Abstract
Modification of flow regimes and habitat degradation are the strongest, most common, and often co-occurring human activities affecting riverine populations. Ongoing efforts to restore peak flow events found under pristine flow regimes could increase advection-driven dispersal for many species. In rivers with extensive habitat loss, increased advection could transport individuals from remnant populations into degraded downstream areas, causing restored flow regimes to decrease persistence of threatened species. To demonstrate such possible ‘washout’ effects across imperiled taxa, we evaluate population growth in spatial models of insect, fish, and mollusc taxa that experience advective dispersal and either long-term habitat loss or temporary drought disturbances. As a case study to quantify advective dispersal in threatened species, we use intensive mark-recapture methods in a Rio Grande population of the endangered mussel Popenaias popeii belonging to the Unionida order, the most threatened faunal taxa worldwide. Our mark-recapture models estimate high levels of annual downstream emigration (16–51%) and immigration from upstream habitats (32–48%) of adult P. popeii, a result consistent with hydrodynamic experiments. Across taxa where such advective dispersal occurs in specific life stages, our population model suggests that washout effects might strongly reduce population recovery under high levels of habitat loss, especially for sessile or shorter lived species. Averting this potential negative consequence of restoring hydrology requires simultaneously restoring or protecting long, contiguous stretches of suitable habitats. In heavily impacted systems, we suggest integrating hydrodynamic studies and field surveys to detect the presence of advective dispersal and prioritize areas for habitat restoration to enhance population persistence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahlstedt SA (1980) The molluscan fauna of the Duck River between Normandy and Columbia dams in central Tennessee. Am Malacol Bull 1980:60–62
Allan JD, Flecker AS (1993) Biodiversity conservation in running waters. Bioscience 43:32–43
Anderson KE, Nisbet RM, Diehl S, Cooper SD (2005) Scaling population responses to spatial environmental variability in advection-dominated systems. Ecol Lett 8:933–943
Auerswald K, Moyle P, Seibert SP, Geist J (2019) HESS Opinions: socio-economic and ecological trade-offs of flood management—benefits of a transdisciplinary approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 23:1035–1044
Balfour DL, Smock LA (1995) Distribution, age structure, and movements of the freshwater mussel Elliptio complanata (Mollusca: Unionidae) in a headwater stream. J Freshw Ecol 10:255–268
Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’donnel TK, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth E (2005) Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637
Bilton DT, Freeland JR, Okamura B (2001) Dispersal in freshwater invertebrates. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 32:159–181
Brittain JE, Eikeland TJ (1988) Invertebrate drift—a review. Hydrobiologia 166:77–93
Cooper AR, Infante DM, Daniel WM, Wehrly KE, Wang L, Brenden TO (2017) Assessment of dam effects on streams and fish assemblages of the conterminous USA. Sci Total Environ 586:879–889
Daraio JA, Weber LJ, Zigler SJ, Newton TJ, Nestler JM (2012) Simulated effects of host fish distribution on juvenile unionid mussel dispersal in a large river. River Res Appl 28:594–608
Diehl S, Anderson KE, Nisbet RM (2008) Population responses of drifting stream invertebrates to spatial environmental variability: an emerging conceptual framework. Aquatic insects: challenges to populations 158–183
Dobler AH, Geist J, Stoeckl K, Inoue K (2019) A spatially explicit approach to prioritize protection areas for endangered freshwater mussels. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 29(1):12–23
Downing JA, Van Meter P, Woolnough DA (2010) Suspects and evidence: a review of the causes of extirpation and decline in freshwater mussels. Anim Biodivers Conserv 33:151–185
Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z, Knowler DJ, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Soto D, Stiassny ML, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182
Dynesius M, Nilsson C (1994) Fragmentation and flow regulation of river systems in the northern third of the world. Science 266:753–762
Franzin WG, Harbicht SM (1992) Tests of drift samplers for estimating abundance of recently hatched walleye larvae in small rivers. North Am J Fish Manag 12:396–405
Gangloff MM, Feminella JW (2007) Stream channel geomorphology influences mussel abundance in southern Appalachian streams, USA. Freshw Biol 52:64–74
Geist J (2010) Strategies for the conservation of endangered freshwater pearl mussels (Margaritifera margaritifera L.): a synthesis of Conservation Genetics and Ecology. Hydrobiologia 644:69–88
Geist J (2011) Integrative freshwater ecology and biodiversity conservation. Ecol Ind 11:1507–1516
Gibbins C, Vericat D, Batalla RJ (2007) When is stream invertebrate drift catastrophic? The role of hydraulics and sediment transport in initiating drift during flood events. Freshw Biol 52:2369–2384
Haag WR (2013) The role of fecundity and reproductive effort in defining life-history strategies of North American freshwater mussels. Biol Rev 88:745–766
Harper EB, Stella JC, Fremier AK (2011) Global sensitivity analysis for complex ecological models: a case study of riparian cottonwood population dynamics. Ecol Appl 21:4
Hastie LC, Boon PJ, Young MR, Way S (2001) The effects of a major flood on an endangered freshwater mussel population. Biol Cons 98:107–115
Hershey AE, Pastor J, Peterson BJ, Kling JW (1993) Stable isotopes resolve the drift paradox for Baetis mayflies in an arctic river. Ecology 74:2315–2325
Hofer K, Kirchhofer A (1996) Drift, habitat choice and growth of the nase (Chondostroma nasus, Cyprinidae) during early life stages. In: Kirchhofer A, Müller DR (eds) Conservation of endangered freshwater fish in Europe. Birkhäuser Verlag Basel/Switzerland, Bern, pp 269–278
Inoue K, Levine TD, Lang BK, Berg DJ (2014) Long-term mark-and-recapture study of a freshwater mussel reveals patterns of habitat use and an association between survival and river discharge. Freshw Biol 59:1872–1883
International Boundary and Water Commission Water Data (2016) http://www.ibwc.gov/wad/DDQLARG/. Accessed 24 Apr 2016
Irmscher P, Vaughn CC (2018) Effects of juvenile settling and drift rates on freshwater mussel dispersal. Am Midl Nat 180:258–272
Jager HI, Van Winkle W, Chandler JA, Lepla KB, Bates P, Counihan TD (2002) A simulation study of factors controlling white sturgeon recruitment in the Snake River. Am Fish Soc Symp 28:127–150
Jiao Y, Neves R, Jones J (2008) Models and model selection uncertainty in estimating growth rates of endangered freshwater mussel populations. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 65:2389–2398
Kappes H, Haase P (2012) Slow, but steady: dispersal of freshwater molluscs. Aquat Sci 74:1–14
Karatayev AY, Miller TD, Burlakova LE (2012) Long-term changes in unionid assemblages in the Rio Grande, one of the World's top 10 rivers at risk. Aquat Conserv: Mar Freshw Ecosyst 22(2):206–219
Karatayev AY, Burlakova LE, Miller TD, Perrelli MF (2018) Reconstructing historical range and population size of an endangered mollusc: long-term decline of Popenaias popeii in the Rio Grande, Texas. Hydrobiologia 810:333–349
Layzer JB, Gordon ME (1993) Reindstroduction of mussels into the upper Duck River, Tennessee. In: Cummings KS, Buchanan AC, Koch LM (eds) Conservation and management of freshwater Mussels. Proceedings of a UMRCC Symposium. Upper Mississippi River Conservation Committee, RockIsland, pp 61–65
Lechner A, Keckeis H, Humphries P (2016) Patterns and processes in the drift of early developmental stages of fish in rivers: a review. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 26:471
Lee HL, DeAngelis D, Koh HL (1998) Modeling spatial distribution of the unionid mussels and the core-satellite hypothesis. Water Sci Technol 38:73–79
Lopes-Lima M, Burlakova LE, Karatayev AY, Mehler K, Seddon M, Sousa R (2018) Conservation of freshwater bivalves at the global scale: diversity, threats and research needs. Hydrobiologia 810:1–14
Lutscher F, Lewis MA, McCauley E (2006) Effects of heterogeneity on spread and persistence in rivers. Bull Math Biol 68:2129–2160
Matter SF, Borrero F, Fleece C (2013) Modeling the survival and population growth of the freshwater mussel, Lampsilis radiata luteola. Am Midl Nat 169:122–136
Morales Y, Weber LJ, Mynett AE, Newton TJ (2006) Effects of substrate and hydrodynamic conditions on the formation of mussel beds in a large river. J N Am Benthol Soc 25:664–676
Nisbet RM, Anderson KE, McCauley E, Lewis MA (2007) Response of equilibrium states to spatial environmental heterogeneity in advective systems. Math Biosci Eng. 4:1–13
Ormerod S, Dobson M, Hildrew A, Townsend CR (2010) Multiple stressors in freshwater ecosystems. Freshw Biol 55:1–4
Pander J, Knott J, Mueller M, Geist J (2019) Effects of environmental flows in a restored floodplain system on the community composition of fish, macroinvertebrates and macrophytes. Ecol Eng 132:75–86
Platania SP, Altenbach CS (1998) Reproductive strategies and egg types of seven Rio Grande Basin cyprinids. Copeia 1998:559–569
Poff NL, Hart DD (2002) How dams vary and why it matters for the emerging science of dam removal. Bioscience 52:659–668
Pulliam HR (1988) Sources, sinks, and population regulation. Am Nat 132:652–661
Rogers A (1966) The multiregional matrix growth operator and the stable interregional age structure. Demography 3:537–544
Rosa IC, Pereira JL, Costa R, Gomes J, de Lourdes Pereira M, Gonçalves F (2014) Dispersal of Corbicula fluminea: factors influencing the invasive clam's drifting behavior. Int J Limnol: Ann Limnol 50:37–47
Sansom BJ, Atkinson JF, Bennett SJ, Vaughn CC (2018) Long-term persistence of freshwater mussel beds in labile river channels. Freshw Biol 63:1469–1481
Sousa R, Varandas S, Cortes R, Teixeira A, Lopes-Lima M, Machado J, Guilhermino L (2012) Massive die-offs of freshwater bivalves as resource pulses. Int J Limnol 48:105–112
Speirs DC, Gurney WS (2001) Population persistence in rivers and estuaries. Ecology 82:1219
Strayer DL (1999) Use of flow refuges by unionid mussels in rivers. J N Am Benthol Soc 18:468–476
Strayer DL, Dudgeon D (2010) Freshwater biodiversity conservation: recent progress and future challenges. J N Am Benthol Soc 29:344–358
Tharme RE (2003) A global perspective on environmental flow assessment: emerging trends in the development and application of environmental flow methodologies for rivers. River Res Appl 19:397–441
Thompson F, Gilvear D, Tree A, Jeffries R (2016) Quantification of freshwater pearl mussel entrainment velocities and controlling factors; a flume study. River Res Appl 32:1179–1186
Townsend CR (1989) The patch dynamics concept of stream community ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 8:36–50
Tuomainen U, Candolin U (2011) Behavioural responses to human-induced environmental change. Biol Rev 86:640–657
Vaughn CC, Taylor CM (1999) Impoundments and the decline of freshwater mussels: a case study of an extinction gradient. Conserv Biol 13:912–920
Villella RF, Smith DR, Lemarié DP (2004) Estimating survival and recruitment in a freshwater mussel population using mark-recapture techniques. Am Midl Nat 151:114–133
von Bertalanffy L (1938) A quantitative theory of organic growth. Hum Biol 10:181
White GC, Burnham KP (1999) Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals. Bird Study 46(Supplement):120–138
Yarnell SM, Petts GE, Schmidt JC, Whipple AA, Beller EE, Dahm CN, Goodwin P, Viers JH (2015) Functional flows in modified riverscapes: hydrographs, habitats and opportunities. Bioscience 65:963–972
Zając K, Zając TA, Adamski P, Bielański W, Ćmiel AM, Lipińska AM (2019) Dispersal and mortality of translocated thick-shelled river mussel Unio crassus Philipsson, 1788 adults revealed by radio tracking. Aquatic Conserv 29:331–340
Zieritz A, Geist J, Gum B (2014) Spatio-temporal distribution patterns of three stream-dwelling freshwater mussel species: towards a strategy for representative surveys. Hydrobiologia 735:123
Acknowledgements
We thank S. Schreiber, E. Grosholz, B. Lang, D. Berg, E. Cooch, K. Inoue, D. Strayer, M. Baskett, D. Smith, D. Woolnough, K. Jirka, and several anonymous reviewers for feedback that greatly improved the manuscript; D. and S. Barclays, S. Daniel and Laredo Community College students for help in field surveys. This survey was funded by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department, and New Mexico Department of Game and Fish (Joint Traditional Section 6 Project no 419446 to L.E.B., A.Y.K., B. Lang and M. May). V.A.K. was supported by an NSF graduate research fellowship during preparation of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VAK conceived the model and conducted data analyses. VAK and LY analyzed the model. LEB, AYK, and TM conceived and conducted the field study.VAK wrote the manuscript, with input from LEB, AYK, and LY.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Donald DeAngelis.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Karatayev, V.A., Burlakova, L.E., Karatayev, A.Y. et al. Advection exacerbates population decline from habitat loss: maintaining threatened taxa while restoring natural river flow regimes. Oecologia 193, 773–785 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04706-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-020-04706-9