC, Thomas GH, Osborne CP (2021) Traits explain sorting of C4 grasses along a global precipitation gradient. Ecol Evol 11(6):2669–2680. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.7223
Knapp AK (1984) Water relations and growth of three grasses during wet and drought years in a tallgrass prairie. Oecologia 65(1):35–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00384460
Knapp AK, Carroll CJ, Denton EM, La Pierre KJ, Collins SL, Smith MD (2015) Differential sensitivity to regional-scale drought in six central US grasslands. Oecologia 177(4):949–957. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3233-6
Knapp AK, Ciais P, Smith MD (2017) Reconciling inconsistencies in precipitation–productivity relationships: implications for climate change. New Phytol 214(1):41–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.14381
Knapp AK, Chen A, Griffin-Nolan RJ, Baur LE, Carroll CJ, Gray JE et al (2020) Resolving the dust bowl paradox of grassland responses to extreme drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci 117(36):22249–22255. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1922030117
Kooyers NJ (2015) The evolution of drought escape and avoidance in natural herbaceous populations. Plant Sci 234:155–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2015.02.012
Larson JE, Anacker BL, Wanous S, Funk JL (2020) Ecological strategies begin at germination: traits, plasticity and survival in the first 4 days of plant life. Funct Ecol 34(5):968–979. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13543
Lavorel S, Garnier É (2002) Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail. Funct Ecol 16(5):545–556. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x
Lemoine NP, Griffin-Nolan RJ, Lock AD, Knapp AK (2018) Drought timing, not previous drought exposure, determines sensitivity of two shortgrass species to water stress. Oecologia 188(4):965–975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-018-4265-5
Lenz TI, Wright IJ, Westoby M (2006) Interrelations among pressure–volume curve traits across species and water availability gradients. Physiol Plant 127(3):423–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00680.x
Májeková M, Martínková J, Hájek T (2019) Grassland plants show no relationship between leaf drought tolerance and soil moisture affinity, but rapidly adjust to changes in soil moisture. Funct Ecol 33(5):774–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.13312
Martínez-Vilalta J, Garcia-Forner N (2017) Water potential regulation, stomatal behaviour and hydraulic transport under drought: deconstructing the iso/anisohydric concept. Plant, cell & environ 40(6):962–976. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12846
Maurer GE, Hallmark AJ, Brown RF, Sala OE, Collins SL (2020) Sensitivity of primary production to precipitation across the United States. Ecol Lett 23(3):527–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13455
Meinzer FC, Woodruff DR, Marias DE, Smith DD, McCulloh KA, Howard AR, Magedman AL (2016) Mapping ‘hydroscapes’ along the iso-to anisohydric continuum of stomatal regulation of plant water status. Ecol Lett 19(11):1343–1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12670
Meziane D, Shipley B (1999) Interacting determinants of specific leaf area in 22 herbaceous species: effects of irradiance and nutrient availability. Plant, Cell & Environ 22(5):447–459. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.1999.00423.x
Milchunas D, Lauenroth W (2001) Belowground primary pro- duction by carbon isotope decay and long-term root biomass dynamics. Ecosystems 4:139–150. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100210000064
Muldavin EH, Moore DI, Collins SL, Wetherill KR, Lightfoot DC (2008) Aboveground net primary production dynamics in a northern Chihuahuan desert ecosystem. Oecologia 155(1):123–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-007-0880-2
Nippert JB, Wieme RA, Ocheltree TW, Craine JM (2012) Root characteristics of C4 grasses limit reliance on deep soil water in tallgrass prairie. Plant Soil 355(1):385–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-011-1112-4
Norton MR, Malinowski DP, Volaire F (2016) Plant drought survival under climate change and strategies to improve perennial grasses. A Rev Agronomy Sust Dev 36(2):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-016-0362-1
Ocheltree TW, Nippert JB, Prasad PV (2016) A safety vs efficiency trade-off identified in the hydraulic pathway of grass leaves is decoupled from photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and precipitation. New Phytol 210(1):97–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13781
Perez-Harguindeguy N, Diaz S, Garnier E, Lavorel S, Poorter H, Jaureguiberry P et al (2016) Corrigendum to: new handbook for standardised measurement of plant functional traits worldwide. Aust J Bot 64(8):715–716. https://doi.org/10.1071/BT12225_CO
Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L (2012) Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta- analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol 193:30–50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x
Post AK, Knapp AK (2019) Plant growth and aboveground production respond differently to late-season deluges in a semi-arid grassland. Oecologia 191(3):673–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-019-04515-9
Post AK, Knapp AK (2020) The importance of extreme rainfall events and their timing in a semi-arid grassland. J Ecol 108:2431–2443. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13478
R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
Reich PB (2014) The world-wide ‘fast–slow’plant economics spectrum: a traits manifesto. J Ecol 102(2):275–301. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.12211
Rosado BH, Dias AT, de Mattos EA (2013) Going back to basics: importance of ecophysiology when choosing functional traits for studying communities and ecosystems. Natureza Conservação 11(1):15–22. https://doi.org/10.4322/natcon.2013.002
Sala OE, Gherardi LA, Reichmann L, Jobbagy E, Peters D (2012) Legacies of precipitation fluctuations on primary production: Theory and data synthesis. Philos Trans r Soc B Biol Sci 367:3135–3144. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0347
Sala OE, Parton WJ, Joyce LA, Lauenroth WK (1988) Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecol 69(1):40–45. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943158
Sandel B, Goldstein LJ, Kraft NJ, Okie JG, Shuldman MI et al (2010) Contrasting trait responses in plant communities to experimental and geographic variation in precipitation. New Phytol 188(2):565–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03382.x
Schenk, H. J. and Jackson, R. B. (2002). Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology 90: 480–494 http://www.jstor.org/stable/3072232.
Slette IJ, Hoover DL, Smith MD, Knapp AK (2022a) Repeated extreme droughts decrease root production, but not the potential for post-drought recovery of root production, in a mesic grassland. Oikos. https://doi.org/10.1111/oik.08899
Slette IJ, Blair JM, Fay PA, Smith MD, Knapp AK (2022b) Effects of compounded precipitation pattern intensification and drought occur belowground in a mesic grassland. Ecosystems 25(6):1265–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-021-00714-9
Smith MD, Knapp AK (2003) Dominant species maintain ecosystem function with non-random species loss. Ecol Lett 6(6):509–517. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00454.x
Smith MD, Knapp AK, Collins SL (2009) A framework for assessing ecosystem dynamics in response to chronic resource alterations induced by global change. Ecology 90(12):3279–3289. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1815.1
Smith MD, Koerner SE, Knapp AK, Avolio ML, Chaves FA, Denton EM et al (2020) Mass ratio effects underlie ecosystem responses to environmental change. J Ecol 108(3):855–864. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2745.13330
Soreng RJ, Peterson PM, Romaschenko K, Davidse G, Teisher JK, Clark LG, Barberá P, Gillespie LJ, Zuloaga FO (2017) A worldwide phylogenetic classification of the Poaceae (Gramineae) II: An update and a comparison of two 2015 classifications. J Syst Evol 55(4):259–290. https://doi.org/10.1111/jse.12262
Still CJ, Berry JA, Collatz GJ, DeFries RS (2003) Global distribution of C3 and C4 vegetation: carbon cycle implications. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 17(1):6–1. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GB001807
Suding KN, Lavorel S, Chapin Iii FS, Cornelissen JH, Díaz S, Garnier E et al (2008) Scaling environmental change through the community-level: a trait-based response-and-effect framework for plants. Glob Change Biol 14(5):1125–1140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01557.x
Sun G, Coffin DP, Lauenroth WK (1997) Comparison of root distributions of species in North American grasslands using GIS. J Veg Sci 8(4):587–596. https://doi.org/10.2307/3237211
Tielbörger K, Bilton MC, Metz J, Kigel J, Holzapfel C, Lebrija-Trejos E et al (2014) Middle-Eastern plant communities tolerate 9 years of drought in a multi-site climate manipulation experiment. Nat Commun 5(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6102
Volaire F, Norton M (2006) Summer dormancy in perennial temperate grasses. Ann Bot 98(5):927–933. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcl195
Weaver JE, Darland RW (1949) Soil-root relationships of certain native grasses in various soil types. Ecol Monogr 19(4):303–338. https://doi.org/10.2307/1943273
Wellstein C, Poschlod P, Gohlke A, Chelli S, Campetella G, Rosbakh S et al (2017) Effects of extreme drought on specific leaf area of grassland species: a meta-analysis of experimental studies in temperate and sub-Mediterranean systems. Glob Change Biol 23(6):2473–2481. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13662
Wigley BJ, Augustine DJ, Coetsee C, Ratnam J, Sankaran M (2020) Grasses continue to trump trees at soil carbon sequestration following herbivore exclusion in a semiarid African savanna. Ecol 101(5):e03008. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3008
Wilcox KR, von Fischer JC, Muscha JM, Petersen MK, Knapp AK (2015) Contrasting above-and belowground sensitivity of three great plains grasslands to altered rainfall regimes. Glob Change Biol 21(1):335–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.12673
Wilcox KR, Shi Z, Gherardi LA, Lemoine NP, Koerner SE, Hoover DL et al (2017) Asymmetric responses of primary productivity to precipitation extremes: a synthesis of grassland precipitation manipulation experiments. Glob Change Biol 23(10):4376–4385. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13706
Williams AP, Cook BI, Smerdon JE (2022) Rapid intensification of the emerging southwestern North American megadrought in 2020–2021. Nat Clim Chang. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-022-01290-z
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the greenhouse staff at Colorado State University as well as Victoria Klimkowski for assistance with maintaining treatments.
Funding
Primary support for this project came from the NSF Macrosystems Biology Program (DEB‐1137378, 1137363, and 1137342) with additional funding from USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Award 2019–67011-29615).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
RJGN, AJF, and IJS conceived, designed, and performed the experiment with input and funding support from AKK and MDS. RJGN analyzed the data and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript; all authors provided editorial advice.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Communicated by Heather Throop.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Griffin-Nolan, R.J., Felton, A.J., Slette, I.J. et al. Traits that distinguish dominant species across aridity gradients differ from those that respond to soil moisture. Oecologia 201, 311–322 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05315-y